Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Can anyone supply the info

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

shopwing the comparison of BLACKSTRAP MOLASSES with SORGHUM?

 

The Sorghum folks send a very very glowing list of what contents that

product contained. .. As long as the Blackstrap is so highly touted

in health food stores, it should be better than plain old

sorghum which is cheaper also but, nobody wants to line both items and

show the difference, or similarity... any body know what is going

on????

 

thanks,

 

muriel from N W arkansas.

 

 

 

 

 

>http://www.godlikeproductions.com/bbs/message.php?message

>=438532 & mpage=1 & topic=3 & showdate=9/24/04 & replies=63

>

>Anonymous Coward

>9/22/2004

>5:27 am EDT Do you know why flouride is put in the water and toothpaste?

>

>http://www.fluoridealert.org/

>

>Research among POWS during the war found that flouride affects a part of the

>brain in a way that makes people less likely to question authority.

>

>http://www.rense.com/general45/bll.htm

>

>Fluoride -

>The Battle of Darkness & Light

>by Mary Sparrowdancer

> 2003

>12-14-3

>

>It was due to my growing concerns about our country´s growing health

>problems as well as the erosion of our civil liberties that, in November of

>2002, I published a paper focusing upon both of these issues and spoke about

>them on several radio programs. The paper quietly made its way through

>Washington, D.C., and then around the world.

>

>The paper detailed the " revolving door " in Washington, D.C., an apparent

>turnstile between private industries and the United States government.

>Through this invisible door, industry managers pass directly into the very

>agencies that govern industry - the government´s food, drug, agricultural

>and chemical regulatory departments - in order to influence regulations or

>speed the approval of their company´s products. The paper, " Let Them Eat

>Anything, " showed this unholy alliance, the conflict of interest that has

>contributed to a mounting epidemic of health problems in the United States.

>(1)

>

>I expected the paper to provoke comments, but I did not expect it to result

>in my being contacted by a nutrition expert who had worked in the USDA. She

>called to thank me for writing the paper. Incredibly, because light was the

>topic of my previous book detailing a personal Near Death Experience and

>ongoing, unexplained encounters with light phenomena, in an example of

>incomparable synchronicity, the name of the former USDA expert who contacted

>me was Luise Light.

>

>I read the first email I received from Luise Light with a sense of

>astonishment. Luise had been the former team leader and Special Nutrition

>Assistant to USDA´s Carol Tucker Foreman - who is described as " a prominent

>food safety advocate " by Eric Schlosser in his best-selling book, Fast Food

>Nation.

>

> From her personal experience, Dr. Light confirmed not only the revolving

>door I had described in my paper, but in addition, the corruption within the

> " government " taking place just on the other side of that door. Here, from an

>eyewitness, came the truth that individuals representing corporations are

>not only holding key government positions, they have also been determining

>which studies are done, who receives grants, and they have been " adjusting "

>the reports in order to create a false sense of security about their favored

>products and services.

>

>With the promise of corporate gain and personal profit, the industry

> " representatives " have been making important decisions affecting all of us

>profoundly. For the most part, the general public has been unaware of this

>partnership between private business and our publicly funded federal

>government.

>

>Of special interest to Luise was what I had presented as the " absurd

>American food pyramid " - a dietary guide that first came out in the 1980s,

>and in which our " government " recommended starch as the foundation of our

>diet. This was of particular interest to Luise because, as I read in awe, it

>was she and her team of nutrition experts who had created the concept of the

>food pyramid - but with a very major twist. The real food pyramid, Luise

>wrote, was completely different from the " adjusted " pyramid that was

>distributed to an unsuspecting American public.

>

>The true pyramid that Luise and her team developed was not absurd, at all.

>It did not have starch as the foundation. Instead, it called for a base of a

>wide variety of fruits and vegetables, with 5 to 9 servings daily. Whole

>grain cereals and grains were recommended in amounts of 2 to 4 servings

>daily - with the smaller amount for females and those with less active

>lifestyles. The real pyramid that Luise and her team created placed baked

>goods, crackers, sweets and other low-nutrient foods up with the sugars and

>fats at the top of the pyramid, where they were recommended only as

>occasional treats.

>

> " But what happened? " Luise wrote, stating that there had been a deliberate,

>unexplained switch made at the political level that completely distorted the

>pyramid - which is the subject of her forthcoming book, Ketchup is Not a

>Vegetable; Sane Eating in a Toxic Food World.

>

> " Instead of fruits and vegetables making up the base of the diet, " she

>wrote, " the cereals and wheat products were made the base of the pyramid,

>and the recommendation [for starchy foods] was no longer 2 to 4 as we had

>determined but switched 6 to 11 servings! We couldn´t believe it! What

>possible rationale could there be for such an unprecedented and unjustified

>switch? In fact the health consequences of encouraging the public to eat so

>much refined grain, which the body processes like sugar, was frightening!

>But our exhortations to the political heads of the agency fell on deaf ears.

>The new food guide, replacing the ´Basic Four,´ would be a promotional tool

>to get the public to buy and consume more calories, sugar and starch. "

>Ultimately, this would result in a poorer quality diet.

>

>What was given to the public in the 1980s was a pyramid with a foundation

>based (in more ways than one) on dough. And the American people - with full

>and innocent trust in the health advice given to them by the government -

>then attempted to follow the new health-based plan. The result would be

>profit and gain for some, and the torments of ill health and weight gain for

>countless others.

>

>As Americans complied with the new dietary suggestions, within a few years

>the results of this unsuspecting compliance began to surface.

>

>According to studies and charts provided by the Centers for Disease Control

>(CDC), during the years 1988 to 2000 the percentage of children and teens

>suffering from obesity more than doubled. During those same years, the CDC

>reported that the prevalence of adults suffering from overweight and obesity

>rose steadily to 64%. In 2001, the second most frequently prescribed drug

>sold in America was a synthetic hormone drug, indicating a vast number of

>individuals were now suffering from thyroid malfunction. Tied in with the

>overweight and obesity problems resulting from thyroid malfunction are a

>host of additional, potentially deadly afflictions suggesting that

> " overweight " might be only a symptom rather than a diagnosis - it is

>actually only one of the more visible clues that something is not right,

>that something is out of kilter. (2, 3, 4)

>

>According to the CDC, between the years 1980 and 1994 the overall incidence

>of asthma increased 75%. Since 1991, the number of US adults with diagnosed

>diabetes has increased 61%, and the number is projected to more than double

>by the year 2050. (5, 6)

>

>An article in the New England Journal of Medicine stated that the incidence

>of gastric/esophageal cancer (adenocarcinoma) has inexplicably risen more

>rapidly than any other cancer incidence in the United States. Yale New Haven

>Hospital and the National Cancer Institute list that rate of increase at

>350%. Also noted was the observation that the majority of the unfortunates

>suffering from gastric cancer in this particular study were white males, and

>the majority of those white males first presented with Gastroesophageal

>Reflux Disease (GERD). Adult white males were not the only ones suffering

>from GERD, however. By the CDC´s own definition of " epidemic, " GERD appears

>to be an epidemic of staggering proportions in the United States, today. (7)

>

>The motto of The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is " Safer,

>Healthier People. " The CDC mission statement is, " To promote health and

>quality of life by preventing and controlling disease, injury, and

>disability. " Yet, when I contacted the CDC because I was having difficulty

>in locating their statistical reports on the increasing prevalence of GERD,

>the response I received was, " CDC does not have activities related to GERD. "

>

>With CDC unable to supply statistics on this epidemic, it was necessary to

>look elsewhere. A reasonable idea of prevalence and trends could be obtained

>by " following the money " and looking at pharmaceutical marketing data.

>

>What was found was stunning, and it suggested that medicine focused on the

>treatment of chronic symptoms results in a dependency on chronic treatment.

>People struggling for relief and a chance to live normal lives become

>dependent on the pharmaceutical industry for relief. If they can pay the

>price, they will be served.

>

>Americans are apparently now paying the price because the marketing

>information indicates this country is now considered " the world leader " in

>the overall consumption of pharmaceutical products.

>

>By following records of drug sales, one can follow the trend of GERD, and

>America once again has somehow become a " world leader, " this time in the

>prevalence of caustic heartburn in its citizenry.

>

>Beginning in 1997, the top-selling prescription drug being purchased by

>Americans was a pharmaceutical preparation that promised relief from ulcers,

>GERD and other conditions related to excessive, corrosive acid in the

>stomach and esophagus. In 1998, 1999 and 2000, that acid-relief drug

>remained the number one prescribed drug in the country.

>

>An editorial that appeared in the March 18, 1999 issue of the New England

>Journal of Medicine, (Volume 340:878-879, Number 11), by Sidney Cohen, M.D.

>and Henry P. Parkman, M.D. noted, " It is ironic that the incidence of

>adenocarcinoma of the esophagus has increased dramatically in the very

>period in which highly effective therapies have provided symptomatic relief

>and mucosal healing. "

>

>Indeed.

>

>In treating the symptoms of GERD, are we silencing true " gut instinct? " Are

>we silencing a divinely designed warning system that is trying to tell us we

>are ingesting something toxic, corrosive and dangerous? Are we silencing

>with drugs a signal that is warning us we must stop ingesting a toxic

>substance before it kills us?

>

>It was not until 2001, that the most popularly prescribed drug was overtaken

>by drugs being purchased by Americans seeking relief from something else

>tormenting them within. In 2001, Americans were spending their money in an

>attempt to seek relief from personal and profound depression - another

>symptom that, along with weight problems, is known to occur as a result of

>thyroid malfunction. It was another signal telling us that something was

>affecting not only our bodies, but our minds and emotions.

>

>While this surge in both corrosive gastric disorders and mental anguish was

>easily dismissed as the price to pay for " the daily stress of life, " the

>same theory cannot be used to explain away the surge in rates of mental

>torment and GERD now afflicting infants and children.

>

>During the five-year period ending in 2001, the sale of drugs prescribed to

>treat reflux, heartburn and other gastrointestinal disorders in children

>soared 660 percent. In a report looking at four of those same years, the

>cost of treating behavioral problems presently referred to as ADHD in

>children also increased 120 percent. (8, 9)

>

>According to an annual report of the US Department of Education to Congress,

>the number of " children aged 0 to 21 " being treated for autism and traumatic

>brain injury rose from the first 5,000 reported cases in 1992/93 (at the

>start of mandatory reporting), to 94,000 cases in 2000/01. In looking at

>individual states, a troubling mosaic forms. States showing the highest

>increase (a two thousand percent increase or greater) in the number of

>children being treated for autism include Alaska, Colorado, Kentucky,

>Mississippi, Maryland and Oregon. This is not to say that the other states

>were faring well - in California from 1987 through 2002, the number of

>people being treated for autism by the Department of Developmental Services

>increased by 634%. In Indiana the percentage of children suffering from

>autism rose by 860%. In Michigan, the increase was over 1000%. The 1999

>Journal of Pediatrics indicated that the majority of autistic children who

>were followed in one study were also suffering from reflux and other

>digestive problems. (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15)

>

>Unfortunately, it appears that little boys are far more likely than little

>girls to suffer from autism as well as from a variety of childhood

>behavioral disorders. Typically, even as infants these boys also appear to

>be suffering from reflux and sleep disturbances. It is while noting the

>surge in ADHD that another disturbing fact emerges: Some of the states with

>the worst surges in behavioral problems - including Colorado, Kentucky,

>Mississippi, Alaska and Oregon - are also states in which still-unexplained

>behavior in juvenile males has manifested in horrific school shootings.

>

>While the brain and its workings are still not fully understood, it is

>within the frontal lobes of the brain that the capacities for moral

>judgment, attention and memory are now thought to be situated. PET scans and

>functional MRIs of the boys afflicted with autistic disorders have revealed

>what appears to be " decreased glucose metabolic rate in the medial frontal

>region, " and " hypometabolism [lowered metabolism] demonstrated in the

>temporal and parietal regions. " (16)

>

>Tests have also indicated that, in the brains of the afflicted boys there is

>a " decreased activity and reduced anatomical size, particularly in the right

>brain . . . " Other brain disturbances, including disturbances in the

>brain´s processing of tryptophan, serotonin and melatonin are becoming

>known, as is damage to the hippocampus area, thought to be associated with

>memory problems and obsessive thoughts. (17)

>

>Pharmaceuticals such as methylphenidate, now in popular use, stimulate the

>frontal lobes in order to heighten the brain´s ability to filter out

>noncritical parts of the daily barrage of stimuli. This pharmaceutical

>appears to at least temporarily improve the behavioral symptoms of

>agitation, hyperactivity and inattention in children whose brains are

>otherwise unable to filter stimuli on their own.

>

>While stimulants might improve outward symptoms, though, research now

>indicates that within the right brain, most notably within the right

>temporal lobe and hippocampus regions, there exists an extremely unusual

>area of neuroreceptors and transmitters. It is this area of the brain that

>is believed to be the connection between the human individual and the still

>unexplained realm of the mystical and the divine - the realm of divinely

>perceived Light. For this reason, this area of the brain is now being

>referred to by some researchers as the " God Spot " - what might be our most

>important connection of all.

>

>Despite the fact that this extraordinary realm of Light is largely bypassed

>as noncritical by the majority of researchers, many individuals have now

>described numerous, similar experiences with the Light, indicating such

>experience is not as uncommon as orthodox science has assumed. In examining

>some of the oldest texts in human history, it is apparent that interactions

>with Beings of Light have, since the earliest of times, been the most

>cherished and desired of all human experiences. Writings from ancient Egypt

>describe journeys into the Light and contact with beings and messengers.

> " Manna, " was the expression voiced by startled Egyptians on seeing the

>living entities emerging from the light. " Manna, " meant, " what is this? "

>

>We can judge from the unprecedented volume of prescriptions for psychiatric

>drugs that something is having a profoundly depressing influence upon the

>human mind at this time. Something is happening within our brains that is

>manifesting as anxiety, depression and impaired cognitive abilities - this

>much we know. Because adequate research of the God-Spot is not an " approved "

>field of study, however, we have no scientific reports warning us if the God

>connection in the brain is also being damaged at this time. Again, we have

>only outward signs to observe - signals indicating something is blocking our

>access to the most important light of our lives, and symptoms that speak to

>a growing angst, darkness and the loneliness of godlessness.

>

>Researchers who dare to study this area of human experience, do so facing

>professional humiliation from peers, although such research may actually be

>critical to the well-being of humanity. Those who guard the borders of

>acceptable research are often quite skeptical or disapproving of what they

>contend is mere " paranormal " speculation, and for this reason, that area of

>study has been largely avoided by professionals and researchers.

>

>Melvin Morse, M.D., pediatrician and author of Closer to the Light, is one

>of very few professionals who has dared to explore this uncharted territory.

>In summing up this unfortunate situation of acceptable study versus study

>that is dismissed as paranormal, he writes, " This lack of a theoretical

>scientific model to allow interaction with an interconnected universe has

>led to a 100 year ´skeptic´ versus ´believer´ debate which has not advanced

>our understanding of human consciousness. " (18, 19, 20)

>

>Although our increasing inability to perceive the divine and understand the

>full extent of our human capabilities remains largely ignored by those

>discrediting or rejecting " paranormal " research, the growing epidemic of

>anxiety, depression and overwhelming despair in this country´s children

>deserves the attention of all of us. It should be considered a national

>emergency, and a national tragedy.

>

>In Colorado, the rate of suicide among teenagers, children and young adults

>has been consistently above the national average since 1980. Suicide is,

>sadly, the second-leading cause of death in children between the ages of 10

>through 19 in Colorado. In Kentucky, suicide is also the second leading

>cause of death in children, teens and young adults. In Mississippi, the

>number of teen and young-adult suicides has increased 126% since 1969, with

>more than 90% of the victims being males. In Alaska, the suicide rate among

>teenagers is nearly twice that of the national average - twice. (21, 22, 23,

>24)

>

>Other strange surges in human suffering have been noted, as well. In

>Colorado, from 1990 through 1999, the percentage of children with orthopedic

>impairments rose 484%. In Alaska, during 1990-98, the incidence of diabetes

>increased by 152%, (much greater than the national rate), and now Alaska is

>among the top three states with the highest incidence of squamous cell

>carcinoma of the esophagus. (25, 26)

>

>In the midst of all this growing and tragic suffering, in the year 2000 the

>Surgeon General issued a " first ever " call to action in response to what was

>noted as a " silent epidemic " of dental problems in the United States.

>Something strange is happening in the mouths of Americans. (27)

>

>According to the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, an

>estimated 80% of American adults currently have some form of periodontal

>(gum) disease. In parts of Kentucky, nearly half of the toddlers have

>cavities in their teeth, which is approximately twice the national average.

>In addition to Kentucky, the top five states cited in a 1997 table used in

>the Surgeon General´s report on toothlessness included West Virginia,

>Louisiana, Arkansas and Maine. (28, 29, 30)

>

>Perhaps it is at this point that one might begin to reasonably suspect that

>whatever lies at the cause of this epidemic of epidemics - whatever is

>disabling Americans in body, mind and spirit - just might be something we

>are putting into our mouths or otherwise absorbing into our bodies. This is

>not an unreasonable suspicion.

>

>Given the avalanche of starch that is now figuratively suffocating us and

>literally fattening us, given the strange new bioengineered oddities now

>secretly passing as food in America, given the relatively new insertion of

>soy compounds in seemingly infinite forms and aliases into nearly every

>packaged, jarred and canned food on the grocery shelves - given the

>chemicals, the mandatory cocktails of highly questionable and extremely

>toxic vaccines all being inserted into the American population - it does not

>appear at all unreasonable to think that what is wrong with our health and

>well-being might have something to do with what we are taking in with

>mouths, skin and lungs.

>

>It does not appear to be at all unreasonable to suspect that our new status

>as world leader in pursuit of relief-seeking drugs has a cause, and that

>cause just might be something unnatural that is entering our bodies en

>masse.

>

>The list of possible suspected toxins, though lengthy, can be shortened by a

>deductive process. Not all of us consume soy - some avoid it by preference,

>others because of allergies, and still others avoid it who have been alerted

>to questions raised by research about its safety. Not all parents permit

>their children to take the vaccines mandated by government. A significant

>number of Americans avoid bioengineered food by purchasing organic, GE-free

>products, and still others have cut large amounts of starch from their diets

>in order to maintain proper weight and health. Not all of us have similar

>lifestyles that might be blamed as the cause for physical distress, mental

>despair, stress, cognitive malfunctions and uncompassionate apathy now upon

>us.

>

>The toxic suspect is unlikely to be an elective, avoidable substance. More

>likely the toxin is in something that we all consume because we need it,

>like flowers need the rain. It might be something undetectable at first -

>something that we willingly ingest without knowing it. It would be a toxin

>that could be added into virtually every food and beverage, with no mention

>of it required on the labels.

>

>The substance would also be now causing problems in a bizarre geographical

>manner. As though it were seemingly able to sense invisible county boundary

>lines, it would be a toxin that is leaving a trail which jumps from county

>to county, state to state, missing some counties and entire states while

>hitting other counties and states particularly hard.

>

>The search is for a substance that can be absorbed through the skin and

>lungs as well as by swallowing it. Undetectable to us except by scientific

>measuring, it is a substance that does its work quietly and in extremely low

>doses. Working at a molecular level, it would cause a gradual onset of

>disease and disability observable only after the slow passage of years. It

>is then, after that slow, slow passage of years, that an epidemic of

>epidemics would be noticed while its cause long forgotten in the mists of

>time.

>

>After a process of elimination, the substance that meets all of the criteria

>and stands alone in the crosshairs of our search is a substance that does

>not appear to be suspect. In fact, it raises no suspicions in most of us,

>whatsoever, because most of us are unaware of the research pertaining to

>this substance.

>

>It is a substance that, according to government reports, has been known

>since 1930 to have such a powerful effect upon thyroid function, it has been

>used in prescription medications to treat hyperthyroidism (overactive

>thyroid). It can, therefore, along with our pyramid of dough, be reasonably

>marked as a suspicious agent contributing to the current epidemic of obesity

>and thyroid problems. (31, 32, 33, 34)

>

>It is a substance that has also long been known to cause or exacerbate the

>exact periodontal disease resulting in the tooth loss that has caught the

>attention of the Surgeon General. In addition to being a causative agent in

>periodontal disease, it is a substance that is known to accumulate in the

>teeth and bones creating brittleness, and for this reason it has also been

>associated with osteoporosis and other bone diseases and disorders that are

>also now being seen in America.

>

>The mysterious substance is so corrosive, when added to water it will eat

>its way through a titanium container. Since it will eat its way through

>titanium, perhaps it should not come as a great surprise to learn that it is

>also known to act as a severe corrosive agent on human gastric and mucosal

>tissues. (35, 36, 37, 38)

>

>As Americans´ afflictions continue to unfold unlike anything else that

>humanity has known and brought upon itself, we also learn that the material,

>once thought unable to cross the blood-brain barrier, crosses it rather

>well. It also concentrates in the pineal gland that is located within the

>brain. (39, 40, 41, 42)

>

>Any agent that passes through the brain can be expected to affect behavior,

>mood and cognitive function, and this substance has been repeatedly shown to

>create a depressing, numbing effect.

>

>As early as 1954 this substance was reported by George L. Waldbott, M.D., to

>cause his patients to become " incoherent, drowsy, lethargic and forgetful. "

>His reports are not isolated. Government reports indicate similar findings

>of " impaired cognition and memory. " So well-known is the impact of this

>chemical on the human brain and mental function, it continues to be

>incorporated in and sold in a variety of popular, well-known psychiatric

>drugs. (43, 44, 45)

>

>Given the existing reports of this substance´s presence within the brain -

>including its effects on the right temporal lobe, hippocampus and the pineal

>gland - perhaps it should come as no wonder that a growing number of people,

>children in particular, are now behaving strangely, unpredictably, and

>sometimes very badly while also noting gross memory impairment after

>ingesting or absorbing this substance.

>

>Reports also indicate that the substance is not as effectively eliminated

>from the body in young males as it is in others. Thus retained in the body,

>its effect upon juvenile males appears to be quite different from its effect

>on females or even adult males. (46)

>

>Because of its known toxic side effects, this substance requires a

>prescription when administered by medical professionals, but in a bizarre

>and quite deadly paradox enabled by industry masterminds working within the

>government, it can be administered en masse to the general public by dealers

>who have no medical training whatsoever, no license to dispense medications

>whatsoever, and who, in fact, have no idea to whom they are administering

>this corrosive, toxic, mind-altering substance.

>

>Those who avoid non-prescribed pharmaceutical substances might feel safe as

>a result of personal choices to refrain from unapproved drugs and

>substances. We have dutifully repeated the " just say no to drugs " mantra,

>and we have instructed our children to repeat the same after us. We would

>not think of taking mind-altering drugs from a dealer, and would never

>consider giving such a substance in unregulated doses to our infants and

>children.

>

>However, we have been innocently doing just that. In a growing number of

>geographical areas that begin and end with invisible county lines, the

>substance is almost impossible to avoid. Some of the hardest hit counties

>are located in Alaska, Colorado, Kentucky, Michigan and Mississippi.

>

>As the old saying goes, when no other agent can be located as the cause for

>our problems, blame it on the water. " It must be something in the water, "

>the saying has been said for ages, usually with a shrug and chuckle.

>

>Perhaps it´s time for us as individuals and as a nation to repeat this

>phrase again - this time as though our lives depended upon it, this time

>without a shrug and chuckle - and while we are at it, take a closer look at

>our water.

>

>Maybe there is something in the water, after all.

>

>* * * * * * * * *

>

>The strange, corrosive, toxic but still controversial agent in the water is

>fluoride.

>

>The atomic symbol for the negatively charged halogen known as fluorine is,

>simply, " F " or " F-. " When the negatively charged ions - or anions - of

>fluorine gas combine with another element, a fluoride compound is formed. If

>the F combines with sodium (Na), for instance, the compound would then be

>known as sodium fluoride, or NaF. If it combines with calcium (Ca), the

>compound formed is calcium fluoride, or CaF. If it combines with arsenic, it

>becomes AsF. And so on.

>

>Fluoride is a trace element in nature, but manmade fluoride compounds became

>grossly abundant as a result of the invention of weapons of mass destruction

>in World War II. Fluoride and uranium are key components in the atomic bomb,

>and fluoride is also a key ingredient in fluorinated organophosphate nerve

>agents, such as Sarin.

>

>Radioactive uranium is naturally present in phosphate ore, but it must be

> " enriched " if it is to become a nuclear weapon or a reactor fuel. After the

>phosphate is mined, the uranium " yellow cake " is removed and sent to an

>enrichment facility such as the plant owned by the Department of Energy in

>Paducah, Kentucky. There, the uranium is fluorinated and uranium

>hexafluoride (UF6) is produced. Paducah´s enrichment plant stopped making

>UF6 for weapons in the 1960s, and began creating it, instead, for commercial

>purposes as a reactor fuel.

>

>Uranium fission was first discovered in the late 1930s by German scientists.

>In 1939, there was a reported fear that the Nazis were about to develop a

>bomb using uranium fission. In 1942, Americans began similar research,

>facilitated by the knowledge of scientists who had fled their own countries

>and moved to the United States. Thus, America was the first to achieve both

>creation - and use - of atomic weaponry in 1945.

>

>That year, 1945, was one of many changes. With World War II over, 1945

>marked the year in which the Nuremberg Trials began - trials that presumably

>reaffirmed the sanctity of life, and human rights - trials which would

>eventually address the atrocities of Nazi human experimentation.

>

>As the world breathed a sigh a relief in knowing that the Nazi health

>officials´ experimentation on human beings had been halted in Germany, 1945

>marked the year that " public health officials " in America began their

>experimentation on human beings with water fluoridation.

>

>In what would turn out to be the biggest human experimentation in history,

>sodium fluoride - NaF - was added into American´s drinking water in selected

>communities under the medical claim that the F would prevent dental caries

>(cavities) in children. Those receiving this experimental, medicinal

>treatment in their drinking water, received it then as they do now: They are

>forced to ingest it, inhale it, bathe and shower in it, whether or not they

>want or even need this toxic chemical in their bodies.

>

>As with all medicinal compounds - indeed, as with virtually everything on

>Earth - some individuals can be expected to have extreme side effects and

>allergic reactions. Individuals having severe allergic reactions to

>penicillin, poison ivy or peanuts are very likely to use common sense and

>avoid those substances. Unlike the penicillin, poison ivy or peanuts,

>however - in fact, unlike any other medicinal compound in history - over 60%

>of Americans at this time are now unable to electively avoid the F product

>unless they also can find a way to avoid their water. While the list of side

>effects from fluoride has been falsely minimized or completely concealed by

>fluoride promoters, the side effects are well documented. Side effects have

>been so severe that previously approved medications containing high-grade F

>compounds have been removed from the market by the FDA. (47, 48, 49, 50, 51)

>

>In a recent paper authored by Myron Coplan, PE, and Roger Masters, PhD, a

>professor at Dartmouth, the authors discovered that a subtle but potentially

>lethal change in F additives took place shortly after the fluoride

>experimentation on Americans began. In 1947 instead of higher-grade NaF or

>sodium fluoride - silicofluorides, or SiFs, were substituted as the

>fluorinating compound in drinking water. This switch was carried out under

>the gross misconception that all F compounds are the same. As outlined in

>some largely ignored research, however, one part of SiF is substantially

>more potent than six parts of NaF. Despite this evidence, and despite the

>fact that it is now SiF rather than NaF primarily being used in American

>water fluoridation, Masters and Coplan found that " virtually all the

>extensive laboratory research on the biological properties and effects of

>fluoride in water has been performed using NaF rather than SiFs... " (52)

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»

>

>§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §

>

>Subscribe:......... -

>To :.... -

>

>Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news

>related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a

>qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment,

>especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.

>**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**

>In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,

>any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without

>profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in

>receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational

>purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...