Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

RADIOACTIVE DUST STILL FALLING In Idaho, fallout from past casts long, dark shadow

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

iF YOU HAVE FAMILY OR FRIENDS IN IDAHO, PASS THIS ON, THESE PEOPLE NEED TO BE PAID FOR THE CANCERS THEY HAVE SUFFERED. FIRST THEY MUST KNOW HELP IS AVAILABLE, PASS THIS ON

 

Last update: September 11, 2004 at 10:36 PM startribune.comIn Idaho, fallout from past casts long, dark shadow Published September 12, 2004 By Sarah KershawNew York TimesEMMETT, IDAHO -- The people in this town of dairy and cattle farmers did not know it then, but half a century ago, northern winds blew radioactive fallout into southeastern Idaho when the federal government set off about 90 nuclear bombs at its Nevada test site near Las Vegas.Back then, in the 1950s and early 1960s, at the height of the Cold War, people in Emmett thought what they occasionally saw dusting their fruit orchards and cow pastures was frost -- only it was not cold to the touch, several longtime residents said. Others described it as a gray-white powder that seemed to come out of nowhere.There is not any doubt that Emmett, population 5,500, and other towns in four Idaho counties were exposed to high levels of radiation from the bomb blasts, receiving among the highest doses of a radioactive chemical that has been linked to increased risk for thyroid cancer. The National Cancer Institute in 1997 released a study and a map plotting the locations of the fallout across the country, ranking concentrations of Radioactive Iodine-131, an isotope released when a nuclear bomb is detonated, from Nevada to upstate New York. The study put the four Idaho counties -- Gem County, which includes Emmett; Lemhi; Blaine; and Custer -- and one in Montana at the top of that list.Letter spurs attentionBut few Emmett residents heard about that study, dozens said in recent interviews. Even as sick residents of other Western states received compensation from the government, the question of how Idahoans may have been affected by the nuclear tests received little attention -- until recently. But now a furor has erupted here and elsewhere in Idaho, set off by one Emmett native, who survived thyroid cancer but is dying of breast cancer that has spread to her liver and her bones.The former resident, Sheri Garman, 52, who now lives in Vancouver, Wash., wrote a long letter to an Idaho state legislator -- a high school classmate -- after learning that the National Academy of Science, at the request of the federal government, is re-evaluating the extent of the fallout from the Nevada test site and its connection to other cancers and diseases besides thyroid cancer.The academy's Board on Radiation Effects Research has held three hearings on the matter, two in Utah and one in Arizona, over the last year."I think Idahoans were severely misled on the seriousness of the situation," Garman wrote on July 14 to Kathy Skippen, a state representative from Gem County. "It's not just thyroid cancer. It's not insignificant. It's deadly, expensive and it is known."Like many Emmett residents, Garman grew up on a dairy farm, drinking fresh milk. Children of her generation living in places like Emmett, where the 1997 cancer institute study showed residents had received large doses of Radioactive Iodine-131, are at greater risk for developing thyroid cancer because the cows ingested contaminated grass.The study, of 3,071 counties, concluded the fallout caused or would eventually cause tens of thousands of cases of thyroid cancer. Radiation from fallout is measured in rads; 1 rad is equivalent to the amount of radiation absorbed by the thyroid of a person who has 10 X-rays in the neck area. Residents of the four Idaho counties, the study said, received average thyroid doses of 13 to 16 rads, but the dose to some children may have been as high as 100 rads.Idaho officials, including Gov. Dirk Kempthorne, then a U.S. senator, responded to the study by calling the situation an "outrage" and demanding further investigation. At the time Kempthorne also asked that Idaho be included in a government compensation program that now provides $50,000 each to residents of 21 counties in Utah, Nevada and Arizona whose illnesses have been diagnosed with any of 19 cancers. But Idaho residents were not included in the compensation program, which has thus far paid out $17 million to other "down winders" exposed to radiation during the bomb tests as well as employees at the weapons testing sites and uranium mine and mill workers."What we need now," Garman said in a telephone interview, "is to get public hearings in Idaho. We need our politicians to be our watchdogs. We're too sick, and we're not all going to be there when this happens."Critics say Kempthorne and other officials, after initially expressing concern, have ignored the public health threat to Idaho residents. Nuclear watchdog groups have questioned whether the officials' reluctance to press the issue was intended to protect Idaho's nuclear power industry, a major employer in the state, or because they did not want to offend the Bush administration in light of its new proposal for nuclear testing. State officials denied such motivations.Writing to the publicThe controversy prompted Kempthorne and Sen. Larry E. Craig, both Republicans, to take the unusual step of defending themselves last month on the editorial pages of the state's largest newspaper, The Idaho Statesman.The governor, in an article published on Aug. 18, said, "I urge anyone with a story to tell to come forward."But he also cited a 1998 study by the Cancer Data Registry of Idaho that found an increasing rate of thyroid cancer in Blaine and Custer counties, but was unable to attribute the rising rates to a specific cause.Asked why the governor had waited until now to urge Idaho residents to come forward if they suspect fallout had made them sick, a spokesman, Mike Journee, said the governor was waiting for concrete proof. He said the governor would support compensation for Idahoans if there were evidence "comparable to the evidence that was used to compensate folks in Utah."Yet when the compensation program was amended in 2000 at the urging of Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, to include more counties in his state and in Arizona, Utah officials had the same scientific information available to them --the 1997 study -- as Idaho officials did.Utah officials cited the testimony of residents from Utah and Arizona that was made available to Hatch's office as a rationale for amending the program to include five more counties in those two states. Hatch wrote the original 1990 law that mandated compensation known as the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act; the payments are administered by the Justice Department.Journee said Utah residents had been more vocal about their illnesses than Idahoans had."They were engaged," he said. "The reason folks down in Utah got compensation is that they told their stories. That's what the governor wants the people of Idaho to do."Kempthorne appeared to go a bit further Sept. 3, writing in a letter to the National Academy of Science board studying the issue, "I call upon the board to compare exposure information for Idaho with the areas currently included" in the compensation program. "Fairness," he wrote, "must recognize the human faces behind cold and often inconclusive studies and statistics."In Emmett, residents have been making lists of relatives and neighbors -- living and dead -- with cancer. They have rushed to a local bakery, where the owner, Tona Henderson, has produced a form letter of her own that residents can fill out and send to the National Academy of Science.A committee of the academy is taking public comment for a study on nuclear fallout and public health to be submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services, said Bill Kearney, a spokesman for the academy.While many scientists and medical experts have said there is a connection between exposure to Iodine-131 and greater risk for thyroid disease and thyroid cancer, a link between the fallout and other diseases has not been established.Still, in Emmett, dozens of residents have gathered in coffee shops and farmhouses to talk about cancer. Many furiously said they suspected their radiation exposure was connected to their cancers."This whole thing is wrong," said Richard Rynearson, 62, who is dying after contracting colon and liver cancer, and who ran a heating and air-conditioning business until he became too sick to work. "Somebody needs to own up to the fact that they messed up."Rynearson, who recalled seeing that strange gray dust on the dairy farm here where he grew up, said he first learned of the nuclear fallout only recently."I always thought maybe there was something wrong in this valley," he said. "But I would have liked to have known 10 years ago if we had this problem. Maybe I could have gotten checked out."http://www.startribune.com/viewers/story.php?template=print_a & story=4972862

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" Suffering Effects of 50's A-Bomb Tests

NY Times ^ | September 5, 2004 | SARAH KERSHAW

 

 

Posted on 09/04/2004 5:49:28 PM PDT by neverdem

 

 

EMMETT, Idaho, Aug. 31 - In the 1950's and early

1960's, at the height of the cold war, people in this

southeastern Idaho town thought what they occasionally

saw dusting their fruit orchards and cow pastures was

frost - only it was not cold to the touch, several

longtime residents said. Others described it as a

gray-white powder that seemed to come out of nowhere.

 

The residents of this town of dairy and cattle farmers

did not know it then, but half a century ago, northern

winds blew radioactive fallout into southeastern Idaho

when the federal government set off about 90 nuclear

bombs at its Nevada test site near Las Vegas.

 

There is not any doubt that Emmett, population 5,500,

and other towns in four Idaho counties were exposed to

high levels of radiation from the open-air atomic bomb

blasts, receiving among the highest doses of a

radioactive chemical that has been linked to increased

risk for thyroid cancer. The National Cancer Institute

in 1997 released a detailed study and a map plotting

the locations of the fallout across the country,

ranking concentrations of Radioactive Iodine-131, an

isotope released when a nuclear bomb is detonated,

from Nevada to upstate New York. The study put the

four Idaho counties - Gem County, which includes

Emmett; Lemhi; Blaine; and Custer - and one in Montana

at the top of that list.

 

But few Emmett residents heard about that study,

dozens said in recent interviews. Even as sick

residents of other Western states received

compensation from the government, the question of how

Idahoans may have been affected by the nuclear tests

received little attention. But now a furor has erupted

here and elsewhere in Idaho, set off by one Emmett

native, who survived thyroid cancer but is dying of

breast cancer that has spread to her liver and her

bones.

 

The native, Sheri Garman, 52, who now lives in

Vancouver, Wash., wrote a long letter to an Idaho

state legislator - a high school classmate - after

learning that the National Academy of Sciences, at the

request of the federal government, is currently

re-evaluating the extent of the fallout from the

Nevada test site and its connection to other cancers

and diseases besides thyroid cancer.

 

The academy's Board on Radiation Effects Research has

held three hearings on the matter over the last year,

two in Utah, including one on July 29, and one in

Arizona.

 

" I think Idahoans were severely misled on the

seriousness of the situation, " Ms. Garman wrote on

July 14 to Kathy Skippen, a state representative from

Gem County. " It's not just thyroid cancer. It's not

insignificant. It's deadly, expensive and it is

known. "

 

Like many Emmett residents, Ms. Garman grew up on a

dairy farm, drinking fresh milk. Children of her

generation living in places like Emmett, where the

1997 cancer institute study showed residents had

received large doses of Radioactive Iodine-131, are at

greater risk for developing thyroid cancer because the

cows ingested contaminated grass.

 

The study, of 3,071 counties, concluded the fallout

caused or would eventually cause tens of thousands of

cases of thyroid cancer. Radiation from fallout is

measured in rads; one rad is equivalent to the amount

of radiation absorbed by the thyroid of a person who

has 10 X-rays in the neck area. Residents of the four

Idaho counties, the study said, received average

thyroid doses of 12 to 16 rads, but the dose to some

children may have been as high as 100 rads.

 

Idaho officials, including Gov. Dirk Kempthorne, then

a United States senator, responded to the study by

calling the situation an " outrage " and demanding

further investigation. At the time Mr. Kempthorne also

asked that Idaho be included in a government

compensation program that now provides $50,000 each to

residents of 21 counties in Utah, Nevada and Arizona

whose illnesses have been diagnosed with any of 19

cancers. But Idaho residents were not included in the

compensation program, which has thus far paid $780

million to other " down winders " exposed to radiation

during the bomb tests as well as employees at the

weapons testing sites and uranium mine and mill

workers.

 

" What we need now, " Ms. Garman said in a telephone

interview, " is to get public hearings in Idaho. We

need our politicians to be our watchdogs. We're too

sick, and we're not all going to be there when this

happens. "

 

Critics say that Governor Kempthorne and other

officials, after initially expressing concern, have

ignored the public health threat to Idaho residents.

Nuclear watchdog groups have also questioned whether

the officials' reluctance to press the issue was

intended to protect Idaho's nuclear power industry, a

major employer in the state, or because they supported

the idea of resuming nuclear testing, as was proposed

in a Pentagon report in 2002. State officials denied

such motivations.

 

The controversy prompted Mr. Kempthorne and Senator

Larry E. Craig, both Republicans, to take the unusual

step of defending themselves two weeks ago on the

editorial pages of the state's largest newspaper, The

Idaho Statesman.

 

The governor, in an article published on Aug. 18,

said, " I urge anyone with a story to tell to come

forward. "

 

But he also cited a 1998 study by the Cancer Data

Registry of Idaho that found an increasing rate of

thyroid cancer in Blaine and Custer Counties, but was

unable to attribute the rising rates to a specific

cause.

 

Asked why the governor had waited until now to urge

Idaho residents to come forward if they suspected

fallout had made them sick, a spokesman for Mr.

Kempthorne, Mike Journee, said that the governor was

waiting for concrete proof. He said the governor would

support compensation for Idahoans if there were

evidence " comparable to the evidence that was used to

compensate folks in Utah. "

 

Yet when the compensation program was amended in 2000

at the urging of Senator Orrin G. Hatch of Utah to

include more counties in his state and in Arizona,

Utah officials had the same scientific information-

the 1997 Cancer Institute study - available to them as

Idaho officials did. Utah officials cited testimony of

residents from Utah and Arizona that was made

available to Mr. Hatch's office as a rationale for

including five more counties in those two states.

 

Senator Hatch, a Republican, wrote the original 1990

law that mandated compensation, known as the Radiation

Exposure Compensation Act; the payments are

administered by the Justice Department.

 

Mr. Journee said that Utah residents had been more

vocal about their illnesses than Idahoans had.

 

" They were engaged, " he said. " The reason folks down

in Utah got compensation is that they told their

stories. That's what the governor wants the people of

Idaho to do. "

 

[On Friday, Mr. Kempthorne wrote in a letter to the

National Academy of Sciences board studying the issue,

" I call upon the board to compare exposure information

for Idaho with the areas currently included " in the

compensation program. " Fairness, " he wrote, " must

recognize the human faces behind cold, and often

inconclusive studies and statistics. " ]

 

Here in Emmett, residents have spent the last several

days making lists of relatives and neighbors - living

and dead - with cancer. They have rushed to a local

bakery, aptly named the Rumor Mill, where the owner,

Tona Henderson, has produced a form letter of her own

that residents can fill out and send to the National

Academy of Sciences.

 

A committee of the academy is taking public comment

for a study on nuclear fallout and public health to be

submitted to the Department of Health and Human

Services, said Bill Kearney, a spokesman for the

academy. While many scientists and medical experts

have said there is a connection between exposure to

Iodine-131 and greater risk of thyroid disease and

thyroid cancer, a link between the fallout and other

diseases has not been established.

 

Still, in Emmett, dozens of residents have gathered in

coffee shops and farmhouses to talk about cancer. Many

furiously said they suspected their radiation exposure

was connected to their cancers.

 

" This whole thing is wrong, " said Richard Rynearson,

62, who is dying of colon and liver cancer, and who

ran a heating and air-conditioning business until he

became too sick to work. " Somebody needs to own up to

the fact that they messed up. "

 

Mr. Rynearson, who recalled seeing that strange gray

dust on the dairy farm where he grew up, said he first

learned of the nuclear fallout last week.

 

" I always thought maybe there was something wrong in

this valley, " he said. " But I would have liked to have

known 10 years ago if we had this problem. Maybe I

could have gotten checked out. "

 

"

--- luckypig <luckypig wrote:

 

> iF YOU HAVE FAMILY OR FRIENDS IN IDAHO, PASS THIS

> ON, THESE PEOPLE NEED TO BE PAID FOR THE CANCERS

> THEY HAVE SUFFERED. FIRST THEY MUST KNOW HELP IS

> AVAILABLE, PASS THIS ON

>

> Last update: September 11, 2004 at 10:36 PM

> startribune.com

> In Idaho, fallout from past casts long, dark shadow

> Published September 12, 2004

> By Sarah Kershaw

> New York Times

>

> EMMETT, IDAHO -- The people in this town of dairy

> and cattle farmers did not know it then, but half a

> century ago, northern winds blew radioactive fallout

> into southeastern Idaho when the federal government

> set off about 90 nuclear bombs at its Nevada test

> site near Las Vegas.

>

> Back then, in the 1950s and early 1960s, at the

> height of the Cold War, people in Emmett thought

> what they occasionally saw dusting their fruit

> orchards and cow pastures was frost -- only it was

> not cold to the touch, several longtime residents

> said. Others described it as a gray-white powder

> that seemed to come out of nowhere.

>

> There is not any doubt that Emmett, population

> 5,500, and other towns in four Idaho counties were

> exposed to high levels of radiation from the bomb

> blasts, receiving among the highest doses of a

> radioactive chemical that has been linked to

> increased risk for thyroid cancer. The National

> Cancer Institute in 1997 released a study and a map

> plotting the locations of the fallout across the

> country, ranking concentrations of Radioactive

> Iodine-131, an isotope released when a nuclear bomb

> is detonated, from Nevada to upstate New York. The

> study put the four Idaho counties -- Gem County,

> which includes Emmett; Lemhi; Blaine; and Custer --

> and one in Montana at the top of that list.

>

> Letter spurs attention

>

> But few Emmett residents heard about that study,

> dozens said in recent interviews. Even as sick

> residents of other Western states received

> compensation from the government, the question of

> how Idahoans may have been affected by the nuclear

> tests received little attention -- until recently.

> But now a furor has erupted here and elsewhere in

> Idaho, set off by one Emmett native, who survived

> thyroid cancer but is dying of breast cancer that

> has spread to her liver and her bones.

>

> The former resident, Sheri Garman, 52, who now lives

> in Vancouver, Wash., wrote a long letter to an Idaho

> state legislator -- a high school classmate -- after

> learning that the National Academy of Science, at

> the request of the federal government, is

> re-evaluating the extent of the fallout from the

> Nevada test site and its connection to other cancers

> and diseases besides thyroid cancer.

>

> The academy's Board on Radiation Effects Research

> has held three hearings on the matter, two in Utah

> and one in Arizona, over the last year.

>

> " I think Idahoans were severely misled on the

> seriousness of the situation, " Garman wrote on July

> 14 to Kathy Skippen, a state representative from Gem

> County. " It's not just thyroid cancer. It's not

> insignificant. It's deadly, expensive and it is

> known. "

>

> Like many Emmett residents, Garman grew up on a

> dairy farm, drinking fresh milk. Children of her

> generation living in places like Emmett, where the

> 1997 cancer institute study showed residents had

> received large doses of Radioactive Iodine-131, are

> at greater risk for developing thyroid cancer

> because the cows ingested contaminated grass.

>

> The study, of 3,071 counties, concluded the fallout

> caused or would eventually cause tens of thousands

> of cases of thyroid cancer. Radiation from fallout

> is measured in rads; 1 rad is equivalent to the

> amount of radiation absorbed by the thyroid of a

> person who has 10 X-rays in the neck area. Residents

> of the four Idaho counties, the study said, received

> average thyroid doses of 13 to 16 rads, but the dose

> to some children may have been as high as 100 rads.

>

> Idaho officials, including Gov. Dirk Kempthorne,

> then a U.S. senator, responded to the study by

> calling the situation an " outrage " and demanding

> further investigation. At the time Kempthorne also

> asked that Idaho be included in a government

> compensation program that now provides $50,000 each

> to residents of 21 counties in Utah, Nevada and

> Arizona whose illnesses have been diagnosed with any

> of 19 cancers. But Idaho residents were not included

> in the compensation program, which has thus far paid

> out $17 million to other " down winders " exposed to

> radiation during the bomb tests as well as employees

> at the weapons testing sites and uranium mine and

> mill workers.

>

> " What we need now, " Garman said in a telephone

> interview, " is to get public hearings in Idaho. We

> need our politicians to be our watchdogs. We're too

> sick, and we're not all going to be there when this

> happens. "

>

> Critics say Kempthorne and other officials, after

> initially expressing concern, have ignored the

> public health threat to Idaho residents. Nuclear

> watchdog groups have questioned whether the

> officials' reluctance to press the issue was

> intended to protect Idaho's nuclear power industry,

> a major employer in the state, or because they did

> not want to offend the Bush administration in light

> of its new proposal for nuclear testing. State

> officials denied such motivations.

>

> Writing to the public

>

> The controversy prompted Kempthorne and Sen. Larry

> E. Craig, both Republicans, to take the unusual step

> of defending themselves last month on the editorial

> pages of the state's largest newspaper, The Idaho

> Statesman.

>

> The governor, in an article published on Aug. 18,

> said, " I urge anyone with a story to tell to come

> forward. "

>

> But he also cited a 1998 study by the Cancer Data

> Registry of Idaho that found an increasing rate of

> thyroid cancer in Blaine and Custer counties, but

> was unable to attribute the rising rates to a

> specific cause.

>

> Asked why the governor had waited until now to urge

> Idaho residents to come forward if they suspect

> fallout had made them sick, a spokesman, Mike

> Journee, said the governor was waiting for concrete

> proof. He said the governor would support

> compensation for Idahoans if there were evidence

> " comparable to the evidence that was used to

> compensate folks in Utah. "

>

> Yet when the compensation program was amended in

> 2000 at the urging of Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, to

> include more counties in his state and in Arizona,

> Utah officials had the same scientific information

> available to them --the 1997 study -- as Idaho

> officials did.

>

> Utah officials cited the testimony of residents from

> Utah and Arizona that was made available to Hatch's

> office as a rationale for amending the program to

> include five more counties in those two states.

> Hatch wrote the original 1990 law that mandated

> compensation known as the Radiation Exposure

> Compensation Act; the payments are administered by

> the Justice Department.

>

> Journee said Utah residents had been more vocal

> about their illnesses than Idahoans had.

>

> " They were engaged, " he said. " The reason folks down

> in Utah got compensation is that they told their

> stories. That's what the governor wants the people

> of Idaho to do. "

>

> Kempthorne appeared to go a bit further Sept. 3,

> writing in a letter to the National Academy of

> Science board studying the issue, " I call upon the

> board to compare exposure information for Idaho with

> the areas currently included " in the compensation

> program. " Fairness, " he wrote, " must recognize the

> human faces behind cold and often inconclusive

> studies and statistics. "

>

> In Emmett, residents have been making lists of

> relatives and neighbors -- living and dead -- with

> cancer. They have rushed to a local bakery, where

> the owner, Tona Henderson, has produced a form

> letter of her own that residents can fill out and

> send to the National Academy of Science.

>

> A committee of the academy is taking public comment

> for a study on nuclear fallout and public health to

> be submitted to the Department of Health and Human

> Services, said Bill Kearney, a spokesman for the

> academy.

>

> While many scientists and medical experts have said

> there is a connection between exposure to Iodine-131

> and greater risk for thyroid disease and thyroid

> cancer,

=== message truncated ===

 

 

 

 

_______________________________

 

Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!

http://vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...