Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

THE DANGERS OF EATING SPLENDA

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

THE DANGERS OF EATING SPLENDA

 

 

12 Questions You Need to Have Answered Before You Eat Splenda

 

From Dr. Janet Starr Hull's Health Newsletter, December 2003

 

http://www.sweetpoison.com/

 

The following interview was conducted with Dr. Janet Starr Hull on the

safety of sucralose

found in Splenda.

 

Q: What exactly is Splenda?

 

A: In a simple sentence, you would just as soon have a pesticide in your

food as sucralose

because sucralose (Splenda) is a chlorocarbon. The chlorocarbons have

long been known for causing

organ, genetic, and reproductive damage. It should be no surprise,

therefore, that the testing of

sucralose reveals that it can cause up to 40 percent shrinkage of the

thymus: a gland that is the

very foundation of our immune system. Sucralose also causes swelling of

the liver and kidneys, and

CALCIFICATION of the kidney. Note: if you experience kidney pain,

cramping, or an irritated bladder

after using sucralose in Splenda, stop use immediately.

 

 

--------

 

Q: So sucralose is not found as a natural compound in nature, like real

sugar?

 

A: Absolutely not. No sugar molecule is compounded with chlorine

anywhere in nature.

 

 

--------

 

Q: Do you know how it is made in the laboratory?

 

A: I found this information from a statement from the manufacturer,

actually. 'Sucralose is

made from sugar, but is derived from sucrose (sugar) through a process

that selectively substitutes

three atoms of chlorine for three hydrogen-oxygen groups on the sucrose

molecule. No artificial

sweetener made in the laboratory is going to be neither natural to the

body nor safer than

unprocessed sugar', they claim.

 

People need to stop searching for excuses to eat all the junk food they

want without penalty.

In the long run, no one benefits from this product but the corporations.

 

 

--------

 

Q: The corporate researchers claim that the chlorine atoms are so

tightly bound; they create

a molecular structure that is exceptionally stable under extreme pH and

temperature conditions. Do

you agree?

 

A: They are testing these conditions in lab rats, and these types of

corporate studies have

forced and 'selective' results, in my opinion. Aspartame research is the

proof of this!

 

Test these chemicals on a child and see how stable it is--but that would

be cruel. So, why

then do we buy it and give it to our children? I don't buy into

manufacturers' claims when it comes

to human beings using ANY man-made chemical. Plus, I have learned over

the past 25 years of

aspartame research to value independent research above that which is

funded by corporations.

 

 

--------

 

Q: The corporations say sucralose is safe.

 

A: They said the same thing about aspartame, and look at the rampant

disease and obesity

taking over America since aspartame was put into the food supply over 20

years ago.

 

 

--------

 

Q: Can sucralose cause cancer?

 

A: Any animal that eats chlorine (especially on a regular basis) is at

risk of cancer. The

Merk Manuel and OSHA 40 SARA 120 Hazardous Waste Handbook states that

chlorine is a carcinogen and

emergency procedures should be taken when exposed via swallowing,

inhaling, or through the skin.

 

It all depends upon how much you use and how often, your present and

past health status, and

the degree of other toxins you are putting inside your body. Good luck

with this one .

 

 

--------

 

Q: Sucralose has been thoroughly tested, they claim. Actually they have

stated that sucralose

is the most tested food additive in history. I quote, " . more than 100

studies on the safety of

sucralose designed to meet the highest scientific standards have been

conducted and evaluated over

the course of 20 years. "

 

A: I don't believe that for a second. They stated verbatim the same

thing about aspartame. We

are looking at the same scenario in so many ways. As with NutraSweet, no

human studies, corporate

payrolled researchers, selective result reporting, government

involvement and personal financial

interests and controlled media. I will say that sucralose is not as

dangerous as aspartame.

 

 

--------

 

Q: Splenda is approximately 600 times sweeter than sugar. How can that

be?

 

A: As I stated before, the product is a forced product, not a natural

sugar the body uses for

fuel. People forget that sweetness is a by-product of foods--a bonus so

to say. Forced sweetness,

revved-up sweetness, and artificial sweetness--all altered foods that

are a trap for people to get

addicted to the sweeter tastes. People with eating disorders, children

who are just learning about

food, and people with illnesses are all being 'sold a bill of rubbish'

in my opinion.

 

 

--------

 

Q: The manufacturer claims sucralose doesn't react with other substances

in the body and is

not broken down in the body.

 

A: They claimed the same thing about saccharin, even though I feel

saccharin is the only

artificial sweetener with true merit. To answer your question, if the

body is digesting properly,

anything you put into the body will be assimilated. If it happens to be

rancid, the stomach will

throw it out immediately by vomiting or diarrhea. It is totally out of

the realm of biological

science to think the body will not immediately attack a toxic chemical.

Henceforth, migraines from

aspartame and diarrhea from Splenda.

 

Now, to add a note to this: if the body is fed an indigestible product

such as plastic (like

in margarine) that it is incapable of dissolving through normal

digestion, it will pass through

undigested (if it doesn't get stuck in the gall bladder, that is.) So,

if sucralose is indigestible

due to its laboratory compounding, then we have yet another serious

health problem to consider,

don't you think?

 

Technology is great, but we sure don't need to be eating it!

 

 

--------

 

Q: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and government food authority

committees and the

Health Ministries in countries such as Canada, Mexico, Dominican

Republic, Jamaica, Trinidad &

Tobago, Argentina, and Brazil have confirmed the safety of sucralose. So

have the countries of

Colombia, Peru, Venezuela, Uruguay, Romania, Lebanon, Qatar, Bahrain,

Pakistan, Tajikistan, China,

South Africa, and Tanzania. What do you think of all these countries

confirming Splenda's safety?

 

A: The history of aspartame has unfortunately proven that individuals

within government

agencies cannot and should not be trusted to make such empowering public

decisions behind closed

doors.

 

Now, re-read this list of countries . Mexico, Jamaica, Tajikistan and

Tanzania? These are the

countries in which Splenda is now marketed? (See the final question.) As

an international

geographer, I can comfortably say that these countries are not nations

with the same technology and

mass marketing strategies to be compared with the United States. These

countries are more concerned

with birth control, food staples, hostile take-overs, and drought--not

diet sweeteners. Compare

apples to apples.

 

 

--------

 

Q: Is sucralose safe for children?

 

A: The manufacturer actually made this statement for disclosure: " One

should note, however,

that foods made with low-calorie sweeteners are not normally a

recommended part of a child's diet,

since calories are important to a growing child's body. "

 

Pay attention . Children should not be encouraged to grow up on fake

foods. But just like

cigarettes and alcohol, do what I say and not what I do? And we wonder

why the younger generation

is angry, ill, and ridden with ADD/ADHD and diabetes?? How many kids do

you see taking a sip of mom

or brother's diet cola?

 

 

--------

 

Q: Who manufactures and markets sucralose?

 

A: McNeil Specialty Products Company (MSPC), a wholly owned subsidiary

of Johnson & Johnson,

along with Tate & Lyle PLC, a world leader in sweeteners and starches,

all share responsibility for

developing and manufacturing sucralose for commercial use. Sucralose is

the first product from

McNeil Specialty, whose mission is to develop and market innovative food

ingredients that help

consumers control, maintain and improve their health. Internationally,

McNeil Specialty markets

sucralose in the United States, Canada, Latin America, the Caribbean,

Australia, New Zealand, and

the Middle East; Tate & Lyle markets sucralose in Africa, Asia, Europe

and Canada. Internationally,

McNeil Specialty markets sucralose under the name SPLENDAR Brand

Sweetener. SPLENDAR is a

registered trademark of McNeil Specialty Products Company.

 

 

--------

 

Dr. Mercola's Comment:

 

This is an excellent interview and one that I encourage you to read

carefully if you think

Splenda is safe to use.

 

Please note that I do not advise using Splenda. Over three years ago I

posted an article

describing the dangers of Splenda (sucralose).

http://www.mercola.com/2000/dec/3/sucralose_dangers.htm

 

Why not use Splenda? Well, research in animals has shown that sucralose

can cause many

problems such as:

 

a.. Shrunken thymus glands (up to 40 percent shrinkage)

 

b.. Enlarged liver and kidneys

 

c.. Atrophy of lymph follicles in the spleen and thymus

 

d.. Increased cecal weight

 

e.. Reduced growth rate

 

f.. Decreased red blood cell count

 

g.. Hyperplasia of the pelvis

 

h.. Extension of the pregnancy period

 

i.. Aborted pregnancy

 

j.. Decreased fetal body weights and placental weights

 

k.. Diarrhea

 

Nearly every month we receive a report from someone who has had an

adverse reaction to

Splenda, and you can see many of these reports posted on our site.

 

http://www.mercola.com/2000/dec/3/sucralose_dangers.htm

 

I also encourage you to take a look at the links below to get a thorough

understanding of the

dangers Splenda poses to your health.

 

Splenda's Dangers: One Man's Personal Story That You

Should Know

 

The Potential Dangers of Sucralose

 

The Dangers of Chlorine and Issues With Sucralose

 

Splenda is Not a Healthy Sweetener

 

Sucralose (Splenda®) U.S. Product List

 

_______________

Get ready for school! Find articles, homework help and more in the Back to

School Guide! http://special.msn.com/network/04backtoschool.armx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keeping the scary HEAVY DANGER article in perspective, the studies

were done on small animals that were half-starved and then given

daily, many thousands of doses of Splenda which, when used as a

sweetener, would be under 2/100 of a gram, for a human of a hundred

times the weight.

 

And that's the total weight of the Splenda, not the chlorine

component you're worried about.

 

A sweetener dose represents less chlorine than 1/4 of a glass of city

water, and less THM organochlorine absorbed than a 5-minute shower in

city water.

 

regards,

 

Duncan Crow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Duncan. I sure wish I could say Splenda didn't effect me any but after just a month of small usage at night in my herbal tea, I was having kidney & bladder pain. Then my muscles in my legs started to hurt and then the headaches set in. Within 3 days of the kidney/bladder pain, I was hurting all over. I started back tracking on what I had eaten and ended up at Splenda. That's when I did my research on side effects and came off of it immediantly. Within 2 or 3 days I was back to the way I was originally feeling and have had no problems since. Side effects of Splenda? I have no doubt on this but I also think we each react to foods differently & there are a ton of human reactions to Splenda that are very negative. It's always good to know the inside information on a product, regardless of how one is effected over another. I personally will NEVER use this stuff again (knowingly) whereas my grandparents are faithful users.

 

Fondly,

Julie

Keeping the scary HEAVY DANGER article in perspective, the studies were done on small animals that were half-starved and then given daily, many thousands of doses of Splenda which, when used as a sweetener, would be under 2/100 of a gram, for a human of a hundred times the weight.And that's the total weight of the Splenda, not the chlorine component you're worried about.A sweetener dose represents less chlorine than 1/4 of a glass of city water, and less THM organochlorine absorbed than a 5-minute shower in city water. regards,Duncan Crow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...