Guest guest Posted August 2, 2004 Report Share Posted August 2, 2004 The Toxicity/Safety of Processed Free Glutamic Acid (Msg): A STUDY IN SUPPRESSION OF INFORMATION Adrienne Samuels 850 DeWitt Place, Chicago, IL 60611, USA http://free.freespeech.org/transgenicos/transgenicos/cuidado/graos/soja/samuels.htm Accountability in Research (1999) Vol 6, pp. 259-310. ABSTRACT Every company interested in promoting its product should attempt to convince its clients that its product is worth buying. However, "selective" collection and reporting of research data would be inappropriate. "Selective" collection and reporting of research data, including suppression of information contrary to that which is espoused by the industry in question, is the subject of this paper. Using promotion of the flavor-enhancing ingredient called monosodium glutamate, and its active component (variously referred to as processed free glutamic acid or MSG) as a case study, this paper presents the case against the safety of MSG and looks at the work of the defenders of the safety of MSG. The structure of the industry organization; an overview of their research; suppression of information; dissemination of misinformation; dirty tricks; and the special role of agencies of the United States government will be considered. KEY WORDS accountability, deception, glutamic acid, glutamate, monosodium glutamate, MSG, suppression of information CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. The Case Against the Safety of Processed Free Glutamic Acid (MSG) a) The chemical in question: processed free glutamic acid b) The first evidence of toxicity c) Confirmation of toxicity d) Personal involvement 3. Defenders of the Safety of MSG a) Structure of their organization - The International Glutamate Technical Committee (IGTC - The Glutamate Association b) Researchers c) Agents d) People and Organizations Influenced by Glutamate-Industry Agents e) An overview of glutamate industry research - Animal research: 1970-1980 - Umami: the alleged fifth basic taste - The Epidemiologic Study - The Double-Blind Studies f) Suppression of Information g) Dissemination of misinformation h) Dirty tricks i) Agencies of the United States Government - The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) - The National Institutes of Health (NIH) - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 4. Summary and Conclusions A. Table 1 B. Appendices C. References Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.