Guest guest Posted July 2, 2004 Report Share Posted July 2, 2004 Mobiles 'could cut male fertility' By Caroline Ryan BBC News Online health staff in Berlin http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3844871.stm Sperm numbers were cut by a third, researchers said Carrying a mobile phone could significantly affect a man's fertility, scientists have suggested. Radiation from the phones could cut the number of sperm a man has by a third, researchers from the University of Szeged, Hungary, said. The research, presented to the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) meeting in Berlin, studied over 200 men. But other experts have criticised their research, saying it did not take any other aspects of the men's lives into account. The Hungarian study is the first to look at how electromagnetic radiation from mobiles could affect sperm. The men who had their phone on standby throughout the day had about a third less sperm than those who did not. You can explain the difference by completely other ways than the use of a mobile phone Professor Hans Evers, former chairman of ESHRE And, of the remaining sperm, high numbers were found to be swimming abnormally, reducing the chances of fertilisation. The researchers say their findings suggest that mobiles do have a " negative effect " on male sperm and fertility. But other experts at the ESHRE conference said the Hungarian study did not allow for other factors which could have affected the men's fertility. Professor Hans Evers, the former chairman of the European Society of Human Reproduction, said it " raises more questions than it answers " . Other factors He said the study had not taken into account the " many potential confounding factors which could have skewed the results " . These could include whether the men who had affected sperm came from a different social class or age range than those who did not. It was also unclear whether the men were carrying their phones in their trouser pockets, close to their bodies, or in briefcases away from them. He said: " These factors would have a considerable effect on the outcome of the research. " Professor Evers added: " Mobile phones are related to a certain lifestyle and they may be related to stress, to a heavily occupied business man rushing around from one office to another, having a lot of concerns in the life; there's all kind of things. " And it is known that this decreases sperm counts and if you compare that to farmers living in the open air, on the land and not carrying a mobile phone at all you can explain the difference by completely other ways than the use of a mobile phone. " He said the only way to get a clearer picture would be for scientists to carry out a study which was carefully designed only to look at the effect of mobile phones on sperm. Ovary transplant pregnancy first By Caroline Ryan BBC News Online health staff in Berlin http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3850381.stm Ovarian tissue was transplanted into the woman A woman has become pregnant after having an ovary tissue transplant for the first time, it has emerged. The breakthrough gives hope to thousands of cancer patients whose treatment can make them infertile. It may also potentially help women who want to give themselves another chance at motherhood after the menopause. Doctors from Universite Catholique de Louvain in Brussels are treating the woman. News of her pregnancy was revealed at the European Fertility Conference in Berlin. The baby, a girl, who was conceived naturally, is due at the beginning of October. Doctors across the world have been working to achieve a successful pregnancy in ovarian transplant patients. A landmark finding Professor Kutluk Oktay, Cornell University, New York Q & A: Ovarian transplant Other teams have been able to create embryos, and have attempted to help women become pregnant through using IVF. But this is the first time a successful pregnancy has occurred in a woman who has had an ovary transplant. Positive test The patient, who is 32, was diagnosed with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma in 1997. It has huge implications for a lot of women around the world. Dr Yding Andersen Prior to chemotherapy, some of her ovarian tissue was removed and frozen. One ovary was left inside her body. When she was declared cancer-free in April 2003, the ovarian tissue was transplanted back into her body, just below her existing ovary. Four months later, she was found to be menstruating and ovulating normally. She is now around 25 weeks pregnant. However, it is not yet clear if the egg which was fertilised came from the grafted tissue, or from her ovary which could have begun to work again independently. Professor Jacques Donnez, who led the research, told RTBF Radio 1 in Brussels: " She is pregnant. She lives a life which she could never hope she would have been able to live. " It's her child genetically, growing from her tissue, and she fell pregnant completely naturally. " 'Offers hope' Professor Kutluk Oktay, of Cornell University, New York, who has pioneered work in this field told BBC News Online: " We need to see more details about this work, but it would be a landmark finding. He added: " If you leave women alone, there is a chance of spontaneous recovery of ovarian function. " But there is a viable possibility that the pregnancy came from this graft. " He said many patients found facing up to the possibility they may never have children was almost as hard to come to terms with as the news of their diagnosis - so the possibilities offered by this treatment were " tremendous " " It helps them to cope with cancer and to have a much more positive attitude to the circumstances that they are in. It takes some of the burden away. " Dr Oktay said the approach could also help other women with blood, kidney and joint diseases who were also treated with cancer drugs. He said there was still too little evidence to recommend healthy woman should freeze ovarian tissue which they could have transplanted back into their bodies after their menopause to give them another chance of having a baby. But he added: " I wouldn't recommend it now. But if you found out that there was a 30% pregnancy rate - as with IVF - why not? " Dr Yding Andersen, from the University Hospital of Copenhagen, who is waiting to see if an ovarian transplant patient he has treated becomes pregnant, said: " It's definitely a breakthrough, absolutely a breakthrough, and it has huge implications for a lot of women around the world. " Simon Davies, spokesman for the Teenage Cancer Trust, said: " It's great news, it's fantastic. " This is a new option and it's going to be worthwhile for cancer patients, particular young ones, and will give them more choices in the future. " But Josephine Quintavalle of the Centre for Reproduction Ethics, said: " This technique should not be used lightly. " I sincerely hope it is not used as a lifestyle choice for deciding when you want to have children. " Professor Jack Scarisbrick, of the charity Life, added: " It is likely this technique will be misused. " It is an important development. But trying to defer the menopause is not the right way for it to be used. " EU faces fertility tourism threat http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3853237.stm CONFERENCE 2004 KEY STORIES Stem cell therapy for Parkinson's EU faces fertility tourism threat Scientists renew cloning warnings Ovary transplant pregnancy first IVF 'should use one embryo' Hypnosis 'doubles IVF success' Botox could treat sexual disorder Donor embryo children 'not told' Atkins diet 'reduces fertility' Khat plant 'boosts sperm power' 'Nazi shadow' over IVF research Mobiles 'could cut male fertility' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.