Study Linking Fatal Organ Failure to AIDS Drugs

[Guest guest]

Stunning Media Silence on Study Linking Fatal Organ Failure to AIDS DrugsJason Nusbaum on the best kept secret from BarcelonaA presentation at the 14th International AIDS Conference in Barcelona by aUniversity of Pittsburgh AIDS researcher reveals the "most common cause ofdeath among HIV positive people is liver failure." Dr. Amy Justice bases herconclusions on a study following nearly 6,000 HIV-positive diagnosedpatients at four sites in the United States. AIDS establishment scientistshave never claimed that HIV damages the liver.I contacted Dr. Justice by phone to learn more. During our conversation shetold me that causes of death among people with AIDS have never beencarefully recorded over the years. This is a concern we AIDS realists havebeen raising for more than a decade only to be dismissed by the AIDSestablishment. Justice said that to the best of her knowledge, her study isthe only one that reliably recorded actual cause of death in AIDS patients.The implications of this admission are astounding. Liver failure is theleading cause of death among individuals being treated with AIDS meds in theonly study that reliably records causes of death. Apparently, noestablishment researchers make the important distinction between deaths fromAIDS drugs and deaths from diseases called AIDS.I wondered if this mainstream AIDS scientist might now agree with what AIDSrealists have known all along, that AIDS meds can kill. I brought up theissue with Dr. Justice: "I hear your careful presentation of the science,and your careful statements about what your research shows. Can you give meyour intuition though, are the AIDS drugs involved in the deaths of thesepeople?"Dr. Justice laughed. "I think they are, yes. It's the dark side of thesedrugs."According to the Justice abstract and the results of another study from theEuropean EuroSIDA cohort also presented at the Barcelona AIDS conference,liver function tests and red blood cell counts are more accurate predictorsof illness and death in HIV positives than viral load tests or T cellcounts. Both liver toxicity and anemia (low red blood cell levels) are wellknown side effects of AIDS drug treatment. And like liver damage, anemia isnot blamed on HIV.AIDS establishment studies with similarly profound implications for HIVpositive diagnosed persons are regularly published in medical journals, butif the mainstream media is aware of such information, they're not telling.The one mainstream mention of the Justice et al and EuroSIDA findings put apositive spin on the dire news, portraying the studies as merely proving out"simpler and cheaper" methods of measuring risk of death and progression todisease, glossing over the issues of drug-induced liver failure deaths andlife-threatening anemia. According to Medscape's report, the studiesilluminate easier and less expensive lab tests, while liver damage and lowred cell counts are "minor metabolic abnormalities."Interestingly, the Medscape article makes a sudden denouncement of viralload testing, claiming it "has not proved the ultimate marker of the risk ofHIV progression and death" that everyone believed.>From Medscape's coverage of the 14th International AIDS Conference:"Barcelona, Spain; Monday, July 8, 2002 -- The role of surrogate markers topredict survival or other outcomes in HIV disease has been an area ofinterest for many groups, especially as the epidemic has advanced and therange of potential markers has increased. When quantitation of viral loadbecame possible in the mid-1990s, it was widely believed that this wouldprovide the ultimate marker of the risk of HIV progression and death. Infact, this has not proved to be the case, and there has therefore beenrenewed attention to other, perhaps simpler and cheaper measures of risk.The laboratory measures that are routinely evaluated in HIV-infectedpatients include hemoglobin levels as a marker of anemia, and liver functiontests."Does this mean we toss viral load? Or that viral load remains the ultimatemarker for HIV positives not taking the meds, but liver and anemia tests arethe new ultimate markers for medicated HIV positives?David Crowe of Alberta Reappraising AIDS Society comments: "I think theimplications are rather sinister. The authors of the Justice study admitthat liver damage is associated with HAART; it is the first factor theylist. To include a surrogate marker that is at least partially controlled bya therapy as a marker of disease progression is very dangerous. If the liverenzymes worsen, does that mean that AIDS is progressing faster and thattreatment should be more aggressive?"The pharmaceutical companies, establishment AIDS activists, and federallyfunded AIDS scientists have nothing to gain and much to lose if these recentstudies are accurately portrayed and widely disseminated. Without the workof Alive & Well AIDS Alternatives, would you ever hear about studies likethese or know what they really mean?(Jason Nusbaum is based in New York and serves as Director of Communicationsfor Alive & Well)For more information about Alive and Well contact:Christine Maggiore, Founder/DirectorAlive & Well AIDS Alternativeshttp://www.aliveandwell.org11684 Ventura Boulevard Studio City, CA 91604 USATel 818/780-1875 National Toll-free 877/411-AIDS Fax 818/780-7093-- --Neil Jensen: neil The WWW VL: Sumeria http://www.sumeria.net/ HIV plus a terminal illness will kill ya. http://www.sumeria.net/aids/