body balance

[Guest guest]

> Well said Peggy. Another problem is that testimonials

> are basically worthless. If someone feels better that

> may be entirely subjective. That why real scientists

> use double blind testing.

 

I agree that some people will give a testimonial for placebo, but

it's the repeat customers that make or break the company. And to

themselves, their opinions are subjective but not worthless. I'd like

to point out that we also have the opinions of health professionals

who have the experience of a one-to-many relationship and so can

observe trends of data, unscientific though that may be it's still

clinical experience.

 

>

> It's also possible that someone may have a significant

> deficiency in one nutrient. If they consume Body

> Balance, or anything else, that provides that

> nutrient, they may indeed feel much better. That

> doesn't mean that Body Balance is superior to anything

> else.

 

More than possible, probable in my view... Body Balance will be

superior to solid supplements, according to the doctors' text

" Harper's Biochemistry " , so perhaps better able to provide the

missing component in bioavailable form.

 

regards,

 

Duncan Crow

[Guest guest]

> Usana looks good but it is still MLM which is NOT. Why is it all these

> MLM 's are from SLC Utah??

>

Direct marketing has been proven to be a viable way to promote a

product, so many of the best products out there are sold this way

rather than in stores. But many of these products can be retailed as

well.

 

An issue for some people is the company's marketing plan, which means

very little to the beneficiary of the product. In other words, who is

in a position to criticise the company's business model? Products

don't necessarily cost more by MLM; Immunocal fetches double US

retail in countries with retail but no MLM, and you can get it for

60% of retail here, or even lower.

 

And Body Balance can be purchased for substantial savings if a person

puts larger orders in.

 

Regards,