Aids a intended political conspiracy that became dogma

[Guest guest]

-

 

dsmckown

kwabena

Cc: HEALSD ; HEALSD

Re: [HEALSD] Message through HEALSD website

response from:Dear Rick,There are so many reasons to question the myth of "HIV causes AIDS." And, in my opinion, based on the medical definition of AIDS, there could never be a cure.Sure, there may be/have been a Virus Program and you may believe what Horowitz declares in his book without question, but you also must be aware that there isn't a whole lot of substantiation for what Horowitz claims. Horowitz's claims are alarmist and he doesn't examine the while picture when it comes to illness and microbes.Basically, if viruses actually were the cause of illness and death, we would all be dead today. This is not to say that viruses don't play a part in disease, but they are not the actual cause, but simply an effect of the disease process. The disease comes first then come the viruses, germs, etc.As far as HIV is concerned, a virus that has been claimed to be 100% fatal, that is highly unlikely.First of all, HIV fails a very tried and tested method for proving a virus is contagious. That method is Koch's postulates.Secondly, if the so-called HIV tests (Western Blot, ELISA, and viral load) are supposed to prove infection, why then are they reacting to antibodies. Antibodies, mind you, are a normal human body response. If this is supposed to be the most ingenious virus in history, then we should be able to test for it directly. All of the known tests for "HIV" are indirect tests, and, according to infectious disease expert and epodemiologist Dr. Roberto Giraldo (he has worked in labs of HIV testing facilities in NYC) all blood that is tested for HIV tests positive until it is diluted 400 times or so with chemical dilutants and stimulants, ALL blood.Also, the antibodies that react on those tests will react to proteins that exist in every person. Dr. Giraldo has also stated this.If this doesn't raise an eyebrow, then nothing I say will matter to you.In addition to this undisclosed fact, there are over 64 medical conditions that have been documented in the scientific literature that are known to cause false positives. Realizing this, why then are we allowing a positive result translate to a death sentence and making life or death decisions based on it?It seems to me that blaming illnesses such as AIDS on a single virus is not only ridiculous, but also murder. This HIV/AIDS spell must end if we are to ever get over AIDS.One more thing, the akronym AIDS - Acquired Immune Deficency Sydrome - is interesting if you look at it. It was a sydrome in the early days. Most scholars will tell you that a syndrome is not a disease and vice-versa. So why then have we opted for the disease? Answer: to take the blame off of the patients, their drug-using, abusive lifestyles, and make it into an industry. It created a whole new field of science, albeit psueodo (false) science.This is not to say that this was a intended conspiracy; it was a political decision that became dogma.Hope you get something out of my posits.I would invite you to a HEAL meeting. Would love to discuess with you in person.Respectfully,Dennis McKownSan Diego