Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

World's marine life is getting sicker

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

-

" Misty " <misty3

" Health and Healing " <health_and_healing

World's marine life is getting sicker

 

World's marine life is getting sicker

http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp? id=ns99994897

 

16:55 19 April 04

 

NewScientist. com news service

 

For years, apparent increases in illness among marine creatures, from whales

to coral, have left marine scientists with the uneasy suspicion that the

seas are increasingly plagued by disease. Now, US researchers have uncovered

the first good evidence that they are right.

 

In 1998, a dozen of the world's top experts on diseases of marine animals

warned that sea creatures seemed to be getting sick more often, with more

diseases.

 

New viruses had appeared in whales and seals, while corals were dying of

fungal and algal infections. Pilchards succumbed to viruses and an

aggressive parasite expanded its range to attack commercial oysters,

scallops and clams. In the Caribbean, some unknown bacteria wiped out what

had been the dominant sea urchin.

 

But there was no way to tell if the apparent increase was simply due to more

scientists paying more attention to marine disease. There was no baseline,

as no one had ever measured disease incidence in any of these species

decades ago.

 

Now, Jessica Ward, at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, has shed

important new light on the problem by looking at how the number of reports

of marine diseases in nine different groups of marine creatures has changed

in the scientific literature since 1970.

 

" We wanted to find out if something was actually happening, " Ward told New

Scientist. " For most groups of organisms, we found that yes, there is

something going on out there. Now we hope more people will try and figure

out where it is coming from. "

 

True incidence

 

Ward, with Kevin Lafferty, of the University of California in Santa Barbara,

first tested whether changing numbers of scientific reports of rabies in US

raccoons matched the true incidence of the disease, which is known

independently. They matched, suggesting more scientific reports really do

mean more disease.

 

The pair further tested the relationship by removing the most prolific

laboratory from the publications they collected for each group of marine

creatures - just in case increased reporting reflected only one scientist's

funding success. This did not change any apparent disease trends. Neither

did taking out multiple papers on one well-reported disease event, such as

the Caribbean urchin die-off.

 

So using scientific reports as a measure, Ward and Lafferty found that

disease has increased in turtles, corals, marine mammals, urchins, and

molluscs such as oysters.

 

Illness seems to have remained steady in the shark and shrimp families, and

in seagrasses. Surprisingly, disease reports have diminished for fish.

 

Easy prey

 

There are numerous possible reasons for rising disease. One, Ward suggests,

is increasing sea surface temperatures due to global warming. This can cause

corals to bleach, making them easier prey for infections.

 

Warming has also led to the northward spread of the oyster parasite

Perkinsus. And warming is thought to accelerate the growth of tumours in

turtles caused by a herpes virus.

 

Another possible factor is that human over-fishing has destabilised marine

ecosystems. For example, when the urchins in the Caribbean died, corals were

overwhelmed by the algae the urchins used to eat. " Normally fish would have

eaten the algae instead, but they weren't there, " says Ward.

 

Other suggested causes include:

 

.. new pathogens from domestic animals, such as dog distemper virus and the

parasite Toxoplasma

 

.. bioaccumulation of toxins weakening marine mammals' immunity

 

.. new species carried across oceans in ships' ballast tanks introducing new

diseases

 

In the face of all this, the apparent health of fish is intriguing. Ward

says this could be because the fish are simply fewer in number. Many

pathogens die out among animals that are not packed densely enough to pass

the infection on. But it is also possible, she says, that the frequency of

disease is just as bad or worse - but fewer fish mean fewer observations,

and fewer reports.

 

Journal reference: PLoS Biology (vol 2, p 542)

 

Subscribe to New Scientist for more news and features

 

Related Stories

 

Sewage nutrients fuel coral disease

11 January 2004

 

Coral bleaching caused by " malaria of the oceans "

11 April 2003

 

Fatal seal epidemic burns out

2 October 2002

 

For more related stories search the print edition Archive

 

Weblinks

 

Ward and Lafferty paper

 

Harvell et al paper

 

Ecology and evolutionary biology, Cornell University

 

Kevin Lafferty, of the University of California in Santa Barbara

 

«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤

»

 

§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §

Subscribe:.........

-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...