Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Deadly Needle Waiting for Every Newborn

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Deadly Needle Waiting for Every Newborn by: Mark Sircus Ac., OMD

Medical News — November 13, 2003 The medical news that is released by organizations like the BBC and the New York Times is not reliable information but “spin†well designed to confuse, misinform and preach the party line of medical authorities. On the 23rd of August in 2001 the BBC reported that there is a safe and effective vaccine for hepatitis B. On the 28th of October in 2003 it reported that “A group of patients (in England) are planning legal action claiming they suffered side effects after being vaccinated against Hepatitis B. Around 50 patients are now planning legal action, claiming they became ill after being vaccinated.†Is this vaccine safe or is it dangerous and to be avoided at all cost? You will not find the answer to this in the public media. When it comes to vaccines all that you will get from the authorities and the above news organizations are lines about safety, necessity and the public good. You will not hear anyone saying that this vaccine is killing people. You will not hear news that some of the top people in the science and medical field are against this vaccine in particular. People like Dr. Jane Orient Director of the Association of Physicians and Surgeons who stated in public testimony before the US congress that “An intelligent and conscientious physician might well recommend AGAINST hepatitis B vaccine, especially in newborns, unless a baby is at unusual risk because of an infected mother or household contact or membership in a population in which disease is common.†The Center for Disease Control in Atlanta files contain 32,731 total reports of possible reactions following Hepatitis B shots since 1991, including 10,915 emergency room visits, 685 life-threatening reactions, 3,700 hospitalizations, 1,200 disabilities and 618 deaths. The vaccine of hepatitis B seems to be much more dangerous than the traditional vaccine because it inoculates into the body cells that are foreign to its genetic code. In the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 alone in the 0 to 1 age group, with 47 deaths reported. It’s a common rule of thumb in the FDA to assume that only 1 to ten percent of adverse vaccine reactions are reported so these numbers above represent vast understatements. Dr. Orient said, “When CDC medical officials say, getting the disease is far more likely to cause serious illness than getting the vaccine, they are deliberately playing on the medical ignorance of the layperson. This may be literally true, but it is seriously misleading if the risk of getting the disease is nearly zero (as is true for most American newborns).†Bonnie Dunbar, PhD, professor of Cell Biology at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston had two individuals working her laboratory who were required to take the Hepatitis B vaccine. Both of those individuals developed severe and apparently permanent adverse reactions as a result of the vaccine. Both of them were completely healthy and very athletic before this vaccine and have now suffered severe, debilitating autoimmune side effects from the vaccine. When she first called the FDA about this she was told by an individual that "this vaccine is a problem and it is a big one." When her own brother’s life was also literally destroyed after taking the vaccine Dr. Dunbar testified before congress “What was obvious from the information I obtained from the VAERS reports (on Hepatitis B vaccine) were that there are thousands of reports listing such conditions as neurological damage, arthritis symptoms, and other serious immunological disorders.†Can the BBC be held liable for promoting the illusion that this vaccine is safe? When the truth comes to light about the Hepatitis B vaccine public confidence of vaccination programs will be shattered as well as trust in international news services which have created a false sense of security and trust in its safety. Why are public health organizations covering up the danger of this vaccine and how can doctors and nurses be administering this “most dangerous†vaccine to newborn babies when there is absolutely no medical reason to do so? These are questions for future historians and legal people to ask and answer but for the pregnant mother these are urgent questions that must be answered before the birth of her child for a potentially deadly needle is waiting on the first day of that child’s life. Posted by

Erin MSecretary to the International Medical Veritas Associationhttp://www.iatrogeny.com/mv/

Erin MBksfld, Ca

Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway - Enter today

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...