Requiem For America On Line

[Guest guest]

--

 

Requiem For America On Line.

By Jim Kirwan kirwanstudios

4-4-4

 

Long before the Internet there was an America. Shortly after the

Internet

began, as a global medium for knowledge and information, as well as

communication, America On Line was born. Very soon it became a household

word that became simply AOL. It was one of many ISP's and very soon it

became one of the largest, and most profitable in a large field of

service

oriented on-line institutions.

 

Then came the hijacking of the nation by the cabal of Cheney-Bush.

Shortly

after that the disaster of 9-11 began to take us all into a completely

other

dimension. In this New World Order, security became not just the most

important thing, but also the only thing that seemingly anyone cared

about.

Fear had once again triumphed over freedom and civil rights. That

ushered in

TIA or Total Information Awareness, with its director being a convicted

felon, the former Admiral John Poindexter. His idiocies were finally

exposed

and the programs supposedly were killed, but they never died. They just

changed their name and are now not only healthy, but the FBI has just

instituted all of Poindexter's wildest dreams on all this nation's

ISP's:

" Carnivore " is alive and well and inside whatever you send or receive.

 

AOL, despite all their success and their entire marketing, advertising,

and

increasing r base, has decided to become an unofficial arm of

HOMELAND security and the Justice department. To that end they have

instituted new software that reads all messages that pass through their

ISP,

and they have begun deciding who will be allowed to read what. Hence

America-On-Line has now become ASHCROFT-on-line.

 

AOL currently hides behind " new software " which is their excuse for

every

intrusion into the thoughts and transmissions between private

individuals.

Whenever anyone complains about these detected intrusions into private

communications between any number of people ­ a computer message handles

all

the dirty-little-details ­ and cannot be confronted about what is really

going on. So all attempts to discuss the reasons for any blocked

messages

have no quarter to appeal to.

 

AOL is in effect hijacking what you can say, or what those who are

rs, are " allowed to read. " There does not seem to be a law

against

this foul practice, but there damn well ought to be. The speed and ease

of

communication, without censorship, by the government was part of the

original appeal behind the Internet, and was one of the reasons that

this

medium has become so popular among so many world-wide.

 

So when you see AOL in that address on your computer, just beware that

whatever or whoever you are sending to, or receiving from, is being

closely

monitored by several agencies of the government. There are those who are

not

bothered by this 'added safeguard.' But for the rest of us, please

remember

that AOL now stands for ASHCROFT on-line.

 

AOL is also deceptive in their privacy rules, hiding the names of those

who

own it and direct it: Once the public learns about their current real

purposes, they may not have a company to worry about much longer. There

will

be an America long after AOL has spent their unearned reputation, and

gone

the way of all despicable and opportunistic endeavors: and that is as it

should be. Because if AOL cannot make it by being straight with its

customer

base, then they should fail, after-all isn't that the

" American-way-of-Business " ?

 

These are very difficult times in which we live. Everyone needs to be

able

to depend on what they are able to learn, about all the various

explosive

situations that are unfolding on both the national and international

stages

of our lives. Of course there's a lot of disinformation out there on all

sides. But no one needs to have yet another false-flag institution in

the

middle of these debates. And no one has asked for commercial censorship,

except John " J. Edgar " Ashcroft. If Ashcroft-on-line wants to continue

as

the US Department of Justice's ISP, then they should say so, proudly!

Otherwise they deserve to lose the support of all those who disagree

with

their current policies.

 

Think about this. What's next from AOL? Will they now begin to edit the

messages sent, of course to better protect their rs, from the

big-bad wolf of world affairs? It's not impossible: after all they are

already the uninvited censors in all that their rs now say or

send ­ so why not just help them out a bit more, by adding or

subtracting

just a word or two?

 

The decision is yours to make. Will you continue to use AOL, or receive

e-mail from AOL addresses? This is not about preference it's about

survival.

This is not a matter of commercial choice ­ it's about your rights to

expected privacy, and the privacy that you are paying to receive!

Perhaps

whether or not there will continue to be an America, may also depend on

the

outting of institutions, such as Ashcroft On Line. This is our country,

and

we ought to be able to have some say about what goes on inside it!

 

 

---

 

 

Lloyd Miller, Research Director, Moderator

http://a-albionic.com/prjframe.html