Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 The Ballad Of Cheap Vitamins And Motor Oil By Alan Graham (with Alfred Lehmberg) Every time I ask someone if they eat a healthy diet and take a good multivitamin/mineral, they invariably say, " yes. " They go on to explain how they first follow the " New Food Pyramid " (consuming lots of bread, pasta, cereal, fruit juice & milk)... ...and then they tell me they take a " Centrum " multi to, you know, insure they are covered from " A " to " Zinc. " They smile at the witticism... I'll cut right to the chase. The preceding is a recipe for unhealthful disaster. Why? Because the " food pyramid, " is a corporate-driven lie (read LTR# 12, 13 & 15 at http://www.alienview.net/ALLTCON.html ). It is an egregious lie benefiting the few at the cruel expense of the many! Sincerely, all multi-vit/min (like " Theragram " , " One-a-Day " , and even " Flintstone " ) from grocery stores and the like are, pretty much, an unhealthful waste of money for the following two reasons: FIRST - these very cheaply manufactured tablets often pass through the system without even being completely dissolved! This is because these pills are semi-indigestible little pebbles hard pressed at high temperature and pressure . They are shellacked pellets with a pharmaceutical glaze coating and they are armored and bound with synthetic chemicals like dicalcium phosphate and magnesium sterate. SECOND - virtually every ingredient is the absolute cheapest and LEAST ABSORBABLE synthetic form of the many forms available! In most cases, this not only makes them more difficult to assimilate, but can have adverse reactions like diarrhea... as opposed to the non-adverse effects of organically chelated minerals and " food based " Vitamins & binders. This is the tip of the iceberg hazarding you and those you love, reader! The stuff gleefully sold to you to enhance your health can actually degrade it! Part of the reason for using these synthetic binders and inferior forms of minerals that are inorganic salts (as opposed to superior organic chelated minerals?), other than being cheap (...forgetting that's the main reason...), is to be able to get all that " crap " into one convenient pill that's not too big. Synthetic binders and inorganic salts take up less space, you see? The per unit costs are reduced so a greater corporate profit is realized. It's too bad that it degrades the product to the point of possible health hazardousness and uselessness. That is unfortunate, indeed. In contrast -- some of the better, more expensive supplements, using food based binders and organic chelated minerals, usually have to use a bigger tablet or capsule... or separate the daily dose into 2, 3 or 4 tablets (or capsules). One of my favorite Multis, in fact, recommends 6 capsules daily! Of course it has about anything you could ever want with regard to health enhancement, from Digestive Enzymes to Myco-Defense Mushrooms and more. Fine wine compared with pond water, reader. I don't remotely overstate this! Also, the better tablets or caplets are pressed under, more expensive, 'cooler' temperatures. This is forgetting, of course, that the chemical form of the vitamins or minerals incorporated are likely the best and most ABSORBABLE non-synthetic forms available! See the difference reader? Here's yet another applicable Dr. Zorba Pasture anecdote...: " Tom " , Dr. Pasture's radio side-kick, read an email to Zorba on his NPR radio show regarding a person who was taking a fairly expensive Multivitamin/Mineral requiring the consumption of 3 tablets daily... Incomprehensibly ignorant once again in his animated, bemused, and incredulous radio-voice, Zorby loudly exclaimed " THAT'S TOO MANY " ! You could tell by his reaction that he thought the writer was taking 3 times a " normal " dose. So " Side-Kick-Tom " (whom I suspect has about 10 I.Q. points on Dr. Z ) said " Zorba, I think that means the SINGLE daily dose is divided into 3 pills. " to which Zorba said " Ohh ?... Well it's still too many - you only need one Vitamin pill daily. " He moved on. I was just incredulous! What a bone-headed thing to say, eh reader? Absolutely. An expression of pompous ignorance at best! At worst? OK...Why would a brilliant doctor with a world wide listening audience think it so strange & unnecessary to divide a dose of something into 3 smaller doses throughout the day...Gee, don't they do that with pharmaceuticals all the time? I suspect that most people who know NOTHING about nutritional supplementation could easily visualize how dividing nutrients into 3 separate doses would be a good thing... and best practice... thereby having a relatively constant " Trickle-charge " of supplements throughout the day! After all, don't we all try to eat three meals a day for that very reason? AND...because most supplements work in synergy with food, doesn't it make sense to take these supps. 3 times daily with meals... ...Am I missing something? Additionally, it is a well established fact in the holistic health community that one can only absorb about 500mg of Calcium at any one time! So if you take a 1000mg to1500mg dose of Cal. all at once (like Dr. Z recommends)... aren't you wasting a bunch of it! Folks, Dr. Pasture does not have the training to understand & appreciate just how complicated it can be to fully utilize any mineral, especially Calcium, and just how many Vitamins, Minerals & co-factors have to fall in place, domino-like, to accomplish this. It can be a difficult, slow, and inefficient process that handles only " so much " at a time. This is because Minerals, themselves, are INORGANIC so Mother Nature must use a couple of time-consuming tricks to get them into a configuration that can then be incorporated into " The Bio-System " . Me? I feel I understand this science. I take 500mg of Elemental, Amino Acid Chelated Calcium, 3 times daily. Back to Dr. Z who has the temerity to ignorantly mock those people who " foolishly " buy expensive Multi Vit/Min. He says that folks should buy the cheapest, discount store, generic, giant-size bottle for about $12.00 a YEAR ... as long as it has the USP (United States Pharmacopeia) Seal ... This is a 'seal' essentially meaning that the product contains what's on the label & that it meets the MINIMUM standards to call itself a multi-vitamin. The reader might remember the character of corporate lap-dogs setting those standards. The USP is supposedly " non-governmental " but their test criteria is recognized by the Government as the official source. Here's what the CSPI has to say: " Center for Science in the Public Interest " -- For Immediate Release: October 4, 2002; New Supplement Certification Program May Mislead Consumers :USP Mark Does Not Mean Ingredient Is Safe Or Effective. " What!?! Yes folks, it's true! Virtually ALL supplemental *watch-dog* organizations like the USP only verify " Potency & Purity " ...and may check to see if it meets the standards for dissolving (those standards are pretty low)... BUT! They don't care or comment about the efficacy of a particular ingredient. For example, one Multi may have Magnesium Oxide (which is Crap, reader!) while another uses Magnesium Citrate ( which is a superior form)... but both will get the same passing grade as long as they meet " Potency & Purity " ! So, if you have a Multi Vit/Min where EVERY ingredient is the cheapest, least absorbable form, what you have is a " Crapola-Multi " with a USP Seal...in other words, you have Centrum, Theragram, One a Day, Flintstones, etc, etc... " Flintstones " , reader! Flintstones! They're our children for god's sake! It is difficult to imagine a Multi that is inferior to the already inferior multi's like Centrum, etc... but if you CAN find a really, really cheap, discount, generic multi with 365 hard pressed tablets for $11.99 at Sam's Club or whatever, with a USP seal, then that's the one you want... ...according to the good doctor " Z. " So, Let me get this straight... Zorba wants you to put " Stuff " in your body that barely meets the minimum standards to call itself a Multi, OKed by the Government. Hummm... But how does he feel about his car? WELL...a couple of the government's " non-governmental " agencies put their seal on very cheap motor oil that meets the minimum standards to call itself Motor Oil ... here's what http://www.metrokc.gov/procure/green/oil.htm has to say: " Several oil companies now market products that have been certified by the American Petroleum Institute (API). API Certification is the basis for warranty requirements of motor vehicle manufacturers and thus is used in specifications of motor oil buyers. Other technologies, such as simple filtration, have also been used to recycle used motor oil. These technologies are often sufficient to make used oil useful as a substitute for virgin oil in fuel applications. " The SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) stamp of approval is on even very cheap " No-name " motor oils that meet the requirements for military vehicles... ....So, here's my question to Zorba -- does he put that cheap, " cleaned-up " used motor oil or cheap " No-name " new oil in his new " BMW " ? Seeing as how it meets the minimum standards, set by the Government to call itself motor oil... he should, considering his faith in government " Seals " ...but somehow I doubt it... Zorba would have more respect for his " Beamer " ...just not much respect for your body & human physiology. This is pure speculation because I have no idea what kind of car he has, but if he has a nice new one, I bet he doesn't put cheap generic oil in it. In fact, ask 1000 MDs who own new 700 Series Mercedes if they use " cleaned & filtered " used motor oil, considering virtually all car manufactories say that it meets their warranty requirements! I bet 99.9% will say " HECK NO ! I use 100% Virgin, High Grade, High Detergent, Multi Viscosity oil that comes from a single individual batch of Pure, Pennsylvania crude drawn from the veins of Amish school girls. " OK, I see...Well, Doctor... what kind of Vitamins do you take and recommend? " Oh, it doesn't matter much... use any brand with the USP Seal " ? So...putting a cheap, harsh, inferior, synthetic, poorly absorbed (and in my opinion, unhealthful), possibly toxic supplement in your body is OK because of some Mickey Mouse " Seal " that doesn't really tell you what you need to know and misleads you on the rest... ...but cheap motor oil with an official seal is not OK... does the reader see the dichotomy or smell the inconsistency... ...feel the disjunct? These self-same MDs would be the first to tell you the human body is a high performance biological machine, reader... you want to run rapidly " gunkable " , bargain basement *oil* in the only bio-machine you will ever have? I suspect not, on reflection. And this is the real kicker of irony! That cheaper, recycled motor oil will do a MUCH more efficacious job in your car than those " Crap " Vitamins will ever do in your body! By the way...don't tell " Dr. 700 Series " , but MERCEDES has been putting RECYCLED OIL in THEIR NEW CARS for YEARS !!! Wait a minute Mr. Graham! Do YOU use that cheap recycled oil in your car? ...Huh, Who Me? ...No freaking Way! Just kidding Folks...that was the old Al,...because I'm a " Green " sort of guy, I am going to start using recycled oil - not because of some government-blessed organization's " Seal " but because a bunch of Teutonic Engineers at Mercedes-Benz are probably on to something. (...und you vill like it !!) You see...now all you have to do is get Dr. Mercola www.mercola.com & the Leaf lady www.leaflady.org to start taking grocery store vitamins and explain how they are superior ...then I will start taking Centrum...just like the recycled oil. OK, take a deep breath and hold it... The following describes three key things to look for when determining the efficacy of your multivitamin: Vitamin " E " -- the most obvious indicator of an inferior multivit... is the use of the petrochemical synthetic form of Vitamin " E " -- " DL " alpha tocopherol (the " d " and " l " should actually be lower case... I cap them for ease of reading), as opposed to the natural forms " D " alpha (no " L " ) and/or, even better, Natural Mixed tocopherol ...( This superior Mixed form has beta, gamma, and delta along with the alpha). In the synthetic " DL " form, (the synthetic is always a double molecule) the " L " molecule is a mirror image of the usable " D " molecule, making the " L " unusable by humans. Unfortunately the " L " still fits nicely into the Vitamin " E " receptor site, much like many keys will fit in a certain style of key-hole but only one key will turn the lock. Consequently the " L " molecule is " plugging the keyhole " , so to speak, and not allowing the usable " D " in to turn same! Think chewing gum in the keyhole. This means that out of the 400 IU of " DL " Vit. " E " that you paid for, only about 150 IU, or less, are actually being used by you. It gets worse. According to the Canadian Government (you could perhaps argue the red-herring that Canada has an axe to grind because they grow lots of soy beans for natural Vit. " E " but don't even bother): Even though the usable synthetic " D " molecule and the natural " D " molecule, in theory - on paper, are identical... ...Canadian science claims that the human body still tells the difference... and whereas synthetic " D " is used but one time, the natural " D " is used over and over again... ....several times! Magic! This inexplicable recycling of one " D " molecule, but not the other, results in two to three times the vitamin " E " found in most tissue (...biopsy of the brain revealing the highest!). Hmmm... Mother Nature on the job, I'm betting! Mineral Forms -- The other sure sign of product inferiority is the form of minerals used. These are the cheap inorganic salts like carbonate, oxide, and phosphate. These inorganic mineral forms are difficult to absorb and they are much more likely to cause problems -- a good example of this is magnesium oxide causing diarrhea. The inorganic calcium form Carbonate, found in Centrum (et sig al) is very difficult to absorb because the carbonate (...also in Tums, btw!) neutralizes the very stomach acid that is required for good absorption. So when a doctor tells you Tums is a " good source of calcium " , they're either lying or they are a bonehead (like Zorba, who says it all the time). Always look for organic chelation, in the preferred form " Amino Acid Chelation " (like the Albion Process), or " citrate " ( especially for calcium ) or malate, lactate, etc. Also, " Krebs Cycle Chelation " is very, very good. Vitamin " D " -- If the Vit. D is D-2, it's no good - this is the cheap crap found in milk. Always make sure it is the more active form D-3 found in Cod Liver Oil, Eggs & the better supplements. The preceding three examples should be sufficient indicators as to the quality of a multivitamin: SO... If the label says " DL " alpha tocopherol, calcium carbonate, magnesium oxide & Vit. D-2 ... put it back! Quick and dirty! But, if it says " D " alpha, or Mixed tocopherol, calcium citrate (etc), magnesium amino acid chelation (etc) & Vit. D-3 -- BUY IT... ....because this means the rest of the ingredients are almost sure to be OK. You don't have to peruse the whole tedious laundry list...but if you're like me, you will do so anyway. Label reading should be a required course in high school. In descending order: I prefer supplements that are liquid, scoop-able powder, capsules, and then food based tablets or caplets. Sublingual (under the tongue) tablets or sprays are actually the best absorbed ( by going directly into the bloodstream ) and in some cases necessary, if easily destroyed by stomach acid... like SOD & Glutathion or like B12, which needs an " Intrinsic Factor " in the gut to be absorbed (often missing); however, some supplements don't work very well this sublingual way. Fortunately, Methylcobalamin " B-12 " and B-12 Complexes with folic acid & B-6 do work well sublingually. Also, don't automatically poo-poo tablets in favor of capsules -- some things have to be in a specially coated tablet to make it through the stomach acid in order to open in the gut...SAMe & SOD are examples. There is a capsule that is designed to make it through the stomach acid and open in the gut...New Life Colostrum is the only example I'm aware of, although I'm sure there are others. *Medical doctors* like Zorba don't really understand nutrition & supplements... ...and they don't want to understand because it is in their financial interest to play dumb... thus surreptitiously perpetuating the same old tired lies. Such is their cognitive dissonance. Here are just a few of those lies: a)...Synthetic Vitamins are just as good as natural Vitamins. No! No way...the most cursory research will show this is just not true. However, doctors want people to get used to the idea that " Synthetic is good " (or even better) so they can push Synthetic alternatives to natural forms... Synthroid (synthetic thyroid hormone) is a good example. Do you want to know the big reason they give for why synthetic drugs are *better*? It is because they can get the dosage very precise as opposed to natural forms sometimes have slight variations... OK...so freaking what! I would rather take something that works & works naturally, even if the dosages have a little greater margin of error, instead of a harsh, toxic, or inefficient form that does not work or might have harmful side effects. A good example is natural Armour Desiccated Thyroid Hormones as opposed to the synthetic Synthroid mentioned above. b)...You can get all the necessary nutrients in a balanced diet... No! Please! What a festering crock, reader... Most people are EFA (Essential Fatty Acids) deficient -- even the sheeple who follow the New Food Pyramid (NFP) are Omega 3 deficient! This is because we consume WAY too much Omega 6 food oils like corn, soy, canola, sunflower, etc. (all recommended by the NEW Food Pyramid, remember). These Omega 6 oils overpower & shut down the Omega 3 Pathway. We further block EFA's by consuming lots of NFP encouraged bread, cereal, pasta, juices & " Cheezy Poofs " These inhibit the production of the D6D Enzyme needed for conversion of the simple Omega 3 (ALA), to the more complex " work-horse " Omega 3's: EPA & DHA! Also, many of the 70 plus trace minerals have been leached from our soil as a result of uninformed farming... artificial fertilizers only replace 3 of the elements! Anytime different groups are given trace minerals, in particular really powerful, critical ones like Selenium -- heart disease & cancer decrease! In fact the preceding was done with a whole country... New Zealand. The selenium depleted soil was causing several diseases, like cancer! It was corrected by importing selenium rich meat from Australia. c)... You can meet your Calcium requirements with 4 servings of dairy. No! How do these people use a mirror at all! Christ retches! OK, lets say you need 1200mg of Cal. and 4 dairy servings has 1200mg of Cal. - So there you have it, you've met the goal...not so fast, my Friend! Do you really think you are utilizing ALL 1200mg of that Calcium? No way, boys and girls! The Calcium/Magnesium ratio needs to be at least a " 2 to 1 " , and " 1 to 1 " would be even better... so Milk, at a " 10 to 1 " ratio, has a real problem. Also, Vitamin D-3 is needed to absorb Cal. but dairy uses Vit. D-2... ...which is not very effective for good absorption. Additionally, the doctors & the dairy people never mention that many other minerals, etc. are required to utilize Calcium, things like potassium, silicon & sodium ...also TRACE minerals like boron, zinc & copper along with 2 or 3 dozen other trace elements as co-factors. Remember the dominos I alluded to before! So, when the women of the WHI study were given a garbage calcium supp. (Cal. Carbonate, Zorba's favorite form!) and the inferior form of Vitamin D ( D-2 ), the Doctors & Dairy Industry were able to shout it from the roof-tops that Calcium supps don't work! Outrageous duplicity, reader! They KNOW the difference! What else can you call that... ...but evil! Something else they were reluctant to discuss with the consumer? They didn't mention that many of those women consumed dairy every day... and were still developing Osteoporosis! ...Got milk? My 80 year old mother consumed large amounts of Milk, yogurt & cottage cheese her whole life to avoid the osteoporosis that plagued her mother...you guessed it...she is bent over double with osteoporosis, regardless! You will be lucky if you utilize 30% of the Calcium found in milk, but if you follow the recommendations of your doctor & the New Food Pyramid? Then you will absorb even LESS. This is science remember! Consider folks, Doctors are not trained in nutrition & supplementation. In medical school those courses (if offered at all) are ELECTIVES. But the real tragedy is that the people who do get training, the mainstream Dieticians? They just repeat the same old tired lies they are taught in " Dietician College " that make you sick & keep you sick. These are Schools receiving big grants from pharmaceutical & processed food industries, remember. Here are two simple questions that you can ask your local hospital Dieticians that will illustrate the depth of their ignorance (or, I suspect an evil mendaciousness): QUESTION # 1... Is Extra-Virgin, 'NON'-hydrogenated coconut oil healthful? They will say NO! ...Coconut oil is heart unhealthful because it is saturated fat...! OK, this person is either ignorant or evil. If they plead ignorance, it requires purposely buying into the lie... covering their eyes & ears to the cacophony of data everywhere! This data shows that non-hydrogenated CCnut Oil is a magical, heart-healthy, and unique Fatty Acid (FA)! That's why it is in every BABY FORMULA on the shelf at " WalleyWorld " ! Go look! The justification for the CCnut Oil lies taught in Dietician College are based on a 4 decade old study where the evil partially Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil (pHVO) corporations took Extra Virgin, unrefined, CCnut Oil and then HYDROGENATED it, turned it into a poison...why? ...So they could then conduct tests that showed it was heart unhealthy. SO... for dieticians, after all this time, to continue to repeat that tired old canard requires covering your ears & dropping to your knees before Satan, dammit! Precious little hyperbole there, reader. I dare you to go to Google and punch-in *non-hydrogenated coconut oil* -- then scan the topics and see how far you have to scroll into the 20,000 hits before you find one that backs the Dietician's bogus claim...I scrolled for about 15 minutes and still had not found one. HOWEVER, there was a continuous stream of articles, from independent researchers around the world, explaining the efficacy of the magical MCT's (Medium Chain Triglycerides) found most heavily in CCnut Oil. Punch-in *hydrogenated coconut oil*! Start scanning the 300,000 hits and see how long it takes you to find JUST ONE that has anything negative to say about unrefined, Extra-Virgin, NON-hydrogenated CCnut Oil...BUT page after page reflects how corporate man takes a wonderful gift of nature, unrefined coconut oil, and turns it into an abomination through hydrogenation. This was an evil trick to destroy the Unrefined, CCnut Oil market so a few rich people could get, just a little, richer by selling you toxic pHVO (partially Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil) and YES...toxic Hydrogenated Coconut Oil. QUESTION # 2... Is refined, grocery store canola oil healthful? They will say YES! Canola oil is heart healthy because it is a Mono Unsat oil, just like Olive oil! Also, it has healthful Omega 3 & is Very low in SatFat... OK, do I need to say it? NO! Oh Yea, Dr. " Z " says that " canola...just like olive oil... " crapola, all the time... There are a plethora of reasons why canola oil is crap and should not be uttered in the same breath with Olive Oil... but just let me give you 2 or 3. Lets look at that " just like olive oil " by comparing two Grocery Store examples, neither of which require refrigeration after opening (a key point). a)... Olive Oil -- It is 76% Mono oil...mono is stable so does not readily turn rancid & toxic (R & T). It is 8% Poly oil...poly is unstable so it will readily turn R & T. However, most or all of this small, negligible 8%, does not readily oxidize for two reasons : the olive, being a soft fruit, will let you extract its oil without much pressure & heat. Also, the large 76% mono with its compliment of antioxidants can usually protect the small 8% poly from oxidation. Consequently, Olive Oil does not require additional processing, like the RBDing discussed below under Canola Oil. b)... Canola Oil -- It is only 56% Mono oil...Yea but, isn't 56% pretty high ? Well I guess so, but the problem is " what's left over " ? Because of this lower 56% Mono, " what's left over " is a big chunk of poly at 37%, which is NOT a negligible amount (like the measly 8% in Olive oil), and considering it has to be pressed from a seed (the Rape Seed), it gets hotter...so that 37% poly has to be RBDed (Refined, Bleached & Deodorized) which means that it is already partially toxic & rancid when you bring it home from the grocery store... ...but you can't smell the rancidity because of the Deodorizing Process that destroys the rancid smell with very high heat, also pretty much destroys any nutritional value that the oil might have once had. Dieticians use 3 convenient little lies, or misdirection's, to be able to " honestly " say Canola oil is heart healthy : (a)...The canola oil they are always referencing is 'Unrefined' oil which is extracted much more carefully & expensively so the poly portion is not rancid, PLUS it must be refrigerated after opening. You never find this kind of oil in the typical grocery store! When is the last time you bought canola oil that had to be refrigerated? I Know...NEVER ! You see Folks, the evil, high ranking, mainstream dieticians know that people are not going to seek out unrefined canola and then pay 4 or 5 times as much, when they think regular, refined, grocery store canola is healthful, based upon what dieticians DON'T tell them. (b)... They are quick to tell you that canola has 7% heart-healthful, Omega 3 Poly-unsat Fatty Acid. That 7% poly is part of the 37% poly mentioned above, that had to be RBDed because it turned rancid during the refining process...in fact, because the 7% Omega 3 is even MORE complex (thus more unstable), than the remaining 30% Omega 6, LESS complex oil,... the Omega 3 oil is the first to go rancid. Again, the only canola with non-rancid Omega 3 is the expensive kind that you NEVER see in Winn Dixie. ©... They tell you Canola oil is wonderful because, of all the food oils, it has the least amount of Saturated Fat (SatFat) at only 7%. But, you see Folks, this is a BAD thing... natural, undamaged, plant derived SatFat, like the 16% SatFat in Olive Oil, is GOOD FOR YOU -- if you didn't give your body some undamaged SatFat, your body would make it on its own to fulfill a host of critical physiological chores... SO having LESS healthful SatFat (7% in canola) means you have MORE room left over for unhealthy Poly Oil (the 37%). (56% Mono) + (30% Poly, Om 6) + (7% Poly, Om 3) + (7% SatFat) = 100% Canola (76% Mono) + ( 8% Poly, OM 6) + (no rancid Om 3) + (16% SatFat) = 100% Olive Can you see the critical differences that makes one healthful & the other, decidedly NOT! Anecdote time: Dieticians tell so many lies that they can't keep the lies straight without errors! Here in our little LA (Lower Alabama) town of Ozark, a local talk show had two young female dieticians from the local hospital talking about weight loss & the low-carb diet. Initially, they explained that people on a low-carb diet could have substantial weight loss, while actually consuming many more calories, by eating caloric-dense foods like meat, cheese, eggs, butter & mayo... Then towards the end of the show when asked " what is the key to weight loss " ? ...They dredged up the " Dietitian School Mantra " that the " ONLY way to lose weight was to eat a balanced diet while consuming less calories & exercising more. " WAIT A MINUTE, Skippy! Didn't you just say you could eat a high caloric, high fat, low-carb diet and lose substantial weight? Please show this paper to your Family Doctor or Dietician -- then after they " spit & sputter " or otherwise hack up an institutional hair-ball and tell you I'm wrong? Write down their reasons as to why, will you? E-mail those reasons to me. I will promptly e-reply as to where and how they are lying to you... ...this time, too! Sincerely, I will debate these scurrilous persons any time... any where! Remember, as you compare our conflicting positions; however, who has the biggest pecuniary dog in the hunt, reader! Then watch as my dog handily shreds their dog and shows their dog for what it really is: A conflicted shill for sociopathic corporate interests greedily and gleefully campaigning to make us stupid. To make us sick... Why? So they can sell us their 21st Century snake oil. Until next time, reader? Well Be. Alan D. Graham (NEW) Email -- alan068 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.