Guest guest Posted August 22, 2003 Report Share Posted August 22, 2003 The Campaign Reporter <thereporter wrote: " The Campaign Reporter " The Campaign Reporter - August 2003 Fri, 22 Aug 2003 07:00:07 -0500 August 2003 Super Sale! Take Action Packets 50% off! thru August 31st In celebration of the introduction of the Genetically Engineered Food Right to Know Act in the U.S. House of Representatives, we are offering for a limited time only an incredible 50% off discount on our popular 32-page Take Action Packets. Order today! The Campaign Reporter Now Available in a 2-page printable PDF format Each month we will now be issuing The Campaign Reporter in three formats: 1) As a HTML e-mail that is sent out to people who sign up to receive The Campaign Reporter. 2) As an online HTML web page readable at: www.thecampaign.org/ reporter.php 3) As a 2-page Adobe Acrobat PDF that can be printed out and photocopied to share with friends at: www.thecampaign.org/ reporter.pdf We will often need to edit the PDF version to fill the 2-page format. So the e-mail and online versions are best for getting the most comprehensive coverage of the news. The new PDF format is ideal for retail stores to use to keep their customers informed on the latest news about genetically engineered foods and the efforts to get them labeled. The PDF version is in color, but can be printed out and photocopied in black and white to keep the cost down. Click here (or on the image above) to go to the PDF version. Now Available! An exceptional new book written by Jeffrey Smith is now available. Seeds of Deception is the best book ever written on the potential dangers to human health from eating genetically engineered foods. This 290-page book is just off the press and is one you will definately want in your library. Order today while supplies last and receive free shipping! [input] [input] $17.95 each price includes FREE shipping for a limited time Support Our Supporters! Click here to see more of our supporters or to become a supporter. Videos, Books, Buttons, Bumper Stickers, Take Action Packets & more are available at The Campaign's Online Store Become an " Active Member " of The Campaign and save 20 percent on your purchases! Archives of The Campaign Reporter Online July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 March 2003 January 2003 December 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 January/ February 2002 August 2001 June 2001 May 2001 March 2001 Click here to go to the web site home page of The Campaign Copyright 2003 The Campaign PO Box 55699 Seattle, WA 98155 425-771-4049 label www.thecampaign.org Featured articles this month It's time to send those letters to Congress! Six new bills on genetically engineered foods introduced to Congress ABC News poll: 92 percent of Americans want labeling USDA misses boat on industrial biocrops Sierra Club campaigning against genetically engineered trees Sign the Save Organic Wheat petition It's time to send those letters to Congress! With the introduction of new Congressional legislation to label genetically engineered foods, it’s time to get your pens handy and send letters to Congress! The Campaign to Label Genetically Engineered Foods is kicking off a new letter-writing campaign to convince Congress to pass this crucial consumer rights legislation, which was introduced late last month by Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio). We make it very easy for you to send letters -- in fact, we’ve already written them for you! Just visit our web site at www.thecampaign.org, and click on the “National” link. There, you’ll find all the details about HR 2916, The Genetically Engineered Food Right to Know Act, along with five other important new bills dealing with genetically engineered foods. You’ll also find pre-written letters to all 435 members of Congress, which you can print out, sign and stick in the mail. Even better, write your own personal letter to your Representative -- personally written mail has an even greater impact than form letters. We also ask you to encourage your family, friends and associates to send in letters. Congress members need to hear from us that almost all Americans want genetically engineered foods to be labeled (see story below). We also encourage you to make a financial contribution to The Campaign. Donations will help us build our grassroots movement and encourage more people to send in letters. You can make a donation by visiting our web site and clicking on the " Donate " link. The Campaign to Label Genetically Engineered Foods endorses all six bills, but our primary goal is to get the Genetically Engineered Food Right to Know Act, HR 2916, passed into law. This 108th Congress runs through October 2004 and we are entering into an election year. So the climate has never been better for us to get Congressional action on labeling genetically engineered foods. Letters are one of the most important tools in the activist’s arsenal. If you don’t think letters to Washington, D.C. are powerful, consider this: in 1997, the U.S. Department of Agriculture tried to revise the definition of “organic” to include genetically engineered foods, irradiated foods and foods grown with toxic sludge-laced fertilizers. The country was outraged, and several hundred thousand people sent letters to the USDA protesting the proposal. The USDA backed down, and removed the offending foods from the organic definition. Six new bills on genetically engineered foods introduced to Congress Press release from Congressman Kucinich's office, July 25th, 2003 Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich (D-OH), Co-Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, introduced six bills today that will provide a comprehensive regulatory framework for all genetically engineered plants, animals, bacteria, and other organisms. The six bills include the Genetically Engineered Food Right to Know Act of 2003, which requires food companies to label all foods that contain or are produced with genetically engineered materials and instructs the Food and Drug Administration to conduct periodic tests to ensure compliance. Also introduced today were the Genetically Engineered Food Safety Act of 2003, the Genetically Engineered Crop and Animal Framer Protection Act of 2003, the Genetically Engineered Organism Liability Act of 2003, the Real Solutions to World Hunger Act of 2003 and the Genetically Engineered Pharmaceutical and Industrial Crop Safety Act of 2003. " This is a basic consumer safety issue, " stated Kucinich. " People have a right to know what is in the food they are eating, and that the food is safe. That is the goal of these bills. It is well past time that Congress change current food safety and environmental laws because the laws were not written with this technology in mind. " Combined Kucinich's bills would ensure that consumers are protected, increase food safety, protect farmers rights, make biotech companies liable for their products, and help developing nations resolve hunger concerns. Learn more about the new legislation ABC News poll: 92 percent of Americans want labeling It’s about time for Washington to get the message: Americans, by a huge margin, want genetically engineered foods to be labeled. According to a July 2003 ABC News telephone poll of 1,024 adults, a whopping 92 percent of Americans support labeling. If genetically engineered foods were labeled, 55 percent of Americans say they would avoid such food, including 62 percent of women, according to ABC. Even without labeling today, one-third of Americans try to avoid buying genetically mutated foods. Fifty-one percent of Americans say they are attracted to foods saying they’re not genetically modified. They new survey confirms results from a similar ABC News poll of 1,024 Americans in 1991. That survey found that 93 percent of Americans wanted genetically engineered foods to be labeled, prompting the news organization to claim that “such near unanimity in public opinion is rare.” Many more polls over the years have supported the ABC News findings. In Nov. 2001, for example, Rutgers University Food Policy Institute found that 90 percent of Americans said genetically engineered foods should have special labels on them. USDA misses boat on industrial biocrops Biotech companies that engineer plants for industrial purposes (such as making paper or detergent) will have to obtain a permit, according to new rules adopted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) earlier this month. Before the USDA decision, companies were not required to seek government approval to grow industrial biocrops; they simply had to notify the government before planting them. The Campaign believes the new USDA rules are grossly inadequate. We believe the USDA should not permit biotech crops containing industrial chemicals to be grown in the open -- permit or no permit. Under current USDA rules, crops containing industrial chemicals and pharmaceutical drugs can be grown as close as one mile away from from food crops. The primary crop being used is corn. Since corn pollen has been shown to travel much further than one mile, it seems apparent that the USDA’s rules will inevitably lead to industrial chemicals and pharmaceutical drugs contaminating the food supply. The Biotechnology Industry Organization supports the new rules. The National Food Processors Association and the Grocery Manufacturers of America have expressed concerns that simply requiring a permit is not adequate to protect the food supply. A spokesman for the National Food Processors Association told reporters: “We have to have 100 percent assurance. We don’t think they’re there yet in terms of full oversight and controls and containment.” Frankly, The Campaign to Label Genetically Engineered Foods is a bit perplexed as to why the biotech industry wants to take advantage of the lack of oversight the USDA is showing on this matter. We predict that sooner or later cross-pollination from corn will cause industrial chemicals and pharmaceutical drugs to show up in food crops. At that point, the biotech industry is going to have a public relations nightmare on its hands. “Shooting themselves in the foot” is an adage that would seem to apply here. Sierra Club campaigning against genetically engineered trees As if genetic engineers haven’t wreaked enough environmental havoc with Roundup-Ready soybeans, pesticidal potatoes and Monarch butterfly-threatening biotech corn, now they’re looking to create forests full of genetically engineered trees. The Sierra Club is calling for a moratorium on the planting of genetically engineered trees until the science is better understood, according to an Associated Press story carried around the country this month. “ It won’t be as widespread as agricultural biotechnology, but it could be much more destructive,” said Jim Diamond, chairman of the Sierra Club’s genetic engineering committee. “Trees are what’s left of our natural environment and home to endangered species.” The Sierra Club web site has a section devoted to genetically mutated trees at www.sierraclub.org/biotech/trees.asp. The Campaign also has information at www.thecampaign.org/trees.php. Already, more than 100 genetically engineered tree test plots have been planted in the United States and 16 other countries. Two dozen tree species are being tested, including eucalyptus, poplar, pine and sweetgum trees, as well as a variety of fruit trees. Timber companies hope to plant genetically engineered trees commercially, and on a large scale, within five years. Engineers already have added the genes of humans, chickens and bacteria to trees. Engineers are also developing trees that would contain pesticides in every cell. These trees would kill pest insects on contact. The impact this would have on large ecosystems is unknown. Sign the Save Organic Wheat petition Just a reminder that The Campaign has launched the Save Organic Wheat coalition (www.saveorganicwheat.org), and has created a petition calling for a moratorium on genetically mutated wheat. Please consider signing the petition, and joining the coalition. Joining is free, and helps send a powerful message that U.S. and Canadian citizens do not want genetically mutated wheat. Save Organic Wheat mission & principles Mission Statement: " To build a coalition of organizations, businesses, farmers and consumers in support of a moratorium on the introduction of genetically engineered wheat in the United States and Canada. " Unifying Principles: 1. We support a moratorium because genetically engineered wheat will contaminate organic and conventional wheat and jeopardize the consumers' right to choose. 2. We support a moratorium because genetically engineered wheat may create an economic hardship on wheat growers due to contamination and loss of export markets. 3. We support a moratorium because genetically engineered wheat is likely to create superweeds and be toxic to insects, birds, bees, soil bacteria and have other negative environmental impacts. 4. We support a moratorium because genetically engineered wheat has not been safety tested on humans and should be subject to the same type of review process required for new drugs and food additives. If you agree with the Mission Statement and Unifying Principles, we invite you to join the Save Organic Wheat coalition. --------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.