Guest guest Posted August 6, 2003 Report Share Posted August 6, 2003 Wed, 6 Aug 2003 11:26:13 -0500 HSI - Jenny Thompson ...And 4 ... And 4 Health Sciences Institute e-Alert August 6, 2003 ************************************************************** Dear Reader, In yesterday's e-Alert - " Easy as 1... 2... 3 " - I told you there were three primary myths about mammograms. But today I'll add one more: Myth 4: Mammography provides the most dependable method of breast cancer screening. Fact: There are several methods of breast cancer screening that are as dependable or more dependable than mammography. ----------------------------- Human touch ----------------------------- One of the most effective tools in breast cancer screening is available to all women, with no danger and at no cost: breast self-examination (BSE). But BSE works best when women are appropriately trained in the procedure, and then follow-up with annual breast exams from their physicians. In a 2000 University of Toronto study, 20,000 women were screened for breast cancer with BSE and annual checkups, and 20,000 were screened with BSE and mammograms. After more than a decade, the BSE and annual exam group reported 610 cases of invasive breast cancer, and 105 deaths. In the BSE and mammogram group there were 622 cases of invasive breast cancer, and 107 deaths. Without question, the first and most effective line of defense begins at home with a monthly BSE. Using BSE and any of the three alternative screening methods I'll tell you about today, there's no reason why any woman should be subjected to the painful discomfort and dangers of mammography. ----------------------------- Taking the temperature ----------------------------- Digital infrared imaging (DII) - also called thermography - can catch cancer cells at work long before a tumor even forms. This simple, non-invasive procedure uses infrared cameras to detect patterns of temperature change in tissue. But unlike mammography, thermography doesn't require painful compression of the breast, and there's no exposure to harmful doses of radiation. Thermography can't pinpoint the exact location of cancerous cells, or determine if a mass is present, so additional procedures (such as MRI or ultrasound) are still necessary to determine if a tumor has already formed. But follow-up procedures (including mammograms) often show nothing because the cancer may still be too small to be detected with other techniques. Thermography results that indicate an abnormal infrared image but no detectable mass provide women with a valuable opportunity to begin boosting their immune systems' cancer- fighting power with dietary changes and supplements, and to continue with a regular schedule of BSE, physician exams, and regular thermographic check ups. Although thermography has been around since the 1970s, it still isn't widely used, and unfortunately many insurance programs still don't cover it. Screenings typically cost between $150 and $175 U.S. To find a qualified thermography provider in your area, visit the International Academy of Clinical Thermology website at iact-org.org ----------------------------- New kid on the block ----------------------------- Many types of cancer (including breast cancer) trigger the production of a peptide called malignin. When the body detects malignan, it launches an immune response of anti- malignan antibody. Fortunately, a blood test has been developed - the anti-malignan antibody in serum test (AMAS) - that can reveal the presence of the antibody. Clinical studies have shown that the AMAS test is up to 95 percent accurate on the first reading, and up to 99 percent accurate after two readings. With such high accuracy rates, a negative AMAS reading would make thermography and other screening methods unnecessary (although monthly BSEs and annual check ups are still strongly encouraged). A positive AMAS reading indicates that there are cancerous cells in your body, but it cannot specify the cancer type or the location, so some sort of follow-up tests would be called for. Anti-malignan antibody was first discovered in the mid-1980s, and the AMAS test has been available for over a decade. Nevertheless, many doctors are still unaware of it. If your doctor needs information about the AMAS test, ask him to look over the information on the web site: amascancertest.com, or to call 1-800-922-8378 to request literature demonstrating the benefits of AMAS. ----------------------------- On the cutting edge ----------------------------- Of the three alternatives, this one represents the future of cancer screening. Developed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, this screening method - like AMAS - requires only a simple blood test. Scientists believe they can detect breast cancer by measuring a particular type of nuclear matrix protein (NMP) in the bloodstream. NMPs aid in healthy cell reproduction by helping form the skeleton of nuclei in new cells. Abnormalities in the skeleton can indicate that a cell is cancerous. The theory behind this screening is that abnormal levels of NMPs in the bloodstream can reveal that cancer is present in the body. Furthermore, different types of cells (kidney cells, lung cells, etc.) use different types of NMP for reproduction. So if you can identify what kind of NMP aids reproduction of breast cells, for example, you can test for breast cancer simply by measuring the amount of breast-specific NMP in the bloodstream. One early, small-scale test of the breast-specific NMP, or NMP66, produced near-perfect results. Among the 78 women in the study, NMP66 was found in all 45 women who had been diagnosed with invasive cancer, and four out of the five women who had noninvasive cancer. It wasn't found in any of the 29 subjects who were cancer-free. Further tests of this cutting-edge screening method are now underway, and when these studies are published, we'll report the results in the e-Alert and the HSI Members Alert. ----------------------------- Help get the word out ----------------------------- As we've seen in yesterday's and today's e-Alerts, mammography is clearly neither the safest nor the most effective method to screen for breast cancer. But most conventional doctors think like mine does: " This is what we do, so just do it. " If you have a friend or family member whose doctor has suggested a mammogram, I hope you'll use the link below to share this e-Alert with them. The tunnel-vision focus of the medical establishment will continue to see what it wants to see. Fortunately, we're free to look elsewhere to find better alternatives. http://www.hsibaltimore.com/ea2003/ea_030806_p.shtml ************************************************************** ... and another thing What's cooking? That question is hard to answer if you're not doing the cooking yourself. In the e-Alert " Happy Meal " I told you about the recent Consumers Report magazine test of irradiated meat that revealed the unfortunate fact that tainted ground beef (that would normally be discarded) can be irradiated and shipped to restaurants and grocery markets where it will no doubt be touted as " Fresh! " . At the grocery, this is no problem because all irradiated product labels carry this phrase: " Treated by irradiation (or with radiation). " Also, the label must show the irradiation symbol, called the " radura, " that resembles a flower inside a circle (a visual euphemism if I've ever seen one). So if you're avoiding irradiated products, you at least have a fighting chance when you're shopping in your grocer's meat section. But what about your friendly neighborhood restaurant? When your waiter tells you about tonight's specials, don't expect him to mention that the burgers are " treated by irradiation (or with radiation). " In the e-Alert " McMedicine " (6/25/03) I told you about some of the problems associated with the use of antibiotics in cattle and poultry intended for human consumption. And fortunately I was able to find an online list of restaurants that refuse to buy meat from suppliers that use antibiotics to unnaturally hype the growth of farm animals. Now I've found a similar list for irradiated ground beef. This list, however, only mentions retailers and restaurants that DO carry irradiated ground beef. It's maintained by the Minnesota Beef Council, a beef industry research and promotional group, and can be found online at mnbeef.org/restaurants_and_retailers.htm. So far, there appear to be only two chains that have signed on for irradiation: more than 100 Dairy Queens in Minnesota and South Dakota, and a family-owned chain called Embers America, with 65 restaurants in four Midwestern states. It would be nice if the list didn't grow beyond these two chains. But the age of irradiation is brand new, so I'm afraid that may be too much to hope for. To Your Good Health, Jenny Thompson Health Sciences Institute ************************************************************** ************************************************************** Sources: " Mammography Does Not Reduce Breast Cancer Mortality When Added to Careful Breast Examination for Women Aged 50-59 Years, " Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2000; 92 (18); 1,455, jncicancerspectrum.oupjournals.org " Cochrane Review on Screening for Breast Cancer with Mammography " The Lancet, 2001; 358: 1340-1342, thelancet.com " Screening Mammography - an Overview Revisited " The Lancet, 2001; 358: 1284-1285, thelancet.com " Is Screening for Breast Cancer with Mammography Justifiable? " The Lancet, 2000; 355: 129-134, thelancet.com " The Cruel and Costly Hoax of Breast Cancer Screening: Protect Yourself from Mainstream Mammography Mania " William Campbell Douglass, M.D., Real Health, January 2002, realhealthnews.com " Medicine Mum on Mammography... Do the Math " Alternative Medicine, 10/23/00, alternativemedicine.com " Updated List of Restaurants and Retailers Marketing Irradiated Ground Beef " mnbeef.org/restaurants_and_retailers.htm Copyright ©1997-2003 by www.hsibaltimore.com, L.L.C. The e-Alert may not be posted on commercial sites without written permission. ************************************************************** Before you hit reply to send us a question or request, please click here http://www.hsibaltimore.com/ealert/questions.shtml ************************************************************** If you'd like to participate in the HSI Forum, search past e-Alerts and products or you're an HSI member and would like to search past articles, visit http://www.hsibaltimore.com ************************************************************** To learn more about HSI, call (203) 699-4416 or visit http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/HSI/WHSID618/home.cfm. ************************************************************** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.