Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

All Roads Lead To Big Pharma

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

ALL ROADS LEAD TO PHRMA

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/30/politics/30DRUG.html?pagewanted=print & position\

=

" When the House voted last week to let Americans import less

expensive medicines from Canada and Europe, 53 senators signed a

letter opposing the legislation, a letter that the industry trade

group, which vigorously opposed the measure, hailed as proof of its

argument that the bill would jeopardize patient safety, " the New

York Times' Sheryl Gay Stolberg reports. " What the trade group, the

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association, did not say,

at the time, was that it helped coordinate the signature campaign.

... The trade group's involvement in gathering signatures, detailed

in a document obtained by The Times, is not a surprise. It offers a

glimpse into the aggressive efforts by the pharmaceutical

manufacturers to defeat the import provision. " PhRMA, one of

Washington's most influential lobbying groups, has a record of

hiding its lobbying activities, often by paying other organizations

to promote its interests. With nearly 100 lobbyists registered to

represent its interests last year, PhRMA is angering many

lawmakers. " This is a multiarmed octopus we're dealing with, " said

Representative Gil Gutknecht, the Minnesota Republican who is the

chief sponsor of the measure. Referring to the trade group, Mr.

Gutknecht added, " All roads lead to Pharma. "

SOURCE: New York Times, July 30, 2003

More web links related to this story are available at:

http://www.prwatch.org/spin/July_2003.html#1059537601

To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit:

http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1059537601

 

July 30, 2003Drug Lobby Pushed Letter by Senators on MedicareBy SHERYL GAY

STOLBERG

 

 

WASHINGTON, July 28 — When the House voted last week to let Americans import

less expensive medicines from Canada and Europe, 53 senators signed a letter

opposing the legislation, a letter that the industry trade group, which

vigorously opposed the measure, hailed as proof of its argument that the bill

would jeopardize patient safety.

 

What the trade group, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association,

did not say, at the time, was that it helped coordinate the signature campaign.

 

The Senate " Dear Colleague " letter, timed to coincide with passage of the House

bill, will have an important role in whether the import measure survives a

conference with the Senate on a larger drug benefits package. Several conferees,

including Senators Orrin G. Hatch of Utah and Don Nickles of Oklahoma, both

Republicans, are among the signers.

 

The trade group's involvement in gathering signatures, detailed in a document

obtained by The Times, is not a surprise. It offers a glimpse into the

aggressive efforts by the pharmaceutical manufacturers to defeat the import

provision. That section would require the Food and Drug Administration to create

a system for consumers, pharmacists and wholesalers to import less expensive

drugs from Canada and Europe.

 

In the letter, apparently intended for Senate Republican aides, Derrick M.

White, director of federal affairs for the trade group, wrote that he was

helping Senator Rick Santorum, Republican of Pennsylvania, with " the logistics

of getting this `Dear Colleague' out to as many offices as possible in as short

a time period. "

 

Mr. White declined to comment. Spokesmen for the trade group, known as Pharma,

did not return calls. Mr. Santorum said he had initiated the letter and had

asked the trade group to help circulate it.

 

" I don't have time to run around and get all these people to sign it, " the

senator said.

 

The bill, which the House passed early Friday morning, 243 to 186, is one of the

most contentious issues of the year. Republican leaders did not back the bill,

but were forced to bring it up for consideration when Representative Jo Ann

Emerson, Republican of Missouri, insisted on it in exchange for her vote on the

larger Medicare drug bill.

 

A similar measure passed the Senate as part of its Medicare package. But that

version requires the secretary of health and human services to certify that the

imports " pose no additional risk " to consumers, a condition that effectively

prevents the program from taking effect, because the Bush administration says it

will not issue the certification. The House bill does not have the certification

requirement, which is why the industry is fighting so hard to kill it.

 

The pharmaceutical manufacturers went to great lengths in their efforts to

defeat the House bill. They sent an army of lobbyists to Capitol Hill to try to

persuade lawmakers to vote against it, and they joined forces with abortion

opponents in a direct-mail campaign focused on conservative House members,

warning that the import bill would make the RU-486 abortion pill " as easy to get

as aspirin. " The mailer was based on a legal memorandum prepared by lawyers for

the trade group.

 

" This is a multiarmed octopus we're dealing with, " said Representative Gil

Gutknecht, the Minnesota Republican who is the chief sponsor of the measure.

Referring to the trade group, Mr. Gutknecht added, " All roads lead to Pharma. "

 

Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...