Guest guest Posted July 26, 2003 Report Share Posted July 26, 2003 http://www.mercola.com/2003/jul/26/pharmaceuticals_spin.htm Spin and the Pharmaceutical Industry: Proudly Protecting Profits by Scaring You By Brian W. Vaszily Let's build a toy together. We'll call our toy the Spokesman for the Pharmaceutically Intoxicated Nation, or " Spin " for short. Every toy must have some purpose, and so we'll package Spin as " Defender of the most responsible, caring, and profitable industry in the world, the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry. " We'll design Spin as a wolf, but then sew on sheep's clothing so as not to frighten anyone away with the mere truth. Every toy these days must also have some gimmick, and here's the catch for Spin: he'll talk. Now, he won't really say much of anything. In fact, he'll only be programmed with a single phrase. But on an emotional level, where all the best toys work, it will be one very effective phrase, creating greater dependency on Spin by inciting fear about a world without him. Our Spokesman for the Pharmaceutically Intoxicated Nation doll will, of course, be critical-voice-activated, so that when anyone says anything that suggests the pharmaceutical industry is corrupting versus aiding our nation's health, he responds with this same very effective phrase: " Well, if we did things any different than the way we're doing them, we'd have no money to research and develop new drugs. And without new drugs, people would have no way of treating all the disorders and diseases plaguing our world and they'd all die. So let us keep doing things our way, and have a nice day. " This is, of course, the same response, in more words or less, that real spokespeople for drug manufacturers use over and over to shield their companies from any criticism and demands for reform. So our Spin toy will be quite lifelike, which is always appealing in a toy. Test Marketing - Phase One Let's say that someone with a moderate grasp on facts about the pharmaceutical industry got her hands on a Spin doll and addressed it with a couple of the facts she knew: " Why is it that the amount we spend on drugs has increased by 15% a year for the past several years - five times the rate of inflation -- but we aren't seeing any correlation in improved health? I mean, a brand-name prescription cost an average of $27 in 1990 but, by 2000, it jumped all the way to $65, far outpacing inflation. What's going on here? " " Well, " our voice-activated Spin doll would respond with a fixed smile on its face, " if we did things any different than the way we're doing them, we'd have no money to research and develop new drugs. And without new drugs, people would have no way of treating all the disorders and diseases plaguing our world and they'd all die. So let us keep doing things our way, and have a nice day. " Alright then, what if someone with even more insight on the drug industry - say, a Chief Financial Officer of a large company whose costs to provide adequate health insurance to employees were reaching impossible heights, as is now the case with may companies in the U.S. - could address the cuddly Spin doll with his concerns: " The U.S. spends nearly $5000 per capita per year on health, which is far more than any other nation, and yet we're nowhere near the healthiest country on the planet. Our average lifespan, for example, is way down at number 25 on the list of all countries. And it's prescription drugs that are the fastest rising part of this national healthcare expense, increasing from just 5.8% of all such costs in 1993 to 10% today. They're projected to increase to 15% by 2011. " Now, the drug companies keep saying that this massive increase in the sale of pharmaceuticals is helping people, but with the rise in chronic diseases, the overweight epidemic, our relatively low average lifespan, and the increase in paid visits to health practitioners overall, where's the help? The only results I'm seeing are sky-high cost increases in health insurance for my employees - which is money we therefore cannot invest in growth areas for our business and our employees' paychecks - and astronomical profits for the pharmaceutical companies. Why? " " Well, " our toy can and will respond, " if we did things any different than the way we're doing them, we'd have no money to research and develop new drugs. And without new drugs, people would have no way of treating all the disorders and diseases plaguing our world and they'd all die. So let us keep doing things our way, and have a nice day. " Okay. Let's move on to someone even more informed about the pharmaceutical industry - because they are forced to be here in the U.S. - a senior citizen. Specifically, let's say a grandmother spending $1400 a year on drugs, like the average senior over 65, and living on a tight fixed income, also like most seniors: " Why is that in Canada they pay an average of only 62% of what I have to pay for the same drug? And the French pay just 55% of what I have to pay, and the Italians only 53%? I mean, these are the SAME drugs, and in some cases, they're even drugs exported from the U.S. into these countries - and they're charged less than us! " Even worse, I'm actually paying twice for these drugs, since my taxpayer dollars fund the FDA and other government organizations that help the drug companies bring these rip-offs to market. Why does the most profitable industry in the world need financial aid from the government anyway? " Most despicable of all, the drug companies are doing everything in their power to stop me from being able to purchase my drugs at a lower cost from Canada, and they're doing nothing to educate me or anyone else on how to prevent disease and avoid their drugs in the first place. They just want to tear away all my options, push me into a corner where my only choice is their drugs, and then force me to pay their inflated prices for those drugs. How come? " Programmed as he is to repeat the phrase, our cuddly Spin toy will respond: " Well, if we did things any different than the way we're doing them, we'd have no money to research and develop new drugs. And without new drugs, people would have no way of treating all the disorders and diseases plaguing our world and they'd all die. So let us keep doing things our way, and have a nice day. " And do you see what an effective toy we've built with Spin? Valid as our test subjects' facts and concerns are, they're hushed by the fear he creates that without him, conventional healthcare would be an even greater disaster. Though the U.S. ranks just 15th in the world in terms of overall health but, by a wide margin, number one in terms of the price we pay for a prescription, Spin convinces people and their government to just keep clinging to him more tightly. This is again just like in the real world, where even the latest so-called reform - the Medicare prescription drug legislation that passed the House and Senate in June - has everything to do with shifting high prescription costs around but nothing to do with lowering drug prices. On the contrary, which is why the drug industry spent $135 million lobbying Congress with Spin dolls much like our own to pass this bill. Test Marketing - Phase Two So let's say someone like you, who receives Dr. Mercola's free eHealthy News You Can Use newsletter from Mercola.com and therefore has access to in-depth facts, insights and solutions to the institutions corrupting conventional healthcare, wrapped your fingers around our Spin doll's neck and addressed him with what you know: " First, according to various studies including one must-read conducted by the Boston University School of Public Health (PDF), just 11% of drug company revenue typically goes to research and development. Meanwhile, about 16% is taken as profit, and over 30%, or three times the amount spent on R & D, is devoted to drug marketing and administration. And it's their marketing budget -- not R & D, which has remained a steady percentage of their revenue for years -- that has been expanding most rapidly. What's more their massive profit is PURE profit, meaning it's AFTER all costs including R & D, meaning it goes to happy shareholders and some of the richest executives in the world, amongst other healthcare causes. " Second, research and development for what " new " drugs? According to a 2002 National Institutes of Health study, only 15% of drugs approved by the FDA between 1989 and 2000 were cited as offering significant clinical advantage over drugs already on the market. That is, a vast majority of R & D dollars are spent on developing drugs that simply compete with existing drugs already on the market, so drug company A can try to rip sales away from drug company B. It has very little to do with improving our health and everything to do with increasing profits. The so-called R & D is, in other words, primarily marketing in disguise. " To which our Spin doll would malfunction. But here's the good news: most people are not aware of the facts above. Most people are addicted to the pharmaceutical model of healthcare and don't even have the rudimentary knowledge of the drug industry displayed in phase one of our toy testing above. And as long as you don'tdocument.write ( " pass this article along to others " ); pass this article along to others, convince them to sign up for the free Mercola.com newsletter, or otherwise spread this information, we'll continue to have a mass market of suckers who'll want to cling tightly to our toy, Spin. What are your thoughts on this article? Do you have any insights you'd like to add on the pharmaceutical industry, pro or con? Click on the " Comment on this Article " link below to provide your feedback, which will be attached to this article through Mercola.com's new KnowledgeFilter feature. Registration to add your comments and rate this article is, of course, absolutely free. When you have posted your comment on this article, you can go to Knowledge Filter, the system that allows you to post these comments which you can find right on the homepage of Mercola.com, and see your own comment on this article, and comments that others have contributed. You'll find this story in KnowledgeFilter under the " Healing Tools " category, " Traditional Medicine " sub-category, under " Drugs. " If you'd like to reprint this article in any publication, please ensure that the proper author credit for Brian Vaszily is provided, as well as " from Dr. Mercola's free health newsletter at Mercola.com. " Return to Table of Contents #449 @ Alternative Medicine/Health-Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc. To , e-mail to: alternative_medicine_forum- Or, go to our group site at: alternative_medicine_forum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.