Guest guest Posted July 1, 2003 Report Share Posted July 1, 2003 http://healthy.net/scr/news.asp?Id=7214 United Nations' committee sets tougher limits for mercury in food than United States WASHINGTON (AP) - The United Nations' World Health and Food and Agriculture organizations have recommended tougher standards for levels of mercury in food, citing concerns that pregnant women who eat fish are exposing their children to harmful levels. The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives on Friday recommended the reduction of weekly methyl mercury intake levels to 1.6 micrograms per kilograms of bodyweight - nearly half the original standard of 3.3 micrograms per kilograms. The recommendation by the panel is more stringent than the weekly standard of 2.8 micrograms of mercury per kilogram set by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Scientists say children exposed to high levels of mercury when they're in the womb are at risk of developing disabilities. FDA officials said they will consider the commission's latest recommendations. The agency is under pressure from consumer groups to change its standard. The Environmental Working Group, a consumer watchdog organization, said the committee had taken an important step toward protecting pregnant women and their unborn children and the United States should consider doing the same. ``It sort of isolates the FDA as the weakest standard in the world,'' said Richard Wiles, senior vice president for the group. ``It leaves us unprotected.'' Michael Bender, director of the Mercury Policy Project, said the new recommendations ``are more reflective of the latest science.'' ``While fish is a good source of protein, we urge caution when consuming predatory fish with higher mercury levels,'' Bender said. The FDA says mercury vapors emanating from burned industrial waste may change into a more dangerous form, methyl mercury, when they enter water bodies. The new mercury form may taint fish, and cooking does not get rid of it. Scientists have warned women to beware of possibly harmful levels of methyl mercury in fish - but also say that there is no need for them to completely remove the highly nutritious food from diets. In its recommendation Friday, the committee also underscored fish's value as a good source of protein. The U.S. Tuna Association and National Food Processors' Association did not immediately return phone calls seeking comment. On the Net: Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives: http://www.codexalimentarius.net/jecfa.stm Food and Drug Administration: http://www.fda.gov Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc. To , e-mail to: Gettingwell- Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.