Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fwd: Blinders In Place

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hi I am 58 and very heavy and already have atrial fibulation, diabetes, I had

cancer, and I have lupus and asthma. I just started taking a large amount of

vitamins, E, and antioxidant with E, B 12, folic acid, salmond oil, and coral

calcium. I also take meds for my diabetes heart problem and depression. I am

wondering if this is going to help me or not help me. I had ovarian cancer and

that was in 94, I had a year of chemo which caused a muscle desease so Im in

a wheelchair now. I started bleeding when I go to the bathroom now and it's

been going on for over 2 years off and on. I am just wondering if I can do

something that would be able to help me besides having so much invasive stuff to

my body. THank you

Georgia Mclaughlin

geori3mc

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Tue, 17 Jun 2003 02:09:43 -0500

HSI - Jenny Thompson

Blinders In Place

 

Blinders In Place

 

Health Sciences Institute e-Alert

 

June 16, 2003

 

**************************************************************

 

Dear Reader,

 

" Here we go AGAIN... " was the only message in an e-mail a

colleague sent me last week. Her words were attached to an

article with this headline: " Study Finds Antioxidant Vitamins

Useless "

 

That's right - " useless. "

 

Once again vitamin supplements are under attack. And as is so

often the case, the attack involves researchers who conclude

with sweeping generalizations, and news writers who emphasize

the most inflammatory aspects of those generalizations.

 

And - once again - when you see the reality hidden in the

details, it completely takes the bite out of the scare

headlines.

 

-----------------------------

Man the barricades

-----------------------------

 

This time the attack comes from the Cleveland Clinic

Foundation, as reported in The Lancet. Researchers reviewed

seven trials that evaluated the effectiveness of vitamin E

supplements in preventing death or stroke due to

cardiovascular events. An additional eight similar trials

that tested supplements of beta-carotene (vitamin A) were

also reviewed.

 

The combined results showed that neither of these antioxidant

supplements reduced the risk of stroke or death due to

cardiovascular problems. In addition, when the columns of

numbers were added up, it appeared that beta-carotene

supplements actually increased the risk of death.

 

Across the country, headline writers picked up the Associated

Press coverage of The Lancet article and refined the message

to tight, damaging phrases designed to catch the eye:

 

* " Antioxidant Pills Don't Make Heart Healthier, Study Says "

* " Study Says Antioxidant Vitamin Use Misguided "

* " Antioxidants Rated Useless for Hearts "

 

Taken at face value, all three of those headlines are false.

 

-----------------------------

Goodbye bathwater...bye bye, baby

-----------------------------

 

Each of the above headlines would come much closer to the

truth if they added this sub-head: " ...In Cases Where

Patients Are Already at High Risk. "

 

In other words, if you're a healthy person who takes vitamin

E, beta-carotene, or any other antioxidant supplement to help

protect your heart, this research doesn't pertain to you at

all because most of the subjects in the 15 studies already

had heart disease or other conditions that would elevate

their risk of cardiovascular failure.

 

And keep in mind that this research only looked for

statistics that recorded deaths or strokes associated with

cardiovascular events. Finer points that would address the

prevention of heart disease - such as an antioxidant's

ability to help lower homocysteine, triglyceride, or C-

reactive protein levels - were not examined.

 

So then - just how misleading is a statement

like, " Antioxidants Rated Useless for Hearts " ?

 

It's completely misleading.

 

-----------------------------

Details, details, details...

-----------------------------

 

But what about that surprising and troubling detail that beta-

carotene supplements may INCREASE your risk of death?

 

For reasons that are not yet clear, a high intake of beta-

carotene has been shown to complicate heart problems for

smokers. Two of the beta-carotene trials examined in this

research included subjects who were smokers (which qualified

them for the study as having a risk factor for heart

disease). In both trials the increased risk of death occurred

mostly with smokers taking large doses of beta-carotene, and

it was this set of statistics that resulted in the

unconditional blanket claim that beta-carotene may increase

the risk of death.

 

So if you're a non-smoker who is not at risk of heart

disease, will you be flirting with the grim reaper if you

take a standard dose of beta-carotene? Of course not. But

these important little details are nowhere to be found in the

widely reported Associated Press article.

 

-----------------------------

Which E?

-----------------------------

 

Also missing are specifics about the vitamin E supplements

used in the studies. As HSI Panelist Allan Spreen, M.D.,

pointed out in the e-Alert " Deconstructing JAMA " (8/27/02),

only the " mixed tocopherol " variety of vitamin E should be

used. If an alpha tocopherol supplement is used, the other

vitamin E fractions - beta, delta, and gamma - are decreased

in value.

 

Was the vitamin E used in these seven studies the more

effective variety of mixed tocopherol? The answer can only

be: " Maybe. " These were not controlled trials where uniform

amounts of the same supplement were used. Subjects were

simply asked to report their supplement intakes - some of

them over a period of 12 years. Chances are very good that

many of the 81,000 total participants were taking a less

effective generic brand of alpha tocopherol vitamin E.

 

-----------------------------

I read the news today, oh boy...

-----------------------------

 

When I read reports like this, it's sometimes hard to tell if

the researchers don't get it because they have another agenda

to promote (which is most often the case), or if they don't

get it because they just don't get it. In either case - as

always - the loser is the consumer who receives

misinformation like this, acts on it, and ends up missing out

on a health benefit.

 

So if you should hear anyone talking about how " useless "

antioxidants are in promoting heart health, you can fill them

in on this reality: when the mainstream media gets hold of

imperfect research, some of the most important details almost

always get lost along the way.

 

**************************************************************

...and another thing

 

You might be healthier if your doctor doesn't tie one on.

 

I'm not talking about cocktails. I mean his choice of

neckwear.

 

Ties may carry bacteria, according to a committee of UK

doctors who are urging physicians to lose the tie, switch to

a bow tie, or wear much shorter ties. (Yes - the 3 inch mini-

tie - that's a sharp look that will inspire confidence in

patients.)

 

The committee is concerned that doctors' ties often brush

against patients during examinations. Bacteria can be

transferred from one patient to another through contact with

the tie. Add to that, ties rarely get frequent washings like

other articles of clothing.

 

When I asked one of my male colleagues here in the office (a

writer - not a doctor) how often he washed his ties, he

said, " You're supposed to wash ties? " Case closed.

 

Time will tell if this call to debug ties will catch on. If

it does, it could open up a whole new tie accessory market

for doctors:

 

* Antibacterial spray for ties

* Roll 'em up ties (roll up for exams, roll down for meetings)

* Disposable sanitary tie sleeves

 

If we get to work on these ideas right now, we'll be able to

corner the market by next Father's Day.

 

To Your Good Health,

 

Jenny Thompson

Health Sciences Institute

 

**************************************************************

 

 

Sources:

" Use of Antioxidant Vitamins for the Prevention of

Cardiovascular Disease: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials "

The Lancet 2003; 361: 2017-23

" Study Finds Antioxidant Vitamins Useless " Emma Ross,

Associated Press, 6/12/03, ap.org

" CRN Voices Concern Over Irresponsible Conclusions Reached by

Researchers in The Lancet " The Council for Responsible

Nutrition Press Release, 6/12/03, npicenter.com

" Doctors' ties 'Spreading Disease' " BBC News, 6/5/03,

news.bbc.co.uk

 

Copyright ©1997-2003 by www.hsibaltimore.com, L.L.C.

The e-Alert may not be posted on commercial sites without

written permission.

 

**************************************************************

Before you hit reply to send us a question or request, please

click here http://www.hsibaltimore.com/ealert/questions.html

 

**************************************************************

 

 

**************************************************************

If you'd like to participate in the HSI Forum, search past

e-Alerts and products or you're an HSI member and would like

to search past articles, visit http://www.hsibaltimore.com

 

**************************************************************

To learn more about HSI, call (203) 699-4416 or visit

http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/HSI/WHSIC313/home.cfm.

 

**************************************************************

 

 

 

Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc.

 

To , e-mail to: Gettingwell-

Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell

 

 

 

SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

you might look for a different doctor! http://www.acam.org

Gracia

 

> Hi I am 58 and very heavy and already have atrial fibulation, diabetes, I

had

> cancer, and I have lupus and asthma. I just started taking a large amount

of

> vitamins, E, and antioxidant with E, B 12, folic acid, salmond oil, and

coral

> calcium. I also take meds for my diabetes heart problem and depression. I

am

> wondering if this is going to help me or not help me. I had ovarian cancer

and

> that was in 94, I had a year of chemo which caused a muscle desease so Im

in

> a wheelchair now. I started bleeding when I go to the bathroom now and

it's

> been going on for over 2 years off and on. I am just wondering if I can do

> something that would be able to help me besides having so much invasive

stuff to

> my body. THank you

> Georgia Mclaughlin

> geori3mc

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...