Fwd: FW: ACTION ALERT and Update: Dr.Rebecca Carley Court Hearing

[Guest guest]

Sat, 14 Jun 2003 11:04:32 -0800

Sandy Mintz

FW: ACTION ALERT and Update: Dr.Rebecca Carley Court Hearing

 

From Arnold Gore:

 

Yesterday we went to hear the Appeal of Dr.Rebecca Carley,MD of the

seemingly impausible Family Court Decision that gave full custody to the

father who according to overwhlming evidence, sexually abused the child,

giving Dr.Carley only one (1) hour of supervied visitation per week.

Dr.Carley, a vocal dissident warning of possible dangers of mandatory

vaccinations has been subject to enormous pressures to silence her truthful,

but disturbing warnings. You might ask, why is this child custody case

important to Heath Freedom? Sadly I am fearful that the State of New York is

sending a very dngerous message to the parents who are most concerned and

opposed to vaccinating their children. There is always the threat of

removing children from parents who do not submit their children to

vaccination. If THE DOCTOR HERSELF can lose her child, what chance do I

have?? This message cannot be tolerated.

 

Under these circumstances a large turnout of steadfast supporters gathered

at the Courthouse of the New York State Apppellate Division 2nd Department

located in Downtown Brooklyn starting at 8am for the 10am hearing. I

prepared 200 copies of a new updated background sheet to pass out to people

going to work. The court is located in a quiet residential neighborhood, so

the volume of pedestrian traffic was much less than when we leafletted

before the Medical Board (OPMC) last year on 34th Street. Nevertheless, we

had such a good turnout of supporters that we were able to post people

across the street, up the block and even around the corner. All the flyers

were used up and we had to use some of my left over folders from the last

OPMC hearing.By the way OPMC has still not made a decision on Dr.Carley's

medical license although the hearings concluded January 30,2003. We feel

that the delay means they are having serious second thoughts about going

through with the propsed revocation.In the meantime Dr.Carley is practicing.

Dr.Carley arrived at about

9:50 am and we all went into the court. The Appellate Division hearing

consists of a 4 judge panel that usually only hears the opposing lawyers

argue why the trial court decision should be reversed and the reason it

should be upheld. The arguments are usually boring detailed legal

technicalities. Dr.Carley was scheduled to be the 16th case to be heard of

about 20 cases.

 

Most of the eary cases were appeals from criminal convictions. One of the

cases did have an element of sexual abuse in it. The strong reaction from

some of the judges, deploring the action of the District Attorney in

accepting a plea bargain to a lesser charge and exempting the defendant from

being recorded in the State Sex Abuse Register, was a seemingly positive

sign of interest in this hot button issue. All of the prior cases were

represented by attorneys who spoke in hushed conversational tones

to the justices, so it was hard to hear in the middle and back of the large

courtroom.

The other cases appealing child custody had no personal appearance from

either side only legal briefs to the court. When the case was called

Dr.Carley strode to the podium to plead for the son she has been deprived of

for over three years, she has been representing herself in all of her legal

proceedings. The rarefied atmosphere of the court was infused with the

soaring plea of a real victim that this court is not used to seeing. Her

compelling recounting of the very questionable characterization her taking

full body photographs of her sons injuries to document sexual abuse as being

an act of " pornography " seemed obvious. The court had maintained that

because the patient was her son, the law did not protect her. Her son should

have the same right to be protected from abuse as any other patient. in

spite of state law mandating all physicians to document and report sexual

abuse and be held harmless from legal action for such reporting was cited

as justification.

Dr.Carley advised the court that she has recently been qualified in court

proceedings as an epert in testifying about child abuse cases. Her practice

contains a large number of children who have been injured from childhood

vaccination that she has often been able to reverse. The assumption that she

is a danger to her own child is ludicrous.

The actions of Family Court Judge Richard Lawerence, in ignoring the

testimony of the chauffeur who transported the child from his fathers house

to Dr.Carley's house and made an audeotape of the childs allegations that he

was afraid of his father. After the tape was trying to be introduced by

Dr.Carley, and was excluded by Judge Lawence and Mr.Carley found out about

the contents of the child's taped plea, the child was subjected to

retaliation, but it was excluded from helping to rescue him from further

abuse. The air was electrified as Dr.Carley continued on, fighting back

tears to place the court on notice that state action deliberately taken to

endanger the health and safety of this child, after being placed on notice

of the actual facts and dangers, makes the state liable for damages caused.

When Dr.Carley finished, there was not one question from the court. We all

filed out of the court and showed that a large group of citizens heard the

testimony and will be watching their decision. We took some photographs with

my hastily made " unprofessional " sign

saying:

DON'T GIVE A CHILD

TO AN ABUSER TO

PRESSURE A DISSIDENT DOCTOR

 

In my earlier email explaining the bakground of the case I gave a phone

number to call the court. It is a very general nimber and you must wait on

the menu, until possibly pressing #6 and getting one of the court personnel

who do not transfer your call to the justices. There is also another judge o

the panel. I did not list Justice Gabriel Krausman.

To be sure your message gets through mail a letter to any or all of the

judges.

The case is being heard by Justices Sandra Feuerstein, Gabriel Krausman,

Gloria Goldstein and Reinaldo Rivera.

Justice (Name)

New York State Supreme Court

Appellate Division 2nd Department

45 Monroe Place

Brooklyn,NY 11201

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sandy Mintz

http://www.vaccinationnews.com

http://www.vaccinationnews.com/Scandals/past_scandals.htm

 

" Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty. " - Wendell Phillips (1811-1884),

paraphrasing John Philpot Curran (1808)

 

http://www.909shot.com

http://www.redflagsweekly.com

 

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE

IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS

REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE

CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION

WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE

MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.

 

IN ADDITION, THE FACT THAT THIS EMAIL HAS BEEN FORWARDED IN NO WAY

NECESSARILY IMPLIES ENDORSEMENT OF THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE AUTHOR OR

AUTHORS OF THE ARTICLE OR EMAIL.

 

 

 

 

Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc.

 

To , e-mail to: Gettingwell-

Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell

 

 

 

SBC DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!