Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fwd: No good? Take two

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Fri, 13 Jun 2003 22:02:36 -0500

WC Douglass

No good? Take two

 

Daily Dose

 

June 13, 2003

 

**************************************************************

 

Blood-pressure baloney - part 2

 

In the last edition of the Daily Dose, I told you about how

the mainstream medical establishment has high blood pressure

all wrong. It seems that after the better part of a century

researching it, they still can't figure out whether it's a

disease in itself - or simply a symptom of the arterial

clogging that's proven to be a precursor to coronary heart

disease. But regardless of the fact that they aren't even

sure what causes hypertension, they're throwing drugs at it

like they're absolutely certain that one of them is the

cure...

 

Fifty years ago, we used diuretics, which work simply by

reducing your blood's volume by purging you of excess water

and salt. These actually worked pretty well at reducing blood

pressure (not that you necessarily want that) - and with

relatively few side effects. But somehow, they weren't good

enough. So the big drug companies came up with the Beta-

blockers, the Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs) - and nowadays

the fancy-schmancy (and expensive) ACE Inhibitors.

 

Why so many medications for the same health problem? Because

drug companies make most of their money via the exclusive

patent rights to a drug - which they hold for 20 years from

the time they first start developing it. After that, anyone

can market a generic version of the same drug, and the

original manufacturer loses its monopoly on that section of

the market...

 

What that means is this: If every drug company can patent a

new and different hypertension drug (or if the same company

can do it three or four times in a row), they ensure

themselves of total market dominance and control over the

drug's price - at least temporarily. It's simple capitalism.

There's just one small problem: Are the new drugs any better

than their predecessors - or just different enough to warrant

a separate patent?

 

It's a good question - one that more doctors should be asking

their drug reps. When it comes to blood pressure medications

in particular, the evidence is inconclusive. In fact, two

separate peer-reviewed studies - one published in the Journal

of the American Medical Association, the other in the New

England Journal of Medicine - recently concluded precisely

the opposite of one another (!) with regard to the

effectiveness of ACE inhibitors vs. ordinary diuretics. Hmmm.

 

But leave it to the Associated Press to conclude, based on

this disparity, that you need MORE THAN ONE of these drugs to

combat hypertension.

 

I'm not kidding, that's what they reported in a recent

article - which was probably picked up by hundreds of news

sources nationwide, prompting God knows how many people to

demand from their doctors a new-fangled drug " cocktail " for

hypertension...

 

When all they may really need is a diet rich in Omega-3 fats,

lean on carbs and trans-fats, and drinking water that's

devoid of chlorine (which causes microscopic arterial tears

that trap and hold cholesterol, boosting blood pressure).

 

But unless they're reading this, the drugs are what they'll

likely end up living (or dying) with. How sad is that?

 

**************************************************************

Meet the REAL tele-tubbies...

 

It's no secret that rates of adult obesity have skyrocketed

in this country in recent years. In fact, there's been a more

than 70 percent increase since just 1991 alone. That's

pretty scary...

 

But what's even scarier is the extent of the mainstream's

naiveté on the subject. Case in point: Apparently, it takes a

Harvard University study to convince us that sitting around

watching the boob tube is making us fatter!

 

I'm not kidding, here - I couldn't make this stuff up if I

tried.

 

According to a recent Reuters' health online article, a crack

team of Harvard PhDs revealed the results of a 25+ year study

of over 50,000 subjects - which determined that for every 2-

hour increase in daily TV consumption, women became 23

percent more likely to suffer from obesity and endured a 14

percent greater risk of type 2 diabetes.

 

And while I can appreciate the hard work and energy that went

into the precision of this finding, my original question

remains: Why do we need a gaggle of scientists at the most

prestigious college in the world (some say) to analyze a

quarter-century's worth of research before we can safely

conclude that sitting around watching television all day (and

eating all the while, most likely) packs on those excess

pounds?

 

Anyone with a brain, a TV, and a bathroom scale could tell

you that!

 

What's wrong with making a serious study out of it, you ask?

I'll tell you - it gives people an excuse to dwell in

unhealthy ignorance - or outright denial. After all, if it

takes a high-falutin' study from a major college (or the

government) to find it out, it must not have been obvious...

 

Therefore, it lets at-risk people say to themselves: " I

didn't know! It's not my fault! I'M A VICTIM! "

 

I wouldn't be surprised if one of them cites this study in a

lawsuit aimed at NBC for its " addictive programming. "

Stranger things have happened....

 

Making junk medicine obvious,

 

William Campbell Douglass II, MD

 

 

**************************************************************

 

 

Copyright ©1997-2003 by www.realhealthnews.com, L.L.C.

The Daily Dose may not be posted on commercial sites without

written permission.

 

**************************************************************

**************************************************************

Before you hit reply to send us a question or request, please

click here http://www.realhealthnews.com/questions.shtml

 

**************************************************************

If you'd like to participate in the Real Health Forum, search

past e-letters and products or you're a Real Health

r and would like to search past articles, visit

http://www.realhealthnews.com

 

**************************************************************

To learn more about Real Health, call (203) 699-4420 or visit

http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/RHB/WRHBCC11/home.cfm

 

**************************************************************

 

 

 

Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc.

 

To , e-mail to: Gettingwell-

Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell

 

 

 

Free online calendar with sync to Outlook.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...