Vaccines fueling autism epidemic?

June 10, 2003

http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=32988

Report: U.S. infants exposed to mercury beyond EPA, FDA limits

Posted: June 9, 2003

5:00 p.m. Eastern

Editor's note: WorldNetDaily is pleased to have a content-sharing agreement with

Insight magazine, the bold Washington publication not afraid to ruffle

establishment feathers. Subscribe to Insight at WorldNetDaily's online store and

save 71 percent off the cover price.

By Kelly Patricia O Meara

The mother of an autistic child wonders aloud when health officials will wake up

to the epidemic that has claimed not only her son but hundreds of thousands of

other children in the United States, with no end in sight. She muses, " Maybe

someday this will be as important as SARS and we'll get the same attention. God

knows we need it. "

Autism is a severely incapacitating developmental disability for which there is

no known cure. According to a recently released report by the California

Department of Developmental Services, or DDS, entitled Autistic Spectrum

Disorders, Changes in the California Caseload: 1999-2002, the rate of children

diagnosed with full-syndrome autism in the Golden State between 1999 and 2002

nearly doubled from 10,360 to 20,377. The report further revealed that " between

Dec. 31, 1987, and Dec. 31, 2002, the population of persons with full-syndrome

autism has increased by 634 percent. " That is a doubling of autism cases every

four years, and the staggering increases are not limited to California.

Infants are being inoculated with vaccines containing toxic ingredients that can

be harmful — or fatal.

According to data provided by the U.S. Department of Education, the increased

autism rate in California is in line with the increases other states are

experiencing. For example, in 1992 Ohio reported 22 cases. A decade later the

number had increased by 13,895 percent to 3,057. In Illinois the rate of autism

cases climbed from just five in 1992 to 3,802 - an increase of 76,040 percent.

Mississippi, New Hampshire and the District of Columbia reported no cases of

autism in 1992, but by 2002 the number of cases reported were 461, 404 and 144,

respectively.

Only Puerto Rico can claim to have an increase of less than 100 percent, with

the remaining states reporting increases of at least 500 percent during the same

period.

Although once considered rare, during the last two decades the chance of a child

being diagnosed with autism has skyrocketed from one in 10,000 to one in 150. In

California, full-syndrome autism now is the No. 1 disability among children and

more prevalent than childhood cancer, diabetes and Down's syndrome. It is

estimated that within the next four years autism cases in the Golden State will

exceed the total number of cases of both cerebral palsy and epilepsy. To get a

better idea of how quickly the epidemic is spreading one need only consider that

in 1987 there were 2,778 persons with autism in California. By 2002 the number

had increased to 20,377, and in 2002 3,575 new cases had been added to the

rolls, far exceeding the total number of cases in the state 15 years earlier.

For years there has been a debate about the cause or causes of autism, but the

vast majority of finger-pointing has been directed at childhood vaccines as the

culprit. And considering what is put into the vaccines injected into hours-old

infants, it is easy to understand why they are at the top of the list of

suspects: formaldehyde (used in embalming), thimerosal (nearly 50 percent

mercury), aluminum phosphate (toxic and carcinogenic), antibiotics, phenols

(corrosive to skin and toxic), aluminum salts (corrosive to tissue and

neurotoxic), methanol (toxic), isopropyl (toxic), 2-pheoxyethanol (toxic), live

viruses and a host of unknown components considered off-limits as trade secrets.

These are just part of the vaccine mixture.

For those who believe there are elements in vaccines that may be responsible for

the increased number of autism cases and other neurological disorders,

thimerosal currently is at the top of the list of possible culprits being

investigated.

Despite official insistence that the evidence linking injected thimerosal to

autism is inconclusive, the data suggest otherwise. In 1999 the National Academy

of Sciences Institute of Medicine, or IOM, must have thought there was something

seriously wrong when it supported removal of thimerosal from vaccines, stating

that it was " a prudent measure in support of the public goal to reduce mercury

exposure of infants and children as much as possible. " The IOM further urged

that " full consideration be given to removing thimerosal from any biological

product to which infants, children and pregnant women are exposed. "

A recently published study in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons by

Mark Geier, M.D., Ph.D., and president of the Genetic Centers of America and his

son, David Geier, president of Medcon Inc. and a consultant on vaccine cases,

was titled " Thimerosal in Childhood Vaccines, Neurodevelopment Disorders and

Heart Disease in the United States. " It presents strong epidemiological evidence

for a link between neurodevelopmental disorders and mercury exposure from

thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines.

Specifically, the authors evaluated the doses of mercury that children received

as part of their immunization schedule, then compared these doses with federal

safety guidelines. Furthermore, to compare the effects of thimerosal in vaccine

recipients, the incident rates of neurodevelopmental disorders and heart disease

reported to the government's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System were

analyzed. The results were dramatic. The report revealed that " U.S. infants are

exposed to mercury levels from their childhood-immunization schedule that far

exceed the EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] and FDA [Food and Drug

Administration]-established maximum permissible levels for the daily oral

ingestion of methyl mercury. "

The authors concluded that " in light of voluminous literature supporting the

biologic mechanisms for mercury-induced adverse reactions, the presence of

amounts of mercury in thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines exceeding federal

safety guidelines for the oral ingestion of mercury and previous epidemiological

studies showing adverse reactions to such vaccines, a causal relationship

between thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines and neurodevelopment disorders

and heart disease appears to be confirmed. "

It is no secret among government and health officials that mercury is toxic and

causes serious adverse reactions. In July 1999 the American Academy of

Pediatrics and the U.S. Public Health Service issued a joint statement calling

for the removal of thimerosal from vaccines. Five years after the joint

statement, however, it still is difficult for parents and physicians to be sure

that the pharmaceutical companies have indeed removed the toxic substance from

their vaccines.

According to Mark Geier, " The 2003 Physicians' Desk Reference, or PDR, still

shows childhood vaccines containing thimerosal, including diphtheria, tetanus

and acellular pertussis. DTaP, manufactured by Aventis Pasteur, contains 25µg

[25 micrograms] of mercury, Hemophilus influenzae b (Hib) vaccine manufactured

by Wyeth contains 25µg of mercury and pediatric Hepatitis B vaccine,

manufactured by Merck, contains 12.5µg of mercury. "

Geier continues, " In addition, the influenza vaccine that is recommended for an

increasing segment of the pediatric population in the U.S. also contains 25µg of

mercury. Assuming that the labeling is correct, it is possible that children in

the U.S. in 2003 may be exposed to levels of mercury from thimerosal contained

in childhood vaccines that are at higher levels than at any time in the past.

Possible total childhood mercury in 2003 is more than 300µg. "

Whether the " labeling is correct " is the question du jour. According to Len

Lavenda, a spokesman for Aventis Pasteur, the maker of DTaP, " Aventis only sells

the DTaP vaccine in the preservative-free formulation. The PDR references both

the single and multidose. However, when we received the license for the

preservative-free we ceased sales of the multidose vial. For some reason, the

package insert takes much longer to revise than one would expect. I believe it

is at the FDA waiting for approval, but the fact is we do not sell or market

that product. In March 2001 we stopped all sales of that product in the

preservative formulation. We did not recall the product at that time because it

was our belief that if we did children may go unimmunized. It's been two years

since anyone has been able to purchase the preservative formulation from us. "

Lavenda continues: " The package insert talks about both the single and multidose

vials and it says that the single-dose vial is preservative-free, and that is

all that is sold. The PDR is outdated, but parents don't have to worry about

their children being administered 25µg of thimerosal. It just takes time to get

the paperwork caught up. The current package insert does not accurately reflect

what is being marketed. "

Geier is astounded by Lavenda's admission. " If this is true, they should be in

jail. They can't have an insert on a drug that is totally wrong. It is against

all regulations. If I'm a doctor and I'm giving you a shot and the insert says

such and such is in the shot, it had better be in it. If doctors can't rely on

the instructions that come with what we're injecting then all bets are off. This

is a far worse admission than admitting that thimerosal is still in the vaccine.

There are at least 15 laws that say the insert has to match what is in the

product. This is absolutely horrendous. In my entire career in medicine I have

never heard of a drug company claiming that what's in the insert and the

accompanying product don't match. This is total mislabeling and fraud by their

own admission. Legally they should be forced to close down because our clinical

decisions are based on their labeling. "

Assuming that the package inserts are correct, Geier tells Insight, " The EPA

limit is 0.1 micrograms of mercury per kilogram body weight per day. It doesn't

take a genius to do the calculations when on their day of birth children are

given the hepatitis B vaccine, which is 12.5 micrograms of mercury. The average

newborn weighs between 6 and 7 pounds, so they would be allowed 0.3 micrograms

of mercury – but in this one shot they are getting 12.5 micrograms. That's 39

times more than allowed by law. And it gets worse when you consider that

children are getting multiple vaccinations at 2 months. And this limit is for

oral ingestion and not injection, which is much worse. "

Rhonda Smith, a spokeswoman for the federal Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention, tells Insight that, except for mere traces, thimerosal has been

removed. " All routinely recommended licensed vaccines, " says Smith, " that are

currently being manufactured for children in the U.S., except influenza, contain

no thimerosal or only trace amounts - a concentration of less than 0.0002

percent. " But according to the 2003 immunization schedule and the package

inserts, there appear to be a number of childhood vaccines that still contain

mercury, including those for tetanus and diphtheria.

This scenario becomes even more bizarre when one further considers that

thimerosal is not a necessary component in vaccines. It first was introduced by

pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly and Co. in the 1930s and is added to vaccines

only as a preservative – the theory being that multiple doses are taken from the

same bottle and that thimerosal will protect against contamination. However,

according to Geier, " the solution to any such problem is to make vaccines

available in a single dose, which will cost the pharmaceuticals about one penny

more. What is interesting is that if you look up the mumps, measles, rubella

[MMR] vaccines in the PDR you'll see that they do not contain thimerosal because

it would kill the live virus. The MMR is available in multidose packaging and,

yet, there is no preservative – nothing. What they did was put a label on it

that says 'This product does not contain preservatives. Handle with care.' It's

that simple. "

Geier insists, " I'm pro-vaccines, but the bottom line is that our kids are

getting massive amounts of mercury. Mercury has been withdrawn from everything,

including animal vaccines, yet we keep injecting it into our children. Everyone

should absolutely refuse to take a vaccine shot that has thimerosal in it, and

they should insist on reading the vaccine package insert. Our data showed that

the more mercury children received in their childhood vaccines the more

neurodevelopment disorders there are. We've looked at this every possible way

and every time there's massive evidence to support it. "

So, if everyone acknowledges the toxicity of mercury and top U.S. health

officials have called for its removal, why is thimerosal still in vaccines?

" Maybe, " concludes Geier, " the mercury isn't being taken out all at once because

if the pharmaceutical companies did that you would see an unbelievable change in

the rate of autism and there would be massive lawsuits. If you look at the

graphs now they go up and up. If you stop the thimerosal all at once you'd see

the numbers fall dramatically. "

Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., a longtime advocate for victims of autism, has a

grandson who became autistic after receiving nine vaccines in one day. Burton

recently sent his second request in as many years to the White House asking for

a conference of scientists, researchers and parents to look into the causes of

autism.

The Indiana lawmaker tells Insight, " There is no doubt in my mind that the

mercury in vaccines is a major contributing factor to a growing number of

neurological disorders among children, but in particular autism. "

Burton explains that " thimerosal is a toxic substance – mercury – and should not

be put in close proximity of people, should not be injected into people,

especially children who have a newly formed immune system that may not be able

to handle it. To my knowledge there never have been long-term tests on

thimerosal and we never should have used mercury in vaccines, period. Now what

we've got is an epidemic that is absolutely out of control. "

The Indiana congressman continues, " One reason this isn't getting the attention

it needs is that the Food and Drug Administration has very close ties to the

pharmaceutical companies, as does the Department of Health and Human Services

[HHS] and the Centers for Disease Control. I've said in the past that in some

cases it appears that it's a revolving door and people leave government health

agencies and go to work for the pharmaceuticals, which I think have undue

influence on our health agencies. Of course, they may not want to look at this

because there's a possibility that large claims would be filed and the

pharmaceutical companies would have to cough up the money to take care of these

kids who have been damaged. "

Burton means business. He insists, " The FDA, CDC and HHS should put out in a

very public way the dangers of mercury, but as soon as they do it will amount to

an admission that their mercury is causing these problems. So the reports that

come out of the FDA, CDC and HHS use ambiguous terms. Well, if they're not sure,

and there's the remotest possibility that mercury in vaccines could cause

autism, they ought to get thimerosal off the market. Too many kids are being

ruined for life because of this stuff. "

Barbara Loe Fisher is founder of the National Vaccine Information Center, a

charitable organization dedicated to the prevention of vaccine injuries and

deaths through public education. Fisher tells Insight, " There are many things in

vaccines that could be causing these disorders, and thimerosal is only part of

the problem. In the last 20 years, we've gone from giving children 23 doses of

seven vaccines to 38 doses of 12 vaccines. I think the mercury is part of it for

some kids, though I'm not sure it's the answer for all. " But this is a

no-brainer, says Fisher. " Mercury shouldn't be in vaccines. They've taken it out

of everything else so why not the vaccines? The one thing that people really

need to look at is the dramatic rise in chronic disease and disabilities in our

kids in just the last two decades. You have to admit that there is something

occurring that a growing number of children cannot get through without being

immune-system and brain-system damaged. And what is the one thing that we expose

every child to? Those vaccines. "

Fisher concludes, " I've always argued that public health is not measured only by

an absence of infectious disease. It also is measured by the absence of chronic

disease. By that score we get a big fat 'F.' So we don't have measles and mumps,

but look what we have now. It's just really simple: Take the mercury out and

let's see what happens. "

Even so, based on the Aventis admission that the package insert does not reflect

what is in the vaccine, it will be difficult to know when, if ever, the

thimerosal actually has been removed. This skews the data about the relationship

between thimerosal and autism. More important, it means parents cannot be sure

the vaccinations their children receive are free of mercury.

Neither the Wyeth nor Merck pharmaceutical companies, nor HHS or FDA, returned

Insight's calls about this matter.

Kelly Patricia O'Meara is an investigative reporter for Insight magazine.

Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc.

To , e-mail to: Gettingwell-

Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell

Free online calendar with sync to Outlook.

June 10, 2003

Hi

I found this information very interesting since we had the very same subject

discussed on a TV programme last Sunday. Now I have clients who are very

concerned and wants to know what they can do about this. What are the

choices - anyone?

Ron

-

" Frank " <califpacific

Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:23 AM

Vaccines fueling autism epidemic?

http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=32988

Vaccines fueling autism epidemic?

Report: U.S. infants exposed to mercury beyond EPA, FDA limits

Posted: June 9, 2003

5:00 p.m. Eastern

Editor's note: WorldNetDaily is pleased to have a content-sharing agreement

with Insight magazine, the bold Washington publication not afraid to ruffle

establishment feathers. Subscribe to Insight at WorldNetDaily's online store

and save 71 percent off the cover price.

By Kelly Patricia O Meara

The mother of an autistic child wonders aloud when health officials will

wake up to the epidemic that has claimed not only her son but hundreds of

thousands of other children in the United States, with no end in sight. She

muses, " Maybe someday this will be as important as SARS and we'll get the

same attention. God knows we need it. "

Autism is a severely incapacitating developmental disability for which there

is no known cure. According to a recently released report by the California

Department of Developmental Services, or DDS, entitled Autistic Spectrum

Disorders, Changes in the California Caseload: 1999-2002, the rate of

children diagnosed with full-syndrome autism in the Golden State between

1999 and 2002 nearly doubled from 10,360 to 20,377. The report further

revealed that " between Dec. 31, 1987, and Dec. 31, 2002, the population of

persons with full-syndrome autism has increased by 634 percent. " That is a

doubling of autism cases every four years, and the staggering increases are

not limited to California.

Infants are being inoculated with vaccines containing toxic ingredients that

can be harmful - or fatal.

According to data provided by the U.S. Department of Education, the

increased autism rate in California is in line with the increases other

states are experiencing. For example, in 1992 Ohio reported 22 cases. A

decade later the number had increased by 13,895 percent to 3,057. In

Illinois the rate of autism cases climbed from just five in 1992 to 3,802 -

an increase of 76,040 percent.

Mississippi, New Hampshire and the District of Columbia reported no cases of

autism in 1992, but by 2002 the number of cases reported were 461, 404 and

144, respectively.

Only Puerto Rico can claim to have an increase of less than 100 percent,

with the remaining states reporting increases of at least 500 percent during

the same period.

Although once considered rare, during the last two decades the chance of a

child being diagnosed with autism has skyrocketed from one in 10,000 to one

in 150. In California, full-syndrome autism now is the No. 1 disability

among children and more prevalent than childhood cancer, diabetes and Down's

syndrome. It is estimated that within the next four years autism cases in

the Golden State will exceed the total number of cases of both cerebral

palsy and epilepsy. To get a better idea of how quickly the epidemic is

spreading one need only consider that in 1987 there were 2,778 persons with

autism in California. By 2002 the number had increased to 20,377, and in

2002 3,575 new cases had been added to the rolls, far exceeding the total

number of cases in the state 15 years earlier.

For years there has been a debate about the cause or causes of autism, but

the vast majority of finger-pointing has been directed at childhood vaccines

as the culprit. And considering what is put into the vaccines injected into

hours-old infants, it is easy to understand why they are at the top of the

list of suspects: formaldehyde (used in embalming), thimerosal (nearly 50

percent mercury), aluminum phosphate (toxic and carcinogenic), antibiotics,

phenols (corrosive to skin and toxic), aluminum salts (corrosive to tissue

and neurotoxic), methanol (toxic), isopropyl (toxic), 2-pheoxyethanol

(toxic), live viruses and a host of unknown components considered off-limits

as trade secrets. These are just part of the vaccine mixture.

For those who believe there are elements in vaccines that may be responsible

for the increased number of autism cases and other neurological disorders,

thimerosal currently is at the top of the list of possible culprits being

investigated.

Despite official insistence that the evidence linking injected thimerosal to

autism is inconclusive, the data suggest otherwise. In 1999 the National

Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine, or IOM, must have thought there

was something seriously wrong when it supported removal of thimerosal from

vaccines, stating that it was " a prudent measure in support of the public

goal to reduce mercury exposure of infants and children as much as

possible. " The IOM further urged that " full consideration be given to

removing thimerosal from any biological product to which infants, children

and pregnant women are exposed. "

A recently published study in the Journal of American Physicians and

Surgeons by Mark Geier, M.D., Ph.D., and president of the Genetic Centers of

America and his son, David Geier, president of Medcon Inc. and a consultant

on vaccine cases, was titled " Thimerosal in Childhood Vaccines,

Neurodevelopment Disorders and Heart Disease in the United States. " It

presents strong epidemiological evidence for a link between

neurodevelopmental disorders and mercury exposure from thimerosal-containing

childhood vaccines.

Specifically, the authors evaluated the doses of mercury that children

received as part of their immunization schedule, then compared these doses

with federal safety guidelines. Furthermore, to compare the effects of

thimerosal in vaccine recipients, the incident rates of neurodevelopmental

disorders and heart disease reported to the government's Vaccine Adverse

Events Reporting System were analyzed. The results were dramatic. The report

revealed that " U.S. infants are exposed to mercury levels from their

childhood-immunization schedule that far exceed the EPA [Environmental

Protection Agency] and FDA [Food and Drug Administration]-established

maximum permissible levels for the daily oral ingestion of methyl mercury. "

The authors concluded that " in light of voluminous literature supporting the

biologic mechanisms for mercury-induced adverse reactions, the presence of

amounts of mercury in thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines exceeding

federal safety guidelines for the oral ingestion of mercury and previous

epidemiological studies showing adverse reactions to such vaccines, a causal

relationship between thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines and

neurodevelopment disorders and heart disease appears to be confirmed. "

It is no secret among government and health officials that mercury is toxic

and causes serious adverse reactions. In July 1999 the American Academy of

Pediatrics and the U.S. Public Health Service issued a joint statement

calling for the removal of thimerosal from vaccines. Five years after the

joint statement, however, it still is difficult for parents and physicians

to be sure that the pharmaceutical companies have indeed removed the toxic

substance from their vaccines.

According to Mark Geier, " The 2003 Physicians' Desk Reference, or PDR, still

shows childhood vaccines containing thimerosal, including diphtheria,

tetanus and acellular pertussis. DTaP, manufactured by Aventis Pasteur,

contains 25µg [25 micrograms] of mercury, Hemophilus influenzae b (Hib)

vaccine manufactured by Wyeth contains 25µg of mercury and pediatric

Hepatitis B vaccine, manufactured by Merck, contains 12.5µg of mercury. "

Geier continues, " In addition, the influenza vaccine that is recommended for

an increasing segment of the pediatric population in the U.S. also contains

25µg of mercury. Assuming that the labeling is correct, it is possible that

children in the U.S. in 2003 may be exposed to levels of mercury from

thimerosal contained in childhood vaccines that are at higher levels than at

any time in the past. Possible total childhood mercury in 2003 is more than

300µg. "

Whether the " labeling is correct " is the question du jour. According to Len

Lavenda, a spokesman for Aventis Pasteur, the maker of DTaP, " Aventis only

sells the DTaP vaccine in the preservative-free formulation. The PDR

references both the single and multidose. However, when we received the

license for the preservative-free we ceased sales of the multidose vial. For

some reason, the package insert takes much longer to revise than one would

expect. I believe it is at the FDA waiting for approval, but the fact is we

do not sell or market that product. In March 2001 we stopped all sales of

that product in the preservative formulation. We did not recall the product

at that time because it was our belief that if we did children may go

unimmunized. It's been two years since anyone has been able to purchase the

preservative formulation from us. "

Lavenda continues: " The package insert talks about both the single and

multidose vials and it says that the single-dose vial is preservative-free,

and that is all that is sold. The PDR is outdated, but parents don't have to

worry about their children being administered 25µg of thimerosal. It just

takes time to get the paperwork caught up. The current package insert does

not accurately reflect what is being marketed. "

Geier is astounded by Lavenda's admission. " If this is true, they should be

in jail. They can't have an insert on a drug that is totally wrong. It is

against all regulations. If I'm a doctor and I'm giving you a shot and the

insert says such and such is in the shot, it had better be in it. If doctors

can't rely on the instructions that come with what we're injecting then all

bets are off. This is a far worse admission than admitting that thimerosal

is still in the vaccine. There are at least 15 laws that say the insert has

to match what is in the product. This is absolutely horrendous. In my entire

career in medicine I have never heard of a drug company claiming that what's

in the insert and the accompanying product don't match. This is total

mislabeling and fraud by their own admission. Legally they should be forced

to close down because our clinical decisions are based on their labeling. "

Assuming that the package inserts are correct, Geier tells Insight, " The EPA

limit is 0.1 micrograms of mercury per kilogram body weight per day. It

doesn't take a genius to do the calculations when on their day of birth

children are given the hepatitis B vaccine, which is 12.5 micrograms of

mercury. The average newborn weighs between 6 and 7 pounds, so they would be

allowed 0.3 micrograms of mercury - but in this one shot they are getting

12.5 micrograms. That's 39 times more than allowed by law. And it gets worse

when you consider that children are getting multiple vaccinations at 2

months. And this limit is for oral ingestion and not injection, which is

much worse. "

Rhonda Smith, a spokeswoman for the federal Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention, tells Insight that, except for mere traces, thimerosal has been

removed. " All routinely recommended licensed vaccines, " says Smith, " that

are currently being manufactured for children in the U.S., except influenza,

contain no thimerosal or only trace amounts - a concentration of less than

0.0002 percent. " But according to the 2003 immunization schedule and the

package inserts, there appear to be a number of childhood vaccines that

still contain mercury, including those for tetanus and diphtheria.

This scenario becomes even more bizarre when one further considers that

thimerosal is not a necessary component in vaccines. It first was introduced

by pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly and Co. in the 1930s and is added to

vaccines only as a preservative - the theory being that multiple doses are

taken from the same bottle and that thimerosal will protect against

contamination. However, according to Geier, " the solution to any such

problem is to make vaccines available in a single dose, which will cost the

pharmaceuticals about one penny more. What is interesting is that if you

look up the mumps, measles, rubella [MMR] vaccines in the PDR you'll see

that they do not contain thimerosal because it would kill the live virus.

The MMR is available in multidose packaging and, yet, there is no

preservative - nothing. What they did was put a label on it that says 'This

product does not contain preservatives. Handle with care.' It's that

simple. "

Geier insists, " I'm pro-vaccines, but the bottom line is that our kids are

getting massive amounts of mercury. Mercury has been withdrawn from

everything, including animal vaccines, yet we keep injecting it into our

children. Everyone should absolutely refuse to take a vaccine shot that has

thimerosal in it, and they should insist on reading the vaccine package

insert. Our data showed that the more mercury children received in their

childhood vaccines the more neurodevelopment disorders there are. We've

looked at this every possible way and every time there's massive evidence to

support it. "

So, if everyone acknowledges the toxicity of mercury and top U.S. health

officials have called for its removal, why is thimerosal still in vaccines?

" Maybe, " concludes Geier, " the mercury isn't being taken out all at once

because if the pharmaceutical companies did that you would see an

unbelievable change in the rate of autism and there would be massive

lawsuits. If you look at the graphs now they go up and up. If you stop the

thimerosal all at once you'd see the numbers fall dramatically. "

Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., a longtime advocate for victims of autism, has a

grandson who became autistic after receiving nine vaccines in one day.

Burton recently sent his second request in as many years to the White House

asking for a conference of scientists, researchers and parents to look into

the causes of autism.

The Indiana lawmaker tells Insight, " There is no doubt in my mind that the m

ercury in vaccines is a major contributing factor to a growing number of

neurological disorders among children, but in particular autism. "

Burton explains that " thimerosal is a toxic substance - mercury - and should

not be put in close proximity of people, should not be injected into people,

especially children who have a newly formed immune system that may not be

able to handle it. To my knowledge there never have been long-term tests on

thimerosal and we never should have used mercury in vaccines, period. Now

what we've got is an epidemic that is absolutely out of control. "

The Indiana congressman continues, " One reason this isn't getting the

attention it needs is that the Food and Drug Administration has very close

ties to the pharmaceutical companies, as does the Department of Health and

Human Services [HHS] and the Centers for Disease Control. I've said in the

past that in some cases it appears that it's a revolving door and people

leave government health agencies and go to work for the pharmaceuticals,

which I think have undue influence on our health agencies. Of course, they

may not want to look at this because there's a possibility that large claims

would be filed and the pharmaceutical companies would have to cough up the

money to take care of these kids who have been damaged. "

Burton means business. He insists, " The FDA, CDC and HHS should put out in a

very public way the dangers of mercury, but as soon as they do it will

amount to an admission that their mercury is causing these problems. So the

reports that come out of the FDA, CDC and HHS use ambiguous terms. Well, if

they're not sure, and there's the remotest possibility that mercury in

vaccines could cause autism, they ought to get thimerosal off the market.

Too many kids are being ruined for life because of this stuff. "

Barbara Loe Fisher is founder of the National Vaccine Information Center, a

charitable organization dedicated to the prevention of vaccine injuries and

deaths through public education. Fisher tells Insight, " There are many

things in vaccines that could be causing these disorders, and thimerosal is

only part of the problem. In the last 20 years, we've gone from giving

children 23 doses of seven vaccines to 38 doses of 12 vaccines. I think the

mercury is part of it for some kids, though I'm not sure it's the answer for

all. " But this is a no-brainer, says Fisher. " Mercury shouldn't be in

vaccines. They've taken it out of everything else so why not the vaccines?

The one thing that people really need to look at is the dramatic rise in

chronic disease and disabilities in our kids in just the last two decades.

You have to admit that there is something occurring that a growing number of

children cannot get through without being immune-system and brain-system

damaged. And what is the one thing that we expose every child to? Those

vaccines. "

Fisher concludes, " I've always argued that public health is not measured

only by an absence of infectious disease. It also is measured by the absence

of chronic disease. By that score we get a big fat 'F.' So we don't have

measles and mumps, but look what we have now. It's just really simple: Take

the mercury out and let's see what happens. "

Even so, based on the Aventis admission that the package insert does not

reflect what is in the vaccine, it will be difficult to know when, if ever,

the thimerosal actually has been removed. This skews the data about the

relationship between thimerosal and autism. More important, it means parents

cannot be sure the vaccinations their children receive are free of mercury.

Neither the Wyeth nor Merck pharmaceutical companies, nor HHS or FDA,

returned Insight's calls about this matter.

Kelly Patricia O'Meara is an investigative reporter for Insight magazine.

Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc.

To , e-mail to: Gettingwell-

Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell

Free online calendar with sync to Outlook.

June 11, 2003

Hi,

I am new to this group and have never posted before. So, Hi everyone......I am

the mother of a Beautiful 6 year old son that has vaccine induced autism. We've

done chelation therapy and vitamin therapy. There have been significant

improvements. I am not, however, anti vaccine. Quite opposite. I am " all for "

vaccines. IF....the MMR is given SEPARATELY and all others are also given

separately AND are thimerosal free. I don't know the scope of this group. So,

I'm not sure what you guys discuss as far as this goes. There are many lawsuits

filed (ours is one of them)....frankly, they're destined to fail. Please feel

free to ask any questions associated with this. After 4 + years I kinda know a

thing or two about it, lol

Good to meet all of you.

Winona

NC

-

Ronnie Horn

Gettingwell

Tuesday, June 10, 2003 2:08 PM

Re: Vaccines fueling autism epidemic?