Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fwd: Good news from Canada!

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Fri, 9 May 2003 06:03:48 -0700

 

News Update from The Campaign

Good news from Canada!

 

News Update From The Campaign to Label Genetically Engineered Foods

----

 

Dear News Update Subscribers,

 

Good news! The Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to hear the case of

Percy Schmeiser, the Canadian canola farmer who was sued by Monsanto.

 

Posted below are two articles that will provide further details.

 

You can watch a free 26-minute video that features Percy Schmeiser

telling his story on The Campaign's web site at:

http://www.thecampaign.org/videohb.php

 

The video, called " Heartbreak in the Heartland, " can also be purchased

at The Campaign's web site for the low price of $7.50, including

shipping. Active Members in The Campaign receive 20 percent off,

lowering the price to just $6.00 each.

 

The Campaign congratulates Percy Schmeiser on this important development

in his ongoing battle with Monsanto.

 

If you would like to read the transcript of the judgment against Percy

that he is appealing, you can read it at:

http://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fct/2001/2001fct256.html

 

You can visit Percy Schmeiser's web site at:

http://www.percyschmeiser.com

 

Craig Winters

Executive Director

The Campaign to Label Genetically Engineered Foods

 

The Campaign

PO Box 55699

Seattle, WA 98155

Tel: 425-771-4049

Fax: 603-825-5841

E-mail: label

Web Site: http://www.thecampaign.org

 

Mission Statement: " To create a national grassroots consumer campaign

for the purpose of lobbying Congress and the President to pass

legislation that will require the labeling of genetically engineered

foods in the United States. "

 

***************************************************************

 

Sask farmer wins hearing from Supreme Court in patent battle with

Monsanto

 

May 8, 2003

 

REGINA (CP) -- The Saskatchewan farmer who has been embroiled in a

costly legal battle with biotech giant Monsanto for more than two years

is being given the opportunity to plead his case in the country's

highest court.

 

The Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to hear the case of Percy

Schmeiser, who is challenging past rulings that held him liable for more

than $170,000 in damages and legal costs.

 

Schmeiser was in Rome and not immediately available for comment

Thursday, but his lawyer Terry Zakreski said he is delighted with the

ruling.

 

" It's a big thrill and it's great news to hear this, " Zakreski said.

" I'm sure Percy will have a smile on his face as big as Saskatchewan

when he finds out. "

 

But much work lies ahead, Zakreski said.

 

" I compare this to Mount Everest. We've come all this way and we are

only at about base camp. All the tough climbing is still ahead. "

 

Monsanto Canada spokeswoman Trish Jordan said the court's decision will

be a costly one for both Schmeiser and the company, but Monsanto is

prepared to defend its position to the end.

 

" We will continue to follow the case for the next 12 to 14 months, "

Jordan said. " It would have been good if it was over today from our

perspective, but we'll keep going. "

 

At issue are U.S.-based Monsanto's patent rights to Roundup Ready

canola, a genetically modified strain resistant to powerful herbicides

that would normally kill the plants, widely used to produce cooking oil.

 

Monsanto charges farmers a fee of about $30 a hectare to use the seeds.

About 20,000 farmers across the country planted the seeds in 2000. Those

crops covered between about 18 million and 20 million hectares and

accounted for about 40 per cent of Canadian canola production.

 

Schmeiser, 72, who has farmed for about 50 years near Bruno, Sask., was

sued by Monsanto for growing its seeds without permission.

 

The Federal Court trial division agreed with the company that its patent

rights had been violated and ordered Schmeiser to pay $19,000 in damages

and $153,000 in court costs.

 

The judgment was upheld by the Federal Court of Appeal, which continued

to hold Schmeiser liable but rejected a counter-claim by Monsanto to

raise the damage figure.

 

Schmeiser denies he knowingly violated the patent. He contends the

herbicide-resistant crop grown in his fields may have resulted from

seeds blowing off a passing truck or from pollination from nearby fields

where his neighbours were growing Roundup Ready canola.

 

But Monsanto says that is impossible considering the large quantity of

Roundup tolerant crop in his field.

 

" We have always been of the belief that he deliberately and knowingly

misappropriated our technology, " Jordan said. " We do charge a fee for

our technology and we will protect our patent rights.

 

" The reason we do that is because of all the other farmers that are

paying for it. "

 

The case has become a cause celebre in Western Canada and has attracted

attention in other countries, making Schmeiser something of a folk hero

among farm and consumer activists who worry about the spread of

genetically modified crops and the economic clout of the companies that

hold patents for them.

 

Schmeiser has said he has drained his life savings in the legal battle

and has been relying on donations to continue his fight.

 

Angela Rickman, campaign co-ordinator with the Sierra Club of Canada,

said the environmental group will be watching the case closely.

 

" It's very important for small farmers, not just in Canada but around

the world, who are really concerned with the ability of multinationals

to patent what was previously considered to be the genetic common, " she

said from her home in Ottawa.

 

" The whole world will be watching the outcome. "

 

No date has been set for the Supreme Court hearing.

 

***************************************************************

 

Genetic food patent challenge to hit Canada court

 

Thursday May 8, 1:23 PM EDT

By Randall Palmer

 

OTTAWA, May 8 (Reuters) - A farmer crusading against genetically

modified grain won the right on Thursday to take the case to the

Canadian Supreme Court to challenge the patent rights of biotech giant

Monsanto Co. (MON).

 

In what began as a question of whether Percy Schmeiser had grown

Monsanto grain without a license on his Saskatchewan farm, the case has

broadened to what Schmeiser sees as a David-and-Goliath battle over

genetically altered food.

 

The Supreme Court agreed on Thursday to hear an appeal of lower-court

decisions that Schmeiser had violated the Monsanto patent for canola

modified to tolerate the herbicide Roundup.

 

It is a powerful invention -- all the weeds disappear but the canola is

left standing -- and 80 percent of the country's farmers now grow

transgenic canola. Canola is the Canadian variant of rapeseed, used

especially for cooking oil.

 

Monsanto is also hoping to introduce Roundup Ready wheat, for a much

larger market, but many farm groups are wary because most international

buyers say they do not want genetically modified wheat.

 

The company took Schmeiser to court after it discovered its patented

transgenic canola growing on his farm. Schmeiser had not signed a C$15

($10) per acre agreement with the company to grow it.

 

Schmeiser says he spent 40 years cultivating his own, conventional

canola varieties, saving seed from one crop to plant the next and that

he did not know how the genetically modified plants ended up on his

farm.

 

He suggested that seeds blew off passing trucks, or pollen from nearby

farms was carried in by wind, insects or birds, and he contended that

Monsanto had unleashed an " invention " they could not control into the

environment.

 

Monsanto said independent tests of Schmeiser's farm had found that 1,030

acres were 95 percent to 98 percent tolerant to Roundup -- though this

was contested by the farmer.

 

Referring to the trial judge's decision in 2001, Monsanto said in a

statement: " At such a high level of tolerance, Justice MacKay ruled the

seed could only be of commercial quality and could not have arrived in

Mr. Schmeiser's field by accident. "

 

Monsanto spokeswoman Trish Jordan said: " We were hopeful the unanimous

decision of the Federal Court of Appeal would have put an end to

unnecessary and costly legal action in this case. "

 

The Supreme Court is not likely to be hear the case before the autumn at

the earliest.

 

***************************************************************

 

If you would like to comment on this News Update, you can do so at the

forum section of our web site at: http://www.thecampaign.org/forums

 

***************************************************************

 

 

 

---------

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc.

 

To , e-mail to: Gettingwell-

Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell

 

 

 

The New Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...