Guest guest Posted March 17, 2003 Report Share Posted March 17, 2003 http://consumeraffairs.com/news03/bush_appeals.html Bush Would Limit Medicare Appeals March 15, 2003 The Bush Administration is trying to make it harder for Medicare beneficiaries to appeal the denial of such benefits as home health care and skilled nursing home care. It's one of several Bush initiatives to limit citizens' right to judicial review in matters involving health, personal injury and employment. Tens of thousands of federal employees lost their right to appeal forced transfers, firings and demotions under the Homeland Security Act and the Administration is pushing hard to limit citizens' rights to punitive damage awards in medical malpractice cases. Now President Bush is proposing legislation that would severely limit the right of federal judges to review cases involving the denial of Medicare services. He wants to replace independent judges with mediators, hearing officers or others appointed by the Department of Health and Human Services, the agency that runs the Medicare program. Secretary of Health and Human Services Tommy G. Thompson says the changes would give his agency " flexibility to reform the appeals system, " allowing it to operate in a more " efficient and effective manner. " Currently, federal judges decide appeals under the Administrative Procedure Act, a 1946 law that is intended to guarantee the fairness of government proceedings. Individual beneficiaries have a big stake in the issue. When claims are denied, the individual may be required to pay tens of thousands of dollars for services already received. In a typical case cited by The New York Times, an administrative law judge ordered Medicare to pay for 230 home care visits to a 67-year-old woman with breast cancer, heart disease and arthritis. Medicare officials had said the woman should pay the cost. But the judge ordered Medicare to pay because the woman was homebound and the services were " reasonable and necessary. " Last year, Medicare beneficiaries and the providers who treated them won more than half the cases -- 39,796 of the 77,388 Medicare cases decided by administrative law judges, the Times reported. Consumer organizations, judges and advocates for the aged were quick to attach the Bush plan. " We see President Bush's proposals as a serious assault ... on the rights of citizens to fair, impartial hearings. These hearings guarantee due process of law, as required by the Constitution, " said Ronald G. Bernoski, president of the Association of Administrative Law Judges. " The president's proposals would compromise the independence of administrative law judges, who have protected beneficiaries in case after case, year after year, " said Judith A. Stein, director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy in Willimantic, Conn. " This is a breath-taking assault on the most basic rights of American citizens -- the right to seek justice before an impartial judge and jury, to be protected from the power of government to seize one's life, liberty and property, " said ConsumerAffairs.Com Founder & CEO James R. Hood. " It is infuriating to hear Tommy Thompson talk about being 'efficient and effective' in handling appeals from elderly individuals who, at the end of their lives, are seeking such modest benefits as daily visits from a home health care aide, " Hood said. " Government needs to be effective in delivering basic benefits to its poor, elderly and dying -- not in finding new ways to deny those benefits. " Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc. To , e-mail to: Gettingwell- Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell Web Hosting - establish your business online Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.