Guest guest Posted February 27, 2003 Report Share Posted February 27, 2003 Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:40:16 -0800 News Update from The Campaign EPA allows Monsanto's continued attack on organic corn News Update From The Campaign to Label Genetically Engineered Foods ---- If you would like to comment on this News Update, you can do so at the forum section of our web site at: http://www.thecampaign.org/forums Dear News Update Subscribers, The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is continuing to jeopardize organic agriculture with its approval on Tuesday of Monsanto's MON 863 genetically engineered corn. It will be sold as YieldGard Rootworm corn. The media is providing broad coverage of this approval with the angle that it will reduce the use of pesticides. But the reduction of pesticides will only occur because the plant itself has been turned into a pesticide with a genetically engineered version of the toxin Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) present throughout the cells of the plant. The built-in Bt pesticide will not kill all the rootworms, so farmers will probably need to continue to spray with pesticides. And overexposure to Bt will render it ineffective in as little as seven years. The EPA ignored the advise of its own " scientific advisory panel " that recommended a 50 percent refuge be set up around the genetically engineered corn to prevent the rootworms from developing resistance. Monsanto only wanted a 20 percent refuge. EPA officials approved Monsanto's request. ORGANIC CORN UNDER ATTACK The EPA's approval of Monsanto's MON 863 genetically engineered corn attacks organic corn in two very direct ways: 1) Pollen from Monsanto's MON 863 corn will cross-pollinate with organic corn contaminating the organic corn with the genetically altered gene. The MON 863 corn contains a genetically engineered toxic derived from the soil bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). A great deal of organic corn grown in the United States is already testing positive for genetically altered genes. The dramatic increase in acreage of Bt corn that will occur with the introduction of the MON 863 variety will greatly accelerate the contamination of organic corn. 2) Overexposure of insects to Bt crops such as Monsanto's MON 863 corn will soon render the spray version of Bt useless for organic farmers. Currently organic farmers use the spray form of Bt if they have a severe insect infestation. The increasing acreage of genetically engineered Bt crops being planted in the United States will cause organic farmers to lose one of the most valuable tools they have to prevent crop lost. The EPA even admits that insects may become resistant to the MON 863 corn in as little as seven years. It is quite likely that the spray form of Bt that organic farmers are using will also become ineffective before the end of this decade. The biotech industry will simply develop another toxin to build into their genetically altered crops. But organic farmers will be left with no replacement for the spray form of Bt to fight insects. Posted below are five articles about Monsanto's new MON 863 corn. The first article is from the New York Times, the second from the Washington Post, the third from the Associated Press and the fourth is from Reuters. The fifth article is a press release from the EPA defending their approval of MON 863. It is titled " New Corn Pest Control Approved by EPA Can Lead to Reduced Pesticide Use. " The EPA knows that the reduction of pesticide use is only occurring because the plant is being turned into a pesticide. They also know that the insects will soon grow resistant to the built-in pesticide. Over time farmers are likely to need to spray more and more pesticides on the plants to achieve results. This is not a model for sustainable agriculture. The bottom line is that the EPA's approval of MON 863 corn helps the profits of the biotech agriculture industry at the expense of the organic agriculture industry. Promises of reduction of pesticide use are being exaggerated and will likely be short-lived. Long-term agricultural sustainability and dramatic reductions of pesticide use can be best obtained through organic farming methods. Craig Winters Executive Director The Campaign to Label Genetically Engineered Foods The Campaign PO Box 55699 Seattle, WA 98155 Tel: 425-771-4049 Fax: 603-825-5841 E-mail: label Web Site: http://www.thecampaign.org Mission Statement: " To create a national grassroots consumer campaign for the purpose of lobbying Congress and the President to pass legislation that will require the labeling of genetically engineered foods in the United States. " *************************************************************** E.P.A. Approves the Use of Monsanto's Altered Corn The New York Times February 26, 2003 By ANDREW POLLACK The government announced yesterday that it had approved a type of genetically modified corn that it says could lead to a significant reduction in the use of toxic insecticides. The approval was granted by the Environmental Protection Agency to a corn developed by Monsanto that is resistant to the corn rootworm. This soil-dwelling pest accounted for one out of seven applications of insecticide to all agricultural crops, according to the E.P.A. The resistant corn would require little or no chemicals. " Corn rootworm is the pest that requires the single largest use of conventional pesticides in the United States, " said Stephen L. Johnson, the E.P.A.'s assistant administrator for prevention, pesticides and toxic substances. " From an environmental and human health perspective, this product replaces some very significant problematic, or potentially problematic, chemicals. " The approval is a boost for Monsanto, which has been struggling with falling earnings, and for biotechnology crops, because it is the first truly new product in some years. Until now the industry has subsisted on variations of two main products: soybeans and other crops resistant to Monsanto's Roundup herbicide, and BT corn and cotton, which are resistant to the corn borer and the cotton bollworm, respectively. The new product is also a form of BT corn, meaning it contains a gene from a bacterium called Bacillus thuringiensis that causes the plant to produce a toxin that kills the rootworm. But the type of BT toxin is different from the ones used to kill the corn borer and the bollworm. Advocates of crop biotechnology have long said that one of its benefits would be to cut the use of more toxic insecticides that are sprayed on fields, often killing not only the target pests but other insects and wildlife and endangering the health of farmers. With the existing BT corn, some experts say, there has been little if any reduction in pesticide use because farmers do not always spray for the corn borer. Monsanto said it expected the genetically engineered corn, which is called YieldGard Rootworm, would eventually be used on 12 million to 15 million of the nation's 80 million acres of corn, generating $150 million to $200 million in revenue. But this year there will be less than a million acres grown because many farmers had already bought their seed before the approval came and because Monsanto needs to manufacture more seed. Monsanto is banking on genetically modified crops to reduce its dependence on its mainstay Roundup herbicide, which is now facing generic competition. The company's profits have been weak because of the competition for Roundup, economic problems in Latin America and resistance to genetically modified crops in some areas of the world, particularly Europe. The company's stock fell 7 cents, to $16.75. Fred Yoder, president of the National Corn Growers Association, predicted farmers would eagerly adopt the new corn. " We've been waiting a long time for this, " he said. " Rootworm is the No. 1 pest and the No. 1 yield robber we have in growing corn. " But Charles Benbrook, a consultant and former agricultural specialist for the National Research Council who has been critical of genetically modified crops, said that data provided by Monsanto showed the corn would not kill all the rootworms. " If it doesn't perform any better than soil insecticides I think a lot of farmers will stick with the insecticides, " he said. The E.P.A. regulates the plant because it is considered to contain a built-in pesticide. To prevent rootworms from becoming resistant to the BT corn, the E.P.A. is requiring that farmers plant 20 percent of their corn fields with different corn, as a refuge. That is the figure proposed by Monsanto. But the majority of members of a scientific advisory panel convened by the E.P.A. last August recommended that the refuge be 50 percent of each farm's corn acreage. This larger refuge requirement might have discouraged some farmers from growing the new corn. Mr. Johnson of the E.P.A. said that after the advisory panel meeting, Monsanto submitted more information that led the agency to conclude that 20 percent would be enough. That requirement is the same as for existing BT corn varieties, and that would make it easier for farmers to comply. The approval of the new corn is only for about one year, though it is expected to be extended to three years, he said. In that time, he said, scientists could gather more data on what size of a refuge is needed. Dow Chemical and the Pioneer Hi-Bred unit of DuPont are working together on their own version of BT rootworm resistant corn, which they hope to market in 2005. *************************************************************** In Key Test, U.S. Allows Sale of Genetically Engineered Corn By Justin Gillis Washington Post Staff Writer Wednesday, February 26, 2003; Page A01 Monsanto Co. won government approval yesterday to sell genetically altered corn designed to combat the most significant pest in the largest crop grown in the United States, setting up a major test of whether the plant biotechnology industry can deliver on its long-standing promise to reduce the use of chemical pesticides. The new corn is genetically engineered to resist corn rootworm disease. That problem, which plagues farmers nationwide, is the biggest single reason they apply toxic pesticides to their fields. Monsanto, of St. Louis, estimates that the corn could eventually be grown on 12 million acres, or 15 percent of the nation's cornfields. In granting permission, the Environmental Protection Agency acknowledged that some environmental questions remain but declared that on balance the corn appears to offer more benefits than risks. " What this decision means is that the environment will have literally millions of pounds of very toxic pesticides not being used, " said Stephen Johnson, the assistant EPA administrator in charge of pesticide regulation. People would be unlikely to eat much, if any, of the new corn. Like most corn grown in North America, the new crop is likely to be used overwhelmingly as animal feed, so people would eat it only indirectly -- as poultry, beef or other meat. But a small amount might be turned into products such as corn syrup, a sweetener. The approval is a victory for Monsanto, a company struggling to gain public acceptance of gene-altered crops. " This is a new tool to help farmers fight insects, " said Robb Fraley, Monsanto's chief technology officer. " But the real beneficiary is the public, which is getting a more sustainable agricultural system. This will allow growers to be better stewards of the land. " For years, the backers of agricultural biotechnology, which involves inserting new genes into plants to confer traits such as improved insect or weed resistance, have claimed that their techniques hold the potential to replace toxic herbicides and insecticides with more benign control methods. But big reductions in chemical use have been achieved only with gene-altered cotton. For genetically engineered crops grown as human food or animal feed, the data have been far murkier. Corn rootworm, nicknamed the " billion-dollar bug " because it costs farmers nearly $1 billion a year in lost yields and control expenses, is such a huge agricultural problem that the new gene-altered corn is likely to serve as the definitive test of whether big chemical reductions can be achieved in a food crop. " This is a blockbuster, " said Gregory Jaffe, director of biotechnology programs at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a Washington consumer group that favors the use of agricultural biotechnology under tightly regulated conditions. " It's the first product to come down the line in a while that really could cut insecticide use and help the environment. " Jaffe and representatives of some other watchdog groups, however, expressed disappointment that the EPA had yielded to Monsanto on one key issue. Most members of a scientific advisory panel had urged the EPA to require farmers to plant sizable " refuges, " or strips of conventional corn, around the genetically altered crops to provide food for the rootworm and slow the pests' ability to develop a resistance to the new corn variety. Panel members wanted the EPA to require that 50 percent of a farmer's cornfield be planted as refuges, while Monsanto pushed for 20 percent, similar to requirements already in place for other crops. The EPA sided with Monsanto. " What we have here is companies doing as they usually do: profiting in the short term " even if it shortens the life of the product, said Jane Rissler, senior staff scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists, a Washington group. Johnson, of the EPA, rejected criticism on the issue, noting that the 20 percent requirement will be in effect for only three years while the resistance issue is studied further. New plans may be put in place if resistance proves to be a problem, Johnson said. Corn rootworm is the common name for the larval stage of four species of beetles that grow in fields throughout the United States. The immature beetles feed on the roots of corn plants, sometimes damaging them so much that the plants blow over in storms or yield little corn. To create resistant corn, Monsanto, through molecular engineering, inserted a gene that contains instructions for making a protein toxic to most varieties of the worms, but one that can be easily digested by people or other mammals. The new crop does pose theoretical risks to some other species, including beneficial insects, and the EPA said it would monitor that issue. Monsanto hopes to put limited supplies of the new corn on the market for the 2003 growing season, but the corn is not expected to gain wide use until 2004, when additional seed becomes available. The company intends to cross the new corn with an older gene-altered corn designed to resist a lesser worm, the European corn borer. And, in a first, Monsanto will create a variety with three genetic modifications: the two anti-worm proteins plus a gene that helps farmers fight weeds. This latter variety, designed to solve virtually all common problems that farmers confront in growing corn, may serve as the first real test of whether large-scale, industrialized agriculture is possible in the United States without significant use of toxic chemicals. *************************************************************** EPA Approves Monsanto's New Type of Corn By EMILY GERSEMA ..c The Associated Press WASHINGTON (AP) - A new corn genetically designed to resist rootworm can go onto the market, the Environmental Protection Agency announced Tuesday. ``This new variety of corn pest control holds great promise for reducing reliance on conventional insecticides now used on millions of acres of corn in the U.S.'' said Stephen L. Johnson, an assistant administrator at the EPA. Monsanto, a St. Louis biotech company, designed the corn variety so it would produce its own insecticide to fend off rootworm, a pest whose larvae feed off the plant's roots. The plant's pesticide is derived from a protein contained in a natural soil bacterium called Bt, or Bacillus thuringiensis. Farmers have had to depend on chemical insecticides and alternating soybean and corn crops every other year to control rootworm. Monsanto officials said the government's approval came just in time for the 2003 planting season. The variety will be sold as YieldGard Rootworm corn. ``The registration of YieldGard Rootworm corn is great news for the hundreds of seed companies and tens of thousands of U.S. farmers who are seeing the benefits of biotech products,'' said Jennifer Ozimkiewicz, a Monsanto spokeswoman. EPA officials said they want to reduce the risk of rootworm developing a tolerance to the corn's pesticide by requiring Monsanto to ensure that 20 percent of the acreage where the seeds are planted is kept as a buffer zone. The zone would be a refuge for rootworms that won't be in contact with the pesticide. EPA officials expect the unexposed rootworms to mate with those exposed to the Bt bacterium, which should prevent the insects from passing on their tolerance and help the pesticide remain effective. Gregory Jaffe, biotech director at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, warned that setting aside 20 percent of the acreage to prevent resistance development isn't enough. He said at least half the acreage should be set aside for the buffer zone as an extra precaution. On the Net: Environmental Protection Agency: http://www.epa.gov Monsanto: http://www.monsanto.com/ 02/25/03 20:24 EST *************************************************************** Monsanto biotech corn wins regulatory approval By Carey Gillam KANSAS CITY, Mo., Feb 25 (Reuters) - Monsanto Co. said Tuesday it had received final regulatory approval for a new biotech corn designed to fight rootworm, and seed would be marketed in time for spring planting in the United States. Both Monsanto and members of the U.S. corn growing industry have been eagerly awaiting the regulatory approval, with Monsanto seeing the new product as a significant addition to its growing stable of biotech crops. " This is a very important product for Monsanto, " said Bryan Hurley, a spokesman for Monsanto, which has been working to offset lagging revenues in its herbicide business with increased sales of biotech seeds and traits. The genetically modified corn, called YieldGard Rootworm corn, contains a protein from a common soil microbe that targets the larvae of corn rootworm, a devastating pest that eats into yields and farmer profits. The corn is able to naturally protect its roots against the corn rootworm. The U.S. Department of Agriculture has estimated that rootworm costs U.S. corn growers about $1 billion annually. " This is very good news, this would really help our farmers, " said Sue Schulte, spokeswoman for Kansas Corn Growers Association. Monsanto is the first company to commercialize a biotech corn aimed at combating corn rootworm, though Dow AgroSciences has one in the pipeline. The new corn will be available in corn hybrids sold through Monsanto's branded seed businesses as well as through licensed, independent seed companies. There will be only enough seed for slightly under a million acres this year, out of a potential estimated market of more than 12-15 million acres where rootworm is treated with insecticides, said Hurley. " It is logical we could probably capture that market longterm, " he said. Monsanto will price the seed to be competitive with the estimated $150-$200 million a year farmers spend on insecticides to fight corn rootworm, Hurley said. The initial release will focus on areas of eastern Colorado, and western Kansas and western Nebraska, where the problems are most severe. Monsanto hopes to ramp up seed production to have supplies for 5-6 million acres by 2005. Gregory Jaffe, biotech project director for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, said the new biotech corn should reduce use of insecticides while still helping farmers protect their crops. But, he said the benefits may be short-lived because regulators are only requiring a 20 percent refuge area -- acres not planted to biotech corn -- to protect against resistance. " The EPA decided to put short-term profits ahead of the long-term public good by agreeing to Monsanto's refuge plan of 20 percent, " said Jaffe. A 50 percent refuge was preferred by scientists to reduce the chance that strains will become less resistant to insects over time. " We wanted to see this product succeed because we think it will have the potential for tremendous environmental benefits, but as a society it will only realize those benefits if it is used in a safe manner. And our view is that 20 percent refuge is not a safe manner at this point, " said Jaffe. An EPA spokesman defended the agency's review of the new biotech corn. Dave Deegan said the EPA found a 20 percent refuge zone was still effective, and was consistent with similar requirements for other biotech crops. " We do think we are actually being very protective, " said Deegan. " But (insect resistance) is something we are continuing to look at and require additional study. " The EPA said it expected resistance of the corn to develop no sooner than seven years, similar to what occurs with traditional pesticides. Shares in Monsanto were down 7 cents a share at $16.75 in trading on the New York Stock Exchange. (Additional reporting by Christopher Doering in Washington) 02/25/03 17:50 ET *************************************************************** New Corn Pest Control Approved by EPA Can Lead to Reduced Pesticide Use WASHINGTON, Feb. 25 /U.S. Newswire/ -- After an intensive, multi-year scientific analysis, EPA has approved the use of a new plant-incorporated protectant designed to control corn rootworm, a widespread and destructive insect in the United States. This new product will provide corn growers with a safe, non-chemical pest control alternative that can reduce reliance on traditional insecticides. The reduced pesticide use will benefit the environment directly and can mean less exposure to people who apply chemical pesticides to corn. " EPA has put this new product through a rigorous, science-based review process, including extensive public comment and independent scientific peer review, to ensure that it is safe for human health and the environment, " commented Stephen L. Johnson, EPA's Assistant Administrator for Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances. " This new variety of corn pest control holds great promise for reducing reliance on conventional insecticides now used on millions of acres of corn in the U.S. " continued Johnson. The new corn pest control, referred to as " MON 863 " and developed by Monsanto, produces its own insecticide within the plant derived from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), a naturally occurring soil bacterium. The Bt protein, called Cry3Bb1, controls corn rootworm, a highly destructive pest responsible for the single largest use of conventional insecticides in the United States. At roughly 80 million planted acres, corn is the largest crop grown in the United States. Use of the new pest-control tool is expected to result in major reductions in the use of numerous conventional insecticides. Many of the older alternative insecticides belong to the organophosphate and carbamate chemical classes which have been the subject of increased EPA analysis and regulatory restrictions since passage of the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996. In order to reduce the possibility of corn rootworm developing resistance to Bt, EPA is requiring Monsanto to ensure that 20 percent of the planted acreage of this product be set aside where non-Bt corn will be grown to serve as a " refuge. " These refuge areas will support populations of corn rootworm not exposed to the Bt bacterium. The insect populations in the refuges will help prevent resistance development when they cross-breed with insects in the Bt fields. This resistance management strategy was developed as a condition of the registration, and EPA will require routine monitoring and documentation that these measures are followed. EPA is also requiring Monsanto to conduct additional research on corn rootworm to ensure that optimal long-term resistance management practices are maintained. Today's action is based on a thorough and comprehensive scientific and regulatory evaluation by EPA. It also builds upon a multi-year reassessment performed by the Agency on all currently available Bt plant-incorporated protectants regulated by EPA which was completed in October 2001. As with all similar products, EPA has approved MON 863 for time-limited use which will be subject to reevaluation in several years. For more information on EPA's regulation of these products, see: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/. Contact: David Deegan of the Environmental Protection Agency, 202-564-7839 02/25 16:00 --------- Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc. To , e-mail to: Gettingwell- Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.