Group opinions and policies concerning health and politics here.

[Guest guest]

Dear Group,

 

I am sorry about the previous post.

 

I sounded like such an autocrat and that is not what I had in mind at

all. Sometimes I just get too tired.

 

I do care about what the group wants. It is just if you have 900

members, you have 900 individual wants.

 

It is no excuse, but I was tired and somewhat ill when i wrote that

earlier

 

I will try and help disseminate good information to the group.

 

I do care that good health information is made public, as much as

possible, so that others can be spared damage and can find health.

 

In our search for understanding of health issues, I just hope that

we can try and care for each other in our search and let that be one

of our main principles.

 

If you feel squimish about any article that you feel has political

overtones, please try and look at it and try and determine the truth

to it, not if it fits your preconceived idea of political correctness.

 

If you determine that it isn't true (from as neutral as possible

viewpoint, not your own partisan politics) then think and post your

reasons. Do not post just because it injures your idea of what is

correct political thinking. We have to become somewhat non political

animals and become just human animals.

 

We have to be able to see what is good for the health of everyone, to

see and acknowledge it openly, and not just have selective vison and

be critical only because it is of the opposition.

 

Once again, I do care what your wishes are. We will just have to

start out, feel our way along, and try and take it in an easy manner.

 

thanks,

 

Frank

[Guest guest]

Frank wrote:

 

>Dear Group,

>

>I have read all of the different opinions concerning politics and health. Thank

you all for posting.

>

>It seems like most want politics discussed that concern health issues.

>

>

 

I got the impression a bit differently: Not that most want politics

discussed concerning health issues, but IF politics are discussed, they

should be only those which concern health issues.

Morton

 

>

>Well, on with the discussions.

>

>thanks again,

>

>Frank

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Morton,

 

It seems to me to be the same thing except a matter of semantics or

possibly sour grapes.

 

Frank

 

 

Gettingwell , Morton Bodanis <mortonmb@c...>

wrote:

>

>

> Frank wrote:

>

> >Dear Group,

> >

> >I have read all of the different opinions concerning politics and

health. Thank you all for posting.

> >

> >It seems like most want politics discussed that concern health

issues.

> >

> >

>

> I got the impression a bit differently: Not that most want politics

> discussed concerning health issues, but IF politics are discussed,

they

> should be only those which concern health issues.

> Morton

>

> >

> >Well, on with the discussions.

> >

> >thanks again,

> >

> >Frank

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

califpacific wrote:

 

>Dear Morton,

>

>It seems to me to be the same thing except a matter of semantics or

>possibly sour grapes.

>

>Frank

>

>

Semantics? Hardly. Sour grapes? What do you mean?

 

How about these 2 quotes:

 

I agree with Rena and Barbara, no politics unless it pertains to a health

issue. Good health groups are hard to find, political groups are in

abundance.

 

Have a great week everyone!

 

Deborah

 

And:

 

 

My opinion of this politic thing is to limit it to the necessity of tying it to

the health issues at hand. Otherwise, I feel only health issues need be

discussed in this group. I think...

 

Deborah

 

Morton

 

>

>Gettingwell , Morton Bodanis <mortonmb@c...>

>wrote:

>

>

>>Frank wrote:

>>

>>

>>

>>>Dear Group,

>>>

>>>I have read all of the different opinions concerning politics and

>>>

>>>

>health. Thank you all for posting.

>

>

>>>It seems like most want politics discussed that concern health

>>>

>>>

>issues.

>

>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>I got the impression a bit differently: Not that most want politics

>>discussed concerning health issues, but IF politics are discussed,

>>

>>

>they

>

>

>>should be only those which concern health issues.

>>Morton

>>

 

>>

>>

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

It means that I read the messages and a few didn't want any politics,

some wanted all out anything on the board. The majority I read, as

believeing that political issues governed the what, where and who

about our health and wanted to be aware of the issues as they came up.

 

You wanted only a minimal with an example of " codex " as the type of

posting you thought were admissable.

 

Codex, in my opinion, is waiting till the " down to the last ditch,

crunch type, emergency, shit, no they are not. type response.

 

Personally, I would like a little more forewarning before the

bastards try to screw over me.

 

If it is that big a deal to you, just delete the offending messages.

or you might think about starting a group the way that you like. You

might discuss it with Deborah, Rena, and Barbara.

 

Frank

 

Gettingwell , Morton Bodanis <mortonmb@c...>

wrote:

>

>

> califpacific wrote:

>

> >Dear Morton,

> >

> >It seems to me to be the same thing except a matter of semantics

or

> >possibly sour grapes.

> >

> >Frank

> >

> >

> Semantics? Hardly. Sour grapes? What do you mean?

>

> How about these 2 quotes:

>

> I agree with Rena and Barbara, no politics unless it pertains to a

health

> issue. Good health groups are hard to find, political groups are in

> abundance.

>

> Have a great week everyone!

>

> Deborah

>

> And:

>

>

> My opinion of this politic thing is to limit it to the necessity

of tying it to the health issues at hand. Otherwise, I feel only

health issues need be discussed in this group. I think...

>

> Deborah

>

> Morton

>

> >

> >Gettingwell , Morton Bodanis <mortonmb@c...>

> >wrote:

> >

> >

> >>Frank wrote:

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>>Dear Group,

> >>>

> >>>I have read all of the different opinions concerning politics

and

> >>>

> >>>

> >health. Thank you all for posting.

> >

> >

> >>>It seems like most want politics discussed that concern health

> >>>

> >>>

> >issues.

> >

> >

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>I got the impression a bit differently: Not that most want

politics

> >>discussed concerning health issues, but IF politics are

discussed,

> >>

> >>

> >they

> >

> >

> >>should be only those which concern health issues.

> >>Morton

> >>

>

> >>

> >>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

califpacific wrote:

 

>It means that I read the messages and a few didn't want any politics,

>some wanted all out anything on the board. The majority I read, as

>believeing that political issues governed the what, where and who

>about our health and wanted to be aware of the issues as they came up.

>

>You wanted only a minimal with an example of " codex " as the type of

>posting you thought were admissable.

>

>Codex, in my opinion, is waiting till the " down to the last ditch,

>crunch type, emergency, shit, no they are not. type response.

>

>Personally, I would like a little more forewarning before the

>bastards try to screw over me.

>

>If it is that big a deal to you, just delete the offending messages.

>or you might think about starting a group the way that you like. You

>might discuss it with Deborah, Rena, and Barbara.

>

>Frank

>

 

And I thought that I had a bad day.

Morton

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Frank,

I would like to go on the record here as saying that I really like this group

and don't want to be lumped in with the opinion of this poster because we do not

share the same views. I am fine with whatever gets posted here. I know where

my delete key is if I don't want to read a certain post and am perfectly happy

with the guidelines of this group.

Rena

 

If it is that big a deal to you, just delete the offending messages.

or you might think about starting a group the way that you like. You

might discuss it with Deborah, Rena, and Barbara.

 

Frank

 

Gettingwell , Morton Bodanis <mortonmb@c...>

wrote:

>

>

> califpacific wrote:

>

> >Dear Morton,

> >

> >It seems to me to be the same thing except a matter of semantics

or

> >possibly sour grapes.

> >

> >Frank

> >

> >

> Semantics? Hardly. Sour grapes? What do you mean?

>

> How about these 2 quotes:

>

> I agree with Rena and Barbara, no politics unless it pertains to a

health

> issue. Good health groups are hard to find, political groups are in

> abundance.

>

> Have a great week everyone!

>

> Deborah

>

> And:

>

>

> My opinion of this politic thing is to limit it to the necessity

of tying it to the health issues at hand. Otherwise, I feel only

health issues need be discussed in this group. I think...

>

> Deborah

>

> Morton

>

> >

> >Gettingwell , Morton Bodanis <mortonmb@c...>

> >wrote:

> >

> >

> >>Frank wrote:

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>>Dear Group,

> >>>

> >>>I have read all of the different opinions concerning politics

and

> >>>

> >>>

> >health. Thank you all for posting.

> >

> >

> >>>It seems like most want politics discussed that concern health

> >>>

> >>>

> >issues.

> >

> >

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>I got the impression a bit differently: Not that most want

politics

> >>discussed concerning health issues, but IF politics are

discussed,

> >>

> >>

> >they

> >

> >

> >>should be only those which concern health issues.

> >>Morton

> >>

>

> >>

> >>

>

>

>