Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

The Pinking of Viagra

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=15096

 

 

The Pinking of Viagra

 

By Steve Dow, AlterNet

February 4, 2003

 

The profit-rich path for female sexual satisfaction is paved with denial, from

the alleged invention of an illness to the naming of a potential quick-fix pill.

 

 

 

Pfizer, the multinational drug company that has given 17 million men the blue

diamond-shaped pill Viagra to spur erections, denies that its employees ever

coined the tag " Pink Viagra " to describe a drug currently being tested to boost

women's bedroom performance. The company gives sole credit to a journalist for

creating the phrase.

 

 

 

A couple of years ago, as Pfizer puts it, a reporter from a newspaper in Israel

was among several journalists taken on a tour of the company's research

facility. He was told about clinical trials on a women's version of Viagra

which, at the time, were " very hush hush. " Pfizer spokesperson Craig Regan says

this journalist's story contained the first reference to " Pink Viagra. "

 

 

 

" The pink absolutely threw everybody, " he says. " Some were a little miffed, to be

honest, because at that stage the trial was in the early stages. "

 

 

 

Before long, the British editors of the Collins Gem dictionary of buzzwords and

phrases had named Pink Viagra as one of the most defining phrases of 2002. " It's

the old story, " says Regan. " A lot of the coverage of anything to do with Viagra

loses perspective. They [journalists] just go feral. "

 

 

 

But is it journalists going feral over the potential for women's Viagra, or is

the drug maker behaving in not quite the circumspect manner in which it portrays

itself?

 

 

 

In a sensationally received critique in the first issue of the British Medical

Journal for 2003, Ray Moynihan, a journalist for The Australian Financial

Review, labelled the idea of female sexual dysfunction a " corporate [drug

company] sponsored creation. "

 

 

 

The Australian journalist touched a nerve when he questioned whether a new

disorder had been identified to meet unmet needs, or, more cynically, to build

markets for new medications. Wrote Moynihan: " [Researchers] with close ties to

drug companies are working with colleagues in the pharmaceutical industry to

develop and define a new category of human illness at meetings heavily sponsored

by companies racing to develop new drugs. "

 

 

 

Moynihan plotted a six-year chart showing that, in order to build a Viagra-type

market for women, pharmaceutical companies funded a series of meetings to create

a " clearly defined medical diagnosis with measurable characteristics to

facilitate credible clinical trials. "

 

 

 

But, says Moynihan, corporate-sponsored definitions of female sexual dysfunction

have been criticized as misleading and potentially dangerous. An estimate by two

Pfizer-funded researchers in the Journal of the American Medical Association

that 43 percent of women aged 18 to 59 suffer sexual dysfunction had been

criticized by other researchers as an exaggeration.

 

 

 

" The role of drug companies in the construction of new conditions, disorders,

and diseases needs more public scrutiny, " urges Moynihan.

 

 

 

Pfizer's Regan denies that female sexual dysfunction is a condition that has

arisen overnight. However, he says, there are four or five broad categories for

defining it – not always as simple as, say, a lack of blood flow to the

clitoris, in the way a lack of blood flow to the penis readily defines many men

with male sexual dysfunction.

 

 

 

" The debate about the definition and parameters has raged on, " says Regan. " It's

not just physiological, it includes psychological problems too. "

 

 

 

Pfizer contends that female sexual dysfunction is much more complex than male

sexual dysfunction. There is no hard and fast definition. " [but] it certainly

does exist and the experts tell us it does exist. "

 

 

 

Regan is not enamored with the Moynihan critique that questions drug companies'

funding of research. " He wants it both ways, " says Regan. " He says research

funding from pharmaceutical companies should be declared. That's fair enough.

Then he lists nine consultative meetings [involving researchers and drug

companies]. But the interest of the drug companies was declared at those

meetings.

 

 

 

" About 92 per cent of new drug discoveries are funded by pharmaceutical

companies, " Regan continues. Moynihan " seems to contend that it's wrong to have

pharmaceutical companies involved, but it's not. Otherwise, you wouldn't see new

medicines. "

 

 

 

Yet Moynihan's critique focuses on drug company involvement in the creation of

parameters for a disease, rather than the drugs themselves. Moynihan points out

that, while male sexual problems can be more readily attributed to physiological

barriers, women's sexual dysfunction is more often difficult to quantify as a

physical problem, and therefore a drug target. The article fired debate around

the world, and brought a huge – and sometimes emotional – response back to the

British Medical Journal.

 

 

 

" I agree that female sexuality issues should not be exploited by the

pharmaceutical companies, " responded one woman in a letter to the BMJ. " But as

one who has suffered female sexual dysfunction after a hysterectomy, I can

reassure you that it is a real physical problem that can have devastating

consequences. Your article seems to have undertones that reflect dark age

thinking – women certainly cannot be interested in sex. "

 

 

 

Others see the drug companies' efforts rather than its critics as patriarchal

and disempowering of women's sexuality. A group calling itself FSD Alert (

www.fsd-alert.org) has set up a Web site, challenging drug companies to look

broadly at women's sexual problems. " The pharmaceutical industry wants women to

think that sexual problems are simple and offers drugs as magic fixes, " says the

group's manifesto. " But positive sexual experiences require accurate, unbiased

information. "

 

 

 

Ray Moynihan says the extent of the reaction to his article surprised him.

 

 

 

" I think it touched a nerve because sex is dear to the hearts of many – almost

all people, " he says. " I think people are genuinely astonished when they learn

of the extent of the drug companies' role in sponsoring so much of the early

scientific work on the definition [of an illness].

 

 

 

" I think the fear among many of the experts and the wider community is that the

power and influence of the pharmaceutical manufacturers in this evolving

definitional process could tend to reduce the complexity of the problems into

simpler 'dysfunctions' or 'diseases' which can then be 'treated' with pills. "

 

 

 

Pfizer's Regan says the jury is still out on whether Viagra can be effectively

used by women. He won't say how the formula in the initial trial differed from

the currently available product of Viagra for men, but that the so far

unpublished results were promising. However, he says, a women's version of

Viagra remains " years away " from approval and marketing.

 

Steve Dow lives in Sydney, Australia. He writes for The Age and The Sydney

Morning Herald and is the author of " GAY, " a collection of journalism on

contemporary gay and lesbian issues. This piece originally appeared on his Web

site.

 

 

 

 

 

Print

 

Get a print-friendly version of this story.

 

 

 

 

Also in Top Stories

 

The Inevitable War?

By Ian Williams

Feb 6, 2003

 

Failing To Make the Case for War

By Geov Parrish

Feb 6, 2003

 

SOLOMON: Colin Powell Is Flawless -- Inside a Media Bubble

By Norman Solomon

Feb 6, 2003

 

Howard Zinn and the Art of War

By Andrew Sigler

Feb 6, 2003

 

HUFFINGTON: There's No Business Like Snow Business

By Arianna Huffington

Feb 5, 2003

 

 

 

 

Also by Steve Dow

 

Tilting at Spin Mills

Jan 29, 2003

 

 

 

 

Email

 

Send this story to a friend.

 

 

[input]

 

To:

[input]

 

Optional Message:

[input] [input] [input]

[input]

 

 

 

 

Support AlterNet

 

America needs independent media now more than ever. Please help support

AlterNet's continuing coverage of current events, civil rights and liberties and

more with your tax-deductible donation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc.

 

To , e-mail to: Gettingwell-

Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell

 

 

 

 

Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...