Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

EO and pregnancy.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hello Everybody.

 

I been part of this group for more than two years , and I find this

group one of the most accurate on the web.

 

I have a question for you all, I am very interested to find out about

the EO and pregnancy. I know you have to be very conscious to recommend

any EO especially the first trimester of pregnancy, but I would love to

know more about why. I been reading a lot of websites and articles about

it, but I would love to now more.

 

Can I find a list of EO that you can not use when you are pregnant?

Can they be harmful when you put that in creams, diluted in water to

take a bath, diffuser etc?

 

It make sound very basic, but I think is a very important matter.

 

Thank you again for all you information and wish all of you a wonderful

2010!!!

 

Claudia Schlebach

 

http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx

<http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx>

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Claudia,

 

This is a tough question to answer! My take on it is that there are two

considerations. Firstly, the total amount of essential oil used and secondly,

which oils to avoid.

 

The answer to the first question can be no more than a " best guess " as there is

not enough information to be specific. To take one example, 1,8-cineole, the

main constituent of eucalyptus oil, is readily absorbed by humans through either

inhalation or dermal application, and it also readily passes from the mother's

blood into the placenta. Animal data suggests that it is not fetotoxic. However,

there is little information on possible fetotoxic/neurotoxic effects of

essential oil constituents in general, so minimal amounts are recommended. I

would interpret that as 1% or 2% in a massage oil, no long-term inhalation (i.e.

vaporizing oils for hours) and keeping steam inhalation to about 15 minutes.

Remember, every type of toxicity is dose-dependent.

 

As for which oils to avoid (throughout pregnancy) any aromatherapist you talk to

will give you a different list, and some oils should be avoided or used with

care anyway, because they are generally toxic (eg pennyroyal). I suggest

avoiding completely these oils, for the reason that they can be fetotoxic, or

contain significant quantities of constituents that can be fetotoxic: Daucus

carota seed, Salvia officinalis leaf, Petroselinum crispum seed, Petroselinum

crispum leaf, Anethum sowa seed, Salvia lavandulifolia leaf, Curcuma zedoaria

rhizome, Artemisia absinthium leaf and Juniperus sabina leaf. These oils could

be reproductively toxic, even when used in the minimal quantities suggested

above. Ruta graveolens leaf oil should possibly also be avoided.

 

Robert

 

 

ATFE , " Claudia " <claudia1027 wrote:

>

>

> Hello Everybody.

>

> I been part of this group for more than two years , and I find this

> group one of the most accurate on the web.

>

> I have a question for you all, I am very interested to find out about

> the EO and pregnancy. I know you have to be very conscious to recommend

> any EO especially the first trimester of pregnancy, but I would love to

> know more about why. I been reading a lot of websites and articles about

> it, but I would love to now more.

>

> Can I find a list of EO that you can not use when you are pregnant?

> Can they be harmful when you put that in creams, diluted in water to

> take a bath, diffuser etc?

>

> It make sound very basic, but I think is a very important matter.

>

> Thank you again for all you information and wish all of you a wonderful

> 2010!!!

>

> Claudia Schlebach

>

> http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx

> <http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils to avoid

during pregnancy.

 

Aniseed (Pimpinella anisum), Basil (Ocimum basilicum), Birch (Betula alba),

Cedarwood (Cedrus atlantica & Juniperus virginiana), Clary sage (Salvia

sciarea), Cypress (Cupressus semperv'irens), Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare),

Hyssop (Hyssopus officinalls), Jasmine (Jasminum grandiflorum), Juniper

(Juniperus communis), Sweet Marjoram (Origanum marjorana), Myrrh (Commiphora

myrrha), Peppermint (Mentha piperita), Parsley (Petroselinum sativum),

Rosemary (Rosernarinus officinalis), Sage (Salvia officinalis), Tarragon

(Artemisia dracunculus), Thyme (Thymus vulgaris)

 

Chamomile, lavender, geranium and rose can be used during the first three

months.

 

That's my list.

 

Lynn

in CA.

newbie on the list

 

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, tisserand <

rtisserand wrote:

 

>

>

> Hi Claudia,

>

> This is a tough question to answer! My take on it is that there are two

> considerations. Firstly, the total amount of essential oil used and

> secondly, which oils to avoid.

>

> The answer to the first question can be no more than a " best guess " as

> there is not enough information to be specific. To take one example,

> 1,8-cineole, the main constituent of eucalyptus oil, is readily absorbed by

> humans through either inhalation or dermal application, and it also readily

> passes from the mother's blood into the placenta. Animal data suggests that

> it is not fetotoxic. However, there is little information on possible

> fetotoxic/neurotoxic effects of essential oil constituents in general, so

> minimal amounts are recommended. I would interpret that as 1% or 2% in a

> massage oil, no long-term inhalation (i.e. vaporizing oils for hours) and

> keeping steam inhalation to about 15 minutes. Remember, every type of

> toxicity is dose-dependent.

>

> As for which oils to avoid (throughout pregnancy) any aromatherapist you

> talk to will give you a different list, and some oils should be avoided or

> used with care anyway, because they are generally toxic (eg pennyroyal). I

> suggest avoiding completely these oils, for the reason that they can be

> fetotoxic, or contain significant quantities of constituents that can be

> fetotoxic: Daucus carota seed, Salvia officinalis leaf, Petroselinum crispum

> seed, Petroselinum crispum leaf, Anethum sowa seed, Salvia lavandulifolia

> leaf, Curcuma zedoaria rhizome, Artemisia absinthium leaf and Juniperus

> sabina leaf. These oils could be reproductively toxic, even when used in the

> minimal quantities suggested above. Ruta graveolens leaf oil should possibly

> also be avoided.

>

> Robert

>

> ATFE <ATFE%40>, " Claudia "

> <claudia1027 wrote:

> >

> >

> > Hello Everybody.

> >

> > I been part of this group for more than two years , and I find this

> > group one of the most accurate on the web.

> >

> > I have a question for you all, I am very interested to find out about

> > the EO and pregnancy. I know you have to be very conscious to recommend

> > any EO especially the first trimester of pregnancy, but I would love to

> > know more about why. I been reading a lot of websites and articles about

> > it, but I would love to now more.

> >

> > Can I find a list of EO that you can not use when you are pregnant?

> > Can they be harmful when you put that in creams, diluted in water to

> > take a bath, diffuser etc?

> >

> > It make sound very basic, but I think is a very important matter.

> >

> > Thank you again for all you information and wish all of you a wonderful

> > 2010!!!

> >

> > Claudia Schlebach

> >

> > http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx

> > <http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx>

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Lynn,

 

I have to confess that I cannot fathom why some of these oils are supposedly

hazardous in pregnancy. Why, for example, clary sage, cypress, the two

cedarwoods, jasmine, juniper, marjoram, myrrh, peppermint, rosemary and thyme?

I'm just very curious - do you know why these particular oils should not be

used?

 

Chamomile, lavender and geranium - are these oils singled out for any particular

reason?

 

Robert

 

ATFE , Lynn <mrningdw wrote:

>

> I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils to avoid

> during pregnancy.

>

> Aniseed (Pimpinella anisum), Basil (Ocimum basilicum), Birch (Betula alba),

> Cedarwood (Cedrus atlantica & Juniperus virginiana), Clary sage (Salvia

> sciarea), Cypress (Cupressus semperv'irens), Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare),

> Hyssop (Hyssopus officinalls), Jasmine (Jasminum grandiflorum), Juniper

> (Juniperus communis), Sweet Marjoram (Origanum marjorana), Myrrh (Commiphora

> myrrha), Peppermint (Mentha piperita), Parsley (Petroselinum sativum),

> Rosemary (Rosernarinus officinalis), Sage (Salvia officinalis), Tarragon

> (Artemisia dracunculus), Thyme (Thymus vulgaris)

>

> Chamomile, lavender, geranium and rose can be used during the first three

> months.

>

> That's my list.

>

> Lynn

> in CA.

> newbie on the list

>

> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, tisserand <

> rtisserand wrote:

>

> >

> >

> > Hi Claudia,

> >

> > This is a tough question to answer! My take on it is that there are two

> > considerations. Firstly, the total amount of essential oil used and

> > secondly, which oils to avoid.

> >

> > The answer to the first question can be no more than a " best guess " as

> > there is not enough information to be specific. To take one example,

> > 1,8-cineole, the main constituent of eucalyptus oil, is readily absorbed by

> > humans through either inhalation or dermal application, and it also readily

> > passes from the mother's blood into the placenta. Animal data suggests that

> > it is not fetotoxic. However, there is little information on possible

> > fetotoxic/neurotoxic effects of essential oil constituents in general, so

> > minimal amounts are recommended. I would interpret that as 1% or 2% in a

> > massage oil, no long-term inhalation (i.e. vaporizing oils for hours) and

> > keeping steam inhalation to about 15 minutes. Remember, every type of

> > toxicity is dose-dependent.

> >

> > As for which oils to avoid (throughout pregnancy) any aromatherapist you

> > talk to will give you a different list, and some oils should be avoided or

> > used with care anyway, because they are generally toxic (eg pennyroyal). I

> > suggest avoiding completely these oils, for the reason that they can be

> > fetotoxic, or contain significant quantities of constituents that can be

> > fetotoxic: Daucus carota seed, Salvia officinalis leaf, Petroselinum crispum

> > seed, Petroselinum crispum leaf, Anethum sowa seed, Salvia lavandulifolia

> > leaf, Curcuma zedoaria rhizome, Artemisia absinthium leaf and Juniperus

> > sabina leaf. These oils could be reproductively toxic, even when used in the

> > minimal quantities suggested above. Ruta graveolens leaf oil should possibly

> > also be avoided.

> >

> > Robert

> >

> > ATFE <ATFE%40>, " Claudia "

> > <claudia1027@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > Hello Everybody.

> > >

> > > I been part of this group for more than two years , and I find this

> > > group one of the most accurate on the web.

> > >

> > > I have a question for you all, I am very interested to find out about

> > > the EO and pregnancy. I know you have to be very conscious to recommend

> > > any EO especially the first trimester of pregnancy, but I would love to

> > > know more about why. I been reading a lot of websites and articles about

> > > it, but I would love to now more.

> > >

> > > Can I find a list of EO that you can not use when you are pregnant?

> > > Can they be harmful when you put that in creams, diluted in water to

> > > take a bath, diffuser etc?

> > >

> > > It make sound very basic, but I think is a very important matter.

> > >

> > > Thank you again for all you information and wish all of you a wonderful

> > > 2010!!!

> > >

> > > Claudia Schlebach

> > >

> > > http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx

> > > <http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx>

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Robert,

 

Excellent question. I have just recently graduated from the college of

Botanical Arts, COBHA, in Santa Cruz, CA. Elizabeth Van Buren is a great

teacher, and the classes were very detailed. www.cobha.org This is the

list received in class, and that is what I am going by.

 

If I were to do anything with a client, the oils would be chosen for their

unique issues. Looking at the list there are some that could be used in

pregnancy, like clary sage, but more useful in encouraging labor. Cypress

can regulate the menstrual cycle, so I would tend not to use that during

pregnancy. Jasmine is another one to use during labor. It appears that

there is a distinction between " during pregnancy " and labor.

 

As noted before, there are lists, which I treat as guidelines. I know I'm

new, and only tried to add my .02.

 

Respectfully,

 

Lynn

 

 

 

*

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:41 PM, tisserand <

rtisserand wrote:

 

>

>

> Hi Lynn,

>

> I have to confess that I cannot fathom why some of these oils are

> supposedly hazardous in pregnancy. Why, for example, clary sage, cypress,

> the two cedarwoods, jasmine, juniper, marjoram, myrrh, peppermint, rosemary

> and thyme? I'm just very curious - do you know why these particular oils

> should not be used?

>

> Chamomile, lavender and geranium - are these oils singled out for any

> particular reason?

>

> Robert

>

>

> ATFE <ATFE%40>, Lynn <mrningdw

> wrote:

> >

> > I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils to avoid

> > during pregnancy.

> >

> > Aniseed (Pimpinella anisum), Basil (Ocimum basilicum), Birch (Betula

> alba),

> > Cedarwood (Cedrus atlantica & Juniperus virginiana), Clary sage (Salvia

> > sciarea), Cypress (Cupressus semperv'irens), Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare),

> > Hyssop (Hyssopus officinalls), Jasmine (Jasminum grandiflorum), Juniper

> > (Juniperus communis), Sweet Marjoram (Origanum marjorana), Myrrh

> (Commiphora

> > myrrha), Peppermint (Mentha piperita), Parsley (Petroselinum sativum),

> > Rosemary (Rosernarinus officinalis), Sage (Salvia officinalis), Tarragon

> > (Artemisia dracunculus), Thyme (Thymus vulgaris)

> >

> > Chamomile, lavender, geranium and rose can be used during the first three

> > months.

> >

> > That's my list.

> >

> > Lynn

> > in CA.

> > newbie on the list

> >

> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, tisserand <

> > rtisserand wrote:

> >

> > >

> > >

> > > Hi Claudia,

> > >

> > > This is a tough question to answer! My take on it is that there are two

> > > considerations. Firstly, the total amount of essential oil used and

> > > secondly, which oils to avoid.

> > >

> > > The answer to the first question can be no more than a " best guess " as

> > > there is not enough information to be specific. To take one example,

> > > 1,8-cineole, the main constituent of eucalyptus oil, is readily

> absorbed by

> > > humans through either inhalation or dermal application, and it also

> readily

> > > passes from the mother's blood into the placenta. Animal data suggests

> that

> > > it is not fetotoxic. However, there is little information on possible

> > > fetotoxic/neurotoxic effects of essential oil constituents in general,

> so

> > > minimal amounts are recommended. I would interpret that as 1% or 2% in

> a

> > > massage oil, no long-term inhalation (i.e. vaporizing oils for hours)

> and

> > > keeping steam inhalation to about 15 minutes. Remember, every type of

> > > toxicity is dose-dependent.

> > >

> > > As for which oils to avoid (throughout pregnancy) any aromatherapist

> you

> > > talk to will give you a different list, and some oils should be avoided

> or

> > > used with care anyway, because they are generally toxic (eg

> pennyroyal). I

> > > suggest avoiding completely these oils, for the reason that they can be

> > > fetotoxic, or contain significant quantities of constituents that can

> be

> > > fetotoxic: Daucus carota seed, Salvia officinalis leaf, Petroselinum

> crispum

> > > seed, Petroselinum crispum leaf, Anethum sowa seed, Salvia

> lavandulifolia

> > > leaf, Curcuma zedoaria rhizome, Artemisia absinthium leaf and Juniperus

> > > sabina leaf. These oils could be reproductively toxic, even when used

> in the

> > > minimal quantities suggested above. Ruta graveolens leaf oil should

> possibly

> > > also be avoided.

> > >

> > > Robert

> > >

> > > ATFE <ATFE%40> <ATFE%

> 40>, " Claudia "

>

> > > <claudia1027@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Hello Everybody.

> > > >

> > > > I been part of this group for more than two years , and I find this

> > > > group one of the most accurate on the web.

> > > >

> > > > I have a question for you all, I am very interested to find out about

> > > > the EO and pregnancy. I know you have to be very conscious to

> recommend

> > > > any EO especially the first trimester of pregnancy, but I would love

> to

> > > > know more about why. I been reading a lot of websites and articles

> about

> > > > it, but I would love to now more.

> > > >

> > > > Can I find a list of EO that you can not use when you are pregnant?

> > > > Can they be harmful when you put that in creams, diluted in water to

> > > > take a bath, diffuser etc?

> > > >

> > > > It make sound very basic, but I think is a very important matter.

> > > >

> > > > Thank you again for all you information and wish all of you a

> wonderful

> > > > 2010!!!

> > > >

> > > > Claudia Schlebach

> > > >

> > > > http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx

> > > > <http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx>

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, Lynn this is useful to know, and I appreciate you replying. This is

as you may have surmised a controversial area, and is symptomatic of the fact

that there are no universally accepted safety guidelines in aromatherapy.

 

I wonder how we can politely ask Elizabeth Van Buren how she came up with her

list. Probably if we looked closely in aromatherapy " textbooks " we might find

the answer.

 

I understand that no-one wants to take unnecessary risks with essential oils.

What is perhaps not so often appreciated, is that claiming a specific adverse

effect for an essential oil when there is no evidence for such an adverse effect

(the just-in-case principal? the fear principal?) is generally not a good idea.

The reasons are that (a) it leads to confusion and argument among practitioners

(b) it could possibly be a basis for (unwarranted) litigation and © it can

cause heartbreak. Imagine you had a miscarriage, and then read in a newspaper

article that cypress oil could cause bleeding in pregnancy, and knew that you

had been receiving weekly aromatherapy massage with cypress oil. You might then

phone someone like Robert Tisserand and ask him, in tears, whether you had

murdered your unborn child. There is no evidence, by the way, that cypress oil

causes bleeding in pregnancy, is abortifacient, or has hormone disrupting

effects.

 

Robert

 

 

ATFE , Lynn <mrningdw wrote:

>

> *Robert,

>

> Excellent question. I have just recently graduated from the college of

> Botanical Arts, COBHA, in Santa Cruz, CA. Elizabeth Van Buren is a great

> teacher, and the classes were very detailed. www.cobha.org This is the

> list received in class, and that is what I am going by.

>

> If I were to do anything with a client, the oils would be chosen for their

> unique issues. Looking at the list there are some that could be used in

> pregnancy, like clary sage, but more useful in encouraging labor. Cypress

> can regulate the menstrual cycle, so I would tend not to use that during

> pregnancy. Jasmine is another one to use during labor. It appears that

> there is a distinction between " during pregnancy " and labor.

>

> As noted before, there are lists, which I treat as guidelines. I know I'm

> new, and only tried to add my .02.

>

> Respectfully,

>

> Lynn

>

>

>

> *

> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:41 PM, tisserand <

> rtisserand wrote:

>

> >

> >

> > Hi Lynn,

> >

> > I have to confess that I cannot fathom why some of these oils are

> > supposedly hazardous in pregnancy. Why, for example, clary sage, cypress,

> > the two cedarwoods, jasmine, juniper, marjoram, myrrh, peppermint, rosemary

> > and thyme? I'm just very curious - do you know why these particular oils

> > should not be used?

> >

> > Chamomile, lavender and geranium - are these oils singled out for any

> > particular reason?

> >

> > Robert

> >

> >

> > ATFE <ATFE%40>, Lynn <mrningdw@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils to avoid

> > > during pregnancy.

> > >

> > > Aniseed (Pimpinella anisum), Basil (Ocimum basilicum), Birch (Betula

> > alba),

> > > Cedarwood (Cedrus atlantica & Juniperus virginiana), Clary sage (Salvia

> > > sciarea), Cypress (Cupressus semperv'irens), Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare),

> > > Hyssop (Hyssopus officinalls), Jasmine (Jasminum grandiflorum), Juniper

> > > (Juniperus communis), Sweet Marjoram (Origanum marjorana), Myrrh

> > (Commiphora

> > > myrrha), Peppermint (Mentha piperita), Parsley (Petroselinum sativum),

> > > Rosemary (Rosernarinus officinalis), Sage (Salvia officinalis), Tarragon

> > > (Artemisia dracunculus), Thyme (Thymus vulgaris)

> > >

> > > Chamomile, lavender, geranium and rose can be used during the first three

> > > months.

> > >

> > > That's my list.

> > >

> > > Lynn

> > > in CA.

> > > newbie on the list

> > >

> > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, tisserand@ <

> > > rtisserand@> wrote:

> > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Hi Claudia,

> > > >

> > > > This is a tough question to answer! My take on it is that there are two

> > > > considerations. Firstly, the total amount of essential oil used and

> > > > secondly, which oils to avoid.

> > > >

> > > > The answer to the first question can be no more than a " best guess " as

> > > > there is not enough information to be specific. To take one example,

> > > > 1,8-cineole, the main constituent of eucalyptus oil, is readily

> > absorbed by

> > > > humans through either inhalation or dermal application, and it also

> > readily

> > > > passes from the mother's blood into the placenta. Animal data suggests

> > that

> > > > it is not fetotoxic. However, there is little information on possible

> > > > fetotoxic/neurotoxic effects of essential oil constituents in general,

> > so

> > > > minimal amounts are recommended. I would interpret that as 1% or 2% in

> > a

> > > > massage oil, no long-term inhalation (i.e. vaporizing oils for hours)

> > and

> > > > keeping steam inhalation to about 15 minutes. Remember, every type of

> > > > toxicity is dose-dependent.

> > > >

> > > > As for which oils to avoid (throughout pregnancy) any aromatherapist

> > you

> > > > talk to will give you a different list, and some oils should be avoided

> > or

> > > > used with care anyway, because they are generally toxic (eg

> > pennyroyal). I

> > > > suggest avoiding completely these oils, for the reason that they can be

> > > > fetotoxic, or contain significant quantities of constituents that can

> > be

> > > > fetotoxic: Daucus carota seed, Salvia officinalis leaf, Petroselinum

> > crispum

> > > > seed, Petroselinum crispum leaf, Anethum sowa seed, Salvia

> > lavandulifolia

> > > > leaf, Curcuma zedoaria rhizome, Artemisia absinthium leaf and Juniperus

> > > > sabina leaf. These oils could be reproductively toxic, even when used

> > in the

> > > > minimal quantities suggested above. Ruta graveolens leaf oil should

> > possibly

> > > > also be avoided.

> > > >

> > > > Robert

> > > >

> > > > ATFE <ATFE%40> <ATFE%

> > 40>, " Claudia "

> >

> > > > <claudia1027@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Hello Everybody.

> > > > >

> > > > > I been part of this group for more than two years , and I find this

> > > > > group one of the most accurate on the web.

> > > > >

> > > > > I have a question for you all, I am very interested to find out about

> > > > > the EO and pregnancy. I know you have to be very conscious to

> > recommend

> > > > > any EO especially the first trimester of pregnancy, but I would love

> > to

> > > > > know more about why. I been reading a lot of websites and articles

> > about

> > > > > it, but I would love to now more.

> > > > >

> > > > > Can I find a list of EO that you can not use when you are pregnant?

> > > > > Can they be harmful when you put that in creams, diluted in water to

> > > > > take a bath, diffuser etc?

> > > > >

> > > > > It make sound very basic, but I think is a very important matter.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thank you again for all you information and wish all of you a

> > wonderful

> > > > > 2010!!!

> > > > >

> > > > > Claudia Schlebach

> > > > >

> > > > > http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx

> > > > > <http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx>

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not know what school " certified " you, but they are certainly teaching

hogwash. Many of the oils you list are permitted food flavours and commonly used

in thousands of foods. The list is typical of the fantasies in aromatherapy

books that have been around for years.

 

As Robert says, everything depends on how used, volume, methods, etc. If we are

talkng about their use in diffusers or diluted in aromatherapy massage, there is

not a shred of sound evidence that most of these could be harmful during

pregnancy.

 

Martin Watt

http://www.aromamedical.com

 

ATFE , Lynn <mrningdw wrote:

>

> I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils to avoid

> during pregnancy.

>

> Aniseed (Pimpinella anisum), Basil (Ocimum basilicum), Birch (Betula alba),

> Cedarwood (Cedrus atlantica & Juniperus virginiana), Clary sage (Salvia

> sciarea), Cypress (Cupressus semperv'irens), Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare),

> Hyssop (Hyssopus officinalls), Jasmine (Jasminum grandiflorum), Juniper

> (Juniperus communis), Sweet Marjoram (Origanum marjorana), Myrrh (Commiphora

> myrrha), Peppermint (Mentha piperita), Parsley (Petroselinum sativum),

> Rosemary (Rosernarinus officinalis), Sage (Salvia officinalis), Tarragon

> (Artemisia dracunculus), Thyme (Thymus vulgaris)

>

> Chamomile, lavender, geranium and rose can be used during the first three

> months.

>

> That's my list.

>

> Lynn

> in CA.

> newbie on the list

>

> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, tisserand <

> rtisserand wrote:

>

> >

> >

> > Hi Claudia,

> >

> > This is a tough question to answer! My take on it is that there are two

> > considerations. Firstly, the total amount of essential oil used and

> > secondly, which oils to avoid.

> >

> > The answer to the first question can be no more than a " best guess " as

> > there is not enough information to be specific. To take one example,

> > 1,8-cineole, the main constituent of eucalyptus oil, is readily absorbed by

> > humans through either inhalation or dermal application, and it also readily

> > passes from the mother's blood into the placenta. Animal data suggests that

> > it is not fetotoxic. However, there is little information on possible

> > fetotoxic/neurotoxic effects of essential oil constituents in general, so

> > minimal amounts are recommended. I would interpret that as 1% or 2% in a

> > massage oil, no long-term inhalation (i.e. vaporizing oils for hours) and

> > keeping steam inhalation to about 15 minutes. Remember, every type of

> > toxicity is dose-dependent.

> >

> > As for which oils to avoid (throughout pregnancy) any aromatherapist you

> > talk to will give you a different list, and some oils should be avoided or

> > used with care anyway, because they are generally toxic (eg pennyroyal). I

> > suggest avoiding completely these oils, for the reason that they can be

> > fetotoxic, or contain significant quantities of constituents that can be

> > fetotoxic: Daucus carota seed, Salvia officinalis leaf, Petroselinum crispum

> > seed, Petroselinum crispum leaf, Anethum sowa seed, Salvia lavandulifolia

> > leaf, Curcuma zedoaria rhizome, Artemisia absinthium leaf and Juniperus

> > sabina leaf. These oils could be reproductively toxic, even when used in the

> > minimal quantities suggested above. Ruta graveolens leaf oil should possibly

> > also be avoided.

> >

> > Robert

> >

> > ATFE <ATFE%40>, " Claudia "

> > <claudia1027@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > Hello Everybody.

> > >

> > > I been part of this group for more than two years , and I find this

> > > group one of the most accurate on the web.

> > >

> > > I have a question for you all, I am very interested to find out about

> > > the EO and pregnancy. I know you have to be very conscious to recommend

> > > any EO especially the first trimester of pregnancy, but I would love to

> > > know more about why. I been reading a lot of websites and articles about

> > > it, but I would love to now more.

> > >

> > > Can I find a list of EO that you can not use when you are pregnant?

> > > Can they be harmful when you put that in creams, diluted in water to

> > > take a bath, diffuser etc?

> > >

> > > It make sound very basic, but I think is a very important matter.

> > >

> > > Thank you again for all you information and wish all of you a wonderful

> > > 2010!!!

> > >

> > > Claudia Schlebach

> > >

> > > http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx

> > > <http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx>

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Chuckle. I'm sure Elizabeth would be aghast to know that she is teaching

hogwash. There were times when we questioned how up to date some data was.

As Robert suggested, there is a need to " politely " ask where she found her

information, and I usually never have a problem with doing that, though I

usually have to temper my bluntness.

 

I'm so used to her oils that I believe I used an incorrect name. Elizabeth

Jones is the head of the school. Larry Jones, her husband, is co owner of

Elizabeth Van Buren oils, and founder of Spectrix Labs. He does all the

GC/MS. As stated in a previous email, www.cobha.org

 

We all come from different backgrounds. Many have walked the path far

longer than I, and I know where I stand in the arena. newbie that I am.

 

There is so much to learn.

 

Lynn

 

 

*

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Martin <aromamedical wrote:

 

>

>

> I do not know what school " certified " you, but they are certainly teaching

> hogwash. Many of the oils you list are permitted food flavours and commonly

> used in thousands of foods. The list is typical of the fantasies in

> aromatherapy books that have been around for years.

>

> As Robert says, everything depends on how used, volume, methods, etc. If we

> are talkng about their use in diffusers or diluted in aromatherapy massage,

> there is not a shred of sound evidence that most of these could be harmful

> during pregnancy.

>

> Martin Watt

> http://www.aromamedical.com

>

> ATFE <ATFE%40>, Lynn <mrningdw

> wrote:

> >

> > I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils to avoid

> > during pregnancy.

> >

> > Aniseed (Pimpinella anisum), Basil (Ocimum basilicum), Birch (Betula

> alba),

> > Cedarwood (Cedrus atlantica & Juniperus virginiana), Clary sage (Salvia

> > sciarea), Cypress (Cupressus semperv'irens), Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare),

> > Hyssop (Hyssopus officinalls), Jasmine (Jasminum grandiflorum), Juniper

> > (Juniperus communis), Sweet Marjoram (Origanum marjorana), Myrrh

> (Commiphora

> > myrrha), Peppermint (Mentha piperita), Parsley (Petroselinum sativum),

> > Rosemary (Rosernarinus officinalis), Sage (Salvia officinalis), Tarragon

> > (Artemisia dracunculus), Thyme (Thymus vulgaris)

> >

> > Chamomile, lavender, geranium and rose can be used during the first three

> > months.

> >

> > That's my list.

> >

> > Lynn

> > in CA.

> > newbie on the list

> >

> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, tisserand <

> > rtisserand wrote:

> >

> > >

> > >

> > > Hi Claudia,

> > >

> > > This is a tough question to answer! My take on it is that there are two

> > > considerations. Firstly, the total amount of essential oil used and

> > > secondly, which oils to avoid.

> > >

> > > The answer to the first question can be no more than a " best guess " as

> > > there is not enough information to be specific. To take one example,

> > > 1,8-cineole, the main constituent of eucalyptus oil, is readily

> absorbed by

> > > humans through either inhalation or dermal application, and it also

> readily

> > > passes from the mother's blood into the placenta. Animal data suggests

> that

> > > it is not fetotoxic. However, there is little information on possible

> > > fetotoxic/neurotoxic effects of essential oil constituents in general,

> so

> > > minimal amounts are recommended. I would interpret that as 1% or 2% in

> a

> > > massage oil, no long-term inhalation (i.e. vaporizing oils for hours)

> and

> > > keeping steam inhalation to about 15 minutes. Remember, every type of

> > > toxicity is dose-dependent.

> > >

> > > As for which oils to avoid (throughout pregnancy) any aromatherapist

> you

> > > talk to will give you a different list, and some oils should be avoided

> or

> > > used with care anyway, because they are generally toxic (eg

> pennyroyal). I

> > > suggest avoiding completely these oils, for the reason that they can be

> > > fetotoxic, or contain significant quantities of constituents that can

> be

> > > fetotoxic: Daucus carota seed, Salvia officinalis leaf, Petroselinum

> crispum

> > > seed, Petroselinum crispum leaf, Anethum sowa seed, Salvia

> lavandulifolia

> > > leaf, Curcuma zedoaria rhizome, Artemisia absinthium leaf and Juniperus

> > > sabina leaf. These oils could be reproductively toxic, even when used

> in the

> > > minimal quantities suggested above. Ruta graveolens leaf oil should

> possibly

> > > also be avoided.

> > >

> > > Robert

> > >

> > > ATFE <ATFE%40> <ATFE%

> 40>, " Claudia "

>

> > > <claudia1027@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Hello Everybody.

> > > >

> > > > I been part of this group for more than two years , and I find this

> > > > group one of the most accurate on the web.

> > > >

> > > > I have a question for you all, I am very interested to find out about

> > > > the EO and pregnancy. I know you have to be very conscious to

> recommend

> > > > any EO especially the first trimester of pregnancy, but I would love

> to

> > > > know more about why. I been reading a lot of websites and articles

> about

> > > > it, but I would love to now more.

> > > >

> > > > Can I find a list of EO that you can not use when you are pregnant?

> > > > Can they be harmful when you put that in creams, diluted in water to

> > > > take a bath, diffuser etc?

> > > >

> > > > It make sound very basic, but I think is a very important matter.

> > > >

> > > > Thank you again for all you information and wish all of you a

> wonderful

> > > > 2010!!!

> > > >

> > > > Claudia Schlebach

> > > >

> > > > http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx

> > > > <http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx>

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lynn

this is very helpful, thanks

sugar

 

Blessings

Email:

sugarsyl71

Windows Instant messenger(no emails pleas):

sugarsyl

Skype:

Twilight.Angel1

-

Lynn

ATFE

Monday, January 18, 2010 11:50 AM

Re: EO and pregnancy.

 

 

 

I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils to avoid

during pregnancy.

 

Aniseed (Pimpinella anisum), Basil (Ocimum basilicum), Birch (Betula alba),

Cedarwood (Cedrus atlantica & Juniperus virginiana), Clary sage (Salvia

sciarea), Cypress (Cupressus semperv'irens), Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare),

Hyssop (Hyssopus officinalls), Jasmine (Jasminum grandiflorum), Juniper

(Juniperus communis), Sweet Marjoram (Origanum marjorana), Myrrh (Commiphora

myrrha), Peppermint (Mentha piperita), Parsley (Petroselinum sativum),

Rosemary (Rosernarinus officinalis), Sage (Salvia officinalis), Tarragon

(Artemisia dracunculus), Thyme (Thymus vulgaris)

 

Chamomile, lavender, geranium and rose can be used during the first three

months.

 

That's my list.

 

Lynn

in CA.

newbie on the list

 

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, tisserand <

rtisserand wrote:

 

>

>

> Hi Claudia,

>

> This is a tough question to answer! My take on it is that there are two

> considerations. Firstly, the total amount of essential oil used and

> secondly, which oils to avoid.

>

> The answer to the first question can be no more than a " best guess " as

> there is not enough information to be specific. To take one example,

> 1,8-cineole, the main constituent of eucalyptus oil, is readily absorbed by

> humans through either inhalation or dermal application, and it also readily

> passes from the mother's blood into the placenta. Animal data suggests that

> it is not fetotoxic. However, there is little information on possible

> fetotoxic/neurotoxic effects of essential oil constituents in general, so

> minimal amounts are recommended. I would interpret that as 1% or 2% in a

> massage oil, no long-term inhalation (i.e. vaporizing oils for hours) and

> keeping steam inhalation to about 15 minutes. Remember, every type of

> toxicity is dose-dependent.

>

> As for which oils to avoid (throughout pregnancy) any aromatherapist you

> talk to will give you a different list, and some oils should be avoided or

> used with care anyway, because they are generally toxic (eg pennyroyal). I

> suggest avoiding completely these oils, for the reason that they can be

> fetotoxic, or contain significant quantities of constituents that can be

> fetotoxic: Daucus carota seed, Salvia officinalis leaf, Petroselinum crispum

> seed, Petroselinum crispum leaf, Anethum sowa seed, Salvia lavandulifolia

> leaf, Curcuma zedoaria rhizome, Artemisia absinthium leaf and Juniperus

> sabina leaf. These oils could be reproductively toxic, even when used in the

> minimal quantities suggested above. Ruta graveolens leaf oil should possibly

> also be avoided.

>

> Robert

>

> ATFE <ATFE%40>, " Claudia "

> <claudia1027 wrote:

> >

> >

> > Hello Everybody.

> >

> > I been part of this group for more than two years , and I find this

> > group one of the most accurate on the web.

> >

> > I have a question for you all, I am very interested to find out about

> > the EO and pregnancy. I know you have to be very conscious to recommend

> > any EO especially the first trimester of pregnancy, but I would love to

> > know more about why. I been reading a lot of websites and articles about

> > it, but I would love to now more.

> >

> > Can I find a list of EO that you can not use when you are pregnant?

> > Can they be harmful when you put that in creams, diluted in water to

> > take a bath, diffuser etc?

> >

> > It make sound very basic, but I think is a very important matter.

> >

> > Thank you again for all you information and wish all of you a wonderful

> > 2010!!!

> >

> > Claudia Schlebach

> >

> > http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx

> > <http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx>

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>there is a need to " politely " ask where she found her information,

 

I do not believe in being polite about people who make money from others by

teaching grossly incorrect information. This trade is packed to bursting with

wrong and highly misleading information that I have been pointing out for many

years. I do not care how nice, charming etc. a teacher is, if they are giving

out information that is wrong then they are not doing their job. I am happy for

anyone to challenge what I say and debate it. Problem is most of the leading

teachers in this trade will not face their lack of real knowledge being

challenged.

 

Martin Watt

 

ATFE , Lynn <mrningdw wrote:

>

> *Chuckle. I'm sure Elizabeth would be aghast to know that she is teaching

> hogwash. There were times when we questioned how up to date some data was.

> As Robert suggested, there is a need to " politely " ask where she found her

> information, and I usually never have a problem with doing that, though I

> usually have to temper my bluntness.

>

> I'm so used to her oils that I believe I used an incorrect name. Elizabeth

> Jones is the head of the school. Larry Jones, her husband, is co owner of

> Elizabeth Van Buren oils, and founder of Spectrix Labs. He does all the

> GC/MS. As stated in a previous email, www.cobha.org

>

> We all come from different backgrounds. Many have walked the path far

> longer than I, and I know where I stand in the arena. newbie that I am.

>

> There is so much to learn.

>

> Lynn

>

>

> *

> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Martin <aromamedical wrote:

>

> >

> >

> > I do not know what school " certified " you, but they are certainly teaching

> > hogwash. Many of the oils you list are permitted food flavours and commonly

> > used in thousands of foods. The list is typical of the fantasies in

> > aromatherapy books that have been around for years.

> >

> > As Robert says, everything depends on how used, volume, methods, etc. If we

> > are talkng about their use in diffusers or diluted in aromatherapy massage,

> > there is not a shred of sound evidence that most of these could be harmful

> > during pregnancy.

> >

> > Martin Watt

> > http://www.aromamedical.com

> >

> > ATFE <ATFE%40>, Lynn <mrningdw@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils to avoid

> > > during pregnancy.

> > >

> > > Aniseed (Pimpinella anisum), Basil (Ocimum basilicum), Birch (Betula

> > alba),

> > > Cedarwood (Cedrus atlantica & Juniperus virginiana), Clary sage (Salvia

> > > sciarea), Cypress (Cupressus semperv'irens), Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare),

> > > Hyssop (Hyssopus officinalls), Jasmine (Jasminum grandiflorum), Juniper

> > > (Juniperus communis), Sweet Marjoram (Origanum marjorana), Myrrh

> > (Commiphora

> > > myrrha), Peppermint (Mentha piperita), Parsley (Petroselinum sativum),

> > > Rosemary (Rosernarinus officinalis), Sage (Salvia officinalis), Tarragon

> > > (Artemisia dracunculus), Thyme (Thymus vulgaris)

> > >

> > > Chamomile, lavender, geranium and rose can be used during the first three

> > > months.

> > >

> > > That's my list.

> > >

> > > Lynn

> > > in CA.

> > > newbie on the list

> > >

> > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, tisserand@ <

> > > rtisserand@> wrote:

> > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Hi Claudia,

> > > >

> > > > This is a tough question to answer! My take on it is that there are two

> > > > considerations. Firstly, the total amount of essential oil used and

> > > > secondly, which oils to avoid.

> > > >

> > > > The answer to the first question can be no more than a " best guess " as

> > > > there is not enough information to be specific. To take one example,

> > > > 1,8-cineole, the main constituent of eucalyptus oil, is readily

> > absorbed by

> > > > humans through either inhalation or dermal application, and it also

> > readily

> > > > passes from the mother's blood into the placenta. Animal data suggests

> > that

> > > > it is not fetotoxic. However, there is little information on possible

> > > > fetotoxic/neurotoxic effects of essential oil constituents in general,

> > so

> > > > minimal amounts are recommended. I would interpret that as 1% or 2% in

> > a

> > > > massage oil, no long-term inhalation (i.e. vaporizing oils for hours)

> > and

> > > > keeping steam inhalation to about 15 minutes. Remember, every type of

> > > > toxicity is dose-dependent.

> > > >

> > > > As for which oils to avoid (throughout pregnancy) any aromatherapist

> > you

> > > > talk to will give you a different list, and some oils should be avoided

> > or

> > > > used with care anyway, because they are generally toxic (eg

> > pennyroyal). I

> > > > suggest avoiding completely these oils, for the reason that they can be

> > > > fetotoxic, or contain significant quantities of constituents that can

> > be

> > > > fetotoxic: Daucus carota seed, Salvia officinalis leaf, Petroselinum

> > crispum

> > > > seed, Petroselinum crispum leaf, Anethum sowa seed, Salvia

> > lavandulifolia

> > > > leaf, Curcuma zedoaria rhizome, Artemisia absinthium leaf and Juniperus

> > > > sabina leaf. These oils could be reproductively toxic, even when used

> > in the

> > > > minimal quantities suggested above. Ruta graveolens leaf oil should

> > possibly

> > > > also be avoided.

> > > >

> > > > Robert

> > > >

> > > > ATFE <ATFE%40> <ATFE%

> > 40>, " Claudia "

> >

> > > > <claudia1027@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Hello Everybody.

> > > > >

> > > > > I been part of this group for more than two years , and I find this

> > > > > group one of the most accurate on the web.

> > > > >

> > > > > I have a question for you all, I am very interested to find out about

> > > > > the EO and pregnancy. I know you have to be very conscious to

> > recommend

> > > > > any EO especially the first trimester of pregnancy, but I would love

> > to

> > > > > know more about why. I been reading a lot of websites and articles

> > about

> > > > > it, but I would love to now more.

> > > > >

> > > > > Can I find a list of EO that you can not use when you are pregnant?

> > > > > Can they be harmful when you put that in creams, diluted in water to

> > > > > take a bath, diffuser etc?

> > > > >

> > > > > It make sound very basic, but I think is a very important matter.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thank you again for all you information and wish all of you a

> > wonderful

> > > > > 2010!!!

> > > > >

> > > > > Claudia Schlebach

> > > > >

> > > > > http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx

> > > > > <http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx>

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Everybody.

 

First of all I would like to thank Robert, Lynn, Martin Butch, for all

the incredible information. Each one of you have a valid point of view,

and I am very impressed for the overwhelming response.

 

I know is a very difficult subject and what I can take of all of it, is

that we have to be cautious, but not scare people telling them about the

DANGERS HIDING IN EO.

 

Thank you very much to all of you again and if something else about this

subject, I would love to know more about it

 

Best regardsClaudia

 

 

ATFE , " Martin " <aromamedical wrote:

>

> >there is a need to " politely " ask where she found her information,

>

> I do not believe in being polite about people who make money from

others by teaching grossly incorrect information. This trade is packed

to bursting with wrong and highly misleading information that I have

been pointing out for many years. I do not care how nice, charming etc.

a teacher is, if they are giving out information that is wrong then they

are not doing their job. I am happy for anyone to challenge what I say

and debate it. Problem is most of the leading teachers in this trade

will not face their lack of real knowledge being challenged.

>

> Martin Watt

>

> ATFE , Lynn mrningdw@ wrote:

> >

> > *Chuckle. I'm sure Elizabeth would be aghast to know that she is

teaching

> > hogwash. There were times when we questioned how up to date some

data was.

> > As Robert suggested, there is a need to " politely " ask where she

found her

> > information, and I usually never have a problem with doing that,

though I

> > usually have to temper my bluntness.

> >

> > I'm so used to her oils that I believe I used an incorrect name.

Elizabeth

> > Jones is the head of the school. Larry Jones, her husband, is co

owner of

> > Elizabeth Van Buren oils, and founder of Spectrix Labs. He does all

the

> > GC/MS. As stated in a previous email, www.cobha.org

> >

> > We all come from different backgrounds. Many have walked the path

far

> > longer than I, and I know where I stand in the arena. newbie that I

am.

> >

> > There is so much to learn.

> >

> > Lynn

> >

> >

> > *

> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Martin aromamedical@ wrote:

> >

> > >

> > >

> > > I do not know what school " certified " you, but they are certainly

teaching

> > > hogwash. Many of the oils you list are permitted food flavours and

commonly

> > > used in thousands of foods. The list is typical of the fantasies

in

> > > aromatherapy books that have been around for years.

> > >

> > > As Robert says, everything depends on how used, volume, methods,

etc. If we

> > > are talkng about their use in diffusers or diluted in aromatherapy

massage,

> > > there is not a shred of sound evidence that most of these could be

harmful

> > > during pregnancy.

> > >

> > > Martin Watt

> > > http://www.aromamedical.com

> > >

> > > ATFE <ATFE%40>, Lynn

<mrningdw@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils

to avoid

> > > > during pregnancy.

> > > >

> > > > Aniseed (Pimpinella anisum), Basil (Ocimum basilicum), Birch

(Betula

> > > alba),

> > > > Cedarwood (Cedrus atlantica & Juniperus virginiana), Clary sage

(Salvia

> > > > sciarea), Cypress (Cupressus semperv'irens), Fennel (Foeniculum

vulgare),

> > > > Hyssop (Hyssopus officinalls), Jasmine (Jasminum grandiflorum),

Juniper

> > > > (Juniperus communis), Sweet Marjoram (Origanum marjorana), Myrrh

> > > (Commiphora

> > > > myrrha), Peppermint (Mentha piperita), Parsley (Petroselinum

sativum),

> > > > Rosemary (Rosernarinus officinalis), Sage (Salvia officinalis),

Tarragon

> > > > (Artemisia dracunculus), Thyme (Thymus vulgaris)

> > > >

> > > > Chamomile, lavender, geranium and rose can be used during the

first three

> > > > months.

> > > >

> > > > That's my list.

> > > >

> > > > Lynn

> > > > in CA.

> > > > newbie on the list

> > > >

> > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, tisserand@ <

> > > > rtisserand@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Hi Claudia,

> > > > >

> > > > > This is a tough question to answer! My take on it is that

there are two

> > > > > considerations. Firstly, the total amount of essential oil

used and

> > > > > secondly, which oils to avoid.

> > > > >

> > > > > The answer to the first question can be no more than a " best

guess " as

> > > > > there is not enough information to be specific. To take one

example,

> > > > > 1,8-cineole, the main constituent of eucalyptus oil, is

readily

> > > absorbed by

> > > > > humans through either inhalation or dermal application, and it

also

> > > readily

> > > > > passes from the mother's blood into the placenta. Animal data

suggests

> > > that

> > > > > it is not fetotoxic. However, there is little information on

possible

> > > > > fetotoxic/neurotoxic effects of essential oil constituents in

general,

> > > so

> > > > > minimal amounts are recommended. I would interpret that as 1%

or 2% in

> > > a

> > > > > massage oil, no long-term inhalation (i.e. vaporizing oils for

hours)

> > > and

> > > > > keeping steam inhalation to about 15 minutes. Remember, every

type of

> > > > > toxicity is dose-dependent.

> > > > >

> > > > > As for which oils to avoid (throughout pregnancy) any

aromatherapist

> > > you

> > > > > talk to will give you a different list, and some oils should

be avoided

> > > or

> > > > > used with care anyway, because they are generally toxic (eg

> > > pennyroyal). I

> > > > > suggest avoiding completely these oils, for the reason that

they can be

> > > > > fetotoxic, or contain significant quantities of constituents

that can

> > > be

> > > > > fetotoxic: Daucus carota seed, Salvia officinalis leaf,

Petroselinum

> > > crispum

> > > > > seed, Petroselinum crispum leaf, Anethum sowa seed, Salvia

> > > lavandulifolia

> > > > > leaf, Curcuma zedoaria rhizome, Artemisia absinthium leaf and

Juniperus

> > > > > sabina leaf. These oils could be reproductively toxic, even

when used

> > > in the

> > > > > minimal quantities suggested above. Ruta graveolens leaf oil

should

> > > possibly

> > > > > also be avoided.

> > > > >

> > > > > Robert

> > > > >

> > > > > ATFE <ATFE%40> <ATFE%

> > > 40>, " Claudia "

> > >

> > > > > <claudia1027@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Hello Everybody.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I been part of this group for more than two years , and I

find this

> > > > > > group one of the most accurate on the web.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I have a question for you all, I am very interested to find

out about

> > > > > > the EO and pregnancy. I know you have to be very conscious

to

> > > recommend

> > > > > > any EO especially the first trimester of pregnancy, but I

would love

> > > to

> > > > > > know more about why. I been reading a lot of websites and

articles

> > > about

> > > > > > it, but I would love to now more.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Can I find a list of EO that you can not use when you are

pregnant?

> > > > > > Can they be harmful when you put that in creams, diluted in

water to

> > > > > > take a bath, diffuser etc?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > It make sound very basic, but I think is a very important

matter.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thank you again for all you information and wish all of you

a

> > > wonderful

> > > > > > 2010!!!

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Claudia Schlebach

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx

> > > > > >

<http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx>

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be curious to know why someone teaching something would give out a list

without supporting, researched documentation explaining why, or at the very

least give reasons through annectodal information as to WHY the items are on the

list. To me that's now teaching anything-sorry, I'm just a big believer in

understanding the " why " s of things. Susan

 

 

 

ATFE , Lynn <mrningdw wrote:

>

> *Chuckle. I'm sure Elizabeth would be aghast to know that she is teaching

> hogwash. There were times when we questioned how up to date some data was.

> As Robert suggested, there is a need to " politely " ask where she found her

> information, and I usually never have a problem with doing that, though I

> usually have to temper my bluntness.

>

> I'm so used to her oils that I believe I used an incorrect name. Elizabeth

> Jones is the head of the school. Larry Jones, her husband, is co owner of

> Elizabeth Van Buren oils, and founder of Spectrix Labs. He does all the

> GC/MS. As stated in a previous email, www.cobha.org

>

> We all come from different backgrounds. Many have walked the path far

> longer than I, and I know where I stand in the arena. newbie that I am.

>

> There is so much to learn.

>

> Lynn

>

>

> *

> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Martin <aromamedical wrote:

>

> >

> >

> > I do not know what school " certified " you, but they are certainly teaching

> > hogwash. Many of the oils you list are permitted food flavours and commonly

> > used in thousands of foods. The list is typical of the fantasies in

> > aromatherapy books that have been around for years.

> >

> > As Robert says, everything depends on how used, volume, methods, etc. If we

> > are talkng about their use in diffusers or diluted in aromatherapy massage,

> > there is not a shred of sound evidence that most of these could be harmful

> > during pregnancy.

> >

> > Martin Watt

> > http://www.aromamedical.com

> >

> > ATFE <ATFE%40>, Lynn <mrningdw@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils to avoid

> > > during pregnancy.

> > >

> > > Aniseed (Pimpinella anisum), Basil (Ocimum basilicum), Birch (Betula

> > alba),

> > > Cedarwood (Cedrus atlantica & Juniperus virginiana), Clary sage (Salvia

> > > sciarea), Cypress (Cupressus semperv'irens), Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare),

> > > Hyssop (Hyssopus officinalls), Jasmine (Jasminum grandiflorum), Juniper

> > > (Juniperus communis), Sweet Marjoram (Origanum marjorana), Myrrh

> > (Commiphora

> > > myrrha), Peppermint (Mentha piperita), Parsley (Petroselinum sativum),

> > > Rosemary (Rosernarinus officinalis), Sage (Salvia officinalis), Tarragon

> > > (Artemisia dracunculus), Thyme (Thymus vulgaris)

> > >

> > > Chamomile, lavender, geranium and rose can be used during the first three

> > > months.

> > >

> > > That's my list.

> > >

> > > Lynn

> > > in CA.

> > > newbie on the list

> > >

> > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, tisserand@ <

> > > rtisserand@> wrote:

> > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Hi Claudia,

> > > >

> > > > This is a tough question to answer! My take on it is that there are two

> > > > considerations. Firstly, the total amount of essential oil used and

> > > > secondly, which oils to avoid.

> > > >

> > > > The answer to the first question can be no more than a " best guess " as

> > > > there is not enough information to be specific. To take one example,

> > > > 1,8-cineole, the main constituent of eucalyptus oil, is readily

> > absorbed by

> > > > humans through either inhalation or dermal application, and it also

> > readily

> > > > passes from the mother's blood into the placenta. Animal data suggests

> > that

> > > > it is not fetotoxic. However, there is little information on possible

> > > > fetotoxic/neurotoxic effects of essential oil constituents in general,

> > so

> > > > minimal amounts are recommended. I would interpret that as 1% or 2% in

> > a

> > > > massage oil, no long-term inhalation (i.e. vaporizing oils for hours)

> > and

> > > > keeping steam inhalation to about 15 minutes. Remember, every type of

> > > > toxicity is dose-dependent.

> > > >

> > > > As for which oils to avoid (throughout pregnancy) any aromatherapist

> > you

> > > > talk to will give you a different list, and some oils should be avoided

> > or

> > > > used with care anyway, because they are generally toxic (eg

> > pennyroyal). I

> > > > suggest avoiding completely these oils, for the reason that they can be

> > > > fetotoxic, or contain significant quantities of constituents that can

> > be

> > > > fetotoxic: Daucus carota seed, Salvia officinalis leaf, Petroselinum

> > crispum

> > > > seed, Petroselinum crispum leaf, Anethum sowa seed, Salvia

> > lavandulifolia

> > > > leaf, Curcuma zedoaria rhizome, Artemisia absinthium leaf and Juniperus

> > > > sabina leaf. These oils could be reproductively toxic, even when used

> > in the

> > > > minimal quantities suggested above. Ruta graveolens leaf oil should

> > possibly

> > > > also be avoided.

> > > >

> > > > Robert

> > > >

> > > > ATFE <ATFE%40> <ATFE%

> > 40>, " Claudia "

> >

> > > > <claudia1027@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Hello Everybody.

> > > > >

> > > > > I been part of this group for more than two years , and I find this

> > > > > group one of the most accurate on the web.

> > > > >

> > > > > I have a question for you all, I am very interested to find out about

> > > > > the EO and pregnancy. I know you have to be very conscious to

> > recommend

> > > > > any EO especially the first trimester of pregnancy, but I would love

> > to

> > > > > know more about why. I been reading a lot of websites and articles

> > about

> > > > > it, but I would love to now more.

> > > > >

> > > > > Can I find a list of EO that you can not use when you are pregnant?

> > > > > Can they be harmful when you put that in creams, diluted in water to

> > > > > take a bath, diffuser etc?

> > > > >

> > > > > It make sound very basic, but I think is a very important matter.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thank you again for all you information and wish all of you a

> > wonderful

> > > > > 2010!!!

> > > > >

> > > > > Claudia Schlebach

> > > > >

> > > > > http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx

> > > > > <http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx>

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Susan said:

>I would be curious to know why someone teaching something would give >out a

list without supporting, researched documentation explaining >why,

 

There is a simple answer to that. Why spend time and money on researched

evidence, when you can set up a school and teach garbage and get paid for doing

it. That position represents the huge majority of aromatherapy schools around

the world. Especially the ones approved by trade associations. I know this

because i either have, or have seen, copies of course notes from most of the

supposed 'leading' schools. They made themselves 'leading' by lots of publicity

and hype and by charismatic teachers. Young Living are a great example of making

money by being confidence tricksters, but there are numerous others in a smaller

way.

 

There are now even Universities teaching aromatherapy. When their knowledge base

is challenged they do not want to know. I challenged one of the nursing

Universities in the USA over the crap on their website, but they never replied.

That site carry very dangerous information on essential oils and Joe public

assume it will be accurate. Far from it.

 

Martin

 

ATFE , " SusanP " <ripple95 wrote:

>

> I would be curious to know why someone teaching something would give out a

list without supporting, researched documentation explaining why, or at the very

least give reasons through annectodal information as to WHY the items are on the

list. To me that's now teaching anything-sorry, I'm just a big believer in

understanding the " why " s of things. Susan

>

>

>

> ATFE , Lynn <mrningdw@> wrote:

> >

> > *Chuckle. I'm sure Elizabeth would be aghast to know that she is teaching

> > hogwash. There were times when we questioned how up to date some data was.

> > As Robert suggested, there is a need to " politely " ask where she found her

> > information, and I usually never have a problem with doing that, though I

> > usually have to temper my bluntness.

> >

> > I'm so used to her oils that I believe I used an incorrect name. Elizabeth

> > Jones is the head of the school. Larry Jones, her husband, is co owner of

> > Elizabeth Van Buren oils, and founder of Spectrix Labs. He does all the

> > GC/MS. As stated in a previous email, www.cobha.org

> >

> > We all come from different backgrounds. Many have walked the path far

> > longer than I, and I know where I stand in the arena. newbie that I am.

> >

> > There is so much to learn.

> >

> > Lynn

> >

> >

> > *

> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Martin <aromamedical@> wrote:

> >

> > >

> > >

> > > I do not know what school " certified " you, but they are certainly teaching

> > > hogwash. Many of the oils you list are permitted food flavours and

commonly

> > > used in thousands of foods. The list is typical of the fantasies in

> > > aromatherapy books that have been around for years.

> > >

> > > As Robert says, everything depends on how used, volume, methods, etc. If

we

> > > are talkng about their use in diffusers or diluted in aromatherapy

massage,

> > > there is not a shred of sound evidence that most of these could be harmful

> > > during pregnancy.

> > >

> > > Martin Watt

> > > http://www.aromamedical.com

> > >

> > > ATFE <ATFE%40>, Lynn <mrningdw@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils to

avoid

> > > > during pregnancy.

> > > >

> > > > Aniseed (Pimpinella anisum), Basil (Ocimum basilicum), Birch (Betula

> > > alba),

> > > > Cedarwood (Cedrus atlantica & Juniperus virginiana), Clary sage (Salvia

> > > > sciarea), Cypress (Cupressus semperv'irens), Fennel (Foeniculum

vulgare),

> > > > Hyssop (Hyssopus officinalls), Jasmine (Jasminum grandiflorum), Juniper

> > > > (Juniperus communis), Sweet Marjoram (Origanum marjorana), Myrrh

> > > (Commiphora

> > > > myrrha), Peppermint (Mentha piperita), Parsley (Petroselinum sativum),

> > > > Rosemary (Rosernarinus officinalis), Sage (Salvia officinalis), Tarragon

> > > > (Artemisia dracunculus), Thyme (Thymus vulgaris)

> > > >

> > > > Chamomile, lavender, geranium and rose can be used during the first

three

> > > > months.

> > > >

> > > > That's my list.

> > > >

> > > > Lynn

> > > > in CA.

> > > > newbie on the list

> > > >

> > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, tisserand@ <

> > > > rtisserand@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Hi Claudia,

> > > > >

> > > > > This is a tough question to answer! My take on it is that there are

two

> > > > > considerations. Firstly, the total amount of essential oil used and

> > > > > secondly, which oils to avoid.

> > > > >

> > > > > The answer to the first question can be no more than a " best guess " as

> > > > > there is not enough information to be specific. To take one example,

> > > > > 1,8-cineole, the main constituent of eucalyptus oil, is readily

> > > absorbed by

> > > > > humans through either inhalation or dermal application, and it also

> > > readily

> > > > > passes from the mother's blood into the placenta. Animal data suggests

> > > that

> > > > > it is not fetotoxic. However, there is little information on possible

> > > > > fetotoxic/neurotoxic effects of essential oil constituents in general,

> > > so

> > > > > minimal amounts are recommended. I would interpret that as 1% or 2% in

> > > a

> > > > > massage oil, no long-term inhalation (i.e. vaporizing oils for hours)

> > > and

> > > > > keeping steam inhalation to about 15 minutes. Remember, every type of

> > > > > toxicity is dose-dependent.

> > > > >

> > > > > As for which oils to avoid (throughout pregnancy) any aromatherapist

> > > you

> > > > > talk to will give you a different list, and some oils should be

avoided

> > > or

> > > > > used with care anyway, because they are generally toxic (eg

> > > pennyroyal). I

> > > > > suggest avoiding completely these oils, for the reason that they can

be

> > > > > fetotoxic, or contain significant quantities of constituents that can

> > > be

> > > > > fetotoxic: Daucus carota seed, Salvia officinalis leaf, Petroselinum

> > > crispum

> > > > > seed, Petroselinum crispum leaf, Anethum sowa seed, Salvia

> > > lavandulifolia

> > > > > leaf, Curcuma zedoaria rhizome, Artemisia absinthium leaf and

Juniperus

> > > > > sabina leaf. These oils could be reproductively toxic, even when used

> > > in the

> > > > > minimal quantities suggested above. Ruta graveolens leaf oil should

> > > possibly

> > > > > also be avoided.

> > > > >

> > > > > Robert

> > > > >

> > > > > ATFE <ATFE%40> <ATFE%

> > > 40>, " Claudia "

> > >

> > > > > <claudia1027@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Hello Everybody.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I been part of this group for more than two years , and I find this

> > > > > > group one of the most accurate on the web.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I have a question for you all, I am very interested to find out

about

> > > > > > the EO and pregnancy. I know you have to be very conscious to

> > > recommend

> > > > > > any EO especially the first trimester of pregnancy, but I would love

> > > to

> > > > > > know more about why. I been reading a lot of websites and articles

> > > about

> > > > > > it, but I would love to now more.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Can I find a list of EO that you can not use when you are pregnant?

> > > > > > Can they be harmful when you put that in creams, diluted in water to

> > > > > > take a bath, diffuser etc?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > It make sound very basic, but I think is a very important matter.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thank you again for all you information and wish all of you a

> > > wonderful

> > > > > > 2010!!!

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Claudia Schlebach

> > > > > >

> > > > > > http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx

> > > > > > <http://claudiaschlebach.swissjust-usa.com/Pages/HomePage.aspx>

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THere is an important principle to follow when caring for pregnant

women: Women's bodies work well, all by themselves, to grow babies

that they can deliver all by themselves! So, the key is for each

woman to eat foods rich in protein, complex carbs, and vitamins and

minerals. NO junk or waste foods. If women are eating a variety of

fresh foods daily, they'll have all the nutrients they need. If they

exercise well - brisk walking, " no-bounce " aerobics, much bending and

stretching, their bodies will be in shape for labor.

 

Mostly what women need is someone to tell them the above: Their

bodies are not just defective men's bodies, they're designed to grow

and push out babies, and they are strong. Unfortunately many doctors

and most books (What to Expect When You're Expecting) are notorious

for scaring the heck out of women. There is a reason the US has a 30%

+ rate of cesarian deliveries, and it isn't that American women have

suddenly lost the ability to have babies, it is that over the past

century, they've been told that labor is horrible and with the

doctor's help, women may survive. Doubt me? Read the obstetric

texts, like Williams.

 

If you have a pregnant client, if she is generally healthy, all she

needs is a soothing bath (2 drops lavender in 1 tsp cream?), a regular

massage with carrier oil, and lots of encouragement to soothe the

culture-induced fear.

 

A skilled midwife can help. Check mana.org or narm.org for lists of

certified professional midwives. Certified nurse midwives are listed

on their site. States also have lists of midwives licensed in the area.

 

 

Trish Ross

Midwives on Missions of Service

www.globalmidwives.org

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anecdotal evidence is not evidence. Anyone can provide anecdotal evidence

for anything. Thus, the need for quality research or at least more than a

" it worked for so-and-so " ... Until there is sufficient randomized controlled

trials to support a hypothesis, at least there is need for a strong body of

historical evidence and some good scientific basis for why it works.

 

Tina Paxton, MS

 

 

ATFE [ATFE ] On Behalf Of SusanP

Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:32 PM

ATFE

Re: EO and pregnancy.

 

I would be curious to know why someone teaching something would give out a

list without supporting, researched documentation explaining why, or at the

very least give reasons through annectodal information as to WHY the items

are on the list. To me that's now teaching anything-sorry, I'm just a big

believer in understanding the " why " s of things. Susan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Martin,

 

Let's not forget that the purveyors of most of this misinformation brought

it from across the pond where it originated, primarily in France and

England. The problem is not specific just to the U.S., as you point out.

Sadly, we can claim sole responsibility for the origination of all the

multi-level marketing tricksters, so it probably makes us evenly culpable.

 

When I was an active volunteer at NAHA, I (and a a few others) pressed to

establish a peer-review committee for all journal articles, a good start for

credible scientific veracity. I also encouraged establishing an arm for

creating acceptable research protocols and documentation and even offered to

secure initial grant funds for its inception, much like the American

Botanical Council. One can only dream of the good position aromatherapy

might be in had NAHA moved in that direction, now going on 20 years later.

The perpetuation of what one might call 'bad' education out there also

probably rests in the fact that when we had the NAHA revolt and exodus we

were unsuccessful in getting them reformed or shut down, therefore, the

general public here in the U.S. still looks to them as being the voice of

aromatherapy. Guidelines for educators haven't changed at NAHA for years and

I am unaware that your approved standing as an educator is dependent on

continuing education as it is in other disciplines. Therefore, it is easy

to be a lazy educator when you have no official taskmaster prodding you to

further excellence. Even more difficult when you start out with 90%

erroneous information, i.e., that associated with whole plant use in

herbalism, which is a logical departure, but it is certainly time to move

on.

 

I'm probably in the crotchey curmudgeon category along with you at this

point, Martin, but I wish some young enthusiasm would step up to shake the

status quo and move aromatherapy to a higher artform.

 

Be Well,

Marcia Elston, Samara Botane/Nature Intelligence

http://www.wingedseed.com

http://www.wingedseed.blogspot.com

http://www.aromaconnection.org

" We make a living by what we get. We make a life by what we give. " - Winston

Churchill

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

 

ATFE [ATFE ] On Behalf Of Martin

Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:42 AM

ATFE

Re: EO and pregnancy.

 

 

 

 

Susan said:

>I would be curious to know why someone teaching something would give >out a

list without supporting, researched documentation explaining >why,

 

There is a simple answer to that. Why spend time and money on researched

evidence, when you can set up a school and teach garbage and get paid for

doing it. That position represents the huge majority of aromatherapy schools

around the world. Especially the ones approved by trade associations. I know

this because i either have, or have seen, copies of course notes from most

of the supposed 'leading' schools. They made themselves 'leading' by lots of

publicity and hype and by charismatic teachers. Young Living are a great

example of making money by being confidence tricksters, but there are

numerous others in a smaller way.

 

There are now even Universities teaching aromatherapy. When their knowledge

base is challenged they do not want to know. I challenged one of the nursing

Universities in the USA over the crap on their website, but they never

replied. That site carry very dangerous information on essential oils and

Joe public assume it will be accurate. Far from it.

 

Martin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, there are no large scale scientific studies in the area of

essential oils or many other subjects in practice today which are being done

based on usage and information passed down from generation to generation. That

is where the problem lies in many forms of alternative therapies-many are not

taken seriously because science hasn't stepped in to PROVE them. However, from

what I gather, the person " teaching " the information to her class provided NO

evidence to back up her claims whatsoever, whether it be scientific, historical

usage or anectodal. Susan

 

ATFE , " Tina Paxton " <Frecs wrote:

>

> Anecdotal evidence is not evidence. Anyone can provide anecdotal evidence

> for anything. Thus, the need for quality research or at least more than a

> " it worked for so-and-so " ... Until there is sufficient randomized controlled

> trials to support a hypothesis, at least there is need for a strong body of

> historical evidence and some good scientific basis for why it works.

>

> Tina Paxton, MS

>

>

> ATFE [ATFE ] On Behalf Of SusanP

> Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:32 PM

> ATFE

> Re: EO and pregnancy.

>

> I would be curious to know why someone teaching something would give out a

> list without supporting, researched documentation explaining why, or at the

> very least give reasons through annectodal information as to WHY the items

> are on the list. To me that's now teaching anything-sorry, I'm just a big

> believer in understanding the " why " s of things. Susan

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ATFE , Lynn <mrningdw wrote:

>

> I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils to avoid

during pregnancy.<

 

Three questions...what does " certified essential oil therapist " mean?

 

Are you licensed under another profession perhaps?

 

Why? I mean those are pretty broad and strange recommendations; why Fennel or

Peppermint for example?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a link about the program...yeah, I know, AIA. It's an overview of

the program.

 

http://www.alliance-aromatherapists.org/aromatherapy_schools-collegebotanicalhea\

ling.htm

 

*I came here to learn from what I consider the experts.* If any piece of my

education is erroneous, then I welcome the correction.

 

Thanks for helping..............Lynn

 

 

 

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:53 AM, SUSAN <sueapito wrote:

 

>

>

> ATFE <ATFE%40>, Lynn <mrningdw

> wrote:

> >

> > I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils to avoid

> during pregnancy.<

>

> Three questions...what does " certified essential oil therapist " mean?

>

> Are you licensed under another profession perhaps?

>

> Why? I mean those are pretty broad and strange recommendations; why Fennel

> or Peppermint for example?

>

>

>

 

 

 

--

 

I don't have a solution, but I admire the problem.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lynn, I wanted to clarify that I didn't intend to disparage AIA when I said

all three orgs were working at dual or cross purposes. I, actually, am a

founding member and think that they're coming along and they are pretty much

in their formative years still. With a focus on clinical aromatherapy, they

no doubt will examine and re-examine the educational standards they have

adopted along as they grow and mature. However, I think that their

educational standards now pretty much replicate what the original Steering

Committee came up with way back in the day, adopted by NAHA and used for the

ARC exam. NAHA, I've given up on. ARC has their own set of problems and

maybe Stacey or someone else can enlighten you here if are really

interested. Educational standards for aromatherapy should be thoroughly

examined and updated. Corrercting misinformation that has now permeated

(and multiplied exponentially) going on 20 years (more if you count across

the pond) is a daunting task. I also know Elizabeth Jones and worked early

on with her at NAHA years ago. She is a lovely woman and I do not know

enough about her particular program to comment, but I agree with Martin that

some of the aromatherapy she seems to have taught you should be re-examined,

based on what you have posted here. I don't know if you feel comfortable

bringing questions and concerns back to Elizabeth, but it is a thought.

Perhaps students will eventually be teaching their teachers all over again

as we progress forward.

 

You will see that pregnancy and potential essential oil toxicity is

complicated, as Robert, Martin and others have already pointed out. I agree

that there is probably over-caution. Better than no caution, however.

 

Be Well,

Marcia Elston, Samara Botane/Nature Intelligence

http://www.wingedseed.com <http://www.wingedseed.com/>

http://www.wingedseed.blogspot.com <http://www.wingedseed.blogspot.com/>

http://www.aromaconnection.org <http://www.aromaconnection.org/>

" We make a living by what we get. We make a life by what we give. " - Winston

Churchill

 

_____

 

ATFE [ATFE ] On Behalf Of Lynn

Saturday, January 23, 2010 2:49 PM

ATFE

Re: Re: EO and pregnancy.

 

 

 

 

Here is a link about the program...yeah, I know, AIA. It's an overview of

the program.

 

http://www.alliance

<http://www.alliance-aromatherapists.org/aromatherapy_schools-collegebotanic

alhealing.htm>

-aromatherapists.org/aromatherapy_schools-collegebotanicalhealing.htm

 

*I came here to learn from what I consider the experts.* If any piece of my

education is erroneous, then I welcome the correction.

 

Thanks for helping..............Lynn

 

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:53 AM, SUSAN <sueapito (AT) (DOT)

<sueapito%40> com> wrote:

 

>

>

> ATFE (AT) (DOT) <ATFE%40> com

<ATFE%40>, Lynn <mrningdw

> wrote:

> >

> > I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils to

avoid

> during pregnancy.<

>

> Three questions...what does " certified essential oil therapist " mean?

>

> Are you licensed under another profession perhaps?

>

> Why? I mean those are pretty broad and strange recommendations; why Fennel

> or Peppermint for example?

>

>

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I can recall, this organisation is just another aromatherapy outfit

put together to gain students. Their web site gives no information on anything

that one can judge the quality of what their teachers provide. I was also

involved with trying to improve the standards of education provided by NAHA

teachers many moons ago. I was appalled when I saw a copy of what it was

proposed their teachers should provide. It included the same old tired

aromatherapy trash that has been taught since this trade started. The leading

teachers will not have their lack of knowledge on essential oils and their real

uses challenged. I gave up trying to help such people years ago.

 

>If any piece of my education is erroneous, then I welcome the >correction.

Put some of it on this group and you may get answers. They may not be what you

want to hear though. My long experience on these groups is that most

aromatherapists prefer to live in a fairy tale world rather than face the facts

of what is wrong with their training.

 

Martin

 

ATFE , Lynn <mrningdw wrote:

>

> Here is a link about the program...yeah, I know, AIA. It's an overview of

> the program.

>

>

http://www.alliance-aromatherapists.org/aromatherapy_schools-collegebotanicalhea\

ling.htm

>

> *I came here to learn from what I consider the experts.* If any piece of my

> education is erroneous, then I welcome the correction.

>

> Thanks for helping..............Lynn

>

>

>

> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:53 AM, SUSAN <sueapito wrote:

>

> >

> >

> > ATFE <ATFE%40>, Lynn <mrningdw@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils to avoid

> > during pregnancy.<

> >

> > Three questions...what does " certified essential oil therapist " mean?

> >

> > Are you licensed under another profession perhaps?

> >

> > Why? I mean those are pretty broad and strange recommendations; why Fennel

> > or Peppermint for example?

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

> --

>

> I don't have a solution, but I admire the problem.

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow! I would say that before jumping to conclusions about an organization, you

either directly inquire or speak to some of its members. AIA is NOT an

organisation that is " just another outfit put together to gain students " . AIA

is not a school. It is a member organisation. I would invite you to learn more

by speaking to its members and perhaps some of its members on the board before

publicly writing it off as just another aromatherapy outfit.

 

Lora Cantele

 

ATFE , " Martin " <aromamedical wrote:

>

> From what I can recall, this organisation is just another aromatherapy outfit

put together to gain students. Their web site gives no information on anything

that one can judge the quality of what their teachers provide. I was also

involved with trying to improve the standards of education provided by NAHA

teachers many moons ago. I was appalled when I saw a copy of what it was

proposed their teachers should provide. It included the same old tired

aromatherapy trash that has been taught since this trade started. The leading

teachers will not have their lack of knowledge on essential oils and their real

uses challenged. I gave up trying to help such people years ago.

>

> >If any piece of my education is erroneous, then I welcome the >correction.

> Put some of it on this group and you may get answers. They may not be what you

want to hear though. My long experience on these groups is that most

aromatherapists prefer to live in a fairy tale world rather than face the facts

of what is wrong with their training.

>

> Martin

>

> ATFE , Lynn <mrningdw@> wrote:

> >

> > Here is a link about the program...yeah, I know, AIA. It's an overview of

> > the program.

> >

> >

http://www.alliance-aromatherapists.org/aromatherapy_schools-collegebotanicalhea\

ling.htm

> >

> > *I came here to learn from what I consider the experts.* If any piece of my

> > education is erroneous, then I welcome the correction.

> >

> > Thanks for helping..............Lynn

> >

> >

> >

> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:53 AM, SUSAN <sueapito@> wrote:

> >

> > >

> > >

> > > ATFE <ATFE%40>, Lynn <mrningdw@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils to

avoid

> > > during pregnancy.<

> > >

> > > Three questions...what does " certified essential oil therapist " mean?

> > >

> > > Are you licensed under another profession perhaps?

> > >

> > > Why? I mean those are pretty broad and strange recommendations; why Fennel

> > > or Peppermint for example?

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> > --

> >

> > I don't have a solution, but I admire the problem.

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Marcia,

 

While I appreciate you clarifying your position on AIA, I would like to share

something with you and the group to set the record straight.

 

<<I think that their (AIA) educational standards now pretty much replicate what

the original Steering Committee came up with way back in the day, adopted by

NAHA and used for the ARC exam.>>

 

As one of the writers of the AIA Educational Guidelines, I can say that they are

not a replication of what was done previously by NAHA or the ARC. The intent of

the writing of the new guidelines was to elevate the education standards in

America, as well as to be more " on par " with those in England and Australia

where the educational requirements are higher (400-665 hrs). In those countries

you either study and achieve certification at that level, or you cannot practice

aromatherapy. Unlike here in the US where a level 1 course as approved by NAHA

is 30 hours. The AIA standards are not only focused on the number of hours of

study, but the SUNSTANCE as well. Level 1 AIA is 100 hours, Level 2 is 200

hours and Level 3 is 400 hours minimum, with additional requirements with regard

to A & P and Research. The information posted on the AIA website is a very broad

and general overview of the levels. Believe me, it goes way deeper than than

and is very detailed.

 

Schools may voluntarily submit their applications for recognition at these

levels, but the process is long and detailed. One need only to look at the list

of currently approved schools, as compared to the when the revised guidelines

came out (1 year ago), to see just how many schools have been recognized at the

higher curriculum standards. The AIA is currently working with schools that

have submitted, but have not yet been recognized, in an effort to encourage more

schools to " beef up " their curriculums. I am not sure how that can be construed

as " replicating " what has been done by other organisations previously or to say

that the only thing AIA is interested in gaining students. I realize you were

not the person who made that latter of those statements, but I wanted to address

that as well.

 

<<I also know Elizabeth Jones and worked early on with her at NAHA years ago.

She is a lovely woman and I do not know enough about her particular program to

comment, but I agree with Martin that some of the aromatherapy she seems to have

taught you should be re-examined,>>

 

Elizabeth has a very good school. I truly believe that all schools should

consistently update their curriculum to be current with new findings in

aromatherapy. The AIA guidelines are a living document that will grow, as well

as the expectations of the schools that wish to be recognized by the AIA. Only

Elizabeth, her administration and students know what is contained in her

curriculum, so it would not be fair for anyone else to make comment or

speculation on it. Not to mention the fact that it could be damaging to her

reputation. I'm sure that Elizabeth would appreciate direct inquiries as

opposed to speculation on ATFE about her program. By the way, the listing that

was posted for COHBA and discussed here on this ATFE forum recently is more than

1 year old and has not been on the AIA website since April 2009. To discuss it

now as if it is current would be improper and misleading.

 

Thank you Marcia for your continued support of the AIA! The organization is a

good and strong one!

 

Lora Cantele

 

ATFE , " Marcia Elston " <Marcia wrote:

>

> Lynn, I wanted to clarify that I didn't intend to disparage AIA when I said

> all three orgs were working at dual or cross purposes. I, actually, am a

> founding member and think that they're coming along and they are pretty much

> in their formative years still. With a focus on clinical aromatherapy, they

> no doubt will examine and re-examine the educational standards they have

> adopted along as they grow and mature. However, I think that their

> educational standards now pretty much replicate what the original Steering

> Committee came up with way back in the day, adopted by NAHA and used for the

> ARC exam. NAHA, I've given up on. ARC has their own set of problems and

> maybe Stacey or someone else can enlighten you here if are really

> interested. Educational standards for aromatherapy should be thoroughly

> examined and updated. Corrercting misinformation that has now permeated

> (and multiplied exponentially) going on 20 years (more if you count across

> the pond) is a daunting task. I also know Elizabeth Jones and worked early

> on with her at NAHA years ago. She is a lovely woman and I do not know

> enough about her particular program to comment, but I agree with Martin that

> some of the aromatherapy she seems to have taught you should be re-examined,

> based on what you have posted here. I don't know if you feel comfortable

> bringing questions and concerns back to Elizabeth, but it is a thought.

> Perhaps students will eventually be teaching their teachers all over again

> as we progress forward.

>

> You will see that pregnancy and potential essential oil toxicity is

> complicated, as Robert, Martin and others have already pointed out. I agree

> that there is probably over-caution. Better than no caution, however.

>

> Be Well,

> Marcia Elston, Samara Botane/Nature Intelligence

> http://www.wingedseed.com <http://www.wingedseed.com/>

> http://www.wingedseed.blogspot.com <http://www.wingedseed.blogspot.com/>

> http://www.aromaconnection.org <http://www.aromaconnection.org/>

> " We make a living by what we get. We make a life by what we give. " - Winston

> Churchill

>

> _____

>

> ATFE [ATFE ] On Behalf Of Lynn

> Saturday, January 23, 2010 2:49 PM

> ATFE

> Re: Re: EO and pregnancy.

>

>

>

>

> Here is a link about the program...yeah, I know, AIA. It's an overview of

> the program.

>

> http://www.alliance

> <http://www.alliance-aromatherapists.org/aromatherapy_schools-collegebotanic

> alhealing.htm>

> -aromatherapists.org/aromatherapy_schools-collegebotanicalhealing.htm

>

> *I came here to learn from what I consider the experts.* If any piece of my

> education is erroneous, then I welcome the correction.

>

> Thanks for helping..............Lynn

>

> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:53 AM, SUSAN <sueapito (AT) (DOT)

> <sueapito%40> com> wrote:

>

> >

> >

> > ATFE (AT) (DOT) <ATFE%40> com

> <ATFE%40>, Lynn <mrningdw@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils to

> avoid

> > during pregnancy.<

> >

> > Three questions...what does " certified essential oil therapist " mean?

> >

> > Are you licensed under another profession perhaps?

> >

> > Why? I mean those are pretty broad and strange recommendations; why Fennel

> > or Peppermint for example?

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Number of hours of education has nothing at all to do with quality. I would

dispute that standards in the UK are higher than America. The trade associations

here continue teaching the junk straight out of the aromatherapy novels. For

example, I have had their students contact me and have been horrified that their

teachers have never given them any documented safety data, and much of what they

are taught on the therapeutics is also straight out of aromatherapy books.

 

The AIA procedures sound to me like the classic educational hogwash where hours,

subjects, etc. take precedence over if the teachers know what they are talking

about. I have enquired in the past about getting my correspondence course

'recognised' by a nursing organisation in the USA. I gave up because all they

were interested in was a mountain of idiotic paperwork with nothing at all about

the quality of education. That organisation included aromatherapists nurses.

 

> Elizabeth has a very good school.

Perhaps if you believe that, you can explain how it is that she teaches

incorrect information over essential oils in pregnancy?

 

Martin Watt

 

ATFE , " anew_kid4us " <anew_kid4us wrote:

>

>

> Hi Marcia,

>

> While I appreciate you clarifying your position on AIA, I would like to share

something with you and the group to set the record straight.

>

> <<I think that their (AIA) educational standards now pretty much replicate

what the original Steering Committee came up with way back in the day, adopted

by NAHA and used for the ARC exam.>>

>

> As one of the writers of the AIA Educational Guidelines, I can say that they

are not a replication of what was done previously by NAHA or the ARC. The

intent of the writing of the new guidelines was to elevate the education

standards in America, as well as to be more " on par " with those in England and

Australia where the educational requirements are higher (400-665 hrs). In those

countries you either study and achieve certification at that level, or you

cannot practice aromatherapy. Unlike here in the US where a level 1 course as

approved by NAHA is 30 hours. The AIA standards are not only focused on the

number of hours of study, but the SUNSTANCE as well. Level 1 AIA is 100 hours,

Level 2 is 200 hours and Level 3 is 400 hours minimum, with additional

requirements with regard to A & P and Research. The information posted on the AIA

website is a very broad and general overview of the levels. Believe me, it goes

way deeper than than and is very detailed.

>

> Schools may voluntarily submit their applications for recognition at these

levels, but the process is long and detailed. One need only to look at the list

of currently approved schools, as compared to the when the revised guidelines

came out (1 year ago), to see just how many schools have been recognized at the

higher curriculum standards. The AIA is currently working with schools that

have submitted, but have not yet been recognized, in an effort to encourage more

schools to " beef up " their curriculums. I am not sure how that can be construed

as " replicating " what has been done by other organisations previously or to say

that the only thing AIA is interested in gaining students. I realize you were

not the person who made that latter of those statements, but I wanted to address

that as well.

>

> <<I also know Elizabeth Jones and worked early on with her at NAHA years ago.

She is a lovely woman and I do not know enough about her particular program to

comment, but I agree with Martin that some of the aromatherapy she seems to have

taught you should be re-examined,>>

>

> Elizabeth has a very good school. I truly believe that all schools should

consistently update their curriculum to be current with new findings in

aromatherapy. The AIA guidelines are a living document that will grow, as well

as the expectations of the schools that wish to be recognized by the AIA. Only

Elizabeth, her administration and students know what is contained in her

curriculum, so it would not be fair for anyone else to make comment or

speculation on it. Not to mention the fact that it could be damaging to her

reputation. I'm sure that Elizabeth would appreciate direct inquiries as

opposed to speculation on ATFE about her program. By the way, the listing that

was posted for COHBA and discussed here on this ATFE forum recently is more than

1 year old and has not been on the AIA website since April 2009. To discuss it

now as if it is current would be improper and misleading.

>

> Thank you Marcia for your continued support of the AIA! The organization is a

good and strong one!

>

> Lora Cantele

>

> ATFE , " Marcia Elston " <Marcia@> wrote:

> >

> > Lynn, I wanted to clarify that I didn't intend to disparage AIA when I said

> > all three orgs were working at dual or cross purposes. I, actually, am a

> > founding member and think that they're coming along and they are pretty much

> > in their formative years still. With a focus on clinical aromatherapy, they

> > no doubt will examine and re-examine the educational standards they have

> > adopted along as they grow and mature. However, I think that their

> > educational standards now pretty much replicate what the original Steering

> > Committee came up with way back in the day, adopted by NAHA and used for the

> > ARC exam. NAHA, I've given up on. ARC has their own set of problems and

> > maybe Stacey or someone else can enlighten you here if are really

> > interested. Educational standards for aromatherapy should be thoroughly

> > examined and updated. Corrercting misinformation that has now permeated

> > (and multiplied exponentially) going on 20 years (more if you count across

> > the pond) is a daunting task. I also know Elizabeth Jones and worked early

> > on with her at NAHA years ago. She is a lovely woman and I do not know

> > enough about her particular program to comment, but I agree with Martin that

> > some of the aromatherapy she seems to have taught you should be re-examined,

> > based on what you have posted here. I don't know if you feel comfortable

> > bringing questions and concerns back to Elizabeth, but it is a thought.

> > Perhaps students will eventually be teaching their teachers all over again

> > as we progress forward.

> >

> > You will see that pregnancy and potential essential oil toxicity is

> > complicated, as Robert, Martin and others have already pointed out. I agree

> > that there is probably over-caution. Better than no caution, however.

> >

> > Be Well,

> > Marcia Elston, Samara Botane/Nature Intelligence

> > http://www.wingedseed.com <http://www.wingedseed.com/>

> > http://www.wingedseed.blogspot.com <http://www.wingedseed.blogspot.com/>

> > http://www.aromaconnection.org <http://www.aromaconnection.org/>

> > " We make a living by what we get. We make a life by what we give. " - Winston

> > Churchill

> >

> > _____

> >

> > ATFE [ATFE ] On Behalf Of Lynn

> > Saturday, January 23, 2010 2:49 PM

> > ATFE

> > Re: Re: EO and pregnancy.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Here is a link about the program...yeah, I know, AIA. It's an overview of

> > the program.

> >

> > http://www.alliance

> > <http://www.alliance-aromatherapists.org/aromatherapy_schools-collegebotanic

> > alhealing.htm>

> > -aromatherapists.org/aromatherapy_schools-collegebotanicalhealing.htm

> >

> > *I came here to learn from what I consider the experts.* If any piece of my

> > education is erroneous, then I welcome the correction.

> >

> > Thanks for helping..............Lynn

> >

> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:53 AM, SUSAN <sueapito (AT) (DOT)

> > <sueapito%40> com> wrote:

> >

> > >

> > >

> > > ATFE (AT) (DOT) <ATFE%40> com

> > <ATFE%40>, Lynn <mrningdw@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > I am a certified essential oil therapist, and these are the oils to

> > avoid

> > > during pregnancy.<

> > >

> > > Three questions...what does " certified essential oil therapist " mean?

> > >

> > > Are you licensed under another profession perhaps?

> > >

> > > Why? I mean those are pretty broad and strange recommendations; why Fennel

> > > or Peppermint for example?

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> Number of hours of education has nothing at all to do with quality. I would

dispute that standards in the UK are higher than America. The trade associations

here continue teaching the junk straight out of the aromatherapy novels.<

 

" Number of hours " is pretty much a standard in every college and university, so

I guess this organization is just mirroring a standard model for educational

requirements.

 

And we all know that you can have a Bachelors degree from Harvard or one from

West Pennsyltucky Community College and have spent the same amount of hours, but

most likely received a better education at the former (as well as spent

considerably more money to receive it.)

 

I know my kids educations costs between $43,000 and $48,000 A YEAR and they

could easily have gone to community college for far less, but hopefully both

will have exceptional educations as a result (along with being brilliant

children, of course.)

 

That said, Martin, if everyone listened to you the entire field of aromatherapy

would die off because " everyone " is teaching nonsense.

 

Where exactly, and how exactly, do you suggest people learn to be professionals

in the field of aromatherapy? Because just saying everyone " else " is in it for

the money and everyone " else " teaches crap isn't really all that helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...