Guest guest Posted May 10, 2008 Report Share Posted May 10, 2008 Howdy Martin, Kathleen, Christina .. other good folks .. Hey Kathleen, > > I am going to make a reply that Butch can join in on when he has time. > Fact 1. All flowers give off volatile chemicals. > Correct .. but modern technology is not able to economically extract usable products from all of them .. so .. > Fact 2. Hundreds of varieties have been analysed by special techniques > that capture those chemicals and analyse them. > these special techniques are used to extract for the purpose of analyzing the chemical profile .. in order to .. > Fact 3. Most of the above is done for the perfume trade so they can > recreate fragrances that distillation cannot capture, ie. cherry > blossom, apple blossom, etc. > do this. And they wind up with products that have a pretty close profile though not necessarily a natural one .. like Nature Identical products. And this opens the door for the adulteration .. or stretching .. or other forms of manipulation by man that Martin hit on in previous messages. If we don't demand some discipline in the field of Aromatherapy we must accept that synthetic fragrances sold by Glade and other companies .. the plug ins, etc., are a legitimate form of Aromatherapy. This is where I draw the line I can't cross and its the point I have tried to sell in my previous posts. If we are to accept that any odor or fragrance that enters the body through the olfactory system .. and causes some form of change to our physical, psychological or emotion being .. is in fact, AT, then we must accept that adulterated, stretched or manipulated natural products .. as well as many synthetic products .. are beneficial .. because they are Therapeutic! Therapeutic is a term that means " having or exhibiting healing powers " . There are people who are pleased with the synthetic odors in elevators or those emitted from the doo dads hanging from rear view mirrors .. if they are pleased then to them there is REAL Therapeutic value there .. strictly from a psychological or emotional point of view. Take it a bit further and we can logically say that if one has their head on straight due to being emotionally pacified .. they can also gain some physiological Therapeutic benefit from their emotional state. We have just incorrectly rationalized ourselves into accepting that there is no need to pay more for naturals when we can get similar benefits from synthetics. I stick to the " incorrectly " rationalized because the here and now is not what it is all about .. we must look at the future. Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS) has increased 5 fold in the Western world in the last 35 years! Many of the so-called allergies today are in fact MCS. An off the cuff disagreement with the above could be .. we're not talking about synthetics .. we're talking about flowers. But that would be shortsighted and would evade the reality of the danger I am laying out here ... the danger of stretching the real meaning of Aromatherapy beyond what we have become accustomed to accepting. Evolution and Natural Selection play a major part in the justification of my position. All life forms that have survived for long periods of time did so because they were able to (1) Protect themselves from their enemies .. and .. (2) Procreate. Few of us are decendants of a Cro-Magnon man that was eaten by a Sabor Tooth Tiger. Evolution and Natural Selection allow for the creation of species that are pretty darned close to perfect .. those that are not .. those that were not able to accomplish items (1) and (2) above fell along the wayside. There is not a single chemical component in the profile of a healthy human or plant or other critter that is not there for a reason .. its not like the Great Spirit created this critter and then recognized that the profile was 1% or 2% short of being complete .. and then threw in something else to fill the void .. to keep those other chemicals from bouncing around and such. It is from this point that one of the Sacred Cows of AT was born .. the one called " Synergy " ! If I am not wrong .. if Evolution and Natural Selection in fact created a perfect critter then we must assume that ALL of the chemical components in that healthy critter are there for a purpose. Martin, being a Herbalist (that is his expertise .. not Aromatherapy) knows that certain chemical components in a plant can be harmful if extracted and used in their pure form .. and that they are there to counter balance other chemicals .. and that together as a " Synergy " they allow that plant to hum along like a fine Swiss Watch .. but extract one of them .. even a minor trace chemical .. and you might be creating the death of that plant .. or that species. This also leans toward Genetic Engineering but I am not going to go there now. I am going to go here .. Contraindications vs Therapeutic Value! It has been and will continue to be my position that ANY manipulated Essential Oil will NOT provide the same Therapeutic Value as will one that has not been manipulated. I will take this as far as saying that FCF Bergamot or any other oil that has been manipulated to make it safer fits into this category ... that's why I have never and will never sell one. If people are not smart enough .. careful enough .. to properly use Bergamot they should leave it alone! I see this as being no different than use of a firearm or driving a motor vehicle! When you manipulate the Natural Synergy of an Essential Oil beyond the point that it has already been manipulated by the very UNNATURAL process of Distillation or other forms of Extraction .. you wind up with a less than perfect product .. so it tracks that it will be less beneficial Therapeutically. If this is not true then we must stop making demands for PURE, UNMANIPULATED oils .. we can't have it both ways in the real world. Martin and all of those who live in the EU know that the Non Democratic EU has created panels of bureaucrats .. many of which have absolutely no knowledge of plants or Essential Oils .. that have studied the effects of chemicals .. extracts they are .. in a vacuum they are .. and based on incorrect extrapolation of the effects of those isolated chemical components they have BANNED many Essential Oils from use in certain commercial preparations. This is pure bureaucratic Bovine Excrement .. it is Big Brother telling the Sheeple what is best for them. Though these prohibitions are minor compared to some of the other ridiculous decisions made by these panels of " experts " .. it is the one that should most concern folks who want unrestricted access to natural products. Canadians .. you are next! Just as we question the unknown long-term effects of Genetically Engineered Foods .. we should question the unknown long-term effects of bombardment of synthetic chemicals that might be considered as being Therapeutic if we want to stretch the meaning of the term. We know that MCS is not a result of Evolution of Man .. though it can certainly play a major role in the Natural Selection process .. MCS is a result of outside interference with mankind's Evolution .. same as all forms of pollution are outside interference! On Contraindications .. we pretty much have these nailed down when discussing the use of EO .. though there is a lot of misinformation out and about .. misinformation like Pennyroyal being an Abortifacient and Marjoram lowering BP and Rosemary causing seizures for those who suffer from Epilepsy ... all of this is TOTAL BS but all of this is a part of the foundation of AT. If you take the BS out of AT it is a lot less interesting .. I tried to point that out in my post on what EO really are and what they are not. Those who are turned on by Spiritual Hocus Pocus don't bother me .. those who preach or practice use of EO in an unsafe manner or peddle products that will not do what they say they will do .. or try to rationalize the use of synthetics .. they bother me .. but so does warm beer. I won't reject those who think differently than I do and I won't reject warm beer if there is no cold beer available. Side Effects .. that's what the Commercial drugs have .. also BS .. what they are calling side effects are Contraindications .. but they use terminology that is easily understood by the average person. Since 1995, I have taken but ONE prescription medication .. and then for a short period of time .. and the only Over the Counter (OTC) medications I have taken are aspirin (hopefully to avoid stroke) .. and antacids because .. even though I am a 65 year old dude who fathered a son two years ago .. I still have a 65 year old stomach and I love onions and garlic and lots of other things that cause a lot of stomach acid. The one prescription medication I took was an anti inflammatory medication and it had a laundry list of Side Effects. I challenge any of you to pull out any medication you have and find that there are no Side Effects listed. Why are there so many Side Effects? Because the odds are good that the medication is the result of the manipulation of the Natural Synergy of some plant life .. they have extracted certain KNOWN active ingredients from the plant and they have broken the Natural Chain .. that chain we call Synergy. Now we have a creation that is far less than perfect .. it is missing all those nice little trace chemicals that might play more of a major role in the Therapeutic value of the plant than the known or supposed active (major) chemical compounds. ALL OF THE ABOVE IS INTENDED TO SUPPORT MY POSITION THAT WE MUST BE RESPONSIBLE AND CONSISTENT WHEN WE DISCUSS ESSENTIAL OILS AND AROMATHERAPY AND WE MUST DEMAND UNIVERSALLY ACCEPTED DEFINITIONS!!! If we want to Redefine the meaning of AT .. if we want to be creative and see just how many exceptions we can list of what AT really is .. then we are helping to justify the positions of Glade and the Pharmaceutical Companies who push synthetics or isolated chemical treatments .. as well as those who manipulate, stretch and otherwise adulterate Essential Oils. Martin and I (and probably others) could (but we won't) give you the names and dates of people in this industry who have been caught with their pants down .. who have been found guilty with no chance of defense .. of adulterating very costly EO with either Synthetic or Extracted Chemicals! One we know spent time in the Hoosegow for his actions .. but I think he is still in the business. Another was kicked out of a certain society in the UK .. but he still sells products and is even held in high esteem by some folks who should know better. These folks are no different than Glade except that people like you know that when you waste money on Glade Plug Ins you are getting a synthetic product .. others are just getting screwed out of their money. I believe that the entire discussion on whether or not Sweet Peas are Aromatherapy has the potential to justify the actions of Glade and the Big Pharma and the con artists in this industry! I can never accept that a child molester is a good person because s/he was exceptionally kind to his/her mother and little puppy dogs .. and I can never except that the inhalation of any odor .. any volatile molecule .. that might allow some Psychological or Emotional Therapeutic gain to a person can be considered as being Aromatherapy .. and I will never accept it unless there is universal agreement on a new .. redefined .. meaning of the term Aromatherapy. This might happen in time .. language is a direct reflection of culture. My nickname is Butch but I am a male and it has a different meaning today. We might in time start calling chairs " butt relaxers " .. we now call janitors and garbage collectors " engineers " of a type. After spending 30 years in the U.S. Army I am NOT willing to go along with the new Politically Correct terms they have been forced to accept .. to me Stockades are not Confinement Facilities and Mess Halls are not Dining Facilities and Dependents are not Family Members .. and when those who wish to redefine or rename the practice of Aromatherapy are able to do so I might not accept their changes .. odds are I will be out of the industry by then .. or Under Snakes. ;-) > Fact 4. The definition of an 'essential oil' is a trade fixed term > mainly based on way outdated French trade definitions that I do not > accept as valid. > Gattefosse coined the term " Aromatherapie " back in 1928 .. but there are many today who would like to redefine the meaning. The term " Hydrosol " has been used for hundreds of years .. though for some reason Jeanne Rose claims to have first used that term .. I would not mention this except that I once wrote a long explanation of why she was out in left field and she didn't accept it .. she still makes this ridiculous claim. ;-) The term " Essential Oil " was used by alchemists back in Medieval times .. back when you Limeys were drawing and quartering folks for shooting the king's deer and such .. there is nothing new about the term. Those who want to know why they used " Essential " can do a bit of research and learn why .. this is long enough now and I'm not being paid to write this. ;-) Whether the term " Essential Oil " is valid or not is a matter of opinion .. but we damn sure have to have a universal meaning or we are opening a door for the con artists and the Commercial dudes to come into the industry! > In my view the only true essential oil is that substance found in the > glands of plants or resins. That is NOT what you get in your little > bottles because hot distillation IS an un-natural chemical process. > That said, it in no way detracts from the usefullness of these " oils " . > I agree with all the above .. but I fear it will be misunderstood by some of the readers. Few of those readers will have an opportunity to experience an EO that does not come in a bottle. And its those EO in the bottle that have allowed this industry to function .. that has allowed folks to benefit from the Therapeutic value of EO. Martin .. when you visited me in the Rose Fields in Isparta, Turkey you will recall that we crushed Damask Rose (Rosa damascena) blossoms and spread them over our hands and faces and such ... we were spreading Essential Oil on our bodies .. the oil from those Roses is easily extracted in that manner. But there are many aromatic botanicals that contain EO but will NOT smell nice if you crush them and rub them on your body .. and there are many botanicals that have a pleasing odor when we sniff them .. BUT .. will NOT allow the economic production of a useable product .. that is why the Fragrance Oil industry is bigger than the EO industry .. they can REcreate those odors using synthetic or partially synthetic Nature Identical chemicals. > Taking into account the fact that we know thousands of chemicals are > emitted by plants into the atmosphere, and some research indicating an > effect on humans in forest airs and gardens, I will stake my > reputation (for what it's worth) that some of these chemicals do have > profound effects on both our physiology and our physchology. Will we > get to find out which chemicals are involved? I kind of doubt it > because most of the analysis is only for the fragrance trade. So is > walking in a fragrant garden aromatherapy - you bet it is. > I will agree that the above is logical .. but I will not agree with REdefining the terms Essential Oil or Aromatherapy. When I was in the 'Nam we used to stay out in the bush for days when the temperature was in the upper 90s and the humidity was so high in the jungles that fish could swim from rice paddy to rice paddy through the air .. but when we came back for a stand down most of us would rush off to a bar for some " 33 " Beer and sniff the odors of all those pretty little Vietnamese Bar Gals .. lemme tell you that this had one helluva profound effect on my psychology and morale (emotions) and in most cases led to me having some profound physiological relief. I will agree that we are not likely to ever know which of the many volatile molecules emitted by aromatic plants or Essential Oils are the key to the Therapeutic values we are aware of .. nor do I think the Fragrance Trade will be able to do that anytime soon. The level of sophistication of the most costly analysis equipment today does not allow us to test more than a few hundred compounds in Rose Otto .. and it is not inconceivable that a single compound present in as low as 1/1000th of a percentage could have a MAJOR impact. This is even more support for use of natural synergies .. for not using oils that have been manipulated .. like FCF Bergamot. And .. it is possible that some trace chemicals are not even emitted as volatile molecules when we crush a Rose blossom .. or when we walk through a Sweet Pea garden. They may or may not even be extracted via distillation alone ... as you well know, some aromatics require laborious preparation prior to distillation and the results can be the creation of a chemical compound that was NOT naturally present in the aromatic when it was alive. There is much we can not know about this .. we can only make logical assumptions based on observed effects. > Lastly bear in mind that the term 'aromatherapy' is an entirely modern > one without any real analysis of what it means. > Language unto itself is mostly modern today .. and if 1928 is to be considered as modern then I feel a helluva lot younger now cause 1942 was just a few days ago. ;-) For you new folks .. Martin and I are buddies and we have been butting heads for close to 15 years now .. we have mutual respect and agree to disagree on a helluva lotta subjects. Come to think on it .. about the only thing we ever had a 100% agreement on was that the Rose Fields of Isparta, Turkey are worth the time and money to visit .. as is the natural earth energy center at Catalhoyuk (King Midas' Tomb) outside of Ankara .. and the Turkish pastries are perhaps the finest in the world. On the latter point .. there is a pastry shop on every corner in Turkey and Martin had me stop at least twice every kilometer. ;-) > Martin Watt > http://www.aromamedical.com > Y'all have a good one .. and keep smiling. :-) Butch .. http://www.AV-AT.com <http://www.av-at.com/> .. Purveyor of Wholesale & Retail GC Tested EO, Tested Hydrosols, Turkish Rose Products and other nice things shipped from our store/warehouse in Downtown Friendsville, Maryland .. population 597. PS: I will concede that when the majority of folks decide that the terms Aromatherapy and Essential Oils should be changed .. and there is at least 51% agreement on this .. then that change can become legitimate. But odds of that happening are about as good as are the odds or the Democrats picking a presidential nominee in the next few days. ;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2008 Report Share Posted May 10, 2008 Hi Butch Some real food-for-thought here, thank you for opening up the real issues and implications of being too liberal with terminology when talking AT. My first reaction when this question came up was Yes! of course flowers are AT! But then I'm feeling summer happy as Manchester has had at least 3 days sunshine with No Rain. The horses are out in the field tonight for the first time since last August - and I'm mucking-out-free!! Woo-Hoo!! Though a well rotted muck heap smells a lot like perfume to me, I'm glad to be free of shifting that equine excrement at last :-) Coming back to your post, you made me realise I'm a bit of a hypocrite because I'm right up the front line shouting against the Glades, dog shampoos - and all -being called AT. And there I was doing (almost) the same thing..... Fragrant flowers do have their own special place - those narcissus in the field are really wonderful - but you are 100% right, they are not AT, and extending the word AT to accommodate them is wrong. We DO need to be consistent in how we use the word Aromatherapy, because if we aren't, we cant complain when others step in and pinch it. Thank you for the eye opener and wake up call :-) LLx > If we don't demand some discipline in the field of Aromatherapy we must > accept that synthetic fragrances sold by Glade and other companies .. the > plug ins, etc., are a legitimate form of Aromatherapy. > > This is where I draw the line I can't cross and its the point I have tried > to sell in my previous posts. If we are to accept that any odor or > fragrance that enters the body through the olfactory system .. and causes > some form of change to our physical, psychological or emotion being .. is in > fact, AT, then we must accept that adulterated, stretched or manipulated > natural products .. as well as many synthetic products .. are beneficial .. > because they are Therapeutic! Therapeutic is a term that means " having or > exhibiting healing powers " . There are people who are pleased with the > synthetic odors in elevators or those emitted from the doo dads hanging from > rear view mirrors .. if they are pleased then to them there is REAL > Therapeutic value there .. strictly from a psychological or emotional point > of view. Take it a bit further and we can logically say that if one has > their head on straight due to being emotionally pacified .. they can also > gain some physiological Therapeutic benefit from their emotional state. > > We have just incorrectly rationalized ourselves into accepting that there is > no need to pay more for naturals when we can get similar benefits from > synthetics. I stick to the " incorrectly " rationalized because the here and > now is not what it is all about .. we must look at the future. Multiple > Chemical Sensitivities (MCS) has increased 5 fold in the Western world in > the last 35 years! Many of the so-called allergies today are in fact MCS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.