Guest guest Posted November 9, 2007 Report Share Posted November 9, 2007 Hi there, I need some advice, I am organising the next NZROHA conference and would like to use a painting as the picture for the advertising. Am I able to use a painting that is famous, or is there copyright ???? Cheers Jeanine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2007 Report Share Posted November 9, 2007 Old dead masters have no copyright.... recently dead have copyrights as well as folk still in the land of the living. K On 11/9/07, David & Jeanine Moss <d.j.moss wrote: > > Hi there, > I need some advice, I am organising the next NZROHA conference and would > like to use a painting as the picture for the advertising. > Am I able to use a painting that is famous, or is there copyright ???? > Cheers > Jeanine > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 10, 2007 Report Share Posted November 10, 2007 Hi Jeanine, If the painting is the work of a living artist, he/she owns the reproduction copyright (even if the specific painting is owned by someone other than the artist). If the artist is deceased (in which case copyrights are extended 70 years beyond his/her death), his/her heirs own the reproduction copyright (same as above applies, also). An artist need not register copyright - as soon as he/she puts brush to canvas, it is copyrighted. Statutory damages up to $150,000 and additional legal costs can be awarded. I can't imagine under what circumstances that you would have free access to reproduce an original work of art without formal and legal agreement with the artist or his/her heirs, or the rightful owner of the painting, or those who have reproduced the work on their website. If you are looking at images on a website, the owners of that website have permission to reproduce the image on their site (at least they should, legally) by virtue of having the painting or print for sale. This was discussed before (on another list, I think) with regard to botanical pictures reproduced on gallery sites. These are copyrighted reproductions (their photos) by the gallery owners websites and clearly stated on their websites. Often images (such as the Curtis photos) are owned by NGO's or nonprofits who generously allow free use so long as they are prominently acknowledged, but this will be clearly stated on their website. Here's some websites that are helpful. http://www.piercelaw.edu/tfield/CopyVis.htm This site also has internet copyright information. http://ahds.ac.uk/copyrightfaq.htm A helpful FAQ I've worked with my brother to publish a series of large lithographs; he gifted ownership of the finished prints to me, but a legal document was prepared and filed to accomplish this. Otherwise, he would retain ownership. You will see on his website, every page of the website has a clear statement of copyright, which includes the images reproduced for use on the website. http://www.artofpainting.net My friend Don Ealy shows at this gallery http://www.theartspiritgallery.com/html/home.asp and you will see copyright of the images on the website clearly stated. My friend John Thamm (actually my first husband) doesn't have copyright clearly stated on his website http://www.jfthammstudios.com/index.htm He might not sue you, he might just come after you with his gun. :-) Just kidding (maybe). Hope this helps. Be well, Marcia Elston/Samara Botane/Nature Intelligence http://www.wingedseed.com http://www.aromaconnection.org " Historically, the most terrible things - war, genocide and slavery - have resulted from obedience, not disobedience. " Howard Zinn ________________________________ ATFE2 [ATFE2 ] On Behalf Of David & Jeanine Moss Friday, November 09, 2007 3:25 PM ATFE2 [ATFE2] Not AT - paintings Hi there, I need some advice, I am organising the next NZROHA conference and would like to use a painting as the picture for the advertising. Am I able to use a painting that is famous, or is there copyright ???? Cheers Jeanine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 This is true. in most cases anyway. --\ ------------- Designer at Scrapbook-Bytes http://www.takeapick.com/2IH *Some people only dream of angels; we held one in our arms.* Remembering Jacob March 8 - 9, 1996 Our Angel: http://sids-network.org/fp/jacob.htm - " Kathleen Petrides " <WoobeyQueen <ATFE2 > Friday, November 09, 2007 4:54 PM Re: [ATFE2] Not AT - paintings > Old dead masters have no copyright.... recently dead have copyrights as > well > as folk still in the land of the living. > > K > > > On 11/9/07, David & Jeanine Moss <d.j.moss wrote: >> >> Hi there, >> I need some advice, I am organising the next NZROHA conference and would >> like to use a painting as the picture for the advertising. >> Am I able to use a painting that is famous, or is there copyright ???? >> Cheers >> Jeanine >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.