Guest guest Posted August 31, 2007 Report Share Posted August 31, 2007 Hey - great to see you here too, Martin! This is the reply the head teacher just emailed me: Fiona I would love to do this but TAFE no longer has facilities to do this sort of testing. Perhaps next year I might be able to negotiate something with UNE. It would be a tricky thing though because the metabolites of the oils would be excreted in urine and perhaps these are unknown. We would need access to a very expensive Mass Spectrometer/LC plus a fair bit of time. Will think about it though. is he correct about the Mass Spec thingy - do we need access to it, and is it expensive?? Are metabolites *that* unknown?? Could we test oils that have the metabolites already documented? Fiona Aust. - Martin Watt ATFE2 Friday, August 31, 2007 8:22 AM [ATFE2] Re: EO absorption >I note that on Martin's website he says that no specific experiments >have been done with subjects NOT being able to smell EO's Since that article was written years ago, I know of one experiment where people wore breathing apparatus and were massaged using Orange oil. I am told there were no traces of that oil or its constituent chemicals when blood samples were taken and analysed. The study has never been published because it was funded by a charity involved in cancer care as a private project, but I do know it was well constructed and done at a UK University as I was asked for some advice. The whole skin absorption thing in aromatherapy is a fantasy invented long ago by know-nothing teachers/authors on the subject. Martin Watt http://www.aromamedical.com ATFE2 , " cooredulla " <cooredulla wrote: > > Ahh Butch - howdy! > > I knew I could count on you for some info ;-) > > The subject that I'm studying is 'Research Methods', and its part of a Diploma of Remedial Massage. I'm already a professional MT, but the industry is becoming more standardised, albeit slowly, so I'm doing subjects that I haven't done previously, to get me a piece of paper that says I now have a " Diploma of Remedial Massage " . > > Anyhow, one task was to review a scientific article from a health science journal and interpret the results. > > Well, I found one: > > Reducing the symptoms of lymphoedema: Is there a role for aromatherapy. Barclayj, Vesley j, Lamber A, Balmer C Eurpoean Journal of Oncology Nursing (2006). > > I am also a qualified Lymphoedema Therapist, and have a Cert IV in Aromatherapy, so I was really excited to find this paper. I 'reviewd' it and received a Distinction. My teacher left comments, and one of them was the one I posted. > > I wanted to prove him wrong (even though I actually agree with him). > > I note that on Martin's website he says that no specific experiments have been done with subjects NOT being able to smell EO's as they are being massaged. Well, I emailed my teacher (who is Head of Studies) and asked him if we could do such an experiment!! I have no idea what he will say....but if one never asks, the answer is definately a 'no'!! > > I'll let you all know what he thinks!!! > > Thanks for the info. > > Cheers, > Fiona > Australia > - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2007 Report Share Posted August 31, 2007 On 8/30/07, cooredulla <cooredulla wrote: > > Hey - great to see you here too, Martin! > > This is the reply the head teacher just emailed me: > > Fiona > I would love to do this but TAFE no longer has facilities to do this sort > of testing. Perhaps next year I might be able to negotiate something with > UNE. It would be a tricky thing though because the metabolites of the oils > would be excreted in urine and perhaps these are unknown. We would need > access to a very expensive Mass Spectrometer/LC plus a fair bit of time. > > Will think about it though. > > is he correct about the Mass Spec thingy - do we need access to it, and is > it expensive?? Are metabolites *that* unknown?? Could we test oils that have > the metabolites already documented? > > Fiona > Aust. > > - > Martin Watt > ATFE2 <ATFE2%40> > Friday, August 31, 2007 8:22 AM > [ATFE2] Re: EO absorption > > >I note that on Martin's website he says that no specific experiments > >have been done with subjects NOT being able to smell EO's > > Since that article was written years ago, I know of one experiment > where people wore breathing apparatus and were massaged using Orange > oil. I am told there were no traces of that oil or its constituent > chemicals when blood samples were taken and analysed. The study has > never been published because it was funded by a charity involved in > cancer care as a private project, but I do know it was well > constructed and done at a UK University as I was asked for some advice. > > The whole skin absorption thing in aromatherapy is a fantasy invented > long ago by know-nothing teachers/authors on the subject. > > Martin Watt > http://www.aromamedical.com > > ATFE2 <ATFE2%40>, " cooredulla " > <cooredulla wrote: > > > > Ahh Butch - howdy! > > > > I knew I could count on you for some info ;-) > > > > The subject that I'm studying is 'Research Methods', and its part of > a Diploma of Remedial Massage. I'm already a professional MT, but the > industry is becoming more standardised, albeit slowly, so I'm doing > subjects that I haven't done previously, to get me a piece of paper > that says I now have a " Diploma of Remedial Massage " . > > > > Anyhow, one task was to review a scientific article from a health > science journal and interpret the results. > > > > Well, I found one: > > > > Reducing the symptoms of lymphoedema: Is there a role for > aromatherapy. Barclayj, Vesley j, Lamber A, Balmer C Eurpoean Journal > of Oncology Nursing (2006). > > > > I am also a qualified Lymphoedema Therapist, and have a Cert IV in > Aromatherapy, so I was really excited to find this paper. I 'reviewd' > it and received a Distinction. My teacher left comments, and one of > them was the one I posted. > > > > I wanted to prove him wrong (even though I actually agree with him). > > > > I note that on Martin's website he says that no specific experiments > have been done with subjects NOT being able to smell EO's as they are > being massaged. Well, I emailed my teacher (who is Head of Studies) > and asked him if we could do such an experiment!! I have no idea what > he will say....but if one never asks, the answer is definately a 'no'!! > > > > I'll let you all know what he thinks!!! > > > > Thanks for the info. > > > > Cheers, > > Fiona > > Australia > > - > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2007 Report Share Posted September 1, 2007 What is needed firstly is the ability to take blood samples. This has to be done from within a sterile bag in order to avoid volatiles contaminating the needle.These then have to be processed by experts in blood analysis. This would include normal GLC and I do not think mass spec is necessary. The metabolites in the urine is not really related to the skin absorption issue. All we need to know is are there components of the oil in the blood and if so how much. Metabolites in the urine are something that are investigated when the toxicity of an oil is being examined and with skin testing you don't need to use anything like that volume. The whole process is expensive though as you need real expertise in forensic blood analysis and those people are few. You need breathing equipement to avoid inhalation. You need a very carefully controlled group of people who will stay on a restricted diet for a couple of weeks. Bear in mind the volatiles we ingest in our normal food which would throw blood test results. All kinds of controls are required and that costs money. At the end of the day the question has to be asked-what for? In my opinion the skin absorption issue is a dead duck which should be laid to rest. Martin Watt ATFE2 , " cooredulla " <cooredulla wrote: > > Hey - great to see you here too, Martin! > > This is the reply the head teacher just emailed me: > > Fiona > I would love to do this but TAFE no longer has facilities to do this sort of testing. Perhaps next year I might be able to negotiate something with UNE. It would be a tricky thing though because the metabolites of the oils would be excreted in urine and perhaps these are unknown. We would need access to a very expensive Mass Spectrometer/LC plus a fair bit of time. > > Will think about it though. > > is he correct about the Mass Spec thingy - do we need access to it, and is it expensive?? Are metabolites *that* unknown?? Could we test oils that have the metabolites already documented? > > Fiona > Aust. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2007 Report Share Posted September 2, 2007 Again, many thanks Martin. Yeah, I realise it's a 'lame duck', but I just thought the more experiments that disprove the aborption by skin theory, the better. Perhaps then, those books, schools, etc that still extoll the virtues of using it topically for every ailment under the sun, would be discredited. I also just thought it would be extremely interesting, from a purely personal level!! Fiona Aust. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.