Guest guest Posted March 21, 2008 Report Share Posted March 21, 2008 They tend to say it is a chemical imbalance. A recent study finds they can't back up that statement, nor can the pshchiatrists cited. Actually, it IS a chemical imbalance - a whole slew of imbalances that are interconnected and not corrected by use of one or a few drugs, though some people respond well in the short term, the actual benefit stats are startling, brief below. This is an interesting report - I didn't realize the extent of the media and professionals speaking thru it who used this as their basis of support for the SSRI meds. Best - Ysha ScienceDaily (Mar. 3, 2008) ... according to a new study co-authored by a Florida State University visiting lecturer, Jeffrey Lacasse and Jonathan Leo, a neuroanatomy professor... As their current study documents, when asked for evidence, reporters were unable to cite peer-reviewed primary articles in support of the theory. " Leo said. " Since the 1960's, there has been no direct evidence to confirm the theory and a significant number of findings cast doubt on the theory. " The " Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, " which almost all psychiatrists use to diagnose and treat their patients, clearly states that the cause of depression and anxiety is unknown! " according to Lacasse and Leo. ... Other studies indicate that for every 10 people who take an SSRI, only one to two people are truly receiving benefit from the medication, according to Lacasse and Leo. The National Center for Health Statistics found that antidepressants are the most prescribed drugs in the United States, with doctors writing more than 31 million prescriptions in 2005. See detailed article and more links at http://health.uniteforlife/message/815 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.