Vaccinations

[Guest guest]

Two hundred young adults (college age) recently participated in the

first smallpox vaccine trial. Here is a news article reporting on this.

 

http://www.stratiawire.com/article.asp?id=750

 

Monday, December 09, 2002

SMALLPOX VACCINE RESULTS ARE IN

DECEMBER 9. The first returns are in on the smallpox vaccine. A recent

multi-center US government clinical trial on 200 “young adults†has been

completed.

 

MSNBC reports. The volunteers who got the shot were VERY healthy to begin

with. One researcher, Kathy Edwards, called them the “crème de la crème.â€

 

Okay? So get this. “Yet when she [Edwards] inoculated them with smallpox

vaccine, arms swelled, temperatures spiked and panic spread [at Baylor

University]. It was the same at clinics in Iowa, Tennessee, and California.â€

 

Stats: After the shot, one-third of the volunteers missed at least a day of

work or school. 75 out of 200 experienced high fever. “Several were put on

antibiotics because physicians worried that their blisters signaled a

bacterial infection.â€

 

Wow.

 

And look, smallpox is a VIRUS, and antibiotics DON’T WORK against viruses.

So, in essence, the researchers were inferring that the vaccine SUPPRESSED

THE IMMUNE SYSTEMS of the volunteers---thus allowing bacterial infections to

bloom suddenly---OR the vaccine was contaminated with bacteria to begin with.

 

 

Researcher Edwards, who headed up the study, said, “I can read all day about

it [the adverse effects of the vaccine], but seeing it is quite impressive.

The reactions we saw were really quite remarkable.â€

 

When a researcher makes a comment like this, you know some very bad things

are happening.

 

AND THIS WAS A POPULATION OF EXTREMELY HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS. YOUNG ADULTS WHO

SHOULD BE AT THE VERY PEAK OF LIFE, WITH THEIR IMMUNE DEFENSES FULLY INTACT.

 

Of course, this story didn’t get much play in the press. But the handwriting

is on the wall. Anyone can see what’ll happen if they start shooting up

people by the millions with the vaccine. For example, people who don’t

qualify as severely immune suppressed by any obvious assessment, but still

do, in fact, have reduced immune capacity---AND THAT IS A WHOLE LOT OF

PEOPLE.---these folks will be AT GREAT RISK from the vaccine.

 

This government study is KEY. Because later on, they will try to cover up the

devastating effects of the vaccine. They will lie, distort, omit. But right

now, here it is. Out in the open. The results, for all to see.

 

Let me tell you something. The CDC WANTED to release the results of this

study. They wanted to go on the record now, before the stuff really hits the

fan. They are very frightened of being nailed for killing people with the

vaccine.

8888888

However as a homeopathic physician those who got this reaction if they do not

go on to developing future problems from the mercury or other elements of the

vaccine will go on to the best immunity.

 

4 stages of getting vaccines

1. No reaction the person had a natural immunity and probably did not need

the vaccine

2. A very mild reaction redness soreness. This person runs the risk of

possibly getting the disease. It contacted the vital force but may or may not

have stimulated the immunity. It depends on the person. However it is

preferable to severe reactions.

3. Severe reactions such as swelling fevers etc. The Vital force (or Qi)

reacted fully and immunity should be in place.

4. death. No one knows if they are the 1-2 in a million who will die from the

vaccine. However they are not publishing the stats of how many other long

term problems arise from use of the vaccine.

 

Here's another story on the smallpox vaccine

Varicella Outbreak at a Day-Care Center despite Vaccination

New England Journal of Medicine

 

Volume 347:1909-1915 December 12, 2002 Number 24

 

 

Outbreak of Varicella at a Day-Care Center despite Vaccination

 

Karin Galil, M.D., M.P.H., Brent Lee, M.D., M.P.H., Tara Strine, M.P.H.,

Claire Carraher, R.N., Andrew L. Baughman, Ph.D., M.P.H., Melinda Eaton,

D.V.M., Jose Montero, M.D., and Jane Seward, M.B., B.S., M.P.H.

 

 

ABSTRACT

 

Background

 

In seven studies of the effectiveness of the varicella vaccine conducted

since it was licensed, the effectiveness was 71 to 100 percent against

disease of any severity and 95 to 100 percent against moderate and severe

disease. We investigated an outbreak of varicella in a population of

children with a high proportion of vaccinees who were attending a day-care

center in a small community in New Hampshire.

 

Methods

 

Using standardized questionnaires, we collected information about the

children's medical and vaccination history from parents and health care

providers. The analysis of the effectiveness of the vaccine and of risk

factors for vaccine failure was restricted to children who were enrolled in

the day-care center continuously during the outbreak and attended for one

week or more and who were cared for in the building that represented the

epicenter of the outbreak, since transmission was not documented in a second

building.

 

Results

 

Varicella developed in 25 of 88 children (28.4 percent) between December 1,

2000, and January 11, 2001. The index case occurred in a healthy child who

had been vaccinated three years previously and who infected more than 50

percent of his classmates who had no history of varicella. The effectiveness

of the vaccine was 44.0 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 6.9 to 66.3

percent) against disease of any severity and 86.0 percent (95 percent

confidence interval, 38.7 to 96.8 percent) against moderate or severe

disease. Children who had been vaccinated three years or more before the

outbreak were at greater risk for vaccine failure than those who had been

vaccinated more recently (relative risk, 2.6 [95 percent confidence

interval, 1.3 to 5.3]).

 

Conclusions

 

In this outbreak, vaccination provided poor protection against varicella,

although there was good protection against moderate or severe disease. A

longer interval since vaccination was associated with an increased risk of

vaccine failure. Breakthrough infections in vaccinated, healthy persons can

be as infectious as varicella in unvaccinated persons.

 

http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/347/24/1909?query=TOC

 

Here is an accurate account of the ramifications of the rider in the

Homeland Security Bill

that protects Eli Lilly and others who have used thimerosal in vaccines from

being sued in state courts.

 

 

Mercury Falling

Homeland Security Act inoculates drug makers against autism lawsuits

BY CHRIS LYDGATE

11.27.02

Williamette Week Online

 

 

When President George W. Bush signed the Homeland Security Act in the

White House on Monday, he praised the bill as a " heroic action " that

demonstrated " the resolve of this great nation to defend our freedom, our

security and our way of life. "

Three thousand miles away, Portland lawyer Mike Williams rolled his eyes.

 

Williams represents hundreds of families who are suing pharmaceutical

companies--in particular, Eli Lilly--over a mercury-based preservative used

in some childhood vaccines. The families contend that the preservative

triggered neurological damage in their children, who have been diagnosed

with autism.

 

Read on...

 

http://www.wweek.com/flatfiles/News3373.lasso

 

I think the real issue is not should we vaccinate or not. In my mind, the

real issues are:

 

-- the withholding of full information on vaccines;

-- and the lack of freedom in some states to choose to not vaccinate;

-- the use of less expensive materials in vaccines despite

the knowledge of higher toxicity.

 

 

For instance:

 

-- clinical studies done by the two manufacturers of the Hep B vaccine were

four and five days in length; other vaccine trials are several days to

several weeks;

 

-- National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine reported this on

vaccines:

 

" In the course of its review, the committee encountered many gaps and

limitations in knowledge bearing directly and indirectly on the safety of

vaccines. These include inadequate understanding of the biologic mechanisms

underlying adverse events following natural infection or immunization,

insufficient or inconsistent information from case reports and case series,

inadequate size or length of follow-up of many population-based

epidemiologic studies, and limited capacity of existing surveillance systems

of vaccine injury to provide persuasive evidence of causation. The committee

found few experimental studies published in relation to the number of

epidemiological studies published. Clearly, if research capacity and

accomplishment in these area are not improved, future reviews of vaccine

safety will be similarly handicapped. "

 

-- Baby deaths may be linked to toxic vaccine; Antony Barnett and Tracy

McVeigh

Sunday, July 8, 2001 The Observer

 

The British drug company Glaxo Wellcome allowed thousands of British babies

to be inoculated with toxic whooping cough vaccines it knew had not passed

crucial

safety tests.

http://www.observer.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,518459,00.html

 

-- Pluserix was banned by the Department of Health in 1992 after being

linked

with meningitis. This was two years after an identical vaccine was banned in

Canada.

 

-- August 5, 2001

 

THE Department of Health has told doctors they must use stocks of a

mercury-based vaccine for infants even though it is being phased out for

safety reasons.

Sunday Times http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/

 

 

-- Sunday July 8, 2001

 

The British drug company Glaxo Wellcome allowed thousands of British babies

to

be inoculated with toxic whooping cough vaccines it knew had not passed

crucial

safety tests.

http://www.observer.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,518459,00.html

 

-- In January of 2002, Barbara Loe Fisher, Co-founder & President

National Vaccine Information Center, testified before the California Senate

Committee on Health and Human Services hearing entitled,

" Childhood Immunization Mandates: Politics vs. Public Health "

 

She said:

 

" The Prevnar pre-licensure clinical trials, which Wyeth Lederle paid Kaiser

Permanente to conduct, compared two experimental vaccines against each

other. To compound this basic methodological flaw, Kaiser and Wyeth Lederle,

allowed most of the children in the trial to be given the more reactive DPT

vaccine rather than use the safer, less reactive DTaP vaccine. This placed

the children in that five-year experiment in greater danger and allowed the

drug company to write off the seizures that occurred as being caused by DPT

and not Prevnar, when in fact, they didn't know. Even so, the groups of

children who got Prevnar suffered more seizures, higher fevers, more

irritability and other reactions than did the children who got the other

experimental vaccine. It was a no-brainer as far as I was concerned: Kaiser

and Wyeth Lederle had proved nothing about Prevnar vaccine safety. "

 

 

 

The issues in vaccination are no different from the issues faced in

medicine-at-large.

The U.S. Congress publication, " Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of

Medical Technologies " quoted 80% to 90% of medical treatments, including

drugs, as being unproven. This was from the late 1970's. The estimate now

is that 70-80%

of medical treatments remain unproven.

 

 

As long as people chose a more pleasant myth, we will struggle to

bring these issues out where they can be appropriately addressed.

 

A website devoted to vaccination info

 

news (NVICNews)

 

Full Committee Hearing on " Vaccines and the Autism Epidemic:Reviewing the

Federal Government's Track Record and Charting aCourse For the Future " Live

on line at Tuesday, December 101:00 p.m. eastern: <A

HREF= " http://64.4.8.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN & lah=aea9f7d2b34c47bedd2b7ac93ef3\

cd4e & lat=1039795168 & hm___action=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2ehouse%2egov%2freform%2fschedu\

le%2ehtm " >

http://www.house.gov/reform/schedule.htm</A>

 

 

 

Sunny

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

There is a book called Natural Healing for Babies and Children by Aviva Jill

Romm. There is a section that deals with the illnesses that people generally

vaccinate for such as whooping cough. It includes emergency signals also.

 

It's a great book. It's not an Ayurvedic book, but a wonderful book anyway.

I would recommend it to any holistic parent/caregiver.

 

The Crossing Press

$16.95

 

For support groups and other information regarding vaccines:

National Vaccine Information Center

http://www.909shot.com

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Thank you, good information. You didn't sign your name, but I appreciate

your input. Vicky York

 

----

 

kalavatidevi108

06/15/05 15:09:42

ayurveda

Re: vaccinations

 

There is a book called Natural Healing for Babies and Children by Aviva Jill

Romm. There is a section that deals with the illnesses that people

generally

vaccinate for such as whooping cough. It includes emergency signals also.

 

It's a great book. It's not an Ayurvedic book, but a wonderful book anyway.

I would recommend it to any holistic parent/caregiver.

 

The Crossing Press

$16.95

 

For support groups and other information regarding vaccines:

National Vaccine Information Center

http://www.909shot.com

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Hi Kalavadevi!

Thanks for this input! I've seen something by Aviva Jill and remember

being positively impressed, although I don't own the book and can't

comment/compare ayurvedic notes. (would be fun, and sounds like this

would make it easier to answer the question at large!).

Martha