Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Immunization and Quaranteen

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

The following is about some posts and not an attack on any person.

 

This is not necessarily about any particular or recent post condemning

vaccinations as I find them mostly useless by way of ridiculous claims so

that I don't often read past the first absurd statement. But at the moment

I happen to have a minute and simply want to present my view of the

situation.

 

It seems that some who question Vaccinations apply more heat than light

on the subject.

 

To deny that Polio and Smallpox vaccines did not stop these diseases 50

years ago is an untenable position. Occasionally I meet someone over forty

that has a damaged limb from Polio.

 

To demand a vaccine that will not harm about 0.01 percent of the population

is absurd.

 

Aspirin hurts more than that!

 

Now it has been said that many people in Israel have been given the new

smallpox vaccine; yet there is nothing in the news telling how many have

been harmed by it nor have I seen any post about harm done in Israel.

 

Some seem not to remember that before measles and pertussis and Tetanus

that the damage done by these diseases was extensive. Back then the State

" Quarantined " homes. No visitors may enter.

 

Now any thinking person is going to reject the whole argument of some of the

obviously wild claims made sometimes on these lists because they ignore

historical data or demand impossible levels of performance.

 

So you who think you are promoting your cause- by wild statements--please

realize that you are shooting your own foot.

 

Some good could be done, by getting some vaccines changed, such as getting

mercury out of them.

 

But wild claims turn most thinking people away, and what do you find on

the internet; mostly educated, articulate thinkers.

 

Lorenzo

 

 

---

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release 11/25/02

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Lorenzo,

I agree that it is a shame that it is difficult to have a reasoned

debate on this issue as it is so important....

I agree with some of what you say but I think even the arguement you

raise is only part of the problem. I confess I am tired of trying to

discuss the need a for measles vaccine in the UK with people who

insist on including the death rates in the third world as if they are

relevent or pertinent .......tired of being attacked as a lunatic for

questioning whether the vaccine schedule is now hopelessly

overloaded ........ a little puzzled at the need for a chicken pox

vaccine at all !

No vaccine is totally safe - and I don't expect it to be - every

person is different and allergies and unexpected reactions are

inevitable with any treatment .

As for the measles quarantine - not in my house ! I grew up as one of

eight children at a time ( not THAT long a go !!LOL!!) when parents

had measles parties to " get it over with " . The only part of the

treatment that involved quarentine was being kept out of sunlight to

prevent damage to the eyes.

This issue is too important for the point scoring I so often see

and , as the mother of a child with severe disabilities as a result

of a vaccination I wish there was less attacking and more discussing .

Regards

Deborah

PS - if we are going to take the mercury out , could we take out the

alluminium and the formaldyhyde too !!!

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- In Gettingwell , " Lorenzo " <lorenzo1@w...> wrote:

>

> The following is about some posts and not an attack on any person.

>

> This is not necessarily about any particular or recent post

condemning

> vaccinations as I find them mostly useless by way of ridiculous

claims so

> that I don't often read past the first absurd statement. But at

the moment

> I happen to have a minute and simply want to present my view of the

> situation.

>

> It seems that some who question Vaccinations apply more heat

than light

> on the subject.

>

> To deny that Polio and Smallpox vaccines did not stop these

diseases 50

> years ago is an untenable position. Occasionally I meet someone

over forty

> that has a damaged limb from Polio.

>

> To demand a vaccine that will not harm about 0.01 percent of the

population

> is absurd.

>

> Aspirin hurts more than that!

>

> Now it has been said that many people in Israel have been given the

new

> smallpox vaccine; yet there is nothing in the news telling how

many have

> been harmed by it nor have I seen any post about harm done in

Israel.

>

> Some seem not to remember that before measles and pertussis and

Tetanus

> that the damage done by these diseases was extensive. Back then

the State

> " Quarantined " homes. No visitors may enter.

>

> Now any thinking person is going to reject the whole argument of

some of the

> obviously wild claims made sometimes on these lists because they

ignore

> historical data or demand impossible levels of performance.

>

> So you who think you are promoting your cause- by wild statements--

please

> realize that you are shooting your own foot.

>

> Some good could be done, by getting some vaccines changed, such as

getting

> mercury out of them.

>

> But wild claims turn most thinking people away, and what do you

find on

> the internet; mostly educated, articulate thinkers.

>

> Lorenzo

>

>

> ---

> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

> Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release 11/25/02

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Lorenzo,

 

Well, My thinking goes something like this.

 

If they lied to me about my food....and they lied to me about the

benefits of western medicine....and they lied to me about

vitamins....and they lied to me about the chemicals in my

enviornment.......and they lied to me about a thousand other things.

 

Should I believe them when they say " trust me " ?

 

I want to know more and not just by the establishment, their record

is horrible.

 

kind regards,

 

Frank

 

 

 

Gettingwell , " Lorenzo " <lorenzo1@w...> wrote:

>

> The following is about some posts and not an attack on any person.

>

> This is not necessarily about any particular or recent post

condemning

> vaccinations as I find them mostly useless by way of ridiculous

claims so

> that I don't often read past the first absurd statement. But at

the moment

> I happen to have a minute and simply want to present my view of the

> situation.

>

> It seems that some who question Vaccinations apply more heat

than light

> on the subject.

>

> To deny that Polio and Smallpox vaccines did not stop these

diseases 50

> years ago is an untenable position. Occasionally I meet someone

over forty

> that has a damaged limb from Polio.

>

> To demand a vaccine that will not harm about 0.01 percent of the

population

> is absurd.

>

> Aspirin hurts more than that!

>

> Now it has been said that many people in Israel have been given the

new

> smallpox vaccine; yet there is nothing in the news telling how

many have

> been harmed by it nor have I seen any post about harm done in

Israel.

>

> Some seem not to remember that before measles and pertussis and

Tetanus

> that the damage done by these diseases was extensive. Back then

the State

> " Quarantined " homes. No visitors may enter.

>

> Now any thinking person is going to reject the whole argument of

some of the

> obviously wild claims made sometimes on these lists because they

ignore

> historical data or demand impossible levels of performance.

>

> So you who think you are promoting your cause- by wild statements--

please

> realize that you are shooting your own foot.

>

> Some good could be done, by getting some vaccines changed, such as

getting

> mercury out of them.

>

> But wild claims turn most thinking people away, and what do you

find on

> the internet; mostly educated, articulate thinkers.

>

> Lorenzo

>

>

> ---

> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

> Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release 11/25/02

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lorenzo wrote:

 

> The following is about some posts and not an attack on any person.

>

> This is not necessarily about any particular or recent post condemning

> vaccinations as I find them mostly useless by way of ridiculous claims so

> that I don't often read past the first absurd statement. But at the moment

> I happen to have a minute and simply want to present my view of the

> situation.

>

> It seems that some who question Vaccinations apply more heat than light

> on the subject.

>

> To deny that Polio and Smallpox vaccines did not stop these diseases 50

> years ago is an untenable position. Occasionally I meet someone over forty

> that has a damaged limb from Polio.

>

> To demand a vaccine that will not harm about 0.01 percent of the population

> is absurd.

>

> Aspirin hurts more than that!

>

> Now it has been said that many people in Israel have been given the new

> smallpox vaccine; yet there is nothing in the news telling how many have

> been harmed by it nor have I seen any post about harm done in Israel.

>

> Some seem not to remember that before measles and pertussis and Tetanus

> that the damage done by these diseases was extensive. Back then the State

> " Quarantined " homes. No visitors may enter.

>

> Now any thinking person is going to reject the whole argument of some of the

> obviously wild claims made sometimes on these lists because they ignore

> historical data or demand impossible levels of performance.

>

> So you who think you are promoting your cause- by wild statements--please

> realize that you are shooting your own foot.

>

> Some good could be done, by getting some vaccines changed, such as getting

> mercury out of them.

>

> But wild claims turn most thinking people away, and what do you find on

> the internet; mostly educated, articulate thinkers.

>

> Lorenzo

 

AMEN to all that! And please include the annual anti-flu vaccine as being a

poential life

saver.

Morton

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-

califpacific <califpacific

Gettingwell

Monday, December 09, 2002 7:46 PM

Re: Immunization and Quaranteen

Frank,

Seventy years ago, when I was a small child, I remember that there were

several kids in the neighborhood that were hobbled by polio, and you could sense

a nagging fear among the caring parents. That's gone now , thanks to Dr. Salk.

 

When I started school, way back then, all the 5 and 6 year olds were required

to have their smallpox innoculations before they could attend class. If there

was widespread concern about this, I can't recall it. Do you know if there was

something different about the vaccine they were using then?

 

I agree with most of what you say about government and the pharma industry. I

consider most levels of government to be totally incompetent, and drug companies

to be the worst of all health hazards. Still, in spite of all this, sometimes

good things happen.

 

Les

 

 

 

 

>

> ---

> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

> Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release 11/25/02

 

 

Getting well is done one step at a time, day by day, building health

and well being.

 

list or archives: Gettingwell

 

........ Gettingwell-

post............. Gettingwell

digest form...... Gettingwell-digest

individual emails Gettingwell-normal

no email......... Gettingwell-nomail

moderator ....... Gettingwell-owner

...... Gettingwell-

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 12/10/02 5:17:56 AM, Gettingwell writes:

 

Debbie,

 

<< PS - if we are going to take the mercury out , could we take out the

 

aluminium and the formaldyhyde too !!! >>

 

 

HEADS UP!

 

They may be telling you they took out the mercury and they would like you to

think it is safer now. Do you know what they plan on using in place of the

mercury, try ANTIFREEZE!

 

Jane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

---Hi Lorenzo

Just had to put in my two Penn'orth on this. I

think it depends on the person. Some pople react badly

some do not. I have had many vaccines but apart from

the odd sore arm no reaction. My mother had severe

reactions to most vaccines from skin rashes to

passing out. I had all the childhood vaccines with no

problems in the 60's but the lad a few doors away from

me (same age as myself) was brain damaged amd is

severely disabled. It is imperative that people who

know they react badly have the choice to say NO.

Best wishes

Chris

 

 

 

Everything you'll ever need on one web page

from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts

http://uk.my.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Les ,

If you will forgive me, i think you are missing an important point -

when the small pox vaccine was introduced what was the vaccination

schedule ?

I have a new baby and the current schedule for her is TWENTY TWO

IMMUNISATIONS BEFORE SHE IS FOUR !!!!!!!!

The individual jabs may be beneficial , may well be necessary and

benign but the cumulative effect does not seem to be . The rates of

autism , profound speech delay ,ADD/ADHD, apraxia , dyslexia , sids

and epilepsy are reaching epedemic levels and this may have many

causes but I don't think we can rule out vaccines - particularly not

those containing thimerosal.The result of this explosion in what were

always thought to be genetic conditions is catastrophic for society

as well as the individuals. My sons care is estimated at about £1

million for his life time and his school is full with many children

turned away . How will the health and social services cope when he

and his peers reach adult hood - and when I am too old to care for

him ?

When we give many doses of triple vaccines before a child is four

months old I think we have gone to far , when we vaccinate to a

schedule that treats a premature child the same as a 10 lbs whopper I

think the tail is wagging the dog . And when we vaccinate small girls

against mumps and toddlers against chicken pox then I think we fail

our children and loose sight of where the greater good lies .

Regards

Deborah

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gettingwell , Les Johnson <lbrman@t...> wrote:

>

> -

> califpacific <califpacific>

> Gettingwell

> Monday, December 09, 2002 7:46 PM

> Re: Immunization and Quaranteen

> Frank,

> Seventy years ago, when I was a small child, I remember that

there were several kids in the neighborhood that were hobbled by

polio, and you could sense a nagging fear among the caring parents.

That's gone now , thanks to Dr. Salk.

>

> When I started school, way back then, all the 5 and 6 year olds

were required to have their smallpox innoculations before they could

attend class. If there was widespread concern about this, I can't

recall it. Do you know if there was something different about the

vaccine they were using then?

>

> I agree with most of what you say about government and the pharma

industry. I consider most levels of government to be totally

incompetent, and drug companies to be the worst of all health

hazards. Still, in spite of all this, sometimes good things happen.

>

> Les

>

>

>

>

> >

> > ---

> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

> > Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release 11/25/02

>

>

> Getting well is done one step at a time, day by day, building

health

> and well being.

>

> list or archives: Gettingwell

>

> ........ Gettingwell-

> post............. Gettingwell

> digest form...... Gettingwell-digest

> individual emails Gettingwell-normal

> no email......... Gettingwell-nomail

> moderator ....... Gettingwell-owner

> ...... Gettingwell-

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HI

 

 

" > AMEN to all that! And please include the annual anti-flu vaccine

as being a poential life

> saver. "

 

Oh good - I'm glad this hasn't degenerated in to " vaccines good - no

vaccines bad " then !!

 

Regards

Deborah

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Jane ,

Thanks !!!

LOL - with my history and a new baby I know more about the

ingredients in these things than I ever thought I would - and

certainly more than I ever wanted to !!!

Wish I'd paid more attention in chemistry !!!

regards

Deborah

 

 

 

Gettingwell , DaRocksMom@a... wrote:

>

> In a message dated 12/10/02 5:17:56 AM, Gettingwell

writes:

>

> Debbie,

>

> << PS - if we are going to take the mercury out , could we take out

the

>

> aluminium and the formaldyhyde too !!! >>

>

>

> HEADS UP!

>

> They may be telling you they took out the mercury and they would

like you to

> think it is safer now. Do you know what they plan on using in place

of the

> mercury, try ANTIFREEZE!

>

> Jane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very good point, Deborah.

 

I agree that government should not require universal immunization, overrulling

the will of the parents. The governments responsibility is to make sure that

the vaccines are as safe as they can possibly be.

 

Les

-

beaniesmum2001 <MONXYMOO

Gettingwell

Tuesday, December 10, 2002 4:07 AM

Re: Immunization and Quaranteen

 

 

Les ,

If you will forgive me, i think you are missing an important point -

when the small pox vaccine was introduced what was the vaccination

schedule ?

I have a new baby and the current schedule for her is TWENTY TWO

IMMUNISATIONS BEFORE SHE IS FOUR !!!!!!!!

The individual jabs may be beneficial , may well be necessary and

benign but the cumulative effect does not seem to be . The rates of

autism , profound speech delay ,ADD/ADHD, apraxia , dyslexia , sids

and epilepsy are reaching epedemic levels and this may have many

causes but I don't think we can rule out vaccines - particularly not

those containing thimerosal.The result of this explosion in what were

always thought to be genetic conditions is catastrophic for society

as well as the individuals. My sons care is estimated at about £1

million for his life time and his school is full with many children

turned away . How will the health and social services cope when he

and his peers reach adult hood - and when I am too old to care for

him ?

When we give many doses of triple vaccines before a child is four

months old I think we have gone to far , when we vaccinate to a

schedule that treats a premature child the same as a 10 lbs whopper I

think the tail is wagging the dog . And when we vaccinate small girls

against mumps and toddlers against chicken pox then I think we fail

our children and loose sight of where the greater good lies .

Regards

Deborah

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gettingwell , Les Johnson <lbrman@t...> wrote:

>

> -

> califpacific <califpacific>

> Gettingwell

> Monday, December 09, 2002 7:46 PM

> Re: Immunization and Quaranteen

> Frank,

> Seventy years ago, when I was a small child, I remember that

there were several kids in the neighborhood that were hobbled by

polio, and you could sense a nagging fear among the caring parents.

That's gone now , thanks to Dr. Salk.

>

> When I started school, way back then, all the 5 and 6 year olds

were required to have their smallpox innoculations before they could

attend class. If there was widespread concern about this, I can't

recall it. Do you know if there was something different about the

vaccine they were using then?

>

> I agree with most of what you say about government and the pharma

industry. I consider most levels of government to be totally

incompetent, and drug companies to be the worst of all health

hazards. Still, in spite of all this, sometimes good things happen.

>

> Les

>

>

>

>

> >

> > ---

> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

> > Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release 11/25/02

>

>

> Getting well is done one step at a time, day by day, building

health

> and well being.

>

> list or archives: Gettingwell

>

> ........ Gettingwell-

> post............. Gettingwell

> digest form...... Gettingwell-digest

> individual emails Gettingwell-normal

> no email......... Gettingwell-nomail

> moderator ....... Gettingwell-owner

> ...... Gettingwell-

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-As a family involved in this " mess " ...let me say that most families

are NOT against vaccines. Just safer ones. Spaced out. One at a time.

And NOT starting the day they are born(hep b) unless the mother has

hep b. They need time to build an immune system, that is strong and

healthy.

It is the cumulative number of vaccines that have been added,

double,triple and more..given at one time that is the problem, along

with the thimerosal and the number of new vaccines that have been

added.

There is NO reason for mercury to be in the vaccines. 5 more cents

per vial is all it would cost to make them single dose. Mercury is a

KNOWN neurotoxin, 2nd most toxic on the face of the earth.

As far as small pox...we don't need an enemy, we are our own. We are

taking a DX that no longer exists, first introducing it into the

health care workers (who are working with ill people all day and are

most vunerable) who will be possible contigious for 14 days into a

population who, for the most part, have no immunity to this....it's

not just the vaccine, it's the introduction of small pox that is an

issue.

There will be Autism hearings on C-span today at 1:00 EST, Dan Burton

will be on Arron Brown's show on CNN tonight. Educate yourself.

A genetic DX does NOT go from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 250 within a 10-15

year period. You can NOT have a genetic, epidemic.

More than you wanted to know, but this is important to all....

Educate before you Vaccinate...

www.safeminds.org

www.vacinfo.org www.909shot.com (has list of thimerosal content and

brands available without) www.vaccinationnews.com

www.vaccineinfo.net www.vaclib.org www.thinktwice.com

 

" What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Children's Vaccineations " by

Dr. Stephanie Cave

and then...there's the aluminum, formaldehyde ....UGH!!!!!

(aluminum and alzheimers - there is another issue!!

 

-- In Gettingwell , " beaniesmum2001 <MONXYMOO@a...> "

<MONXYMOO@a...> wrote:

Hi Jane ,

> Thanks !!!

> LOL - with my history and a new baby I know more about the

> ingredients in these things than I ever thought I would - and

> certainly more than I ever wanted to !!!

> Wish I'd paid more attention in chemistry !!!

> regards

> Deborah

>

>

>

> Gettingwell , DaRocksMom@a... wrote:

> >

> > In a message dated 12/10/02 5:17:56 AM,

Gettingwell

> writes:

> >

> > Debbie,

> >

> > << PS - if we are going to take the mercury out , could we take

out

> the

> >

> > aluminium and the formaldyhyde too !!! >>

> >

> >

> > HEADS UP!

> >

> > They may be telling you they took out the mercury and they would

> like you to

> > think it is safer now. Do you know what they plan on using in

place

> of the

> > mercury, try ANTIFREEZE!

> >

> > Jane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi ,

sorry - did I miss something ? Was your post intended for me ?

Your post reads as if you are explaining to me the stance of vaccine

damaged families - and as if I have disagreed , or made some sort of

pronouncement in that regard.

I know you cannot have an epedemic of genetic conditions - that is

why I said an epedemic of conditions " previously thought to be

genetic " - what is happening to our kids is not genetic !!

My last post was light " more than I wanted to know " was a joke !!-

my previous two posts were not...................................

- I have read everything there is to read on vaccines and chelation.

I think you have misunderstood my post or not read any of my previous

postings .

LOL .....I didn't expect to get shouted at by someone from a similar

stance as me - all those capitals !! - I feel like I should be

standing in the corner !!

 

Regards

Deborah

 

 

 

Gettingwell , " anagrammys <anagramy@b...> "

<anagramy@b...> wrote:

> -As a family involved in this " mess " ...let me say that most

families

> are NOT against vaccines. Just safer ones. Spaced out. One at a

time.

> And NOT starting the day they are born(hep b) unless the mother has

> hep b. They need time to build an immune system, that is strong and

> healthy.

> It is the cumulative number of vaccines that have been added,

> double,triple and more..given at one time that is the problem,

along

> with the thimerosal and the number of new vaccines that have been

> added.

> There is NO reason for mercury to be in the vaccines. 5 more cents

> per vial is all it would cost to make them single dose. Mercury is

a

> KNOWN neurotoxin, 2nd most toxic on the face of the earth.

> As far as small pox...we don't need an enemy, we are our own. We

are

> taking a DX that no longer exists, first introducing it into the

> health care workers (who are working with ill people all day and

are

> most vunerable) who will be possible contigious for 14 days into a

> population who, for the most part, have no immunity to this....it's

> not just the vaccine, it's the introduction of small pox that is an

> issue.

> There will be Autism hearings on C-span today at 1:00 EST, Dan

Burton

> will be on Arron Brown's show on CNN tonight. Educate yourself.

> A genetic DX does NOT go from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 250 within a 10-

15

> year period. You can NOT have a genetic, epidemic.

> More than you wanted to know, but this is important to all....

> Educate before you Vaccinate...

> www.safeminds.org

> www.vacinfo.org www.909shot.com (has list of thimerosal content

and

> brands available without) www.vaccinationnews.com

> www.vaccineinfo.net www.vaclib.org www.thinktwice.com

>

> " What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Children's Vaccineations "

by

> Dr. Stephanie Cave

> and then...there's the aluminum, formaldehyde ....UGH!!!!!

> (aluminum and alzheimers - there is another issue!!

>

> -- In Gettingwell , " beaniesmum2001 <MONXYMOO@a...> "

> <MONXYMOO@a...> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Hi Jane ,

> > Thanks !!!

> > LOL - with my history and a new baby I know more about the

> > ingredients in these things than I ever thought I would - and

> > certainly more than I ever wanted to !!!

> > Wish I'd paid more attention in chemistry !!!

> > regards

> > Deborah

> >

> >

> >

> > Gettingwell , DaRocksMom@a... wrote:

> > >

> > > In a message dated 12/10/02 5:17:56 AM,

> Gettingwell

> > writes:

> > >

> > > Debbie,

> > >

> > > << PS - if we are going to take the mercury out , could we take

> out

> > the

> > >

> > > aluminium and the formaldyhyde too !!! >>

> > >

> > >

> > > HEADS UP!

> > >

> > > They may be telling you they took out the mercury and they

would

> > like you to

> > > think it is safer now. Do you know what they plan on using in

> place

> > of the

> > > mercury, try ANTIFREEZE!

> > >

> > > Jane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

--I'm sorry if my message seemed harsh. It was not directed to you in

particular, nor were my caps intended as shouting, simply for

emphasis and out of frustration, I guess.

I'm sorry if it read that way, or that you took it that way.

 

- In Gettingwell , " beaniesmum2001 <MONXYMOO@a...> "

<MONXYMOO@a...> wrote:

> Hi ,

> sorry - did I miss something ? Was your post intended for me ?

> Your post reads as if you are explaining to me the stance of

vaccine

> damaged families - and as if I have disagreed , or made some sort

of

> pronouncement in that regard.

> I know you cannot have an epedemic of genetic conditions - that is

> why I said an epedemic of conditions " previously thought to be

> genetic " - what is happening to our kids is not genetic !!

> My last post was light " more than I wanted to know " was a joke !!-

 

> my previous two posts were not...................................

> - I have read everything there is to read on vaccines and

chelation.

> I think you have misunderstood my post or not read any of my

previous

> postings .

> LOL .....I didn't expect to get shouted at by someone from a

similar

> stance as me - all those capitals !! - I feel like I should be

> standing in the corner !!

>

> Regards

> Deborah

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi ,

Don't worry - I've got a thick skin . I was just a little taken aback

as it did seem directed at me as you quoted me a couple of times . (

I confess though I took being told to educate myself a little hard

when I give support talks to local mums of ASD kids !!LOL !!)

I hear you about the frustration part though!

I guess I have just got used to the stereotypes and the " yes it is -

no it isn't " level of discussion. I only get wound up very

occasionally any more - like when I am personally attacked which has

happened.

The other one that gets me ( I don't know if you ever get this ) is

that " at least my child is still alive " ....that phrase never ceases

to illustrate the dumb simplicity of the speaker and the absoloute

truth that they have absoloutely no idea how tragic it is to live

with a severly disabled child.

Of course I would not be without him , of course I love him with a

pain that is almost physical- he is the sweetest boy and he brings so

much happiness into our home - but the notion that the fact that he

is breathing makes what happened " not so bad " is just dispicable.

I have just had a baby and I see the mums coming into the surgery to

get their kids jabbed - they look at me as if I am crazy when I am

not having the same schedule as them and I do wonder how many have

actually reached an informed decision and how many are doing what I

did - just doing what you do with a new baby !!

Oh to have my choices again !

Any way - thanks for the apology - but obviously we just

misunderstood each other

Best wishes

Deborah

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gettingwell , " anagrammys <anagramy@b...> "

<anagramy@b...> wrote:

> --I'm sorry if my message seemed harsh. It was not directed to you

in

> particular, nor were my caps intended as shouting, simply for

> emphasis and out of frustration, I guess.

> I'm sorry if it read that way, or that you took it that way.

>

> - In Gettingwell , " beaniesmum2001 <MONXYMOO@a...> "

> <MONXYMOO@a...> wrote:

> > Hi ,

> > sorry - did I miss something ? Was your post intended for me ?

> > Your post reads as if you are explaining to me the stance of

> vaccine

> > damaged families - and as if I have disagreed , or made some sort

> of

> > pronouncement in that regard.

> > I know you cannot have an epedemic of genetic conditions - that

is

> > why I said an epedemic of conditions " previously thought to be

> > genetic " - what is happening to our kids is not genetic !!

> > My last post was light " more than I wanted to know " was a

joke !!-

>

> > my previous two posts were not...................................

> > - I have read everything there is to read on vaccines and

> chelation.

> > I think you have misunderstood my post or not read any of my

> previous

> > postings .

> > LOL .....I didn't expect to get shouted at by someone from a

> similar

> > stance as me - all those capitals !! - I feel like I should be

> > standing in the corner !!

> >

> > Regards

> > Deborah

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lorenzo wrote:

 

> It seems that some who question Vaccinations apply more heat than light

> on the subject.

>

 

Yes, you are probably right about that. Many anti-vaccine sites/e-mails seem

highly emotionally driven.

 

> Aspirin hurts more than that!

 

Yes, but the difference is that aspirin is not mandatory. (And technically,

vaccines aren't mandatory either, but the problem is that no one else seems to

know that!) I can't tell you how many zillions of times I've met people who

tell me that my children can't go to school because they haven't been

vaccinated.

 

Lorenzo, I appreciate your ballsiness - it is not easy to open up in a forum

*like this one* and say, out loud, that you think vaccines are good. Hopefully

this will engender some good discussion as long as we keep it lighthearted,

level, and logical.

 

Though I must say as an afterthought, it is not always easy to keep the

emotional part out of a discussion, particularly if our own children have been

damaged by vaccines. My own children of course have not been vaccinated, but

one of my nephews was blinded by a vaccine, so I am particularly wary.

 

Mindy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...