I think it's because animals don't eat junk,

[Guest guest]

" I think it's because animals don't eat junk, for one

thing. They eat natural foods. Still, there are

times ........................ "

 

Reply,

 

Pottinger studied Cats. He found that they can not live on cooked

food........without serious health complications.

 

Search for " Pottingers Cats " .

 

Lorenzo

 

 

 

 

---

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release 11/25/02

[Guest guest]

I think pets eat a lot of junk especially dogs fed

dried pet food. Yeah its full of vitamins etc but its

also full of maize and grains which a dog on a natural

diet would not eat. Perhaps this is one reason vets

are so busy.

Best wishesa Chris

 

 

 

Everything you'll ever need on one web page

from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts

http://uk.my.

[Guest guest]

Hello Lorenzo,

> " Lorenzo " <lorenzo1

 

I think it's because animals don't eat junk,

 

>Pottinger studied Cats. He found that they can not live on cooked

>food........without serious health complications.

>

>Search for " Pottingers Cats " .

>

>Lorenzo

>

I haven't read anything about Pottingers Cats for a couple years. And when

I read it I accepted it at its face value , I was interested in eating raw

foods myself and am currently eating rvaf (raw veg and animal foods) and I

do agree that most raw foods are better for ones health , cats or people. I

can only go on my personal experience as far as cats are concerned and

pottengers findings.

My mother always had cats...many of them ... and they were always fed

cooked cat/dog food mostly canned. She usually had 10 and at most 22 at one

time. I'm talking 50 years of cats mostly unspayed at that, a few of the

cats lived to twenty + years and many lived into late teens, the ones that

didn't get run over or carried away by predators. Admittidly they did run

free compaired to the caged pottinger cats, I never saw any of the free

range cats eat any prey, sure they killed mice, birds etc.but only carried

them around as a trophy. The point i'm trying to make is: the cats were able

to keep a continuious exchange of genes from outside sources so that I never

saw the genetic mutations that pottinger claims he got from his cats that

were kept in cages.I'm not sure how many cats that he experiminted with i'm

sure that its documented somplace? I never saw any number of cats quoted. I

do know that you do get genetic mutations with " in breeding "

Regards Charles

>

>

 

 

_______________

Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*

http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

[Guest guest]

--- Charles Day <chastsr wrote:

> Hello Lorenzo,

> > " Lorenzo " <lorenzo1

>

> I think it's because animals don't eat junk,

>

> >Pottinger studied Cats. He found that they can

> not live on cooked

> >food........without serious health complications.

 

 

I don't know anything about Pottnger's cats, but I

find gross generalizations of any kind to be

questionable. We are all different (including cats or

any other creature). We all have different reactions

to different things and to say that any one thing is

bad for a whole species is, well irresponsible.

 

Julie

 

 

 

Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.

http://mailplus.