THE TRUTH ABOUT BREAST CANCER?

[Guest guest]

<Cancer prevention means being well nourished.>

 

I agree.

 

<Too bad you can't be well nourished in America.

 

I think you can. It just takes an enormous amount of effort, resistance to

cultural pressures, and money. <g>

 

Claire

 

 

[Guest guest]

Gettingwell, Frank <califpacific> wrote:

 

> In sum, cancer prevention means avoiding contact with carcinogens

> --avoiding the bullets. This is the truth about cancer,

> including breast cancer. What percentage of cancers are

> avoidable?

 

Hi Frank:

Cancer prevention means being well nourished. Carcinogens, or cancer

causing bullets, just bounce off the well-nourished. Avoiding

carcinogens carries no extra benefits. Being well nourished is not

just protection against cancer, it's protection against all disease.

Too bad you can't be well nourished in America.

Chi

[Guest guest]

Dear Chi,

 

Your response, is quite one sided when the dealing with the biology

of cancer.

 

Yes, I believe that the nutritional level of the individual is

paramount to the immune functions ability to protect against cancer.

 

That is one side of the equation. The other is of equal importance.

The process of toxic damage to the inner structure of the cell and

the consequent cancer cell. It is dependent on to what quatity the

sytem is able to handle.

 

To say that the carcinogen is unimportant (bounce off any well

nourished body) is very wrong. It is dependent on the amount of

carcinogens present and damage caused vs. the amount of protection

afforded by the immune system.

 

Any system can be overwhelmed by carcinogens, if produced in

sufficient quatities. One need only look to what happens in toxic

catastrophic events events to see this. And has been shown in many

laboratories for something like 70 - 80 years.

 

Approximatly 50% of the survivors of the atomic bomb dropped in

Japan, during WWII, developed cancer (primarily leukemia) as well as

a very high portion of those exposed at Chernobyl.

 

Chemical toxins act in the same way. If present if sufficient

quatities, they can easily overwhelm the body's ability to handle

them. In industrial acidents around the world, cancer is a common

occurance afterwards.

 

The $64 dollar question is what is the cancer/toxic vs immune

function load amount to tip the scales. That is individual to each

person and their genetic, nutritional, immune system makeup.

 

Do I believe that nutritional support is the best way to protect

oneself from cancer. Yes. Please look at our links page and you will

see reams of nutritional and cancer information. As to the other

aspect of cancers. I suggest that everyone protect themselves from

all toxic substances and not be foolhardy enough to think that they

are bullet proof because they consider themselves well nourished.

That is absolute foolishness.

 

It is easy to fall into the trap, for most people, of obtaining one's

knowledge from the commercial sites on the web selling something.

They tend to tell only one aspect (whichever one they are selling) in

our culture. It may be the only one that they have exposure to. That

is part of the reason of this site. To try and approach these issues

in a non commercial environment, so we can look at them more fully.

 

Frank

 

 

 

 

Gettingwell, " soilfertility " <soilfertility> wrote:

> Gettingwell, Frank <califpacific> wrote:

>

> > In sum, cancer prevention means avoiding contact with carcinogens

> > --avoiding the bullets. This is the truth about cancer,

> > including breast cancer. What percentage of cancers are

> > avoidable?

>

> Hi Frank:

> Cancer prevention means being well nourished. Carcinogens, or

cancer

> causing bullets, just bounce off the well-nourished. Avoiding

> carcinogens carries no extra benefits. Being well nourished is not

> just protection against cancer, it's protection against all

disease.

> Too bad you can't be well nourished in America.

> Chi