The Biotechnology Debate has United the World against Corporate Rule by Mae-Wan Ho.

[Guest guest]

The Biotechnology Debate has United the World against Corporate Rule Mae-Wan Ho

International Forum on Globalisation Teach-in, Seattle 27 November, 1999

I joined the biotechnology debate in 1994 because my friends from the Third

World Network inspired me with their selfless dedication to equity, justice,

democracy, compassion, in short, all the human ideals that are severely under

threat, especially from the biotech industry. These same ideals have brought us

out here in droves today. The biotechnology debate has united the world, and all

of society in resisting GM crops. It is not just the Europeans who are refusing

to accept them, it is also India, Japan, Brazil, the whole of South Asia, the

entire African Region, South Korea, Thailand, Australia, New Zealand. In fact,

the more real knowledge people have, the greater their resistance. The debate

has captured the imagination of the global civil society, and becoming part of

the biggest, most inclusive civil rights movement against the corporate empire

and the WTO. We’ve won the first round: Monsanto is to be split up and sold off,

its ag biotech division declared worthless.

 

I am here on behalf of more than 140 scientists from 27 countries to deliver an

open letter to all government delegates at the WTO, calling for the immediate

suspension of all environmental releases of GM crops and products on grounds of

threats to health and biodiversity and for patents on life-forms and living

processes to be revoked and banned because they are deeply immoral.

 

Patents on life-forms and living processes are thefts from nature. They also

expropriate the inventive genius and knowledge accumulated by indigenous

communities and by previous generations of western scientists who have worked

entirely for the public good. These patents threaten food security, violate

basic human rights and dignity, compromise healthcare, impede medical and

scientific research, and are against animal welfare.

 

There is a lot of misinformation and dis-information put out by the biotech

industry and our governments. Contrary to what they would like the public to

believe, GM crops are neither needed nor beneficial. They are a dangerous

diversion from the real task of providing food and health around the world. To

put it bluntly: the existing technologies are crude, unreliable, uncontrollable

and unpredictable, they don’t qualify as technologies, let alone patentable

inventions. And they are inherently hazardous. Moreover, these technologies are

misguided by a scientific paradigm which is fundamentally flawed, out of date

and in conflict with scientific findings. They call that sound science. But it

is the ultimate phoney science.

 

The promises to genetic engineer crops to fix nitrogen, resist drought, improve

yield and to 'feed the world' have been around for at least 30 years. Such

promises have built up a multibillion-dollar industry now controlled by a mere

handful of corporate giants.

 

But the miracle crops have not materialised. So far, two simple characteristics

account for all the GM crops in the world. More than 70% are tolerant to

broad-spectrum herbicides, with companies engineering plants to be tolerant to

their own brand of herbicide, while the rest are engineered with bt-toxins from

a soil bacterium to kill insect pests. A total of 65 million acres were planted

in 1998 within the US, Argentina and Canada. The latest surveys on GM crops in

the US, the largest grower by far, showed no significant benefit. On the

contrary, the most widely grown GM crops - herbicide-tolerant soya beans -

yielded on average 6.7% less and required two to five times more herbicides than

non-GM varieties.

 

The same GM crops have already given rise to herbicide-tolerant weeds and

bt-resistant insect pests. Worse still, the broad-spectrum herbicides not only

decimate wild species indiscriminately, but are toxic to animals. One of them,

glufosinate, causes birth defects in mammals, while another, glyphosate, is now

linked to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. GM crops with bt-toxins kill beneficial

insects such as bees and lacewings, and pollen from bt-maize is lethal to

monarch butterflies.

 

According to the UN food programme, there is enough food to feed the world one

and a half times over. World cereal yields have consistently outstripped

population growth since 1980, but one billion are hungry. It is on account of

corporate monopolies operating under the globalised economy that the poor are

getting poorer and hungrier. Corporations already control 75% of the world trade

in cereals. The new patents on seeds will intensify corporate monopoly by

preventing farmers from saving and replanting seeds, which is what 80% of the

farmers still do in the Third World. Christian Aid, a major charity working with

the Third World, concludes that GM crops will cause unemployment, exacerbate

Third World debt, threaten sustainable farming systems and damage the

environment. It predicts famine for the poorest countries.

 

It is clear that GM crops offer no benefits and cannot feed the world. There are

also enormous risks. You know the children's joke of what do you get when you

cross impossible things like a spider with a goat? Part of the joke is knowing

you can't because there are biological barriers between species which only allow

one to cross closely related species such as horse and donkey, for example.

Genetic engineering bypasses all these barriers, so that is not a joke anymore.

Genes are being transferred in the laboratory between any and every species.

Indeed, spider genes have been transferred into goats in an attempt to make the

poor female goats produce silk in their milk, and human genes have been

transferred into cows, sheep, mice, fish and bacteria.

 

The most immediate dangers are random and unpredictable, basically because the

genetic engineer cannot control where and how the foreign genes are integrated

into the genetic material of the host. Genetic engineering animals are acts of

cruelty, there are high failure rates and even the so-called successes are often

monstrously deformed. Genetic engineered plants may end up having new toxins and

allergens. Dr. Arpad Pusztai, an eminent scientist in the Rowett Institute of

Scotland, lost his job when he released findings showing that two GM potato

lines were unexpectedly toxic to rats.

 

A more insidious danger is horizontal gene transfer - the transfer of genetic

material directly to unrelated species. In genetic engineering, many viral and

bacterial genes are being combined in new combinations that have never existed

before, and introduced into organisms by invasive methods that make the foreign

genes (or transgenic DNA) more likely to transfer again to unrelated species.

Such horizontal gene transfer can give rise to new viruses and bacteria that

cause diseases and spread antibiotic and drug resistances among the pathogens.

 

It was because of these concerns that the pioneers of genetic engineering called

for a moratorium in the '70s. Unfortunately, commercial pressures cut the

moratorium short. Since then, drug and antibiotic resistant infectious diseases

have returned with a vengeance. New viruses are appearing at alarming

frequencies, while life-threatening bacteria are rapidly becoming resistant to

all antibiotics and are hence untreatable.

 

Another hazard is that the transgenic DNA can jump into the genomes of cells,

resulting in harmful effects including cancer. In its interim report (May 1999),

the British Medical Association called for an indefinite moratorium on the

release of GM crops pending further studies on new allergies, on the spread of

antibiotic resistances and on the effects of transgenic DNA.

 

These hazards are acknowledged by sources within our Governments. UK scientists

advising the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food are warning of

horizontal transfer of genetically modified DNA.

 

Unless it changes direction, the whole biotechnology enterprise has little

chance of success, not the least among the reasons being that the scientific

paradigm promoting and misguiding the technology has been thoroughly discredited

at least 15 years before. Genetic has changed out of all recognition, and yet

the old paradigm is still dominating the scene. The old paradigm offers a

simplistic view that the characteristics or traits of organisms are each tied to

specific genes, which are unaffected by one another or by the environment. And

that, except for very rare random mutations, the genes are passed on unchanged

to the next generation.

 

Instead, scientific findings within the past 20 years reveal an immense amount

of cross-talk between genes. Genes are nothing if not sensitive, dynamic and

responsive, to other genes, to the cell or organism in which they find

themselves and to the external environment. The layer upon layer of feedback

between genes and environment, not only determine whether genes are active or

not, but what function and structure they have. Genes can mutate, multiply,

rearrange and jump around in response to the environment. They may even jump out

of the genome of one organism to infect another one. Geneticists have coined the

phrase " the fluid genome " to describe the situation. It is more accurate to see

the genes as having a very complicated ecology, and that for genes and genomes

to remain constant, you need a balanced ecology. So the new genetics is

radically ecological and holistic.

 

I referred to genetic engineering biotechnology as a hoax back in 1994. This

hoax is perpetrated by an unholy alliance between corporate capitalism and the

discredited scientific paradigm. Together, they mean to control every aspect of

our lives, from the food we eat, to the healthcare we can receive or not, to the

babies we can conceive and give birth to, and humans beings we can clone. Yes,

the first so-called human clone has already been created by transferring the

genetic material of a human being to a cow’s egg. Mercifully, they destroyed it

at day 14, the current legal limit, before the real Frankenstein monster takes

shape. And all done in the name of scientific progress and free enterprise.

 

Fortunately, the game is up, the bubble has burst. The tidal wave of protest is

sweeping across the world and has hit the United States. Your national coalition

of family farming groups have taken the lead in demanding a moratorium on GM

crops and a ban on patents of life-forms and processes. Support your family

farmers. When the farmer dies, so dies America.

 

While the 'benefits' from GM crops remain illusory and hypothetical, the

successes of sustainable, organic farming are well-documented, in the Third

World, in Latin America, in Europe and North America. There is also an enormous

'health bonus' in phasing out agrochemicals which are linked to many forms of

cancer, to reproductive abnormalities and degenerative diseases. An organic

revolution in farming is underway all over the world.

 

What excites me most as a scientist is that there is also an organic revolution

going on in western science, which restores and reaffirms the holistic,

ecological perspectives that many traditional indigenous cultures have never

lost touch with. This organic revolution in western science will put an end to

the dominant culture that treats organisms as machines and life and

life-necessities as commodities, that glorifies competition and sanctions

exploition in the name of the struggle for survival of the fittest. Instead, we

begin to appreciate the universal entanglement of all nature, which will

transform the very meaning and texture of our lives. The future looks great.

Let's go for it.

 

printer friendly version

RELEVANT LINKS

from the ISIS website

 

Open Letter from World Scientists to All Governments

 

 

The only radical science magazine on earth

Science in Society 16 OUT NOW! Order your copy from our online store.

 

Science in Society gets inside science, puts science under the political

spotlight to demand it is accountable to society

 

Join the I-SIS mailing list; enter your email address [input] [input] html

[input] asci

 

[input]

 

I-SIS is a not-for-profit organisation, depending on dontations, membership

fees, and subscriptions to continue its work. Find out more about membership

here

 

 

 

 

 

Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc.

 

To , e-mail to: Gettingwell-

Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell

 

 

 

 

U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive medley & videos from Greatest Hits CD