Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

20-20 Soy Products May Be Dangerous ABCNEWS http://www.abcnews.go.com/onair/2020/2020_000609_soy_feature.html

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

ABCNEWS.com : 20/20: Could Soy Products Be

Dangerous?http://www.abcnews.go.com/onair/2020/2020_000609_soy_feature.html

 

 

 

- http://www.abcnews.go.com/onair/2020/2020_000609_soy_feature.html -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Other Side of Soy

 

Scientists Concerned Over Potential Health Risks

 

Since last year’s FDA approval of certain soy products as good for

the heart, grocery stores have been inundated with a variety of soy-based goods.

Click on the image to watch video of the report on the controversy over their

health benefits. (ABCNEWS.com)

 

 

 

 

By Brian Ross and Richard D. Allyn

 

June 9 — From tofu and tacos to burgers and baby formula, soy products

have swept the nation as a healthy source of high protein, with a reputation for

being all natural and all good.

But a 20/20 investigation has found that amid all of this praise,

some scientists are now challenging this popular wisdom, and suggesting there

may be a downside to this “miracle food.”

“The safety issues are largely unanswered,” says Daniel Doerge, a

research scientist for the Food and Drug Administration and an expert on soy.

New studies have raised questions over whether the natural

ingredients in soy might increase the risk of breast cancer in some women,

affect brain function in men and lead to hidden developmental abnormalities in

infants.

This unresolved scientific debate continues to develop. Just last

October, soy enjoyed a huge boost when the FDA issued a health claim, concluding

that soy may lower both cholesterol levels and the risk of heart disease.

But two of the FDA’s experts on soy — Doerge and his colleague,

Daniel Sheehan — have stepped forward to criticize their own agency’s claim and

even attempted in vain to stop the recommendation. Their main concern: that the

claim could be misinterpreted as a much broader endorsement for soy protein,

beyond benefits solely for the heart.

Signing a highly unusual letter of protest to their employer, Doerge

and Sheehan pointed to research that demonstrates a link between soy and

fertility problems in certain animals. (You can find a copy of the letter in the

related stories section on the right-hand column.)

“The animal data is a clear indication for adverse effects, the

potential for adverse effects in humans,” Doerge says to 20/20.

Debate Over Soy Infant Formula

The core of their concern rests with the chemical make-up of soy: in

addition to all the nutrients and protein, exists a natural chemical that mimics

estrogen, the female hormone. Some studies in animals show that this chemical

can alter sexual development. And in fact, two glasses of soy milk a day, over

the course of a month, contains enough of the chemical to change the timing of a

woman’s menstrual cycle.

About 3 to 4 percent of babies must ingest soy formula because they

are allergic or can’t digest regular milk formula. (ABCNEWS.com)

 

“We are doing a large uncontrolled and unmonitored experiment on human

infants,” Sheehan says. “We’re exposing infants to the chemicals in soy infant

formula that are known to have adverse effects in experimental animals, and we

have never looked in the human population to see if they have adverse effects.”

The infant formula industry, along with some scientists, have blasted

this criticism of soy, calling it “scientifically unjustified claims that could

unduly frighten thousands of parents.”

Kenneth Setchell, a pediatrics professor at Children’s Hospital in

Cincinnati and a leading advocate of soy, contends that scientific studies on

soy show promise in fighting a number of diseases and that adverse effects seen

in animals do not apply to humans.

“There have been literally hundreds of thousands of infants that have

been raised on those soy formulas,” Setchell says to 20/20. “Some of those

infants would be well into their late 30s, early 40s now. And you know, I don’t

see evidence of tremendous numbers of cases where there are abnormalities.”

The debate over soy formula for infants poses a major issue

throughout the country. Soy infant formula is an undeniable lifesaver for the 3

to 4 percent of babies who are allergic to or can not digest cow’s milk.

However, heavy marketing of soy infant formula has led to its much wider use,

extending well beyond just those infants who are allergic to 25 percent of the

entire formula market.

“My careful and considered professional opinion is that it makes more

sense not to needlessly expose your baby to these compounds,” says Dr. Claude

Hughes, director of the Women’s Health Center at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in

Los Angeles. He adds that while breast-feeding is preferred, mothers who don’t

breast-feed should use a milk-based formula and choose soy as a last resort.

 

Other Health Concerns

Aside from his concerns about soy’s health effects on infants, Hughes has

also raised potentially more serious questions about soy and breast cancer. In

some cases, soy is thought to protect against breast cancer. But some studies

now indicate, for other women, the chemicals found in soy may enhance a widely

found kind of estrogen-feeding breast cancer.

“It can speed up divisions of those cells that are already cancer

cells that depend on estrogen for their growth,” Hughes tells 20/20.

The multibillion dollar soy industry has insisted that the health

benefits of soy significantly outweigh any potential risk.

Soy — consumed in the form of tofu — may have a connection to

accelerated aging in the brain, according to a three decade-long study begun by

the National Institutes of Health.

Dr. Lon White of NIH says that he found greater brain aging and

shrinkage among elderly men — all Japanese-American and living in Hawaii — who

had eaten tofu at least twice a week during middle age.

“Their brains, looking at them in terms of how their brain functions,

memory cognition, their brains seemed to be showing an exaggeration of the usual

patterns we see in aging,” White says.

The soy industry countered that White’s study only shows an

association between tofu consumption and brain aging, does not prove cause and

effect and is in conflict with research on Asian populations and animals.

While the scientific research on soy is still emerging and is often

contradictory, there are now some serious questions being raised about this

miracle food, and some of its staunchest defenders acknowledge that these

questions need to be answered.

 

 

 

 

Related Stories

20/20: The Down Side of Soy (Transcript)

 

20/20: Scientists' Protest Letter Over FDA Soy Approval

 

Dairy Farmers Say Soy Isn't Milk

 

USDA Wants Soy in Schools

 

Soy Health Claim Receives FDA Authorization

 

No Soy in McCartney Foods

 

 

 

 

 

 

Watch Brian Ross’ report on soy products on 20/20 Friday at 10 p.m.

ET.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A R C H I V E

More stories by Brian Ross

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

W E B L I N K S

 

FDA Ruling on Soy Health Claim

 

FDA Soy Talk Paper

 

American Academy of Pediatrics - Soy Infant Formula

 

The Pump Station - Moms' Resource Center

 

Center for Science in Public Interest

 

United Soybean Association

 

U.S. Soyfoods Directory

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“We are doing a large uncontrolled and unmonitored experiment on human

infants.”

— Dr. Daniel Sheehan, research scientist for the Food and Drug

Administration and expert on soy.

 

 

 

 

2000 ABC News Internet Ventures. Click here for Terms of Use

and Privacy Policy and Internet Safety Information applicable to this site.

 

 

 

 

§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§

 

*§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §*

 

Subscribe:......... -

digest emails:..... -digest

Individual emails:. -normal

To Post:...........

To :.... -

 

**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,

any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without

profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the

included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§*§

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...