Insulin Sensitivity ( we never test for that )

[Guest guest]

-

" Wayne Fugitt " <wayne

 

Saturday, September 21, 2002 3:15 PM

Insulin Sensitivity ( we never test for that )

 

 

> Evening Alobar,

>

> Yes, it was a great article. I read all of it.

>

> While I am not a diabetic, I have a daughter and many friends who

are in

> fact a diabetic.

>

> Except for a few, they are the most confused and helpless group I

know about.

 

I can speak from experience that the drugs the allopath

prescribed (glyburide) made me feel confused (not to mention body

aches, belly aches, constipation, etc). Then one is told to take

over the counter pain killers as often as needed (which destroy the

liver long term). Getting off the glyburide made me feel 10 years

youngwer & muich clearer in my head. More trusting in myself to

choose a reasonable path.

 

 

>

> They have been brainwashed by the mainstream into believing they

will never

> get well. And of course they will not as long as they do what the

allopath

> suggest. ( and the ADA )

 

They have also been brainwashed into a " balanced " (sic) diet

containing far too many carbohydrates for a non-diabetic. So they

take more drugs to increase insulin. Which causes more problems

long-term.

 

>

>

> Below is one paragraph in the article that really got my attention.

>

> ==============

> This is the same thing with insulin resistance. What happens is

that if

> your cells are exposed to insulin at all they get a little bit more

> resistant to it. So the pancreas just puts out more insulin. I saw

a

> patient today, her blood sugar was 102 and her insulin was 90! She

wasn't

> sure if she was fasting or not, but I've seen other patients where

their

> blood sugar was under 100 and their fasting insulin has been over

90.

> ==============

>

> I have tried to find more information relative to " Blood Insulin " .

Many

> of the searches I have done return

> articles about glucose. It appears that glucose is what they want

you to

> know about, and have suppressed the term " blood insulin " .

>

> Most diabetics have never had a " blood insulin " test.

>

> This is the " we don't test for that " syndrome. I had a blood

insulin

> test done early this year.

> The lab showed a range of 3 to 22 or similar. My reading was 5.

>

> I communicate often with a nurse of over 25 years experience. In

response

> to many of my queries, she

> replies, " we don't test for that " .

>

> Consider hydrochloride acid production. Correcting this in older

people

> would help many ailments.

> Still, this particular doctors office reports, ........ " we don't

test for

> that " .

>

> After much study and deliberation, I have come to the conclusion

that any

> test that would have widespread

> effect on many diseases, gets the same treatment, ........ " we

don't test

> for that " .

>

> Have you ever had a blood insulin test?

 

Not yet. Most of my life I avoided allopaths. Too much

money & I did not trust them. Then when I got a non-healing

diabetic ulcer on my foot, I went to Charity Hospital & the physical

therapist helped me heal the hole in my foot. For 4 months or so, I

took their meds while I did research on diet, got the hole in my foot

healed, and started taking gourdin (Aryuvedic herbal supplement).

For another few months I allowed Charity Hopspital to do further

testing. They eventually figured out I was too poor to pay them

(nearly $10,000 over 8 months), but not poor enough that Charity

Hospital wanted to give me their services for free.

 

So now I am back on my own. I am real broke right now (my

main income is in the Spring), but I have located an inexpensive way

to get blood testing done. See

http://bloodtesting.copperheadroad.com/ . Blood insulin testing is

definitely on my list for getting done next Spring when I have the

money.

 

 

 

>

> This same nurse told me that my Essential Fatty Acid profile was

the first

> one she had ever seen.

> I would bet the doctor has never seen one before mine.

>

> The idea here is that many people are running around with a near

normal

> glucose level, while their insulin level is highly elevated.

>

> Instead of correcting the problem early on, they are allowed to

progress to

> a " never get well " state due to

> the " we never test for that " syndrone.

>

> Please tell me I am all wet and having bad dreams !

 

Sorry to say, I can't do that Wayne. From what I can figure

out, sickness is lucrative business. Sick people need doctors &

medicines & hospitals & support staff. As long as most people are

doctor dependent, the economy prospers. If everyone doctored

themselves by eating right, getting rid of things & people from their

lives which caused illness, & by taking supplements, I'll bet there

would be an economic depression. This culture sure ain't ready for

that one.

 

In your opinion Wayne -- exactly which blood tests would you

recommend (money aside) to all of us wanting to live long healthy

lives, and why? If money is a big factor, which one(s) would you do

first? The blood testing available thru the URL above lets one talk

to people by phone about one's results to help understand what the

numbers mean.

 

Alobar

[Guest guest]

Evening Alobar,

 

> > Please tell me I am all wet and having bad dreams !

>

> Sorry to say, I can't do that Wayne.

 

Darn, for once I was hoping I was wrong. Often I become so disturbed

and concerned about some of these terrible things, I really wish I was wrong.

 

><http://bloodtesting.copperheadroad.com/>http://bloodtesting.copperheadroad.com\

/

>. Blood insulin testing is

>definitely on my list for getting done next Spring when I have the

>money.

 

I looked over the site, especially the blood test page. The prices look

decent and may be a bit lower than the prices I got locally.

 

I just got the bill last week. I think the part my insurance die not

pay will be close to $ 300.00.

 

I could post the different tests and prices, if anyone is interested.

Likely they are about the same across the country.

 

 

> In your opinion Wayne -- exactly which blood tests would you

>recommend (money aside) to all of us wanting to live long healthy

>lives, and why? If money is a big factor, which one(s) would you do

>first?

 

That is a hard one to answer for sure. Often when I meet new people

that have serious ailments,

and I may never seem them again, or very infrequently, I have to

summarize and make a simple statement that I believe will help them. It is

very hard to do. I know I should not make dozens of recommendations that

will confuse and overwhelm them, else they will do nothing.

 

After I got the EFA profile back, I spent some time researching each

item trying to gain a better understanding of how they all effect overall

body function, ........ no small task. I need a few hundred hours more

study before I get to first base understanding the EFA's.

 

One statement by some doctor got my attention. It stated that the

EFA profile is one of the best diagnostic tools he had seen. Relating

this to the " we don't test for that " ........ really got my blood boiling.

 

The complete blood chemistry should probably be done first. Items

like homocysteine and c-reactive protein are very important. Likely the

mycoplasma was not important. After the head tech at one of the large

blood labs made the statement, " everyone has it " , ....... I just had to

have a mycoplasma test. It was negative. So...... everyone does not have

it, unless the test itself is flawed.

 

I have told my family and friends, ........ If I die suddenly

tomorrow, it will prove one thing. all of these blood test are not worth

two cents. Often that is my thinking anyway. Still, I can't escape from

the web we have built. <grin>

 

I hope to get my last blood report posted soon, along with the EFA

profile. I think a few people will find it very interesting and it may

cause a few more people to get one of these.

 

To answer your question, the EFA profile should be done as item # 3

or # 4, unless the individual has some condition specific disease which

would be more important. That is only my opinion and not based on any

research, studies, or scientific facts. An opinion only.

 

Wayne

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Thanks, Wayne. I am in no need of expert advice. You

opinion is what I was looking for.

 

Alobar

 

 

-

" Wayne Fugitt " <wayne

 

Saturday, September 21, 2002 4:17 PM

Re: Insulin Sensitivity ( we never test for

that )

 

 

> Evening Alobar,

>

> > > Please tell me I am all wet and having bad dreams !

> >

> > Sorry to say, I can't do that Wayne.

>

> Darn, for once I was hoping I was wrong. Often I become so

disturbed

> and concerned about some of these terrible things, I really wish I

was wrong.

>

>

><http://bloodtesting.copperheadroad.com/>http://bloodtesting.copperh

eadroad.com/

> >. Blood insulin testing is

> >definitely on my list for getting done next Spring when I have the

> >money.

>

> I looked over the site, especially the blood test page. The

prices look

> decent and may be a bit lower than the prices I got locally.

>

> I just got the bill last week. I think the part my insurance

die not

> pay will be close to $ 300.00.

>

> I could post the different tests and prices, if anyone is

interested.

> Likely they are about the same across the country.

>

>

> > In your opinion Wayne -- exactly which blood tests would

you

> >recommend (money aside) to all of us wanting to live long healthy

> >lives, and why? If money is a big factor, which one(s) would you

do

> >first?

>

> That is a hard one to answer for sure. Often when I meet new

people

> that have serious ailments,

> and I may never seem them again, or very infrequently, I have to

> summarize and make a simple statement that I believe will help

them. It is

> very hard to do. I know I should not make dozens of

recommendations that

> will confuse and overwhelm them, else they will do nothing.

>

> After I got the EFA profile back, I spent some time

researching each

> item trying to gain a better understanding of how they all effect

overall

> body function, ........ no small task. I need a few hundred hours

more

> study before I get to first base understanding the EFA's.

>

> One statement by some doctor got my attention. It stated

that the

> EFA profile is one of the best diagnostic tools he had seen.

Relating

> this to the " we don't test for that " ........ really got my blood

boiling.

>

> The complete blood chemistry should probably be done first.

Items

> like homocysteine and c-reactive protein are very important.

Likely the

> mycoplasma was not important. After the head tech at one of the

large

> blood labs made the statement, " everyone has it " , ....... I just

had to

> have a mycoplasma test. It was negative. So...... everyone does

not have

> it, unless the test itself is flawed.

>

> I have told my family and friends, ........ If I die suddenly

> tomorrow, it will prove one thing. all of these blood test are not

worth

> two cents. Often that is my thinking anyway. Still, I can't

escape from

> the web we have built. <grin>

>

> I hope to get my last blood report posted soon, along with the

EFA

> profile. I think a few people will find it very interesting and it

may

> cause a few more people to get one of these.

>

> To answer your question, the EFA profile should be done as

item # 3

> or # 4, unless the individual has some condition specific disease

which

> would be more important. That is only my opinion and not based on

any

> research, studies, or scientific facts. An opinion only.

>

> Wayne