Guest guest Posted August 11, 2002 Report Share Posted August 11, 2002 'Gene gun' blazes away in biotech fight on famine JoAnn Guest Aug 10, 2002 16:56 PDT 5) 'Gene gun' blazes away in biotech fight on famine By Jeremy Smith LONDON (Reuters) - A designer " gene gun " blasting slivers of metal into an innocent soybean plant may sound like a futuristic and far-fetched way to ward off famine by improving the food supply of the world's poorest countries. So does subjecting stalks of defenseless corn to doses of high- voltage electricity, or bombarding them with sound waves. But these are just some of the techniques used by scientists striving for more versatility in altering plant cell structures in the controversial research area known as biotechnology, which tries to improve on the precision of natural plant breeding. Their efforts, they hope, will eventually help the world's poor guard against starvation by beating crop disease and beefing up yields of staple foods such as soy, wheat and maize. While the bulk of current research aims to improve food plants, the rest of the work is concerned with non-food crops such as cotton, tobacco, ornamental plants and pharmaceuticals. Even though the term biotechnology refers to a wide range of technologies making use of living organisms, it has now become largely synonymous with genetic engineering -- the controlled alteration of genetic material, or DNA, by artificial means. Genetic modification (GM) involves exchanging or splicing genes of unrelated species that cannot naturally swap with each other and scientists say the applications are almost limitless. The species can be vastly different, for example, inserting scorpion toxin or spider venom genes into maize and other food crops as a 'natural pesticide' to deter insects and birds from feeding on them, or fish antifreeze genes into tomatoes. Gene-splicing has also been used to overcome the sensitivity of fruits such as bananas and melons to lower temperatures so that they can be grown in colder parts of the world. And scientists believe that plants can be genetically altered to grow cheap vaccines inside them, leading to the use of fruit for painless and plentiful protection against disease. But how does genetic engineering of plants actually work? SCIENTISTS USE VARIETY OF GENE-SPLICING TECHNIQUES Scientists now have a number of techniques at their disposal to move genes artificially into host organisms although only a small proportion of the target cells in the selected plant ever properly incorporate the desired DNA. One of the most successful ways is to use 'agrobacterium', a soil-dwelling bacterium, as a go-between to introduce genetic information into more than 100 plant species, mainly into wide-leafed plants such as tomato, apple and pear. A wide variety of plant and tree varieties have been altered by this method, and the technique was used to modify the first genetic plants ever produced -- tobacco, petunia and cotton. When the bacterial DNA is integrated into a plant chromosome, it effectively hijacks the plant's cellular machinery to ensure that the bacterial population proliferates. " GENE GUN " BLASTS PLANT WITH SLIVERS OF METAL But the most important cereal crops are not affected by agrobacterium and so other methods had to be found. Scientists say their relative success rates are still difficult to judge. These include ballistic impregnation, also known as " bioballistics " or " biolistics, " an unlikely-sounding projectile science developed and popularized during the 1980s and used for narrow-leafed plants such as grasses and grains. A specially-designed " gene gun " fires dozens of metal slivers like bullets at target cells. The tiny pellets, usually of tungsten or gold, are much smaller than the diameter of the target cell, and coated with genetic material. While the shell cartridge is stopped in its tracks by a perforated metal plate, the metallic micro-missiles are able to penetrate into living cells where the genetic material is then carried to the nucleus to be integrated among the host genes. Gene guns have helped to transform monocot species such as corn and rice. Monocots, meaning monocotyledonae or plants with one cotyledon or seed leaf, comprise a quarter of all flowering plant types. Barley and wheat also derive from monocots. " Biolistics became quite popular, while the other ways of directly introducing DNA were there all the time but didn't take off quite so much, " said Professor Peter Caligari at the Department of Agricultural Botany at Reading University, in southern England. " The monocots, for example the grasses and cereals, were much more difficult to transform using the popular agrobacterium system of transferring DNA than the dicots. But biolistics was a way of getting at the monocots, " he told Reuters. Biolistics was still used moderately widely though probably still less than the agrobacterium approach, now developed to be more readily used with at least some of the monocots, he said. " Agrobacterium at first was fairly limited to dicotyledons although they had also got it to work for monocotyledon plants like corn. But it (biolistics) is just easier, " said Jane Rissler, senior scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists, a prominent U.S. environmental group. PLANTS BLASTED WITH HIGH VOLTAGE, SOUND WAVES Other transfer methods include creating pores or holes in the cell membrane to allow entry of the new genes. This can be achieved chemically, with sound waves or by using electric currents -- a technique known as electroporation. With strong electric pulses transmitted on a microsecond basis, minute pores are caused in the plant cells which allows the desired DNA to enter from a surrounding solution. Sometimes, a genetic scientist will wish to 'silence' a particular gene of an organism to prevent it from being expressed. Gene silencing was first used to create tomatoes with a higher solid content and longer shelf life by halting the natural evolution of an enzyme involved in the ripening process. Viruses can also be a useful DNA vehicle as they are infectious particles to which a new gene can be added, carrying this gene into a recipient cell while infecting that cell. And where the host cell is large enough, a fine-tipped glass needle may be enough to inject genetic material containing the new gene, although fewer cells can be treated in this way and the method is much more time-consuming than using a gene gun. " There's always the thought that maybe a more efficient or more widely applicable single system is out there somewhere, " said Reading University's Caligari. " And the more knowledge we get about things, the more possible that perhaps becomes, " he added. 08:27 11-14-01 JoAnn Guest jogu- Friendsforhea- http://canceranswer.homestead.com/AIM.html theaimcompanies " Health is not a Medical Issue " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.