Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fwd.cancer therapy that works and doesn't kill you.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Group,

 

Here is a site that shows how the government and medical industry

work not for you but, for big business.

 

There are links to each of these family's stories.

 

Pass this stuff along so others will know.

 

If you don't believe this stuff, investigate it yourself and see for

yourself.

 

It has been used for 20 years by this scientist doctor and for 20

years they havee been trying to shut him up and put him out of

business. Not because it doesn't work, but because (it seems), it

does work.

 

http://www.cancerinform.org/kids1.html

 

 

 

 

MEET THREE CHILDREN DENIED THE

BEST CANCER TREATMENT

Probably the single greatest motivator for me in trying to raise

peoples awareness of the cancer racket

are the true stories of three children and what their familyfs went

through in trying to save them.

Thomas Navarro, Alexander Horwin and Crystin Schiff. Orthodox

treatment for brain

cancer, especially Children's, is absolutely appalling. Chemotherapy

and radiation treatment cause

horrific side-effects and permanent retardation. Very few survive for

five years with this treatment. Their

quality of life is ghastly, constantly sick from the

chemotherapy/radiation treatments, their immune

system wrecked by this barbaric treatment. But if this was the only

treatment available, of course we

would do all we could to try and buy our child a few extra months or

years, anything to try and save them.

The truth is however that it is definitely not the best treatment.

Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski MD

(and Ph.D. in biochemistry) developed natural, non-toxic

antineoplastons over 20 years ago.

They are incredibly effective for brain cancer and they have very few

side-effects

that are temporary.

 

Here is an excerpt form a report by Dr. Robert Burdick, oncologist

and professor at the University of

Washington Medical School. Burdick based his report on 17 cases of

brain cancer that were treated with

antineoplastons as of April 1996. He writes,

" As a rough estimate, neurosurgeons do well to cure one in every

1,000-brain cancer patients they operate on. Radiation therapy slows

the growth of adult tumors, gaining perhaps one month of life, and

may result in a cure of only one in 500-1,000 patients. Similarly,

chemotherapy, despite 30 years of clinical trials, has not resulted

in the development of a single drug or drug combination that elicits

more than an occasional transient response in primary brain tumors.f

 

After reviewing Burzynskifs cases Burdick wrote gI am very

impressed with the number

of complete and partial responsesccompared with the number of

responses that I have

seen in my personnel experience. The responses here are far in excess

of any prior series

of patients published in the medical literaturecthe response rate

here is an astounding

81%, with an equally astounding 35% complete remissioncIt is very

clear the responses

here are due to antineoplaston therapy and are not due to surgery,

radiation or

standard chemotherapy.h (Daniel Haley, gPolitics In Healingh

p379/80)

These three familyfs independently researched their child's cancer.

After collectively studying

cancer treatments for many thousands of hours they all concluded that

antineoplastons were by far the

best choice. But the FDA will not allow access to this treatment

until the child has first undergone

chemotherapy/radiation treatment. At which time it is usually too

late because the child's immune system

is destroyed and nothing can help. Raphaele and Michael Horwin

researched their sonfs treatment and

decided that antineoplastons were the best choice. The FDA refused

and forced them to use

chemotherapy/radiation. On January 31 1999, two year old Alexander

Horwin died in his mothers arms.

Then we have the particularly nefarious and very well documented case

of 4 year old Crystin Schiff. On January 21, 1992, Crystin was

diagnosed with malignant rhabdoid tumor in her brain and spinal cord,

the most deadly of all childhood cancers. Her parents,Ric and Paula,

were beside themselves with worry. Crystin immediately underwent

surgery at the University of California at San Francisco Medical

Center (UCSF).This was a temporary measure that would buy a little

time. The only other options open to Crystin was chemotherapy and

radiation treatment that may extend her life by a few months. Ric and

Paula asked many of the oncologists at UCSF if there were any other

alternatives apart from immune wrecking chemotherapy/radiation that

causes appalling side-effects. The unanimous answer was " no " .

 

So trusting the doctors, Crystin went through 6 months of devastating

chemotherapy and radiation treatment. Ric and Paula describe this

barbaric treatment best,

 

" Over the next 6 months, we literally tortured our little girl.

Crystinfs urine burned her from the poisons, and we had to use

rubber gloves to change her diapers. She threw up constantly and lost

weight rapidly. We played a constant game of trying together to eat

more than she lost. Every little cold was life-threatening, and no

comfort from us could ease her suffering. I doubt whether Crystin had

a comfortable night's sleep ever again. "

 

During this time Ric and Paula started investigating different cancer

treatments. They found Dr.Burzynski's antineoplastons and asked

Crystin's oncologist about it. All the doctors at UCSF were very

negative about it. Ric and Paula write,

 

" Crystin's oncologist was concerned and asked us to speak to a

colleague of his who supposedly knew all about Dr. Burzynski. I met

with Dr. Prados, head of neuro-oncology at UCSF. He told me that

Dr.Burzynskifs medicine did not work and that he had testified

against Burzynski in court. He suggested other experimental and toxic

therapies, but by then we were weary of chemotherapy. "

 

After investigating Burzynski and listening to his patient's candid

opinions the Schiff's decided to give antineoplastons a try. The

Schiff's continue,

 

Within months, Crystin became cancer free. Eighteen months after

starting on Dr. Burzynskifs treatment Crystin was still cancer free.

My wife and I had been living a miracle as each successive MRI showed

Crystin improving. Strangely, our doctors continued to remain

unexcited about Crystinfs improvement.

 

It is of little surprise that the oncologists at UCSF were unexcited

about Crystin's remission after antineoplastons. These doctors are

not allowed to prescribe Antineoplastons. They also couldn't bare to

face the fact that Crystin's only health issues now were a result of

their barbaric treatments that included 10,000 rads of radiation to

her still-developing brain/spinal cord, and highly toxic chemotherapy

drugs. As Dr. Whitaker writes in his February 1996 " Health and

Healing " Newsletter,

 

" Miraculously, Cryssie's malignant cancer did not come back as the

medical staff at UCSF expected, which was cause for consternation

among them. They had counted on Cryssie's dying, because her type of

cancer had never responded to any treatment for long. With Cryssie in

remission, they were forced to watch the effects of their toxic

therapies eat away at a four-year-old girl. "

 

Although the antineoplaston's had put Crystin into remission from

cancer, her body had been too badly damaged by the radiation and

chemotherapy.The Schiff's continue,

 

" On July 29, 1995, the bravest and strongest little girl I have ever

known died absolutely cancer free. Her autopsy revealed the ultimate

cause of death was brain damage as a result of radiation and

chemotherapy. "

 

Several months after Crystin's death Dr. Julian Whitaker contacted

Ric and Paula. Whitaker told theSchiffs that Dr. Prados had followed

an earlier caseof brain cancer treated with antineoplsatons. From

Whitaker's February 1996 issue of " Health andHealing, "

 

" Dr. Prados followed this case closely. From 1989 through 1993, he

sent Dr. Burzynski 14 two-page letters documenting Jeff Keller's

condition on his follow-up visits at UCSF. All these letters were

signed or initialed by Michael Prados. On September 6,1991, with Jeff

Keller now in complete remission, Dr. Prados wrote, " We are very

pleased that Mr. Keller'sclinical and adiographic status is stable.

He seems to be having an excellent response to antineoplaston

therapy. "

 

This information was derived from Ric and Paula Schiff's letter

(linked at the bottom) and Dr.Julian Whitaker's February 1996 " Health

and Healing " newsletter. I emailed the Schiff's and verified the

accuracy of the information.

 

 

Starting about a year and a half ago, the Navarrofs fought the FDA

tooth and nail to have their son,

Thomas, treated with antineoplastons. They waged a large media

campaign supported by Alan Keyes,

then Texas governor eorge W. Bush, Senator Orin Hatch, Senator John

McCain and Chairman of the

Committee for Government Reform, ngressman Dan Burton. Nothing had an

effect on the FDA.

Protecting the drug companies profit margins was far more important

than saving a little boys life.

Finally, after 18 wasted months the FDA finally allowed Thomas the

treatment of his parents choice.

The reason they allowed this was because a recent MRI had shown

multiple new tumors in his head

neck and spine. This was all caused by the chemotherapy Thomas was

forced to undergo.

He was now considered terminal by conventional medicine so it was

okay to allow him to use the

so-called alternative treamtent. Once his doctors had virtually

killed him and the drug

companies had made their blood money.I have spent many hours reading

about the blatant

conflict of interests between the FDA and pharmaceutical companies. A

few years ago the FDA

director left for a 2 million a year job at a pharmaceutical company.

One hand washes the other.

THE EVIDENCE IS OVERWHELMING THAT ANTINEOPLASTONS

ARE FAR BETTER THAN CHEMOTHERAPY/RADIATION

TREATMENT FOR BRAIN CANCER. THE FDA ARE KILING OUR

KIDS TO PROTECT THE DRUG COMPANIES PROFITS AND

DESTROY ANY COMPETITION. WE MUST HAVE MEDICAL

FREEDOM OF CHOICE.

 

Read the Facts About These Children's Cases From Their

Parents. Clicking on the Links Below Will Open A Seperate

http://www.cancerinform.org/kids1.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...