Make-up kit holds hidden danger of Cancer, Neurological and Reproductive Damage

[Guest guest]

-

* Health and Healing *

Monday, April 08, 2002 5:09 PM

Make-up kit holds hidden danger of Cancer, Neurological and

Reproductive Damage

 

 

-

http://www.observer.co.uk/Distribution/Redirect_Artifact/0,4678,0-680266,00.html

-

 

Make-up kit holds hidden danger of cancer

 

New study claims legal loopholes allow beauty products to contain deadly toxins

 

Amelia Hill

Sunday April 7, 2002

The Observer

 

Women are being exposed to deadly diseases through the everyday use of common

cosmetics bought over the counter, according to a new study.

The growing list of synthetic ingredients manufacturers add to their products

are turning the most innocent-looking shampoos and moisturizers into cocktails

of toxins that could cause cancer over years of sustained use.

 

In Drop Dead Gorgeous: Protecting Yourself From The Hidden Dangers of Cosmetics,

to be published in Britain next month, authors Kim Erickson and Dr Samuel S.

Epstein reveal how manufacturers exploit loopholes in legislation designed to

protect the public.

 

'These synthetic ingredients are inexpensive, stable and have a long

shelf-life,' said Erickson. 'Manufacturers love them, but although the majority

of products appear safe in the short run the results from long-term use could be

deadly.'

 

The UK cosmetics industry, which employs more than 20,000 people and accounts

for £4.5 billion in sales each year, is regulated under the the Department of

Trade and Industry's 1996 Cosmetic Products (Safety) Regulations.

 

But while the regulations have approved more than 3,000 ingredients for cosmetic

use in Europe, Erickson warns that many more find their way into use through

loopholes, such as the caveat that allows products to contain traces of banned

substances if they could not reasonably be removed during or after manufacture.

 

'Modern cosmetics contain a host of dubious ingredients which would be more at

home in a test tube than on our faces,' said Erickson. 'Coal tar colours,

phenylenediamine, benzene, even formaldehyde, are just a few of the synthetic

chemicals commonly included in shampoos, skin creams and blushes - toxins which

are absorbed into your skin with every use.'

 

Unlike food or drugs, cosmetics and their raw ingredients are not subject to

review or independent pre-market approval, a situation criticised by experts

including Dr Jean Munro, medical director of The Breakspear Hospital,

Hertfordshire, which specialises in allergies and has seen 8,000 women since

opening in 1982 - nearly all of whom were found to have a sensitivity to

cosmetics.

 

'There is no question that people are being damaged by their cosmetics,' Munro

said. 'How can they not be? So many things are put into cosmetics now that are

carcinogenic and it is allowed because cosmetics are not considered to be as

serious as drugs or food.'

 

Munro believes the presence of large numbers of even small amounts of banned

substances means that, over time, users will have been exposed to danger.

 

'One of the most extreme cases I have seen was a woman whose bone marrow was

affected by chemicals used in hair dye. The level of her blood platelets dropped

and she broke out in a severe rash,' she said. 'The situation as it is is

plainly dangerous - unacceptably so.'

 

Denise Santamarina, a 34-year-old beautician, has spent 10 years battling

chemically induced lupus. 'I started getting sick when I began taking

cosmetology classes,' she said. 'Over the next 10 years I suffered from a string

of digestive problems, sinus infections and excruciating pain in my back,

ribcage and arms. There were days when I would crawl across the floor in pain.'

 

Santamarina was given a chemical screening by doctors which showed high levels

of benzene and toluene C, both common ingredients in nail polish and polish

remover. After leaving her job and removing all synthetic cosmetics from her

dressing table, Santamarina gradually began to recover.

 

'I am basically better now, but it was a long road to travel,' she said. 'I

still find it hard to believe that I was poisoned by cosmetics, but the cause

and effect leave no room for argument.'

 

Erickson believes the adverse effects of toxins is compounded over decades,

confusing hormone receptors and slowly altering cell structure. Chemicals are

transmitted into the bloodstream in a number of ways: powders have the least

absorption, while oily solutions or those designed to increase moisture allow

more of the chemical to be absorbed.

 

Eye makeup can be absorbed by the highly sensitive mucous membranes. Hair

sprays, perfumes and dusting powders can be inhaled, irritating the lungs.

Lipstick is often chewed off and swallowed.

 

The United Nations Environmental Programme estimates that approximately 70,000

chemicals are in common use across the world with 1,000 new chemicals being

introduced every year. Of all the chemicals used in cosmetics, the National

Institute of Occupational Safety and Health has reported that nearly 900 are

toxic - although other groups attack that figure as being far too conservative.

 

'Compared to the toxins found in our air, soil and waterways, cosmetics seem a

trivial pursuit to many environmental health and consumer advocacy groups,' said

Erickson. 'But many of the same poisons that pollute our environment, from

dioxins to petrochemicals, can be found in the jars and bottles that line our

bathroom shelves.'

 

Erickson admits it is too early to know with certainty how serious the long-term

impact could be on health, but warns that hormone-disrupting chemicals may lurk

in cosmetics which could lower immunity to disease and cause neurological and

reproductive damage. 'Many of these same ingredients have been found to cause

cancer in laboratory animals,' she said. 'At best, a visit to your neighbourhood

cosmetic counter could result in allergies, irritations and sensitivities.'

 

Some companies are moving slowly towards producing synthetic-free cosmetics, but

experts say it is too early to judge whether these ranges are all they claim to

be.

 

Special report

Observer Science pages

 

Science news

07.04.2002: Bishop warns Blair over danger of creationism

07.04.2002: Make-up kit holds hidden danger of cancer

07.04.2002: Warning: too tubby tots face lifetime of obesity

07.04.2002: Focus: The obsession with eternal youth

24.03.2002: Focus: The unstoppable power of the male menopause

 

Books

24.03.2002: Lewis Wolpert on brain science

 

 

 

 

To learn more about the group, please visit

 

 

To to this group, simply send a blank e-mail message to:

-

To change status to digest: -digest

To change status to normal: -normal

You are receiving this email because you elected to .

To Post: