Guest guest Posted March 28, 2002 Report Share Posted March 28, 2002 The Campaign <information wrote: The Campaign angelprincessjo Voluntary labeling of GE foods discussed by FDA Sat, 23 Mar 2002 05:29:01 PST News Update From The Campaign to Label Genetically Engineered Foods ---- Dear Health Freedom Fighters, On Thursday, the deputy commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Lester Crawford, testified before the House agricultural appropriations subcommittee. Crawford discussed the FDA's position on voluntary labels for non-genetically engineered foods. He also discussed the labeling of irradiated foods. The Associated Press (AP) article posted below is titled " Biotech Food Labeling Delayed. " This refers to the delay of voluntary labeling rules for products that do not contain genetically engineered ingredients, as opposed to the mandatory labeling legislation we are working to get passed in the U.S. Congress. The AP article made an error in stating that the " FDA proposed labeling rules for non-biotech foods in January 2001. " That is not correct. What the FDA released in January 2001 was a " Notice " and not " Proposed Rules. " When the FDA actually does issue " Proposed Rules, " there will be a public comment period. Then, after reviewing and considering the comments they receive about the Proposed Rules, the FDA will eventually issue " Final Rules. " Even then, the Final Rules are usually not enacted for months or even years. Such time is normally provided to allow manufacturers the opportunity to change their labels and work existing inventories out of their stock. Deputy commissioner Crawford said it could be months or even years before the rules are made final. Years are a lot more likely time frame based on the previous track record of the FDA on such matters. Rather than waiting for the FDA to issue proposed rules on voluntary labeling of non-genetically engineered products, some industry leaders in the natural products industry are working together on this issue. They are trying to determine the logical level of contamination that should still allow a product to be marketed as a non-genetically engineered product. Deputy commissioner Crawford mentions a level of 1 percent. Many people in the natural foods industry would like to see it significantly lower. So tests are being conducted for accuracy and to determine a practical level for a label indicating that the products do not contain genetically engineered ingredients. If you would like to read the actual notice the FDA issued January 1, 2001, about voluntarily labeling foods as not containing genetically engineered ingredients, here is a link to that Adobe Acrobat document: http://www.thecampaign.org/voluntarylabeling.pdf Posted after the AP article below is one from China Daily titled " New rule requires GMO product labels. " That article discusses the recent implementation of labeling requirements for genetically engineered foods in China. There is one final point I would like to address in this e-mail. Many people are asking when the mandatory labeling legislation will be introduced before the U.S. Congress. We have been recently assured by the offices of both Senator Barbara Boxer and Representative Dennis Kucinich that the legislation is coming soon. However, they are not able to provide an accurate time estimate on when it will be introduced. In the meantime, keep sending letters to your members of Congress asking them to support and co-sponsor the legislation. Letters to Congress are usually delayed a week or two because they are being irradiated to kill any possible anthrax, but they ARE getting delivered. Form letters to Congress are available on The Campaign's web site at: http://www.thecampaign.org/congressletters.htm Letters are also contained in the back of The Campaign's informative 32-page Take Action Packets. Order extra Take Action Packets and share them with your friends: http://www.thecampaign.org/tap.htm Craig Winters Executive Director The Campaign to Label Genetically Engineered Foods The Campaign PO Box 55699 Seattle, WA 98155 Tel: 425-771-4049 Fax: 603-825-5841 E-mail: label Web Site: http://www.thecampaign.org Mission Statement: " To create a national grassroots consumer campaign for the purpose of lobbying Congress and the President to pass legislation that will require the labeling of genetically engineered foods in the United States. " *************************************************************** Biotech Food Labeling Delayed By PHILIP BRASHER ..c The Associated Press WASHINGTON (AP) - Companies that want to label food as free of genetically engineered ingredients will have to wait while the government decides how to make sure it's true. The food would have to be tested by the companies and checked periodically by federal inspectors to make sure it doesn't contain biotech products, said Lester Crawford, deputy commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration. ``If it's on the label, it has to be true, and it's up to us to be sure that it is,'' Crawford told the House agricultural appropriations subcommittee on Thursday. FDA proposed labeling rules for non-biotech foods in January 2001, during the final days of the Clinton administration. But Crawford, an appointee of the Bush administration, said it could be months or even years before the rules are made final. Genetically engineered soy and corn are used in a wide variety of foods and drinks. FDA says the ingredients are just as safe as those produced by conventional methods. Critics of biotechnology pushed the Clinton administration to require foods with gene-altered ingredients to be labeled as such, but FDA refused. Instead, it proposed the labeling rules for foods that are biotech-free. The agency would likely allow genetically modified ingredients to make up no more than about 1 percent of officially biotech-free foods. FDA plans to check a portion to make sure foods meet the standard, but hasn't decided how much testing is needed for the results to be statistically valid, Crawford said. FDA has suggested several possible labels, including ``We do not use ingredients that were produced using biotechnology'' and ``This oil is made from soybeans that were not genetically engineered.'' A food industry spokesman said few consumers appear interested in buying non-biotech products. ``I don't really think you're going to see many companies going out and marketing them if we had the standard tomorrow,'' said Gene Grabowski of the Grocery Manufacturers of America. Consumers who want to avoid bioengineered products already can buy organic products. Beginning this fall, foods that meet the government's standards for organic products, which bar the use of genetically engineered crops, will bear a special Agriculture Department seal. Crawford also told the lawmakers Thursday that FDA has all but ruled out allowing the term ``cold pasteurization'' on foods that have been irradiated to kill harmful bacteria. The food industry has been slow to use irradiation because of consumer resistance to the term. Lawmakers have been pushing FDA to allow such products to be called pasteurized. But the agency tested the term ``cold pasteurization'' with consumer focus groups and found they viewed it ``as kind of a ruse to conceal the fact'' the food has been irradiated, Crawford said. ``The public needs to know that food has been irradiated and that irradiation is safe.'' He also said the special symbol that must appear on the labels of irradiated foods is ``threatening to the public.'' AP-NY-03-21-02 1608EST *************************************************************** New rule requires GMO product labels (03/21/2002) (China Daily) China started the implementation of its new rules on genetically modified organisms (GMO) on Wednesday and the expected reactions have been heard from the market. The new rules required all imported genetically modified soya beans, corn, rapeseed, cotton seed and tomatoes to be clearly labelled as genetically modified products. Furthermore, overseas firms that export genetically modified products to China must obtain certificates from China's Ministry of Agriculture to ensure their goods are safe. Genetically modified imports that lack safety certificates and relevant papers will be returned to their ports of origin or destroyed, according to the new rules. Fu Zhongwen, an official with the ministry's newly created GMO biosafety office, said the office will supervise the implementation of the new rules in conjunction with relevant government departments. Dong Jingsheng, deputy secretary-general with the China Consumers' Association, spoke highly of the new rules in an interview last week. Dong said the rules can better ensure domestic consumers' rights to know the truth and make a choice, both of which are highlighted in China's Law on Protecting Consumers' Rights and Interests, which came into effect in 1993. Sales offices with Beijing-based Jingkelong and French-funded Carrefour -- two big chain store groups in the capital -- both pledged on Wednesday to " strictly obey the new rules. " Cui Hong, an administrative officer with Jingkelong, said his company stopped the acceptance of unlabelled genetically modified products earlier this week. Hongcheng Supermarket Group in Guangzhou, capital of South China's Guangdong Province, has also made thorough measures to block unlabelled GMOs, local media reported on Wednesday. The report said Hongcheng and other major supermarkets in Guangzhou had cleared out genetically modified products without labels by the end of last month. The United States shipped 1.9 million tons of soya beans to China between September 1 and December 6, up to 70 per cent of which had been genetically altered, according to the American Soybean Association. Japan and the European Union have similar rules on genetically modified imports. <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> * To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to: http://i.mb00.net/remove?TheCampaign:12 * Enter your email address (angelprincessjo) in the field provided and click " Un " . The mailing list ID is " TheCampaign:12 " . OR... * Forward a copy of this message to TheCampaign.12 with the word remove in the subject line. This message was sent to address angelprincessjo X-PMG-Recipient: angelprincessjo <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> pmguid:1m.1xcf.3o4 The complete " Whole Body " Health line consists of the " AIM GARDEN TRIO " Ask About Health Professional Support Series: AIM Barleygreen " Wisdom of the Past, Food of the Future " http://canceranswer.homestead.com/AIM.html Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards® Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.