Psychic Remote influence for subjective influencing of others

[Guest guest]

(Moderator's note: I think that Jimmy sent this to the WRONG group. He sent it

here instead of to the manifestationmasters group, which I also lead.

BUT...because the method can be used positively for Psychic Remote Healing, I'm

leaving it here. Thanks Jimmy. Dr. John La Tourrette)

 

Psychic Remote influence for subjective influencing of others

 

, Jim Knippenberg

<erommel wrote:

 

> Well, what about segment intending one's " hating " ?

 

> For instance, if I hate someone, wire the mental curse in to their >timeline

with anchors, convincer strategies, etc, etc., etc... And >then go fix my own

energies...

 

Yep.

 

That will fit for awhile. And it will work.

 

Then you'll notice that you can do it with " blessings " .

 

You will notice that they can get " significant emotional lessons " on X, Y and Z

without you getting those lessons also.

 

It's the automatic " rebound " effect. Either way will cause the " automatic

rebound effect " so you might as well do one that will evolve you at the same

time, right?

 

> My whole problem with that is the attractor for rage / anger and then taking

excessive action on it.

 

Sometimes those attractors go beyond what we call 'reasonable' and 'common

sense'.

 

And we've all been there. At least I have.

 

So now-a-days I calm the anger/rage with doing a simple side of the head hold as

I take in 3 deep breaths.

 

Then I do the James Dean drill.

 

I am always more clear about MY directions after that. I am also clear about my

" positive frames " .

 

> For instance, if I practice mentally cursing someone with a thought >form

designed to " do them in, " then what STOPS the attractor field >of " getting

pissed off and doing someone in " if I have a different >type of weapon with me

(in other words getting pissed off, pulling >out a gun, and shooting someone)?

 

You are correct in the fact that both are attractor fields.

 

" Cursing them " also has negative results on you.

 

Carrying a gun with reasonableness and self-responsibility means that you don't

carry to go after someone, but to protect and keep safe someone.

 

And with that training of carrying, you then acknowledge and train with the

wisdom that you are being held to a higher level of responsibility than the one

you might have to stop.

 

There are very positive learnings in looking at life situations from that higher

level of criteria.

 

> By the way, what's the difference between a " Norma " and a created >entity that

you use to " enter someone's energy field and / or >partially or completely

'possess' them for the purpose of gaining >certain types of activities and

shared experiences " ?

 

Well the creation of a " Norma " ...

 

(For those that don't know, its a Remote Psychic Influence method of installing

positive possibilities in others about you, so you both can be entertained

together in a good way by each other. It is a tactic that I taught to a man from

Mexico City that loved a specific lady, and wanted a method to enhance her

attraction to him.)...

 

....For a creation of a " Norma " you are dove-tailing criteria both in the

subjective plane and in the objective plane for all people concerned.

 

In the " possession " of another you are subverting their criteria, attempting to

erase any freewill they might have, and attempting to make them your mind slave

so you can do what you will.

 

And it can be done.

 

If you use their criteria and their values and their beliefs, then, whatever you

do with others will benefit them as much as and as well as you.

 

That is called " dove-tailing " and is appropiate behavior.

 

People who want the same things are attracted to each other.

 

So when that type of Remote Psychic Influence is used the concept is necessary

of what " YOU need to do to earn and attract " that wanted behavior in them.

 

It is Napoleon Hills 3rd Law.

 

It follows the concept of, " there is NO free lunch " .

 

What I have found certain people doing is to attempt to psychically influence

others for " their own free lunch " .

 

That is possible. Then it has problems after awhile.

 

How do I know that? Guess.

 

One of our coaching members from Australia just sent me an email today.

 

She was having trouble getting new clients for her business. So on Skype (so I

could see her) I had her do certain drills to erase her negative feelings about

" if the psychic influence drills would work or not " .

 

Then I taught her a specific Psychic Hyper-Linking Mind Method of reaching the

type of person at a distance, even if she didn't know them, who would love to

acquire the neat and high quality items she makes and sells.

 

So they would accidentally and automatically be psychically attracted to her

goods, her shop and her products.

 

I then had her send me a written transcription of the Skype session, so I could

be damn sure that she knew the EXACT instructions to follow.

 

(Running West to see the sun rise, just is wasted effort, and will not put you

in the right directin. So a correct formula is necessary BEFORE the necessary

actions are taken.)

 

In her email she thanked me for teaching her that Remote Psychic Hyper-Linking

Mind Method Influence tactic.

 

It was (and still is) working so good, that she has never, ever been so busy

with that many new, quality clients.

 

She understands that " there is NO free lunch " and was willing to do what it took

to attact and keep that high level of clientel.

 

I will be teaching that tactic of Psychic Hyper-Linking Mind Method Remote

Influence at my upcoming " Bullet Proof Wallet Fattening Techniques " here in the

back woods of Oregon on Feb 26, 27 & 28.

 

Thanks for the questions Jimmy.

 

Dr John La Tourrette

PS. That lady will be at the event here on Feb 26,27, 28 and is staying for the

" Coaching Member's ONLY Day " on Mar 1. You'll have a chance to network with her

and us to find out what REALLY works!

 

PPS. If interested email Jack at warriorpublication

 

> Thanks,

> Jim