Guest guest Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 Well, what's interesting is that I know someone who is in real bad need of the Energy Medicine techniques, Edgar Cayce techniques and some additional tools. I sometimes " feel that I 'should' work their health case remotely, " but I also know that they will need to either DO the drills or have someone there with them DO the drills on them. So I was wondering how I could " get them to do the damn drills, " and this thing about dovetailing came up. But not until I took care of " If I tell them this stuff, they are going to think I'm nuts, and they are going to call me a screwball, and they're going to just laugh at me and ignore it anyway. " But Wednesday night I had a nagging that I should " Send so and so Donna Eden's book! Go get it NOW and send it to them in the mail! " I recognized that by mentally fearing them not using the book was the same as cursing them and myself, so I fixed it. One of the tools I used was the Meta Model, reframing, etc.: " They will think you are nuts? How do you know they will think you are nuts instead of something else? How specifically will they not do the drills? If you could tell them about the book in a way that would cause them to want to read it and see for themselves, how would you? " Then the next question that came up was " WHICH book? " I " felt " like EM for Women, but when I went in the bookstore, they had both books, and I couldn't decide because EM has a section in it that EM for Women DOESN'T have, and that person needs that part... So I bought both books. Now the rest of what you wrote about the " other topic " is applicable here, because it has to do with dovetailing, convincer strategies, etc. I don't have the time to do their drills for them Remotely, and I SHOULDN'T, either. I think I can send the package with the right influences for them to look at the book. And regardless of what they do, I satisfied the nagging inside of me that wouldn't leave me alone and kept telling me to tell them about EM and castor oil packs and send them the book. I think Jose Silva took up to 3 years on some of the health cases he was using for research until each and every one of those " incurable " cases was healed. I don't have the motivation to work this health case for 3 years, and by doing it half-heartedly or just because I feel like I'm " obligated " to would be a curse to that person. They're not in my immediate family, and it's interesting how Remote Influence, compulsion, impulsion, and " forcing someone to do X " vs. " Law of Allowing " are all involved in something simple. Hell, I had to fix my own stuff just to overcome my own objection of " they'll think I'm nuts... " I've kind of learned from experience some people are more open than others. Although I really don't know why I feel an inner nagging to send them those books. I know I'm not going to sit here using Mental Influence to " force " them to do the damn drills. I got my own stuff that needs doing without trying to micro manage what other people do or don't do. So as long as I do what I felt I need to do, and I communicate it in a way that fits the other person's own convincer strategies so they can make a choice based on more than just a knee jerk response, I can live with myself knowing I did my duty and did it well, regardless of whether or not they do the drills. Thanks for the posts Doc. Jim >docspeed2001 <docspeed2001 >Jan 28, 2010 1:47 AM > > Psychic Remote influence for subjective influencing of others > >(Moderator's note: I think that Jimmy sent this to the WRONG group. He sent it here instead of to the manifestationmasters group, which I also lead. BUT...because the method can be used positively for Psychic Remote Healing, I'm leaving it here. Thanks Jimmy. Dr. John La Tourrette) > >Psychic Remote influence for subjective influencing of others > > , Jim Knippenberg <erommel wrote: > >> Well, what about segment intending one's " hating " ? > >> For instance, if I hate someone, wire the mental curse in to their >timeline with anchors, convincer strategies, etc, etc., etc... And >then go fix my own energies... > >Yep. > >That will fit for awhile. And it will work. > >Then you'll notice that you can do it with " blessings " . > >You will notice that they can get " significant emotional lessons " on X, Y and Z without you getting those lessons also. > >It's the automatic " rebound " effect. Either way will cause the " automatic rebound effect " so you might as well do one that will evolve you at the same time, right? > >> My whole problem with that is the attractor for rage / anger and then taking excessive action on it. > >Sometimes those attractors go beyond what we call 'reasonable' and 'common sense'. > >And we've all been there. At least I have. > >So now-a-days I calm the anger/rage with doing a simple side of the head hold as I take in 3 deep breaths. > >Then I do the James Dean drill. > >I am always more clear about MY directions after that. I am also clear about my " positive frames " . > >> For instance, if I practice mentally cursing someone with a thought >form designed to " do them in, " then what STOPS the attractor field >of " getting pissed off and doing someone in " if I have a different >type of weapon with me (in other words getting pissed off, pulling >out a gun, and shooting someone)? > >You are correct in the fact that both are attractor fields. > > " Cursing them " also has negative results on you. > >Carrying a gun with reasonableness and self-responsibility means that you don't carry to go after someone, but to protect and keep safe someone. > >And with that training of carrying, you then acknowledge and train with the wisdom that you are being held to a higher level of responsibility than the one you might have to stop. > >There are very positive learnings in looking at life situations from that higher level of criteria. > >> By the way, what's the difference between a " Norma " and a created >entity that you use to " enter someone's energy field and / or >partially or completely 'possess' them for the purpose of gaining >certain types of activities and shared experiences " ? > >Well the creation of a " Norma " ... > >(For those that don't know, its a Remote Psychic Influence method of installing positive possibilities in others about you, so you both can be entertained together in a good way by each other. It is a tactic that I taught to a man from Mexico City that loved a specific lady, and wanted a method to enhance her attraction to him.)... > >...For a creation of a " Norma " you are dove-tailing criteria both in the subjective plane and in the objective plane for all people concerned. > >In the " possession " of another you are subverting their criteria, attempting to erase any freewill they might have, and attempting to make them your mind slave so you can do what you will. > >And it can be done. > >If you use their criteria and their values and their beliefs, then, whatever you do with others will benefit them as much as and as well as you. > >That is called " dove-tailing " and is appropiate behavior. > >People who want the same things are attracted to each other. > >So when that type of Remote Psychic Influence is used the concept is necessary of what " YOU need to do to earn and attract " that wanted behavior in them. > >It is Napoleon Hills 3rd Law. > >It follows the concept of, " there is NO free lunch " . > >What I have found certain people doing is to attempt to psychically influence others for " their own free lunch " . > >That is possible. Then it has problems after awhile. > >How do I know that? Guess. > >One of our coaching members from Australia just sent me an email today. > >She was having trouble getting new clients for her business. So on Skype (so I could see her) I had her do certain drills to erase her negative feelings about " if the psychic influence drills would work or not " . > >Then I taught her a specific Psychic Hyper-Linking Mind Method of reaching the type of person at a distance, even if she didn't know them, who would love to acquire the neat and high quality items she makes and sells. > >So they would accidentally and automatically be psychically attracted to her goods, her shop and her products. > >I then had her send me a written transcription of the Skype session, so I could be damn sure that she knew the EXACT instructions to follow. > >(Running West to see the sun rise, just is wasted effort, and will not put you in the right directin. So a correct formula is necessary BEFORE the necessary actions are taken.) > >In her email she thanked me for teaching her that Remote Psychic Hyper-Linking Mind Method Influence tactic. > >It was (and still is) working so good, that she has never, ever been so busy with that many new, quality clients. > >She understands that " there is NO free lunch " and was willing to do what it took to attact and keep that high level of clientel. > >I will be teaching that tactic of Psychic Hyper-Linking Mind Method Remote Influence at my upcoming " Bullet Proof Wallet Fattening Techniques " here in the back woods of Oregon on Feb 26, 27 & 28. > >Thanks for the questions Jimmy. > >Dr John La Tourrette >PS. That lady will be at the event here on Feb 26,27, 28 and is staying for the " Coaching Member's ONLY Day " on Mar 1. You'll have a chance to network with her and us to find out what REALLY works! > >PPS. If interested email Jack at warriorpublication > >> Thanks, >> Jim > > >--- > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 I suggest you help all that you feel the " call " to help. So it is because of an inner attractor, something inside you that will do the guiding of what to do... ....especially someone like you Jimmy, with vast amounts of great trainings which has lead to very good Distant Healing Skills. Dr John La Tourrette , Jim Knippenberg <erommel wrote: > > Well, what's interesting is that I know someone who is in real bad need of the Energy Medicine techniques, Edgar Cayce techniques and some additional tools. > > I sometimes " feel that I 'should' work their health case remotely, " but I also know that they will need to either DO the drills or have someone there with them DO the drills on them. > > So I was wondering how I could " get them to do the damn drills, " and this thing about dovetailing came up. > > But not until I took care of " If I tell them this stuff, they are going to think I'm nuts, and they are going to call me a screwball, and they're going to just laugh at me and ignore it anyway. " > > But Wednesday night I had a nagging that I should " Send so and so Donna Eden's book! Go get it NOW and send it to them in the mail! " > > I recognized that by mentally fearing them not using the book was the same as cursing them and myself, so I fixed it. > > One of the tools I used was the Meta Model, reframing, etc.: " They will think you are nuts? How do you know they will think you are nuts instead of something else? How specifically will they not do the drills? If you could tell them about the book in a way that would cause them to want to read it and see for themselves, how would you? " > > Then the next question that came up was " WHICH book? " > > I " felt " like EM for Women, but when I went in the bookstore, they had both books, and I couldn't decide because EM has a section in it that EM for Women DOESN'T have, and that person needs that part... > > So I bought both books. > > Now the rest of what you wrote about the " other topic " is applicable here, because it has to do with dovetailing, convincer strategies, etc. > > I don't have the time to do their drills for them Remotely, and I SHOULDN'T, either. I think I can send the package with the right influences for them to look at the book. > > And regardless of what they do, I satisfied the nagging inside of me that wouldn't leave me alone and kept telling me to tell them about EM and castor oil packs and send them the book. > > I think Jose Silva took up to 3 years on some of the health cases he was using for research until each and every one of those " incurable " cases was healed. > > I don't have the motivation to work this health case for 3 years, and by doing it half-heartedly or just because I feel like I'm " obligated " to would be a curse to that person. > > They're not in my immediate family, and it's interesting how Remote Influence, compulsion, impulsion, and " forcing someone to do X " vs. " Law of Allowing " are all involved in something simple. > > Hell, I had to fix my own stuff just to overcome my own objection of " they'll think I'm nuts... " > > I've kind of learned from experience some people are more open than others. Although I really don't know why I feel an inner nagging to send them those books. > > I know I'm not going to sit here using Mental Influence to " force " them to do the damn drills. I got my own stuff that needs doing without trying to micro manage what other people do or don't do. > > So as long as I do what I felt I need to do, and I communicate it in a way that fits the other person's own convincer strategies so they can make a choice based on more than just a knee jerk response, I can live with myself knowing I did my duty and did it well, regardless of whether or not they do the drills. > > Thanks for the posts Doc. > > Jim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.