Psychic Remote influence for subjective influencing of others

[Guest guest]

Well, what's interesting is that I know someone who is in real bad need of the

Energy Medicine techniques, Edgar Cayce techniques and some additional tools.

 

I sometimes " feel that I 'should' work their health case remotely, " but I also

know that they will need to either DO the drills or have someone there with them

DO the drills on them.

 

So I was wondering how I could " get them to do the damn drills, " and this thing

about dovetailing came up.

 

But not until I took care of " If I tell them this stuff, they are going to think

I'm nuts, and they are going to call me a screwball, and they're going to just

laugh at me and ignore it anyway. "

 

But Wednesday night I had a nagging that I should " Send so and so Donna Eden's

book! Go get it NOW and send it to them in the mail! "

 

I recognized that by mentally fearing them not using the book was the same as

cursing them and myself, so I fixed it.

 

One of the tools I used was the Meta Model, reframing, etc.: " They will think

you are nuts? How do you know they will think you are nuts instead of something

else? How specifically will they not do the drills? If you could tell them

about the book in a way that would cause them to want to read it and see for

themselves, how would you? "

 

Then the next question that came up was " WHICH book? "

 

I " felt " like EM for Women, but when I went in the bookstore, they had both

books, and I couldn't decide because EM has a section in it that EM for Women

DOESN'T have, and that person needs that part...

 

So I bought both books.

 

Now the rest of what you wrote about the " other topic " is applicable here,

because it has to do with dovetailing, convincer strategies, etc.

 

I don't have the time to do their drills for them Remotely, and I SHOULDN'T,

either. I think I can send the package with the right influences for them to

look at the book.

 

And regardless of what they do, I satisfied the nagging inside of me that

wouldn't leave me alone and kept telling me to tell them about EM and castor oil

packs and send them the book.

 

I think Jose Silva took up to 3 years on some of the health cases he was using

for research until each and every one of those " incurable " cases was healed.

 

I don't have the motivation to work this health case for 3 years, and by doing

it half-heartedly or just because I feel like I'm " obligated " to would be a

curse to that person.

 

They're not in my immediate family, and it's interesting how Remote Influence,

compulsion, impulsion, and " forcing someone to do X " vs. " Law of Allowing " are

all involved in something simple.

 

Hell, I had to fix my own stuff just to overcome my own objection of " they'll

think I'm nuts... "

 

I've kind of learned from experience some people are more open than others.

Although I really don't know why I feel an inner nagging to send them those

books.

 

I know I'm not going to sit here using Mental Influence to " force " them to do

the damn drills. I got my own stuff that needs doing without trying to micro

manage what other people do or don't do.

 

So as long as I do what I felt I need to do, and I communicate it in a way that

fits the other person's own convincer strategies so they can make a choice based

on more than just a knee jerk response, I can live with myself knowing I did my

duty and did it well, regardless of whether or not they do the drills.

 

Thanks for the posts Doc.

 

Jim

 

 

 

>docspeed2001 <docspeed2001

>Jan 28, 2010 1:47 AM

>

> Psychic Remote influence for

subjective influencing of others

>

>(Moderator's note: I think that Jimmy sent this to the WRONG group. He sent it

here instead of to the manifestationmasters group, which I also lead.

BUT...because the method can be used positively for Psychic Remote Healing, I'm

leaving it here. Thanks Jimmy. Dr. John La Tourrette)

>

>Psychic Remote influence for subjective influencing of others

>

> , Jim Knippenberg

<erommel wrote:

>

>> Well, what about segment intending one's " hating " ?

>

>> For instance, if I hate someone, wire the mental curse in to their >timeline

with anchors, convincer strategies, etc, etc., etc... And >then go fix my own

energies...

>

>Yep.

>

>That will fit for awhile. And it will work.

>

>Then you'll notice that you can do it with " blessings " .

>

>You will notice that they can get " significant emotional lessons " on X, Y and Z

without you getting those lessons also.

>

>It's the automatic " rebound " effect. Either way will cause the " automatic

rebound effect " so you might as well do one that will evolve you at the same

time, right?

>

>> My whole problem with that is the attractor for rage / anger and then taking

excessive action on it.

>

>Sometimes those attractors go beyond what we call 'reasonable' and 'common

sense'.

>

>And we've all been there. At least I have.

>

>So now-a-days I calm the anger/rage with doing a simple side of the head hold

as I take in 3 deep breaths.

>

>Then I do the James Dean drill.

>

>I am always more clear about MY directions after that. I am also clear about my

" positive frames " .

>

>> For instance, if I practice mentally cursing someone with a thought >form

designed to " do them in, " then what STOPS the attractor field >of " getting

pissed off and doing someone in " if I have a different >type of weapon with me

(in other words getting pissed off, pulling >out a gun, and shooting someone)?

>

>You are correct in the fact that both are attractor fields.

>

> " Cursing them " also has negative results on you.

>

>Carrying a gun with reasonableness and self-responsibility means that you don't

carry to go after someone, but to protect and keep safe someone.

>

>And with that training of carrying, you then acknowledge and train with the

wisdom that you are being held to a higher level of responsibility than the one

you might have to stop.

>

>There are very positive learnings in looking at life situations from that

higher level of criteria.

>

>> By the way, what's the difference between a " Norma " and a created >entity

that you use to " enter someone's energy field and / or >partially or completely

'possess' them for the purpose of gaining >certain types of activities and

shared experiences " ?

>

>Well the creation of a " Norma " ...

>

>(For those that don't know, its a Remote Psychic Influence method of installing

positive possibilities in others about you, so you both can be entertained

together in a good way by each other. It is a tactic that I taught to a man from

Mexico City that loved a specific lady, and wanted a method to enhance her

attraction to him.)...

>

>...For a creation of a " Norma " you are dove-tailing criteria both in the

subjective plane and in the objective plane for all people concerned.

>

>In the " possession " of another you are subverting their criteria, attempting to

erase any freewill they might have, and attempting to make them your mind slave

so you can do what you will.

>

>And it can be done.

>

>If you use their criteria and their values and their beliefs, then, whatever

you do with others will benefit them as much as and as well as you.

>

>That is called " dove-tailing " and is appropiate behavior.

>

>People who want the same things are attracted to each other.

>

>So when that type of Remote Psychic Influence is used the concept is necessary

of what " YOU need to do to earn and attract " that wanted behavior in them.

>

>It is Napoleon Hills 3rd Law.

>

>It follows the concept of, " there is NO free lunch " .

>

>What I have found certain people doing is to attempt to psychically influence

others for " their own free lunch " .

>

>That is possible. Then it has problems after awhile.

>

>How do I know that? Guess.

>

>One of our coaching members from Australia just sent me an email today.

>

>She was having trouble getting new clients for her business. So on Skype (so I

could see her) I had her do certain drills to erase her negative feelings about

" if the psychic influence drills would work or not " .

>

>Then I taught her a specific Psychic Hyper-Linking Mind Method of reaching the

type of person at a distance, even if she didn't know them, who would love to

acquire the neat and high quality items she makes and sells.

>

>So they would accidentally and automatically be psychically attracted to her

goods, her shop and her products.

>

>I then had her send me a written transcription of the Skype session, so I could

be damn sure that she knew the EXACT instructions to follow.

>

>(Running West to see the sun rise, just is wasted effort, and will not put you

in the right directin. So a correct formula is necessary BEFORE the necessary

actions are taken.)

>

>In her email she thanked me for teaching her that Remote Psychic Hyper-Linking

Mind Method Influence tactic.

>

>It was (and still is) working so good, that she has never, ever been so busy

with that many new, quality clients.

>

>She understands that " there is NO free lunch " and was willing to do what it

took to attact and keep that high level of clientel.

>

>I will be teaching that tactic of Psychic Hyper-Linking Mind Method Remote

Influence at my upcoming " Bullet Proof Wallet Fattening Techniques " here in the

back woods of Oregon on Feb 26, 27 & 28.

>

>Thanks for the questions Jimmy.

>

>Dr John La Tourrette

>PS. That lady will be at the event here on Feb 26,27, 28 and is staying for the

" Coaching Member's ONLY Day " on Mar 1. You'll have a chance to network with her

and us to find out what REALLY works!

>

>PPS. If interested email Jack at warriorpublication

>

>> Thanks,

>> Jim

>

>

>---

>

>

[Guest guest]

I suggest you help all that you feel the " call " to help.

 

So it is because of an inner attractor, something inside you that will do the

guiding of what to do...

 

....especially someone like you Jimmy, with vast amounts of great trainings which

has lead to very good Distant Healing Skills.

 

Dr John La Tourrette

 

, Jim Knippenberg

<erommel wrote:

>

> Well, what's interesting is that I know someone who is in real bad need of the

Energy Medicine techniques, Edgar Cayce techniques and some additional tools.

>

> I sometimes " feel that I 'should' work their health case remotely, " but I also

know that they will need to either DO the drills or have someone there with them

DO the drills on them.

>

> So I was wondering how I could " get them to do the damn drills, " and this

thing about dovetailing came up.

>

> But not until I took care of " If I tell them this stuff, they are going to

think I'm nuts, and they are going to call me a screwball, and they're going to

just laugh at me and ignore it anyway. "

>

> But Wednesday night I had a nagging that I should " Send so and so Donna Eden's

book! Go get it NOW and send it to them in the mail! "

>

> I recognized that by mentally fearing them not using the book was the same as

cursing them and myself, so I fixed it.

>

> One of the tools I used was the Meta Model, reframing, etc.: " They will think

you are nuts? How do you know they will think you are nuts instead of something

else? How specifically will they not do the drills? If you could tell them

about the book in a way that would cause them to want to read it and see for

themselves, how would you? "

>

> Then the next question that came up was " WHICH book? "

>

> I " felt " like EM for Women, but when I went in the bookstore, they had both

books, and I couldn't decide because EM has a section in it that EM for Women

DOESN'T have, and that person needs that part...

>

> So I bought both books.

>

> Now the rest of what you wrote about the " other topic " is applicable here,

because it has to do with dovetailing, convincer strategies, etc.

>

> I don't have the time to do their drills for them Remotely, and I SHOULDN'T,

either. I think I can send the package with the right influences for them to

look at the book.

>

> And regardless of what they do, I satisfied the nagging inside of me that

wouldn't leave me alone and kept telling me to tell them about EM and castor oil

packs and send them the book.

>

> I think Jose Silva took up to 3 years on some of the health cases he was using

for research until each and every one of those " incurable " cases was healed.

>

> I don't have the motivation to work this health case for 3 years, and by doing

it half-heartedly or just because I feel like I'm " obligated " to would be a

curse to that person.

>

> They're not in my immediate family, and it's interesting how Remote Influence,

compulsion, impulsion, and " forcing someone to do X " vs. " Law of Allowing " are

all involved in something simple.

>

> Hell, I had to fix my own stuff just to overcome my own objection of " they'll

think I'm nuts... "

>

> I've kind of learned from experience some people are more open than others.

Although I really don't know why I feel an inner nagging to send them those

books.

>

> I know I'm not going to sit here using Mental Influence to " force " them to do

the damn drills. I got my own stuff that needs doing without trying to micro

manage what other people do or don't do.

>

> So as long as I do what I felt I need to do, and I communicate it in a way

that fits the other person's own convincer strategies so they can make a choice

based on more than just a knee jerk response, I can live with myself knowing I

did my duty and did it well, regardless of whether or not they do the drills.

>

> Thanks for the posts Doc.

>

> Jim