Guest guest Posted January 9, 2002 Report Share Posted January 9, 2002 Dear Friends, I had a moment with Yang Tiande and inquired about pulse mastery by Jiang Ji. Dr. Yang's response was an emphatic "Yes, of course he was a master of pulse diagnosis." I asked whether the pulse was considered critical in SHL, he responded "It was the most important." I asked how do we know this? Dr Yang: "Because it is the first line in every section." Will Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2002 Report Share Posted January 10, 2002 WMorris116 [WMorris116] Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:55 AM To: Re: SHL Dear Friends, I had a moment with Yang Tiande and inquired about pulse mastery by Jiang Ji. Dr. Yang's response was an emphatic " Yes, of course he was a master of pulse diagnosis. " I asked whether the pulse was considered critical in SHL, he responded " It was the most important. " I Dr Yang: " Because it is the first line in every section. " Well… This is just not true, at least in my versions…??? So we all have different opinions, doesn’t mean any of them are right (or wrong), but as Ken was requesting in a previous conversation, The logic of one’s decision is much more important than what one’s teacher or friend has said. Anyone can find people to say anything, and then argue that this or that person has more credentials… IT is Moot as far as I’m concerned… The reality is no one knows and an argument like this is all speculation (from the original text)… But thanx for the post… -Jason .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2002 Report Share Posted January 10, 2002 , Al Stone <alstone@b...> wrote: Though it is true as > Jason mentioned, it is all opinion, when it comes to the SHL, I give Dr. > Yang a lot of credit. though all we can really crdit him for is having one man's opinion (albeit educated). As Jason said,it does not make him right or wrong. Other educated scholars have differing opinions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2002 Report Share Posted January 10, 2002 , " " <@o...> > Well. This is just not true, at least in my versions.??? So we all have different opinions, doesn't mean any of them are right (or wrong), but as Ken was requesting in a previous conversation, The logic of one's decision is much more important than what one's teacher or friend has said. Anyone can find people to say anything, and then argue that this or that person has more credentials. IT is Moot as far as I'm concerned. > The reality is no one knows and an argument like this is all speculation (from the original text). But thanx for the post. Jason: What, then, would prevent us from falling into complete relativism--- demonstrable clinical competence? Jim Ramholz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2002 Report Share Posted January 12, 2002 Yes, I love the craig,mitchell, feng ye, nigel wiseman translation by paradigm publications Fri, 11 Jan 2002 11:37:13 EST dautobrody change in posting procedure In other thoughts...has anyone practiced much in the Shan Han Lun tradition? I'm just starting to study this in depth in school, and it is quite interesting. Is there an English translation of the text available? Thanks! Lauren list moderator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2004 Report Share Posted April 12, 2004 I am curious to know if anybody is using the dosages of gan cao written in SHL of mitchell, ye and wiseman. Some of the formulas are recommending 60g a day. Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.