More Energy Secrets of Tapping IN a NEW BELIEF!

[Guest guest]

, docresults

<docresults@h...> wrote:

> Rusty,

> Something to consider.

 

> One of the original purposes of the " even though " statemen was not

>to bring up a negative but to accept and not resist the negative-

>resistance that already exist in the energy system and to discharge

>or pull the energy out of it so that it would no longer have an

>effect on the energy flow. (In other words it was EFT's attempt at

>being " sung " .)

 

What is funny here, is the part that rusty was complaining about is

actually COVERED IN " ALL " VALID THERAPIES, in one way or another,

from NLP, to hypnosis, to Energy Medicine, to Energy Psychology.

 

In NLP it's called " parts " therapy...taken care of with the 6 step

reframe, and many other drills...some of which are also used in

hypnosis, blab, blab, blab...

 

> That is why it was used originally in TFT after muscle testing and

they found (if my memory is correct) 70-80% of the time there was a

> Psychological Reverse.

 

Actually the premise is right. The numbers are a bit off.

 

Energy Psychology, normally estimates, through the use of their

records, that about 45% of the population that CAME TO THEM for help

were Psychologically Reversed.

 

Now, whether that number is the same amount of PR's with the general

population, who knows?

 

....and it ain't important.

 

Why is it NOT important?

 

Because the PR correction, long enough for it to be effective, only

takes about 30-60 seconds! So, as Gary says, " why not just include

it in the process EVERY TIME?

 

Thanks Houston.

 

 

Ps. Houston did come out with a book several years back on EFT.

Contact him if you want it. It's a good book.

 

>The purpose for the set-up statement ( " even though " ) was to

>address PR's. A PR is where consciously you don't think there is

>any resistance but unconsciously or energy body wise there is

>resistance.