Why is the Herbert quote so powerful?

[Guest guest]

, " viannaflowerchild "

<viannaflowerchild wrote:

 

Group,

 

Just for funnzies let's disect the following, sentence by sentence.

 

> " I must not fear.

 

This is a presupposition that fearing is NOT good. And it presupposes that there

will be given methods to enhance 'security-of-mind'.

 

> Fear is the mind-killer.

 

Gives a reason NOT to fear, because if you 'fear' then you have a dead mind

(Mind-killer)...

 

This is part of the 'agitate, agitate' formula for a propulsion system to

enhance doing something else besides 'fearing'.

 

Which is actually quite close to reality because of the Triple-Warmer, fight or

flight energies being released and over-whelming of subjugating all other

energies.

 

> Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.

 

More propulsion system.

 

> I will face my fear.

 

Now giving a solution.

 

But the solution is much too general and simple to be effective.

 

> I will permit it to pass over me and through me.

 

This is nice. It's a form of simple dissociation, so that the fear is NOT

attached and over-whelming, but is like wind.

 

> And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.

 

Telling what to do when it is gone.

 

Looking at it from a distance to see it's path presupposes that you are

dissociation and not attached.

 

> Where the fear has gone there will be nothing.

 

A hypnotic command. A submodality swish. Changing the mind-killer into something

that is totally gone, none existent.

 

> Only I will remain. "

 

Sounds good.

 

I would definitively build in some resource states so fear the mind-killer will

lead to dissociation, then to association into some type of power state, ie, a

state where they've had courage, self-confidence and control in the past and

anchor it automatically.

 

So group,

 

How would you define the above quote from Herbert?

 

Anyone got the cajones to do the drill and get the skill?

 

John La Tourrette, PhD