9-11 EVIDENCE KIT - The Truth About Sept 11

[Guest guest]

9-11 EVIDENCE KIT - The Truth About Sept 11

 

 

Gerard Holmgren

holmgren

14 June 2003 13:12

Undisclosed Recipients

evidence kit

 

(The Web pages below have been backed up.

If any links are dead, the backed up page can

be mailed on request.)

holmgren

 

THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11

Last updated June 14 2003

 

----------------------

 

Section 1: Airforce stand-down

 

1:1 It has become popular mythology in the media

that fighter jets were scrambled to intercept the

hijacked planes. This is completely untrue as the

following research shows.

Guilty For 9-11: Bush, Rumsfeld, Myers,

by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, 14 Nov 2001

http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-1.htm

 

1:2 Mr. Cheney's Cover Story -- Section 2

of Guilty For 9-11, 20 Nov 2001

http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-2.htm

 

1:3 9-ll: Nothing Urgent, by George Szamuely,

Research & documentation by Illarion Bykov

and Jared Israel, Jan 2002

http://emperor.vwh.net/indict/urgent.htm

 

1:4 Planes " did scramble " on 9/11,

they just " arrived late "

http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/faq.htm

 

1:5 Scrambled Messages, by George Szamuely,

12 Dec 2001

http://www.nypress.com/14/50/taki/bunker.cfm

 

1:6 Air National Guard Mission and Vision statements

http://nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/ang-mission.htm

 

1:7 Russian Air Force chief says official 9/11 story impossible

http://emperors-clothes.com/news/airf.htm

 

Scrambling of fighter jets to intercept stray

aircraft is a routine procedure.

Here's an example of how routine it is.

 

1.13 Jet Sent to probe Fla. Gov. Plane.

Netscape news. May 15 2003.

http://channels.netscape.com/ns/news/story.jsp?floc=NW_2-T & oldflok=FF-APO-11

10 & idq=/ff/story/0001/20030515/001648315.htm & sc=1110 & floc=NW_2-T

 

The procedures were already in place before

Sept 11 2001. It happened 67 times in the 10 months

between September 2000 and June 2001.

 

1.8 Use of military jets jumps since 9/11.

Associated Press Aug 13 2002.

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/completetimeline/2002/ap081302.html

1.9 CBS News. Scrambling to prevent another

9/11 Aug 14 2002

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/08/14/attack/main518632.shtml

1.10 Preventing another 9/11 Military.com

http://www.military.com/NewsContent/1,13319,FL_jet_081502,00.html

1.11 ABC News Jets on high Alert. Aug 13 2002.

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/homefront020813.html

1.12 Military now notified immediately of unusual

air traffic events. Fox news Aug 12 2002

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,60245,00.html#top

 

So on Sept 11, 2001 - Why were no fighter jets

scrambled, and why has a cover up story been

concocted?

 

In the unlikely event that the airforce failed

through incompetence, ( not once but 4 times! )

where is the major inquiry?

I have seen bigger inquiries into car crashes

at race tracks.

 

----------------------

 

Section 2: Complicit behaviour of G.W.Bush

 

It has become common mythology in the media

that George W. Bush was at Booker Elementary

School when he learned of the first WTC crash.

This is a lie. Why is Bush lying about where he

was, and what he knew?

 

2:1 Guilty for 9-11 Section 3: Bush in the open

by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel.

http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-3.htm

 

This is not the only lie Bush has told about his

movements that morning. See how many times

he has changed his story.

 

2:2 Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion

by Steve Grey.

http://austin.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=2342 & group=webcast

(Read the section called " A tangle of lies " )

 

2.3 Bush gets tangled in his lies Part 1.

A strange press conference. By Jared israel

and Francisco Gil-White Sept 25 2002.

http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif1.htm

 

2:4 Bush Gets Tangled in his 9-11 Lies, Part 2:

White House Cover-up Creates More Problems

than it Solves by Jared Israel and Francisco

Gil-White [7 October 2002]

http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif2.htm

 

2:5 The President as Incompetent Liar:

Bush's Claim that he Saw TV Footage of 1st

Plane Hitting WTC. Comments by Jared Israel

[Posted 12 September 2002]

http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/liar.htm

 

Clinton was impeached for lying about an affair.

Bush is lying about where he was, what he was

doing and what he knew, during the crucial

period between 8.45 and 9 AM on Sept 11.

 

----------------------

 

Why did the President - after being told " America

is under attack " continue to listen to schoolchildren

reading for another 25 minutes ? Why was he

cheering, smiling and joking even as it was known

that at least one more hijacked plane was on the

loose ? View the TV footage which proves treason

at the top level.

2:6 http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/vid.htm

 

----------------------

 

Section 3: The Fictitious Hijackers

 

If 19 Arabs hijacked the planes, why are there

no Arabic names on any of the passenger lists?

If they used non-Arabic aliases, which of the

" innocents " on the lists are alleged to be the

hijackers?

3:1 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html

Passenger and crew list for AA 11 (first WTC crash.)

 

3:2 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html

AA 77 (Pentagon crash)

 

3:3

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua175.victims.html

UAL 175 (2nd WTC crash)

 

3:4 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua93.victims.html

UAL 93 (Pennsylvania crash)

 

If they are alleged to have been using non-Arabic

aliases (19 obviously Arabic men got on board

using non-Arabic ID, with 100% success rate ?),

why did the FBI claim that they were traced through

the use of credit cards to buy tickets in their own

names?

 

If 9 of the alleged hijackers were searched before

boarding, as claimed in this article

3:5 http://www.policetalk.com/9_hijackers.html

why is there no airport security footage of them?

How did they (allegedly) get on board with knives,

guns, AND electronic guidance systems, while being

searched, but avoiding security cameras and not

being on the passenger lists?

What aliases were they alleged to be using when

they were searched,and if they were not using

aliases, why are they not on the passenger lists?

 

 

What of reports that some of the alleged hijackers

are still alive, and had nothing to do with the attacks ?

3:6 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm

3:7 http://www.rense.com/general20/alives.htm

3:8 http://www.muslimedia.com/archives/world01/afgwar-die.htm

3:9

http://www.americanfreepress.net/10_12_01/STILL_ALIVE__FBI_Mixed_Up_on_T/sti

ll_alive__fbi_mixed_up_on_t.html

3:10 http://www.corpust.com/CorpusTArchiveFBI70f19Alive.cfm

3.12 http://www.welfarestate.com/911/

3.13 http://truedemocracy.net/td4/24s-c-6men.html

3.14 http://www.abqtrib.com/archives/news01/092001_news_trail.shtml

3.15

http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/23/widen

23.xml

3.16 http://www.worldmessenger.20m.com/alive.html

3.17 http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/NEWSTF/stfch11.htm

3.18

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0109190363sep19.story?col

l=chi-news-hed

 

According to this article

3:11

http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:uEUylyDIXdYC:www.dallasnews.com/sharedc

ontent/dallas/nation/9-11/stories/121202dnint911gas.928b2377.html+FBI+Agent:

+Sept.+11+Hijackers+Probably+Used+Gas & hl=en & ie=UTF-8

 

the FBI now claims that the hijackers used gas to

subdue the passengers and crew. If they used gas

they would have been affected themselves - unless

they had masks. The story gets better all the time.

They somehow got on board with masks, gas, guns,

knives and electronic guidance systems, in spite of

being searched, didn't show up on the airport security

cameras, and were not on the passenger lists.

They left flight manuals in Arabic in rented cars

outside the airport (last minute brushing up on the

way there, about how to fly the things!) and then

crashed the planes in breath taking displays of

skilled piloting. Just to make sure we knew who

they were, their passports were conveniently found

in spite of fiery crashes which incinerated the planes

and occupants. So they got on board with false

IDs but used their real passports ?

 

If the mythical Arab hijackers really were on the

planes and airport security systems failed due

to incompetence (not once but 19 times!), where

is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries

into racehorse doping scandals.

 

----------------------

 

Section 4: More oddities

 

Why the official story concerning the hijacking

of AA11 (first WTC crash) cannot possibly be true.

 

4:1 9/11 Redux: (The Observer¹s Cut) American

Airlines Flight 11, Re-examined By David L. Graham

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/redux.html

 

Was an urban rescue team sent to New York

the night before the attacks?

4:2 http://www.halturnershow.com/FEMA.htm

4:3 http://www.tpromo.com/gk/jun02/062602.htm

 

4.4 Former top German Cabinet Minister rejects

official story of 9 11 attacks. Interview with Andreas

von Buelow. Tagesspiegel Jan 13 2002.

http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/VonBuelow.html

 

National Security Advisor Rice and WhiteHouse

spokesman Fleischer lied in saying that nobody

had ever conceived of planes being used in this

manner, their statements in this article,

 

Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11;

Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News

May 16 2002

4:5 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html

 

when the 1994 extract from Time magazine,

quoted in article 2:1 demonstrates that the potential

problem had been recognized for decades.

And there are other examples of this possibility

having been widely recognized prior to Sept 11.

4:6 " Omens of terror. " by David Wise Oct 7 2001

http://www.hermes-press.com/omens.htm

 

In article 4:5 Rice also lied in saying that any threat

had been overwhelmingly perceived as being overseas.

The statement she made is in this press briefing.

4:7 Press Briefing by National Security Advisor

Dr. Condoleezza Rice. The James S. Brady Briefing

Room May 16 2002 . 4.10PM EDT

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/05/20020516-13.html

 

But this is the truth about the memo to which she refers.

4:8 August memo focused on attacks in the U.S. by

Bob Wooward and Dan Eggen. Washington Post

staff writers. May 18 2002. page A01.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article & node= & contentId=A3

5744-2002May17 & notFound=true

 

What did happen to Flight 93? by Richard Wallace.

The Daily Mirror Sept 13, 2002

4:9 http://www.unansweredquestions.net/timeline/2002/mirror091302.html

4:10 http://www.thepowerhour.com/postings-three/flight-93-shot-down.htm

4.11

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12192317 & method=full &

siteid=50143

 

Are cell phone calls from planes, of the type

allegedly made by passengers on Sept 11 possible?

4:12

http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/project_achilles_report_1_030123.htm

l

4.13

http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/project_achilles_report_2_030225.htm

l

 

----------------------

 

Section 5: Where is the evidence against Bin laden?

 

Why is it that the US government doesn't feel

confident enough of it's case against Bin laden

to lay any formal charges, but keeps " finding "

convenient video " confession " tapes ?

Probably because new video technology makes

it impossible to distinguish between a real video

confession and a fake.

 

When seeing and hearing isn't believing.

by William M. Arkin. Washington Post Feb 1 1999

5:1 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/dotmil/arkin020199.htm

 

Last word in High Tech trickery. by David Higgins

Sydney Morning Herald. may 16 2002

5:2 http://smh.com.au/articles/2002/05/16/1021415016681.html

 

For more detailed evidence of a preplanned

agenda to fabricate evidence against Bin Laden,

 

Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey.

2:2 http://austin.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=2342 & group=webcast

(Read the section called " Evidence please ! " )

 

It has become a common myth that Bin Laden

has admitted to the attacks. This simply isn't true.

 

Bin laden denies terror attacks and points

finger at Jews. Annanova news.

5:3

http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_410936.html?menu=news.latestheadlines

 

Bin laden denies attacks as Taliban talks holy war.

ABC news online Sept 17 2001.

5:4 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2001/09/item20010917010639_1.htm

 

Bin Laden denies being behind attacks. JS ONline

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Sept 16 2001

5:5 http://www.jsonline.com/news/nat/sep01/binladen-denial.asp

 

Osama Bin Laden claims terrorist attacks in USA

were committed by some American terrorist group.

Pravda Sept 12 2001

5:6 http://english.pravda.ru/accidents/2001/09/12/14910.html

 

Bin laden Denies US attack says paper. Middle East News

5:7 http://www.metimes.com/2K1/issue2001-37/reg/bin_laden_denies.htm

 

Bin laden says he wasn't behind attacks CNN Sept 17 2001

5:8 http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/index.html

 

Bin Laden denies role in attacks. newsday.com Sept 17 2001

5:9 http://www.newsday.com/ny-wobin172369727sep17,0,7370581.story

 

Taliban says Bin Laden denied role in attacks.

news Sept 13 2001.

5:10 http://www.welfarestate.com/binladen/denies-reuters-taliban.htm

 

----------------------

 

Section 6: Insider trading reveals high level foreknowledge

 

In the first few hours after the attacks, it was reported

that investigators were already looking into huge

volumes of insider trading on airline stocks in the

weeks leading up to the attacks.

Why has this story since completely disappeared?

Do authorities seriously expect us to believe that

more than a year later, they still do not know who

was responsible? Should not alarm bells have

been ringing BEFORE the attacks with these

record volumes of trading?

If the executive director of the CIA had previously

managed the firm which handled much of the trade,

are we seriously expected to believe that he

doesn't know who was responsible?

 

Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading

Lead Directly Into The CIA's Highest Ranks --

CIA Executive Director `Buzzy' Krongard Managed

Firm That Handled `Put' Options on UAL,

by Michael C. Ruppert, 9 Oct 2001

6:1 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/10_09_01_krongard.html

 

Mystery of terror `insider dealers',

by Chris Blackhurst, 14 Oct 2001

6:2 http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=99402

 

Profits of Death -- Insider Trading and 9-11,

by Tom Flocco - Edited by Michael C. Ruppert,

6 Dec 2001

6:3 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FLO112B.html

 

Where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger

inquiries into local government contract scandals.

 

----------------------

 

Section 7: The pentagon frame up and the WTC

plane switch

 

It is alleged that American Airlines 77

(a hijacked Boeing 757) crashed into the Pentagon.

A Boeing 757 is a very large aircraft with a wingspan

of 125 ft and a length of 155 ft. So how did it make

an initial hole 12 ft wide, collapsing only about a

35 ft depth of the outer ring of the building -

and not leave any wreckage outside ?

 

This photo of the damage to the Pentagon wall

7:1 http://66.129.143.7/june2aa.htm

proves that whatever crashed into the pentagon

was NOT AA 77, which demonstrates the Pentagon

attack to have been a self-inflicted frame up.

 

For a quick overview of the impossibility

of the official story

7:2 http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm

 

For a full physical analysis of the crash scene

 

Physical and mathematical analysis of Pentagon

crash. by Gerard Holmgren Oct 2002

7:3 http://alberta.indymedia.org/news/2002/10/4578.php

 

Why was there a concerted effort to fabricate

eyewitness evidence for the official story regarding

AA 77?

Did AA 77 hit the Pentagon? Eyewitness accounts

examined. by Gerard Holmgren June 2002

7:4

http://hamilton.indymedia.org:8081/front.php3?article_id=1786 & group=webcast

 

7:5 The Pentagon crash hoax

http://nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/WhatHitThePentagon/

 

What hit WTC towers? Were they the planes

we've been told ? ( AA 11 and UAL 175)

http://whatzit.bravepages.com

 

----------------------

 

Section 8: If the Attack on Afghanistan was a

retaliation for Sept 11, why had it already been

planned months before ?

 

BBC News report by George Arney.

8:1

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1550000/1550366.stm

 

U.S. Planned for attack on Al -Qaida. White house

given strategy two days before Sept 11.

NBC news. May 16 2002

8:2

http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:A5WwRGMKgTYC:www.unansweredquestions.ne

t/timeline/2002/msnbc051602.html+U.S.+Planned+for+attack+on+Al+-Qaeda.+White

+house+given+strategy+two+days+before+Sept+11. & hl=en & ie=UTF-8

 

US planned to hit bin Laden ahead of

September 11. By David Rennie in Washington

 

8:3

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/08/05/walq05.xml

 

US Tells of covert Afghan plans before 9/11

By Bob Drogin LA Times May 18 2002

8.5 http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-051802strike.story

 

Why were we originally told that the attack on

Afghanistan was not planned prior to Sept 11,

and was purely a retaliation to a " surprise "

attack, and the story then changed after proof

of the preplanned attack came to light ?

 

----------------------

 

Section 9: U.S. and Bin Laden co-operate behind

the scenes.

 

The new story is that they allegedly feared Bin Laden

so much that they wanted to get him first. So why

didn't they arrest him when they had the chance

in July 2001?

The CIA met Bin Laden while undergoing treatment

at an American Hospital last July in Dubai, by

Alexandra Richard, Translated courtesy of Tiphaine

Dickson, Le Figaro, 11 Oct 2001

9:1 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/RIC111B.html

9:2 http://guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,584444,00.html

9:3 http://emperors-clothes.com/misc/lefigaro.htm

 

Bin Laden met with the CIA in July and walked

away by Michael C. Ruppert

9:4 http://www.rense.com/general16/bin.htm

And why was the Bush family still in business

with the Bin Laden Family, even AFTER Sept 11?

 

Osama bin Laden's Bush family Business

Connections, Alliance With Pakistan Will Stimulate

Drug Trade, Bring Revenues Under U.S. Control

--Colombian Opium Production Will Soar;

The Taliban's Biggest Economic Attack on the

U.S. Came in February With The Destruction of

Its Opium Crop by Michael C. Ruppert,

18 Sept 2001

9:5 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/09_18_01_bushbin.html

 

Carlyle profit from Afghan war,

by David Lazarus, 2 Dec 2001

9:6 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/LAZ112A.html

 

Elder Bush in Big G.O.P. Cast Toiling for

Top Equity Firm, by Leslie Wayne, 5 Mar 2001

9:7 http://www.truthout.com/0662.Bush.Saudi.htm

 

The George W. Bush Money Tree

9:8 http://www.bushnews.com/bushmoney.htm

 

Bush Family's dirty little secret: President's oil

companies funded by Bin Laden family and wealthy

Saudis who financed Osama bin Laden,

by Rick Wiles, Sept 2001

9:9 http://www.americanfreedomnews.com/afn_articles/bushsecrets.htm

 

Arms Build-up Enriches Carlyle Group,

Bush Sr. is Consultant, by Mark Fineman,

10 Jan 2002

9:10 http://www.truthout.com/01.11F.Arms.Carlyle.htm

 

Gaping holes in the CIA V Bin Laden Story by Jared Israel

9:11 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/probestop-i.htm

 

BushLaden by Jared Israel

9:12 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/bushladen.htm

 

Addition to the above article

9:13 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/bushladen2-i.htm

 

Judicial Watch: Bush/Bin Laden connection

" has now turned into a scandal " Statement from

Judicial watch with comments by Jared Israel

9:14 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/jw.htm

 

9:15 Bin laden. Terrorist monster: Take two !

by Jared Israel. Oct 9 2001

http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/taketwo-a.htm

 

9:16 New Chairman of 9/11 Commission had

business ties with Osama's Brother in Law

by Michel Chossudovsky 27 December 2002

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO212A.html

 

And why did the US turn down an offer to

extradite Bin Laden in 1996, AFTER naming

him as wanted for the 1993 WTC bombing?

 

----------------------

 

Section 10: The suspicious collapse

of the World trade centre Towers.

 

How did the WTC collapse? Why no serious inquiry?

Why was the debris rushed away for recycling

before any examination could be held?

 

10:1 Muslims suspend laws of physics

by J. McMichael Nov 25 2001

http://www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/physics_1.html

 

10:2 Muslims suspend laws of Physics. p

art 2 by J.McMichael

http://serendipity.li/wot/mslp_ii.htm

 

" Burning Questions...Need Answers " :

Fire Engineering's Bill Manning Calls for

Comprehensive Investigation of WTC Collapse,

4 Jan 2002

10:3 http://zgrams.zundelsite.org/pipermail/zgrams/2002-January/000200.html

10:4 http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/jan2002/markr19-12.htm

10:5

http://www.nyenvirolaw.org/PDF/FireEngineering-1-4-02-BurningQuestionsNeedAn

swers.pdf

10:6 A firefighter says " we think there were

bombs set in the building "

http://people.aol.com/people/special/0,11859,174592-3,00.html

 

10:7 In Curious Battle: An expert recants on

Why the WTC collapsed by John Flaherty

and Jared Israel

http://emperors-clothes.com/news/albu.htm

 

10:8 Documentary footage from the scene

of the WTC attacks, and eyewitness accounts

from firefighters at the scene reveal serious

flaws in the official accounts.

http://www.thepowerhour.com/postings/911-oddities-revealed.htm

 

For a series of engineering articles and

informative videos on the WTC collapse, see

 

10:9 http://home.attbi.com/~jmking/Collapse_update.htm

 

10:10 Evidence of explosives in South WTC

Tower collapse

http://la.indymedia.org/news/2002/12/23816.php

 

10:11 The World Trade Centre demolition

http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/wtc-demolition.htm

 

10:12 Chapter 1 of the FEMA WTC collapse report

(with comment)

http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/WTC_ch1.htm

 

10:13 Chapter 2 (with comment)

http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/WTC_ch2.htm

 

10.14 The jet fuel. How hot did it heat the World trade Center?

http://www.uscrusade.com/forum/config.pl/read/1064

 

10.15 Proof of controlled demolition at the WTC by Jerry Russell, Ph.D.

http://www.attackonamerica.net/proofofcontrolleddemolitionatwtc.htm

 

10.16 Where's the inferno?

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_fire.htm

 

Steel melts at 1539 degrees. Jet fuel (kerosene)

burns at 800 degrees. Are we seriously expected to

believe that burning kerosene towards the top of

the building (heat travels upwards) somehow

caused both towers to neatly implode in a manner

identical to that of a controlled demolition ?

Where is the inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries

into suburban housefires. Why is discussion of

the possibility of a controlled implosion completely

taboo? Why do authorities keep inventing

ridiculous stories about burning jet fuel melting

steel?

 

----------------------

 

Section 11: Hands off Bin Laden !

 

Why were the FBI told to not investigate

the Bin Laden family links in the US?

 

Has someone been sitting on the FBI? Transcript

of a BBC Newsnight Report on " the questionable

links of the bin Laden Family, " 6 Nov 2001

11:1 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/BBC111A.html

11:2 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/probetrans.htm

(added comments by Jared Israel)

 

Bush thwarted FBI probe against bin Ladens,

Hindustan Times, 7 Nov 2001

11:3 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/HIN111A.html

 

US efforts to make peace summed up by `oil',

by Lara Marlowe, 19 Nov 2001

11:4 http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MAR111A.html

11:5 http://www.fisiusa.org/fisi_News_items/news369.htm

 

Called Off the Trail? FBI Agents Probing Terror

Links Say They Were Told, ‘Let Sleeping Dogs Lie’

By Brian Ross and Vic Walker. ABC News

Dec 19 2002

11:6

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers021219.

html

 

After capturing one of the six most wanted

Taliban leaders, the US then let him go. " By mistake "

of course, because of " flawed intelligence. "

11:7 Taliban general 'freed by mistake'

Sunday Times Dec 19 2002

http://www.sundaytimes.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,7034,5704967%255E1557

4,00.html

 

11:8 US accidentally set wanted Taliban

Leader free. Clari news dec 18 2002.

http://quickstart.clari.net/qs_se/webnews/wed/bn/Qus-attacks-taliban.RVGa_CD

I.html

 

11:9 FBI agent Robert Wright says FBI

assigned to intelligence operations continue

to protect terrorists from criminal investigations

and prosecutions. Judicial Watch Sept 11, 2002.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/2469.shtml

 

----------------------

 

Section 12: Its really not so surprising.

 

In 1962, the joint chiefs of staff approved a CIA

plan to commit terrorist acts against the US

and frame Cuba.

 

Friendly Fire -- Book: U.S. Military Drafted Plans

to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With

Cuba, by David Ruppe, 1 May 2001

12:1 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html

 

Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuba Invasion

in 1962, The National Security Archive, 30 Apr 2001

12:2 http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/

 

Northwoods - a plan for terror to justify war.

Comments by Jared Israel.

12:3 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-int.htm

 

Scanned images of the actual document.

12.4 Page i http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-i.htm

12.5 Page ii http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-ii.htm

12:6 Page iii http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-iii.htm

12.7 Page 1 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-1.htm

12.8 Page 2 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-2.htm

12.9 Page 3 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-3.htm

12.10 Page 4 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-4.htm

12.11 Page 5 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-5.htm

12.12 Page 6 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-6.htm

12.13 Page 7 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-7.htm

12.14 Page 8 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-8.htm

12.15 Page 9 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-9.htm

12:16 Page 10 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-10.htm

12.17 Page 11 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-11.htm

12.18 Page 12 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-12.htm

 

US military schemes- ominously like 9/11.

12:19 http://emperors-clothes.com/misc/bamford.htm

 

If such tactics were considered normal and

acceptable practice by the Government in 1962,

what evidence is there that things have changed?

 

Henry Kissinger advocated a similar strategy in 1992

12:20 http://www.spotlight.org/Newsbureau/Prisoner/Media/media.html

 

as Did Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1997.

A War in the Planning for Four Years. HOW STUPID

DO THEY THINK WE ARE? Zbigniew Brzezinski

and the CFR Put War Plans In a 1997 Book - It Is

" A Blueprint for World Dictatorship, " Says a

Former German Defense and NATO Official Who

Warned of Global Domination in 1984, in an

Exclusive Interview With FTW by Michael C. Ruppert

12:21 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/zbig.html

 

----------------------

 

Section 13: Who created and funded the

Al Qaeda Network?

 

A Vital Piece of the Puzzle: Dollars for Terror --

The United States and Islam, by Carol Brouillet.

13:1 http://www.communitycurrency.org/vital.html

 

Bin Laden in the Balkans - Collection of mainstream

media articles. Compiled by Jared Israel

13:2 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/binl.htm

 

The Creation called Osama by Shamsul Islam

13:3 http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/creat.htm

 

" Articles documenting US creation of

Taliban and Bin Laden's terrorist network "

Series of links to different articles

13:4 http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/doc.htm

 

" Osama Bin Laden: Made in USA " by Jared Israel

13:5 http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/madein.htm

 

" Bush and the media cover up the Jihad

schoolbook scandal " by Jared Israel

13:6 http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/jihad.htm

 

U.S. Protects Al-Qaeda Terrorists in Kosovo,

by Umberto Pascali, 2 Nov 2001

13:7 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/PAS111A.html

 

Which Terrorists are worse? Al Quaeda?

Or the KLA? by Jared Israel

13:8 http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/kla-aq.htm

 

----------------------

 

Section14 : Who created the civil war in Afghanistan?

 

Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, President

Jimmy Carter's National Security Adviser

[Posted 6 October 2001]

Ex- National Security Chief Brzezinski admits:

Afghan war and Islamism were made in Washington

14:1 http://emperors-clothes.com/interviews/brz.htm

 

----------------------

 

Section 15: Why have the President and Vice

President resisted moves for an inquiry into

Sept 11? Bush asks Daschle to limit Sept. 11

probes -- CNN Jan 29 2002.

15:1 http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/29/inv.terror.probe

 

Bush, GOP blast calls for 9/11 inquiry. CNN May 17 2002

15:2 http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/05/16/president.gop.senators

 

Daschle: Bush, Cheney Urged No Sept. 11

Inquiry Reuters newswire UK May 26 2002

15:3 http://www.newsfrombabylon.com/article.php?sid=1680

 

Bush and Cheney Block 9-11 Investigation

By Mike Hersh Oct 24, 2002, 2:22pm

15:4

http://www.mikehersh.com/Bush_and_Cheney_Block_911_Investigation_.shtml

 

Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11;

Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News

May 16 2002

4:5 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html

 

15.5 Bush opposes 9/11 query panel.

CBS News. May 23 2002.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/15/attack/main509096.shtml

 

15:6 9/11 Panel asks what briefers told Bush.

White House retreats on independent probe.

Dana Priest and Dana Milbank.

Washington Post Sept 21 2002. Page A01

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article & node= & contentId=A4

6446-2002Sep20 & notFound=true

 

15.7 White House refuses to release Sept 11 info.

by Frank Davies Miami Herald May 5 2003

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/5792329.htm?template=contentModules/pri

ntstory.jsp

 

----------------------

 

BEFORE MORE PEOPLE GET THEIR ARMS

AND LEGS BLOWN OFF WORLDWIDE IN

THE MAD 'WAR ON TERROR' --- PLEASE

FORWARD THIS MAIL; DO THE RESEARCH;

AND COMMUNICATE & ACT.

 

--- PLEASE FORWARD ---