Questions questions and more questions!!!

[Guest guest]

Yes Rebecca,

 

I know I've got to get that letter up so all new people will know

when they join. It's just not been an issue before.

 

I made the mistake of assuming that people have MY LEARNING/POSTING

style, and they don't.

 

My style is to always study first, so I can understand, and then ask

questions about what I didn't understand that I studied.

 

And, most people just don't live by the same rules I live by...

 

....because if they did, they'd notice the many, many times I've

posted those rules to the group.

 

Nice having you here.

 

 

 

> >Paulina did NOT feel her post was dumb.

 

> Neither did I! I just observed that she prefaced her question

with, " this may sound dumb "

 

> > >So, you think that actually reading DONNA'S BOOK first, and

studying > >DAVID'S ENERGY PSYCHOLOGY INTERACTIVE second, and going

through THE > >REMOTE VIEWING ESP COURSE next, is not a valid and

important step > >ALL POSTERS SHOULD MAKE " before " posting?

 

> > I didn't ask this question...who did? I wasn't aware that this

>was a requirement. Could you maybe post the rules at the beginning

>of the sign up? That could be helpful.

 

> > >We expect them to act that way, don't we?;-) > > Well, we can

certainly hope so.

 

> > >Again Rebecca, you are getting real sloppy with your

definitions.

 

> Which definitions would you be speaking of, Doc?

 

> > >If someone asks a question, a question that has just been >

>answered 6 times in the past week, and we call them on that, you >

>call that public humiliation?

 

> Did Paulina ask a question about the computer that many times in

the last 6 weeks?

 

> >You are switching topics, and we all know it.

 

> I'M switching topics???? The topic was how a question was

prefaced!

 

> > " Discussing " presupposes that one has some KNOWLEDGE about >

>what they are discussing, at least it does on this list. > OH, my

bad, then. I apologize. I wasn't given a set of rules when >I came

on. I thought I could learn from picking other people's >brains.

Someone that has knowlege could discuss with me their >learning and

then we could discuss what had been learned from >there. But, then,

rules are rules..I apologize for not knowing them

 

> > >Otherwise, they are just ignorant fools wagging their lips to >

>hear the sound of their own voices, aren't they?

 

> You would obviously know more about that than me. You have more

knowlege than I do

 

> > > >There is A BIG DIFFERENCE between using the Socratic method,

and > >asking stupid, meaningless, waste of time questions.

 

> > >So, group, what is/are those differences?

 

> > > > >ps. This is a VERY IMPORTANT

THREAD!

 

> > > > Gosh, you know, since I joined this group, I've seen so many

> > >people preface their questions with something like you

did " this > > >may be a dumb question... " I wonder why that is? > >

> > IT's probably because when someone does ask a question that is >

> already answered in the files, on in the back posts, I do tend to

> > get a bit pissy and bitchy. > > > > >I was under the impression

that this group was supposed to be a > > >helpful, informative,

learning forum, and usually the best way to > > >learn is to ask

questions.

 

> > > > Really?

 

> > > > Who told you that?

 

> > > > First study, then study some more, then study some more... >

> > > ...then study some more...

 

> > > > ...and if you still don't get it after you've done your

homework,

 

> > then that's the time for questions.

 

> > > > So many questions are asked because most people have NOT

done > their > > homework.

 

> > > > Then again, there are valid questions, are their not?

 

> > > > And, sometimes people ask questions because they only have >

opinions > > and no training...just some real faulty beliefs...

 

> > > > But that's okay. I'll be writing up something in the next

few days > > to really help those people.

 

> > > > Sincerely, > >