FORCIBLY VACCINATE A NEWBORN

[Guest guest]

bpb

FORCIBLY VACCINATE A NEWBORN

Sun Jun 8 17:55:34 2003

http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495;article=41085

 

They violate existing law and strip you of your God-given rights

protected by the Constitution and law.

 

Medstapo Political Commissars And Courtstapo

FORCIBLY VACCINATE A NEWBORN

 

People who have little contact with Hospitals

are now being shocked to learn the extent

to which these Corporations are being merged

into the body of the Fascist Corporate State.

 

They are shocked to find that Hospitals are now

staffed with Police, SWAT Teams, Spys

and Political Commissars (Social Workers)

 

They are shocked to find that they must get past

a newly installed desk at the door of,

" The Outpatient Entrance " manned by a 300 pound goon

and a " social worker " .

 

Once inside they are shocked to discover

that they are under constant surveillance

by camera and microphone

 

They are shocked to see that the Hospitals

are looking more and more like the Airport,

Schools, Prisons and Government Buildings.

 

They are further shocked to learn that if this

arm of the Corporate State damages the visitor or patient

there is no remedy to be had from the other arms of the State

=======================

http://www.forcedvaccination.netfirms.com/

 

HOSPITAL & CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES TERRORIZE FAMILY WHILE JUDGE

IGNORES THE LAW AND FORCIBLY VACCINATES A NEWBORN

 

On the afternoon of April 2, 2003, a young couple in Grand Junction,

Colorado, was celebrating the birth of their first child. Their hopes

and dreams for the future lay in this healthy baby girl.

 

The next night, they were fighting for the life of the newborn.

 

Had a crippling disease or congenital deformity been discovered? No,

they are defending their innocent, healthy newborn from the threats

of a dangerous vaccination coming from the staff and doctors of St.

Mary's Hospital, social workers, Mesa County Department of Human

Services (MCDHS), an onslaught of attorneys, and a district judge.

 

Individuals and entities that were sworn to save lives, and adhere

to the " law " were the threat.

 

After being pressured to " consent " to a Hepatitis B inoculation for

the baby, by hospital staff, and neonatologist, Dr. Noel Carrasco,

treating physician for the baby, the parents stood firm and said

" NO " .

 

The parents have a strong religious conviction they adhere to,

holding vaccinations are against God's laws, and also, a

philosophical conviction vaccinations are harmful to one's health, as

supported by data and statistics. They are very knowledgeable as to

the many serious dangers of vaccinations that can be disabling or

life threatening.

 

The doctor called in hospital social service worker, Joni Vohs, who

then proceeded to threaten the parents with the loss of their baby if

they did not comply with the initial and subsequent shots.

 

The parents could not in good conscience comply.

 

Social services and the administration of St. Mary's hospital, headed

by Bob Ladenburger, CEO and President, called in attorneys, who then

pressured District Judge Charles Buss to have an " emergency " meeting

that night (after hours). The reason, " medical emergency " , meaning

the child's life was in " imminent danger " if inoculation did not

occur immediately.

 

This was all based on an erroneous, and highly inaccurate 'screening'

test for Hepatitis B on the birth mother that showed up positive.

These screening tests have a 40% false-positive rate. A " hearing " was

held at the hospital, for which the child's family had 15 minutes

warning.

 

Due Process was not followed; the family had no time to obtain

competent legal help or expert witnesses. A panel of 10 faced the

family, including the judge, 4 attorneys, social workers, hospital

administrators, and the doctor.

 

The " judge " ignored the pleas for second opinions and subsequent

blood tests on the birth mother. A unilateral arbitrary decision was

made to inoculate the child immediately, in violation of existing

state law and the civil liberties of the parents.

 

In addition to the harmful shot administered to the 1 day old

infant, the child was put into " protective supervision " of the MCDHS

(MESA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES)

to protect the " child's best interests " .

 

Are hospitals places that administer " health " care, or a place where

you can loose your rights (and even your children), and be subjected

to extreme health risks by the administration of vaccinations proven

to be dangerous?

 

>From what I have learned this past week, hospitals can be an extreme

health risk and the courts will not protect you.

 

They violate existing law and strip you of your God-given rights

protected by the Constitution and law.

 

My eyes have been opened, and my views forever changed.

 

Oh, I forgot to mention, 4 days later a negative blood test came

back on the mother.

 

(Chiropractic Physician for the Family)

April 9, 2003